@article{DumontWeberLassalleJolyBeauparlantetal.2022, author = {Dumont, Martine and Weber-Lassalle, Nana and Joly-Beauparlant, Charles and Ernst, Corinna and Droit, Arnaud and Feng, Bing-Jian and Dubois, St{\´e}phane and Collin-Deschesnes, Annie-Claude and Soucy, Penny and Vall{\´e}e, Maxime and Fournier, Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric and Lema{\c{c}}on, Audrey and Adank, Muriel A. and Allen, Jamie and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Arnold, Norbert and Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. and Berutti, Riccardo and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Bull, Shelley and Carvalho, Sara and Cornelissen, Sten and Dufault, Michael R. and Dunning, Alison M. and Engel, Christoph and Gehrig, Andrea and Geurts-Giele, Willemina R. R. and Gieger, Christian and Green, Jessica and Hackmann, Karl and Helmy, Mohamed and Hentschel, Julia and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hollestelle, Antoinette and Hooning, Maartje J. and Horv{\´a}th, Judit and Ikram, M. Arfan and Kaulfuß, Silke and Keeman, Renske and Kuang, Da and Luccarini, Craig and Maier, Wolfgang and Martens, John W. M. and Niederacher, Dieter and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Ott, Claus-Eric and Peters, Annette and Pharoah, Paul D. P. and Ramirez, Alfredo and Ramser, Juliane and Riedel-Heller, Steffi and Schmidt, Gunnar and Shah, Mitul and Scherer, Martin and St{\"a}bler, Antje and Strom, Tim M. and Sutter, Christian and Thiele, Holger and van Asperen, Christi J. and van der Kolk, Lizet and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Volk, Alexander E. and Wagner, Michael and Waisfisz, Quinten and Wang, Qin and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Devilee, Peter and Tavtigian, Sean and Bader, Gary D. and Meindl, Alfons and Goldgar, David E. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Easton, Douglas F. and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Hahnen, Eric and Simard, Jacques}, title = {Uncovering the contribution of moderate-penetrance susceptibility genes to breast cancer by whole-exome sequencing and targeted enrichment sequencing of candidate genes in women of European ancestry}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {14}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {14}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers14143363}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281768}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Rare variants in at least 10 genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, are associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, these variants, in combination with common variants identified through genome-wide association studies, explain only a fraction of the familial aggregation of the disease. To identify further susceptibility genes, we performed a two-stage whole-exome sequencing study. In the discovery stage, samples from 1528 breast cancer cases enriched for breast cancer susceptibility and 3733 geographically matched unaffected controls were sequenced. Using five different filtering and gene prioritization strategies, 198 genes were selected for further validation. These genes, and a panel of 32 known or suspected breast cancer susceptibility genes, were assessed in a validation set of 6211 cases and 6019 controls for their association with risk of breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor (ER) disease subtypes, using gene burden tests applied to loss-of-function and rare missense variants. Twenty genes showed nominal evidence of association (p-value < 0.05) with either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer. Our study had the statistical power to detect susceptibility genes with effect sizes similar to ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, however, it was underpowered to identify genes in which susceptibility variants are rarer or confer smaller effect sizes. Larger sample sizes would be required in order to identify such genes.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtHaywardCoelhoetal.2019, author = {Schmidt, Thomas S. B. and Hayward, Matthew R. and Coelho, Luiis P. and Li, Simone S. and Costea, Paul I. and Voigt, Anita Y. and Wirbel, Jakob and Maistrenko, Oleksandr M. and Alves, Renato J. C. and Bergsten, Emma and de Beaufort, Carine and Sobhani, Iradj and Heintz-Buschart, Anna and Sunagawa, Shinichi and Zeller, Georg and Wilmes, Paul and Bork, Peer}, title = {Extensive transmission of microbes along the gastrointestinal tract}, series = {eLife}, volume = {8}, journal = {eLife}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.42693}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228954}, pages = {e42693, 1-18}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The gastrointestinal tract is abundantly colonized by microbes, yet the translocation of oral species to the intestine is considered a rare