@incollection{Schneider1994, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Schriftspracherwerb: Befunde aus den M{\"u}nchner L{\"a}ngsschnittstudien LOGIK und SCHOLASTIK}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50566}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1994}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {de} } @incollection{Schneider1992, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Gedanken zur Grundlegung einer christlichen Erziehung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-55304}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1992}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {christliche Erziehung}, language = {de} } @article{SchneiderBrun1987, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Brun, Hedwig}, title = {The role of context in young children's memory performance: Istomina revisited}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-52726}, year = {1987}, abstract = {According to more recent studies on memory development in young children, preschoolers and kindergarteners are able to demonstrate surprisingly good memory skills in natural as weH as in laboratory-type settings. This finding is not consistent with the results of a study by Istomina (1975), conducted in 1948, leading to the concJusion that (a) preschoolers do not use voluntary remembering, and (b) children generally recall better in play situations than in typical experimental settings. In this study, two experiments were conducted to replicate Istomina's research. In the first, it was shown that Istomina's findings were replicable when methodological problems in the procedure were ignored. Experiment 2 improved methodologically upon Istomina's experimental methods and did not produce results to support her concJusions. Four- and 6-year-olds showed voluntary memory in play activities as weH as in laboratory-type settings, and remembered equally weB in both contexts. The results did not support the assumption that memory performance in young children can be substantially facilitated by motivating contexts.}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @incollection{SchneiderMoebus1986, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and M{\"o}bus, C.}, title = {Vorwort zu: Strukturmodelle f{\"u}r L{\"a}ngsschnittdaten und Zeitreihen : LISREL, Pfad- und Varianzanalysen / Claus M{\"o}bus und Wolfgang Schneider [Hrsg.]}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50433}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1986}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {LISREL}, language = {de} } @incollection{SchneiderSodian1990, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Sodian, Beate}, title = {Ged{\"a}chtnisentwicklung im Vorschulalter: "Theoriewandel" im kindlichen Verst{\"a}ndnis des Lernens und Erinnerns?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87183}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1990}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, subject = {Entwicklungspsychologie}, language = {de} } @article{SchneiderSodian1991, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Sodian, Beate}, title = {A longitudinal study of young children's memory behavior and Performance in a sort-recall task}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62169}, year = {1991}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @article{GruberRenklSchneider1994, author = {Gruber, Hans and Renkl, Alexander and Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Expertise und Ged{\"a}chtnisentwicklung: L{\"a}ngsschnittliche Befunde aus der Dom{\"a}ne Schach}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87473}, year = {1994}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Arbeit ging zwei Hauptfragestellungen nach: (I) Inwiefern unterscheiden sich Experten in der Dom{\"a}ne Schach von Aussteigern aus der Expertisekarriere? (2) Wie ver{\"a}ndern sich schachspezifische und generelle Ged{\"a}chtnisparameter {\"u}ber einen Zeitraum von mehreren Jahren? Es wurden 27 Experten und Novizen mit einem durchschnittlichen Alter von knapp 12 Jahren zum ersten Meßzeitpunkt und von 16 Jahren zum zweiten Meßzeitpunkt untersucht. Die Aussteiger aus der Expertisekarriere zeigten bereits bei der Erstmessung schlechtere schachspezifische Ged{\"a}chtnisleistungen als die {\"u}brigen Experten; die Annahme selektiver Aussteiger, die die Aussagekraft querschnittlicher Experten-Novizen-Vergleiche in Frage stellt, wird damit best{\"a}tigt. Sowohl f{\"u}r die Experten als auch f{\"u}r die Novizen zeigte sich ein Anstieg der schachspezifischen Ged{\"a}chtnisleistung von der Erst- zur Zweitmessung. W{\"a}hrend daf{\"u}r bei Experten dom{\"a}nenspezifische Faktoren verantwortlich sein d{\"u}rften, scheint dies bei Novizen auf die Entwicklung allgemeiner Ged{\"a}chtnisparameter zur{\"u}ckzugehen.}, subject = {Expertise}, language = {de} } @incollection{WeinertKnopfKoerkeletal.1984, author = {Weinert, F. E. and Knopf, Monika and K{\"o}rkel, J. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Vogel, K. and Wetzel, M.}, title = {Die Entwicklung einiger Ged{\"a}chtnisleistungen bei Kindern und {\"a}lteren Erwachsenen in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von kognitiven, metakognitiven und motivationalen Einflußfaktoren}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50458}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1984}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {de} } @misc{Schneider1986, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {How to avoid traps and fallacies: The multilevel issue in educational research}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87336}, year = {1986}, abstract = {Review of "Hans Oosthoek and Pieter van den Eeden (Eds.) Education From the Multi-Level Perspective: Models, Methodology and Empirical Findings. - London: Gordon \& Breach Science, 1984. 295 pp."}, language = {en} } @article{SchneiderHelmke1986, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Helmke, Andreas}, title = {The role of classroom differences in achievement changes}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87356}, year = {1986}, abstract = {A combined criterion involving the regression slopes of pretest-posttest achievement scores and achievement gain scores was used to classify similar types of classrooms. Mathematics achievement differences among 632 fifth graders were analysed in a longitudinal design and explained in a structural equation framework provided by LISREL, separately for four types of classrooms. The results replicated the findings of an earlier study (Schneider \& Treiber, 1984) in that the local nature of achievement models could be demonstrated. That is, the structural components of the causal models could not be generalized across the four groups of classrooms. The inclusion of a second grouping criterion (i. e., achievement gainJ proved useful in that a better model fit was always obtained for classrooms with high achievement gains. As a global model test ignoring group and classroom membership did mask the differential validity of the achievement model in the various subgro.ups, the need for multilevel approaches was emphasized.}, subject = {Schulleistung}, language = {en} }