@article{HartrampfWeinzierlBucketal.2022,
  author    = {Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Weinzierl, Franz-Xaver and Buck, Andreas K. and Rowe, Steven P. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Seitz, Anna Katharina and K{\"u}bler, Hubert and Schirbel, Andreas and Essler, Markus and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Matched-pair analysis of [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T and [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-022-05744-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324581},
  pages     = {3269-3276},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Labelled with lutetium-177, the urea-based small molecules PSMA I\&T and PSMA-617 are the two agents most frequently used for radioligand therapy (RLT) in patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expressing prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this matched-pair analysis, we aimed to compare the toxicity and efficacy of both agents for PSMA-directed RLT. Materials and methods A total of 110 mCRPC patients from two centres were accrued, 55 individuals treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T, and a matched cohort of 55 patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Matching criteria included age at the first cycle, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, and previous taxane-based chemotherapy. Using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v. 5.0), toxicity profiles were investigated (including bone marrow and renal toxicity). Overall survival (OS) between both groups was compared. Results Toxicity assessment revealed grade III anaemia in a single patient (1.8\%) for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T and five (9.1\%) for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. In addition, one (1.9\%) grade III thrombopenia for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was recorded. Apart from that, no other grade III/IV toxicities were present. A median OS of 12 months for patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T did not differ significantly when compared to patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (median OS, 13 months; P = 0.89). Conclusion In this matched-pair analysis of patients receiving one of the two agents most frequently applied for PSMA RLT, the rate of clinically relevant toxicities was low for both compounds. In addition, no relevant differences for OS were observed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{WernerBundschuhBundschuhetal.2019,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Bundschuh, Lena and Fanti, Stefano and Javadi, Mehrbod S. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Weich, A. and Pienta, Kenneth J. and Buck, Andreas K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Herrmann, Ken and Lapa, Constantin and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers},
  series = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  journal   = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  issn      = {0161-5505},
  doi       = {10.2967/jnumed.118.223537},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-174629},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Standardized reporting is more and more routinely implemented in clinical practice and such structured reports have a major impact on a large variety of medical fields, e.g. laboratory medicine, pathology, and, recently, radiology. Notably, the field of nuclear medicine is constantly evolving, as novel radiotracers for numerous clinical applications are developed. Thus, framework systems for standardized reporting in this field may a) increase clinical acceptance of new radiotracers, b) allow for inter- and intra-center comparisons for quality assurance, and c) may be used in (global) multi-center studies to ensure comparable results and enable efficient data abstraction. In the last two years, several standardized framework systems for positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers with potential theranostic applications have been proposed. These include systems for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasias. In the present review, those standardized framework systems for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET will be briefly introduced followed by an overview of their advantages and limitations. In addition, potential applications will be defined, approaches to validate such concepts will be proposed, and future perspectives will be discussed.},
  subject      = {Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie},
  language  = {en}
}