aberrant event, and a hallmark of disease. By studying salivary and fecal microbial strain populations of 310 species in 470 individuals from five countries, we found that transmission to, and subsequent colonization of, the large intestine by oral microbes is common and extensive among healthy individuals. We found evidence for a vast majority of oral species to be transferable, with increased levels of transmission in colorectal cancer and rheumatoid arthritis patients and, more generally, for species described as opportunistic pathogens. This establishes the oral cavity as an endogenous reservoir for gut microbial strains, and oral-fecal transmission as an important process that shapes the gastrointestinal microbiome in health and disease.}, subject = {Barrier}, language = {en} } @article{BakirciFrankGumbeletal.2021, author = {Bakirci, Ezgi and Frank, Andreas and Gumbel, Simon and Otto, Paul F. and F{\"u}rsattel, Eva and Tessmer, Ingrid and Schmidt, Hans-Werner and Dalton, Paul D.}, title = {Melt Electrowriting of Amphiphilic Physically Crosslinked Segmented Copolymers}, series = {Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics}, volume = {222}, journal = {Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics}, number = {22}, doi = {10.1002/macp.202100259}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-257572}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Various (AB)\(_{n}\) and (ABAC)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers with hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments are processed via melt electrowriting (MEW). Two different (AB)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers composed of bisurea segments and hydrophobic poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) or hydrophilic poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) (PPO-PEG-PPO) segments, while the amphiphilic (ABAC)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers consist of bisurea segments in the combination of hydrophobic PDMS segments and hydrophilic PPO-PEG-PPO segments with different ratios, are explored. All copolymer compositions are processed using the same conditions, including nozzle temperature, applied voltage, and collector distance, while changes in applied pressure and collector speed altered the fiber diameter in the range of 7 and 60 µm. All copolymers showed excellent processability with MEW, well-controlled fiber stacking, and inter-layer bonding. Notably, the surfaces of all four copolymer fibers are very smooth when visualized using scanning electron microscopy. However, the fibers show different roughness demonstrated with atomic force microscopy. The non-cytotoxic copolymers increased L929 fibroblast attachment with increasing PDMS content while the different copolymer compositions result in a spectrum of physical properties.}, language = {en} } @article{FerreiraGamazonAlEjehetal.2019, author = {Ferreira, Manuel A. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Al-Ejeh, Fares and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arason, Adalgeir and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Arun, Banu K. and Asseryanis, Ella and Azzollini, Jacopo and Balma{\~n}a, Judith and Barnes, Daniel R. and Barrowdale, Daniel and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Behrens, Sabine and Benitez, Javier and Bermisheva, Marina and Bialkowska, Katarzyna and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Borg, Ake and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Broeks, Annegien and Burwinkel, Barbara and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Caligo, Maria A. and Campa, Daniele and Campbell, Ian and Canzian, Federico and Carter, Jonathan and Carter, Brian D. and Castelao, Jose E. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Christiansen, Hans and Chung, Wendy K. and Claes, Kathleen B. M. and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Cox, Angela and Cross, Simon S. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and de la Hoya, Miguel and Dennis, Joe and Devilee, Peter and Diez, Orland and D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Dunning, Alison M. and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ejlertsen, Bent and Ellberg, Carolina and Engel, Christoph and Eriksson, Mikael and Fasching, Peter A. and Fletcher, Olivia and Flyger, Henrik and Friedman, Eitan and Frost, Debra and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Ganz, Patricia A. and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garber, Judy and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Glendon, Gord and Godwin, Andrew K. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Gonz{\´a}lez-Neira, Anna and Greene, Mark H. and Gronwald, Jacek and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haimann, Christopher A. and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and He, Wei and Heyworth, Jane and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hollestelle, Antoinette and Hoover, Robert N. and Hopper, John L. and Hulick, Peter J. and Humphreys, Keith and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Isaacs, Claudine and Jakimovska, Milena and Jakubowska, Anna and James, Paul A. