@article{LivingstoneZarembaHornetal.2020, author = {Livingstone, E. and Zaremba, A. and Horn, S. and Ugurel, S. and Casalini, B. and Schlaak, M. and Hassel, J.C. and Herbst, R. and Utikal, J.S. and Weide, B. and Gutzmer, R. and Meier, F. and Koelsche, C. and Hadaschik, E. and Sucker, A. and Reis, H. and Merkelbach-Bruse, S. and Siewert, M. and Sahm, F. and von Deimling, A. and Cosgarea, I. and Zimmer, L. and Schadendorf, D. and Schilling, B. and Griewank, K.G.}, title = {GNAQ and GNA11 mutant nonuveal melanoma: a subtype distinct from both cutaneous and uveal melanoma}, series = {British Journal of Dermatology}, volume = {183}, journal = {British Journal of Dermatology}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1111/bjd.18947}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-215434}, pages = {928 -- 939}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background GNAQ and GNA11 mutant nonuveal melanoma represent a poorly characterized rare subgroup of melanoma with a gene mutation profile similar to uveal melanoma. Objectives To characterize these tumours in terms of clinical behaviour and genetic characteristics. Methods Patients with nonuveal GNAQ/11 mutated melanoma were identified from the prospective multicentre tumour tissue registry ADOREG, Tissue Registry in Melanoma (TRIM) and additional cooperating skin cancer centres. Extensive data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively. Targeted sequencing was used to determine tumour mutational burden. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed for programmed death-ligand 1 and BRCA1-associated protein (BAP)1. Existing whole-exome cutaneous and uveal melanoma data were analysed for mutation type and burden. Results We identified 18 patients with metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanoma. Tumours had a lower tumour mutational burden and fewer ultraviolet signature mutations than cutaneous melanomas. In addition to GNAQ and GNA11 mutations (nine each), six splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1), three eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A X-linked (EIF1AX) and four BAP1 mutations were detected. In contrast to uveal melanoma, GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas frequently metastasized lymphatically and concurrent EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations showed no apparent association with patient prognosis. Objective response to immunotherapy was poor with only one partial response observed in 10 treated patients (10\%). Conclusions Our findings suggest that GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is both clinically and genetically distinct from cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As they respond poorly to available treatment regimens, novel effective therapeutic approaches for affected patients are urgently needed. What is already known about this topic? The rare occurrence of GNAQ/11 mutations in nonuveal melanoma has been documented. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas also harbour genetic alterations in EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 that are of prognostic relevance in uveal melanoma. What does this study add? GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas show metastatic spread reminiscent of cutaneous melanoma, but not uveal melanoma. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas have a low tumour mutational burden that is higher than uveal melanoma, but lower than cutaneous melanoma. What is the translational message? Primary GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is clinically and genetically distinct from both cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas respond poorly to available systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, novel therapeutic approaches for these tumours are urgently needed.}, language = {en} } @article{JungwirthYuMoustafaetal.2019, author = {Jungwirth, Gerhard and Yu, Tao and Moustafa, Mahmoud and Rapp, Carmen and Warta, Rolf and Jungk, Christine and Sahm, Felix and Dettling, Steffen and Zweckberger, Klaus and Lamszus, Katrin and Senft, Christian and Loehr, Mario and Keßler, Almuth F. and Ketter, Ralf and Westphal, Manfred and Debus, Juergen and von Deimling, Andreas and Simon, Matthias and Unterberg, Andreas and Abdollahi, Amir and Herold-Mende, Christel}, title = {Identification of KIF11 as a Novel Target in Meningioma}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {11}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {4}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers11040545}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-197402}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Kinesins play an important role in many physiological functions including intracellular vesicle transport and mitosis. The emerging role of kinesins in different cancers led us to investigate the expression and functional role of kinesins in meningioma. Therefore, we re-analyzed our previous microarray dataset of benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas (n = 62) and got evidence for differential expression of five kinesins (KIFC1, KIF4A, KIF11, KIF14 and KIF20A). Further validation in an extended study sample (n = 208) revealed a significant upregulation of these genes in WHO°I to °III meningiomas (WHO°I n = 61, WHO°II n = 88, and WHO°III n = 59), which was most pronounced in clinically more aggressive tumors of the same WHO grade. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a WHO grade-associated upregulated protein expression in meningioma tissues. Furthermore, high mRNA expression levels of KIFC1, KIF11, KIF14 and KIF20A were associated with shorter progression-free survival. On a functional level, knockdown of kinesins in Ben-Men-1 cells and in the newly established anaplastic meningioma cell line NCH93 resulted in a significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation upon siRNA-mediated downregulation of KIF11 in both cell lines by up to 95\% and 71\%, respectively. Taken together, in this study we were able to identify the prognostic and functional role of several kinesin family members of which KIF11 exhibits the most promising properties as a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target, which may offer new treatment options for aggressive meningiomas.}, language = {en} }