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Jankowitz, Rachel C. and John, Esther M. and Johnson, Nichola and Joseph, Vijai and Karlan, Beth Y. and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kiiski, Johanna I. and Ko, Yon-Dschun and Jones, Michael E. and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Laitman, Yael and Lambrechts, Diether and Lazaro, Conxi and Leslie, Goska and Lester, Jenny and Lesueur, Fabienne and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Long, Jirong and Loud, Jennifer T. and Lubiński, Jan and Makalic, Enes and Mannermaa, Arto and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Margolin, Sara and Maurer, Tabea and Mavroudis, Dimitrios and McGuffog, Lesley and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Michailidou, Kyriaki and Miller, Austin and Montagna, Marco and Moreno, Fernando and Moserle, Lidia and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Nevelsteen, Ines and Nielsen, Finn C. and Nikitina-Zake, Liene and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Offit, Kenneth and Olah, Edith and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Osorio, Ana and Papp, Janos and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Parsons, Michael T. and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Peixoto, Ana and Peterlongo, Paolo and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Poppe, Bruce and Presneau, Nadege and Radice, Paolo and Rantala, Johanna and Rennert, Gad and Risch, Harvey A. and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Sanden, Kristin and Sawyer, Elinor J. and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Sharma, Priyanka and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Singer, Christian F. and Soucy, Penny and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Stone, Jennifer and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tapper, William J. and Taylor, Jack A. and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Terry, Mary Beth and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Thomassen, Mads and Th{\"o}ne, Kathrin and Thull, Darcy L. and Tischkowitz, Marc and Toland, Amanda E. and Torres, Diana and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tung, Nadine and Vachon, Celine M. and van Asperen, Christi J. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Vega, Ana and Viel, Alexandra and Wang, Qin and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Wendt, Camilla and Winqvist, Robert and Yang, Xiaohong R. and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Ziogas, Argyrios and Kraft, Peter and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Zheng, Wei and Easton, Douglas F. and Milne, Roger L. and Beesley, Jonathan and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia}, title = {Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {10}, journal = {Nature Communications}, organization = {EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-08053-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228024}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.}, language = {en} } @article{SchofferSchueleinArandetal.2016, author = {Schoffer, Olaf and Sch{\"u}lein, Stefanie and Arand, Gerlinde and Arnholdt, Hans and Baaske, Dieter and Bargou, Ralf C. and Becker, Nikolaus and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Bodack, Yves and B{\"o}hme, Beatrix and Bozkurt, Tayfun and Breitsprecher, Regine and Buchali, Andre and Burger, Elke and Burger, Ulrike and Dommisch, Klaus and Elsner, Gudrun and Fernschild, Karin and Flintzer, Ulrike and Funke, Uwe and Gerken, Michael and G{\"o}bel, Hubert and Grobe, Norbert and Gumpp, Vera and Heinzerling, Lucie and Kempfer, Lana Raffaela and Kiani, Alexander and Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika and Kl{\"o}cking, Sabine and Kreibich, Ute and Knabner, Katrin and Kuhn, Peter and Lutze, Stine and M{\"a}der, Uwe and Maisel, Tanja and Maschke, Jan and Middeke, Martin and Neubauer, Andreas and Niedostatek, Antje and Opazo-Saez, Anabelle and Peters, Christoph and Schell, Beatrice and Schenkirsch, Gerhard and Schmalenberg, Harald and Schmidt, Peter and Schneider, Constanze and Schubotz, Birgit and Seide, Anika and Strecker, Paul and Taubenheim, Sabine and Wackes, Matthias and Weiß, Steffen and Welke, Claudia and Werner, Carmen and Wittekind, Christian and Wulff, J{\"o}rg and Zettl, Heike and Klug, Stefanie J.}, title = {Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002-2011}, series = {BMC Cancer}, volume = {16}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, number = {936}, doi = {10.1186/s12885-016-2963-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164544}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background Over the past two decades, there has been a rising trend in malignant melanoma incidence worldwide. In 2008, Germany introduced a nationwide skin cancer screening program starting at age 35. The aims of this study were to analyse the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages over time, as well as demographic and regional differences in stage distribution and survival of melanoma patients. Methods Pooled data from 61 895 malignant melanoma patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and documented in 28 German population-based and hospital-based clinical cancer registries were analysed using descriptive methods, joinpoint regression, logistic regression and relative survival. Results The number of annually documented cases increased by 53.2\% between 2002 (N = 4 779) and 2011 (N = 7 320). There was a statistically significant continuous positive trend in the proportion of stage UICC I cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2011, compared to a negative trend for stage UICC II. No trends were found for stages UICC III and IV respectively. Age (OR 0.97, 95\% CI 0.97-0.97), sex (OR 1.18, 95\% CI 1.11-1.25), date of diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95\% CI 1.04-1.06), 'diagnosis during screening' (OR 3.24, 95\% CI 2.50-4.19) and place of residence (OR 1.23, 95\% CI 1.16-1.30) had a statistically significant influence on the tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall 5-year relative survival for invasive cases was 83.4\% (95\% CI 82.8-83.9\%). Conclusions No distinct changes in the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages among those aged 35 and older were seen that could be directly attributed to the introduction of skin cancer screening in 2008. "}, language = {en} } @article{FlorenvonRintelenHerbertetal.2020, author = {Floren, Andreas and von Rintelen, Thomas and Herbert, Paul D. N. and de Araujo, Bruno Cancian and Schmidt, Stefan and Balke, Michael and Narakusumo, Raden Pramesa and Peggie, Djunijanti and Ubaidillah, Rosichon and von Rintelen, Kristina and M{\"u}ller, Tobias}, title = {Integrative ecological and molecular analysis indicate high diversity and strict elevational separation of canopy beetles in tropical mountain forests}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {10}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-73519-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230565}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Tropical mountain forests contribute disproportionately to terrestrial biodiversity but little is known about insect diversity in the canopy and how it is distributed between tree species. We sampled tree-specific arthropod communities from 28 trees by canopy fogging and analysed beetle communities which were first morphotyped and then identified by their DNA barcodes. Our results show that communities from forests at 1100 and 1700 m a.s.l. are almost completely distinct. Diversity was much lower in the upper forest while community structure changed from many rare, less abundant species to communities with a pronounced dominance structure. We also found significantly higher beta-diversity between trees at the lower than higher elevation forest where community similarity was high. Comparisons on tree species found at both elevations reinforced these results. There was little species overlap between sites indicating limited elevational ranges. Furthermore, we exploited the advantage of DNA barcodes to patterns of haplotype diversity in some of the commoner species. Our results support the advantage of fogging and DNA barcodes for community studies and underline the need for comprehensive research aimed at the preservation of these last remaining pristine forests.}, language = {en} } @article{HardulakMoriniereHausmannetal.2020, author = {Hardulak, Laura A. and Morini{\`e}re, J{\´e}r{\^o}me and Hausmann, Axel and Hendrich, Lars and Schmidt, Stefan and Doczkal, Dieter and M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg and Hebert, Paul D. N. and Haszprunar, Gerhard}, title = {DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring in a national park: Screening for invasive and pest species}, series = {Molecular Ecology Resources}, volume = {20}, journal = {Molecular Ecology Resources}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1111/1755-0998.13212}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-217812}, pages = {1542 -- 1557}, year = {2020}, abstract = {DNA metabarcoding was utilized for a large-scale, multiyear assessment of biodiversity in Malaise trap collections from the Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, Bavaria). Principal component analysis of read count-based biodiversities revealed clustering in concordance with whether collection sites were located inside or outside of the National Park. Jaccard distance matrices of the presences of barcode index numbers (BINs) at collection sites in the two survey years (2016 and 2018) were significantly correlated. Overall similar patterns in the presence of total arthropod BINs, as well as BINs belonging to four major arthropod orders across the study area, were observed in both survey years, and are also comparable with results of a previous study based on DNA barcoding of Sanger-sequenced specimens. A custom reference sequence library was assembled from publicly available data to screen for pest or invasive arthropods among the specimens or from the preservative ethanol. A single 98.6\% match to the invasive bark beetle Ips duplicatus was detected in an ethanol sample. This species has not previously been detected in the National Park.}, language = {en} } @article{MechauFrankBakircietal.2021, author = {Mechau, Jannik and Frank, Andreas and Bakirci, Ezgi and Gumbel, Simon and Jungst, Tomasz and Giesa, Reiner and Groll, J{\"u}rgen and Dalton, Paul D. and Schmidt, Hans-Werner}, title = {Hydrophilic (AB)\(_{n}\) Segmented Copolymers for Melt Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing}, series = {Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics}, volume = {222}, journal = {Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1002/macp.202000265}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224513}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Several manufacturing technologies beneficially involve processing from the melt, including extrusion-based printing, electrospinning, and electrohydrodynamic jetting. In this study, (AB)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers are tailored for melt-processing to form physically crosslinked hydrogels after swelling. The copolymers are composed of hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)-based segments and hydrophobic bisurea segments, which form physical crosslinks via hydrogen bonds. The degree of polymerization was adjusted to match the melt viscosity to the different melt-processing techniques. Using extrusion-based printing, a width of approximately 260 µm is printed into 3D constructs, with excellent interlayer bonding at fiber junctions, due to hydrogen bonding between the layers. For melt electrospinning, much thinner fibers in the range of about 1-15 µm are obtained and produced in a typical nonwoven morphology. With melt electrowriting, fibers are deposited in a controlled way to well-defined 3D constructs. In this case, multiple fiber layers fuse together enabling constructs with line width in the range of 70 to 160 µm. If exposed to water the printed constructs swell and form physically crosslinked hydrogels that slowly disintegrate, which is a feature for soluble inks within biofabrication strategies. In this context, cytotoxicity tests confirm the viability of cells and thus demonstrating biocompatibility of this class of copolymers.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtFantuzziKlopfetal.2021, author = {Schmidt, Paul and Fantuzzi, Felipe and Klopf, Jonas and Schr{\"o}der, Niklas B. and Dewhurst, Rian D. and Braunschweig, Holger and Engel, Volker and Engels, Bernd}, title = {Twisting versus delocalization in CAAC- and NHC-stabilized boron-based biradicals: the roles of sterics and electronics}, series = {Chemistry - A European Journal}, volume = {27}, journal = {Chemistry - A European Journal}, number = {16}, doi = {10.1002/chem.202004619}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-256636}, pages = {5160-5170}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Twisted boron-based biradicals featuring unsaturated C\(_2\)R\(_2\) (R=Et, Me) bridges and stabilization by cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs) were recently prepared. These species show remarkable geometrical and electronic differences with respect to their unbridged counterparts. Herein, a thorough computational investigation on the origin of their distinct electrostructural properties is performed. It is shown that steric effects are mostly responsible for the preference for twisted over planar structures. The ground-state multiplicity of the twisted structure is modulated by the σ framework of the bridge, and different R groups lead to distinct multiplicities. In line with the experimental data, a planar structure driven by delocalization effects is observed as global minimum for R=H. The synthetic elusiveness of C\(_2\)R\(_2\)-bridged systems featuring N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) was also investigated. These results could contribute to the engineering of novel main group biradicals.}, language = {en} } @article{KimpelSchindlerSchmidtPenningtonetal.2023, author = {Kimpel, Otilia and Schindler, Paul and Schmidt-Pennington, Laura and Altieri, Barbara and Megerle, Felix and Haak, Harm and Pittaway, James and Dischinger, Ulrich and Quinkler, Marcus and Mai, Knut and Kroiss, Matthias and Polat, B{\"u}lent and Fassnacht, Martin}, title = {Efficacy and safety of radiation therapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma}, series = {British Journal of Cancer}, volume = {128}, journal = {British Journal of Cancer}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1038/s41416-022-02082-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324411}, pages = {586-593}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Background International guidelines emphasise the role of radiotherapy (RT) for the management of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, the evidence for this recommendation is very low. Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients who received RT for advanced ACC in five European centres since 2000. Primary endpoint: time to progression of the treated lesion (tTTP). Secondary endpoints: best objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and the establishment of predictive factors by Cox analyses. Results In total, 132 tumoural lesions of 80 patients were treated with conventional RT (cRT) of 50-60 Gy (n = 20) or 20-49 Gy (n = 69), stereotactic body RT of 35-50 Gy (SBRT) (n = 36), or brachytherapy of 12-25 Gy (BT) (n = 7). Best objective lesional response was complete (n = 6), partial (n = 52), stable disease (n = 60), progressive disease (n = 14). Median tTTP was 7.6 months (1.0-148.6). In comparison to cRT\(_{20-49Gy}\), tTTP was significantly longer for cRT\(_{50-60Gy}\) (multivariate adjusted HR 0.10; 95\% CI 0.03-0.33; p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR 0.31; 95\% CI 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016), but not for BT (HR 0.66; 95\% CI 0.22-1.99; p = 0.46). Toxicity was generally mild and moderate with three grade 3 events. No convincing predictive factors could be established. Conclusions This largest published study on RT in advanced ACC provides clear evidence that RT is effective in ACC.}, language = {en} } @article{CoelhoKultimaCosteaetal.2018, author = {Coelho, Luis Pedro and Kultima, Jens Roat and Costea, Paul Igor and Fournier, Coralie and Pan, Yuanlong and Czarnecki-Maulden, Gail and Hayward, Matthew Robert and Forslund, Sofia K. and Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt and Descombes, Patrick and Jackson, Janet R. and Li, Qinghong and Bork, Peer}, title = {Similarity of the dog and human gut microbiomes in gene content and response to diet}, series = {Microbiome}, volume = {6}, journal = {Microbiome}, doi = {10.1186/s40168-018-0450-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-223177}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background Gut microbes influence their hosts in many ways, in particular by modulating the impact of diet. These effects have been studied most extensively in humans and mice. In this work, we used whole genome metagenomics to investigate the relationship between the gut metagenomes of dogs, humans, mice, and pigs. Results We present a dog gut microbiome gene catalog containing 1,247,405 genes (based on 129 metagenomes and a total of 1.9 terabasepairs of sequencing data). Based on this catalog and taxonomic abundance profiling, we show that the dog microbiome is closer to the human microbiome than the microbiome of either pigs or mice. To investigate this similarity in terms of response to dietary changes, we report on a randomized intervention with two diets (high-protein/low-carbohydrate vs. lower protein/higher carbohydrate). We show that diet has a large and reproducible effect on the dog microbiome, independent of breed or sex. Moreover, the responses were in agreement with those observed in previous human studies. Conclusions We conclude that findings in dogs may be predictive of human microbiome results. In particular, a novel finding is that overweight or obese dogs experience larger compositional shifts than lean dogs in response to a high-protein diet.}, language = {en} } @article{DoerkPeterlongoMannermaaetal.2019, author = {D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Peterlongo, Peter and Mannermaa, Arto and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Wang, Qin and Dennis, Joe and Ahearn, Thomas and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Augustinsson, Annelie and Beane Freeman, Laura E. and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia and Behrens, Sabine and Bermisheva, Marina and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Burwinkel, Barbara and Canzian, Federico and Chan, Tsun L. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Choi, Ji-Yeob and Christiansen, Hans and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ekici, Arif B. and Eriksson, Mikael and Evans, D. Gareth and Fasching, Peter A. and Figueroa, Jonine and Flyger, Henrik and Fritschi, Lin and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Gao, Chi and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haeberle, Lothar and Haimann, Christopher A. and H{\aa}kansson, Niclas and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and Hartman, Mikael and Hauke, Jan and Hein, Alexander and Hillemanns, Peter and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hooning, Maartje J. and Hopper, John L. and Howell, Tony and Huo, Dezheng and Ito, Hidemi and Iwasaki, Motoki and Jakubowska, Anna and Janni, Wolfgang and John, Esther M. and Jung, Audrey and Kaaks, Rudolf and Kang, Daehee and Kapoor, Pooja Middha and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kim, Sung-Won and Kitahara, Cari M. and Koutros, Stella and Kraft, Peter and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Kwong, Ava and Lambrechts, Diether and Le Marchand, Loic and Li, Jingmei and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Linet, Martha and Lo, Wing-Yee and Long, Jirong and Lophatananon, Artitaya and Lubiński, Jan and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Manoukian, Siranoush and Margolin, Sara and Martinez, Elena and Matsuo, Keitaro and Mavroudis, Dimitris and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Milne, Roger L. and Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah and Muir, Kenneth and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Neven, Patrick and Newman, William G. and Offit, Kenneth and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olshan, Andrew F. and Olson, Janet E. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Park, Sue K. and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Peto, Julian and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Pohl-Rescigno, Esther and Presneau, Nadege and Rack, Brigitte and Radice, Paolo and Rashid, Muhammad U. and Rennert, Gad and Rennert, Hedy S. and Romero, Atocha and Ruebner, Matthias and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Schneider, Michael O. and Schoemaker, Minouk J. and Scott, Christopher and Shen, Chen-Yang and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Slager, Susan and Smichkoska, Snezhana and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Stone, Jennifer and Surowy, Harald and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tamimi, Rulla M. and Tapper, William J. and Teo, Soo H. and Terry, Mary Beth and Toland, Amanda E. and Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. and Torres, Diana and Torres-Mej{\´i}a, Gabriela and Troester, Melissa A. and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tsugane, Shoichiro and Untch, Michael and Vachon, Celine M. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Veen, Elke M. and Vijai, Joseph and Wendt, Camilla and Wolk, Alicja and Yu, Jyh-Cherng and Zheng, Wei and Ziogas, Argyrios and Ziv, Elad and Dunnig, Alison and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Schindler, Detlev and Devilee, Peter and Easton, Douglas F.}, title = {Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {9}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, organization = {ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-48804-y}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222838}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95\%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.}, language = {en} } @article{HeWuD'Avinoetal.2018, author = {He, Tao and Wu, Yanfei and D'Avino, Gabriele and Schmidt, Elliot and Stolte, Matthias and Cornil, J{\´e}r{\^o}me and Beljonne, David and Ruden, P. Paul and W{\"u}rthner, Frank and Frisbie, C. Daniel}, title = {Crystal step edges can trap electrons on the surfaces of n-type organic semiconductors}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {9}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-04479-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227957}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Understanding relationships between microstructure and electrical transport is an important goal for the materials science of organic semiconductors. Combining high-resolution surface potential mapping by scanning Kelvin probe microscopy (SKPM) with systematic field effect transport measurements, we show that step edges can trap electrons on the surfaces of single crystal organic semiconductors. n-type organic semiconductor crystals exhibiting positive step edge surface potentials display threshold voltages that increase and carrier mobilities that decrease with increasing step density, characteristic of trapping, whereas crystals that do not have positive step edge surface potentials do not have strongly step density dependent transport. A device model and microelectrostatics calculations suggest that trapping can be intrinsic to step edges for crystals of molecules with polar substituents. The results provide a unique example of a specific microstructure-charge trapping relationship and highlight the utility of surface potential imaging in combination with transport measurements as a productive strategy for uncovering microscopic structure-property relationships in organic semiconductors.}, language = {en} }