@article{Schneider1991, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Domain-specific knowledge and memory Performance}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50494}, year = {1991}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @incollection{Schneider1986, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Strukturgleichungsmodelle der zweiten Generation - Eine Einf{\"u}hrung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50401}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1986}, subject = {LISREL}, language = {de} } @incollection{SchneiderTreiber1986, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Treiber, B.}, title = {Determinanten der Leistungsver{\"a}nderung im Mathematikunterricht - Ein Modellvergleich f{\"u}r unterschiedliche Schulleistungstypen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50419}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1986}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {de} } @article{HautmannDoepfnerKatzmannetal.2018, author = {Hautmann, Christopher and D{\"o}pfner, Manfred and Katzmann, Josepha and Sch{\"u}rmann, Stephanie and Wolff Metternich-Kaizman, Tanja and Jaite, Charlotte and Kappel, Viola and Geissler, Julia and Warnke, Andreas and Jacob, Christian and Hennighausen, Klaus and Haack-Dees, Barbara and Schneider-Momm, Katja and Philipsen, Alexandra and Matthies, Swantje and R{\"o}sler, Michael and Retz, Wolfgang and Gontard, Alexander von and Sobanski, Esther and Alm, Barbara and Hohmann, Sarah and H{\"a}ge, Alexander and Poustka, Luise and Colla, Michael and Gentschow, Laura and Freitag, Christine M. and Becker, Katja and Jans, Thomas}, title = {Sequential treatment of ADHD in mother and child (AIMAC study): importance of the treatment phases for intervention success in a randomized trial}, series = {BMC Psychiatry}, volume = {18}, journal = {BMC Psychiatry}, doi = {10.1186/s12888-018-1963-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227930}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background The efficacy of parent-child training (PCT) regarding child symptoms may be reduced if the mother has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The AIMAC study (ADHD in Mothers and Children) aimed to compensate for the deteriorating effect of parental psychopathology by treating the mother (Step 1) before the beginning of PCT (Step 2). This secondary analysis was particularly concerned with the additional effect of the Step 2 PCT on child symptoms after the Step 1 treatment. Methods The analysis included 143 mothers and children (aged 6-12 years) both diagnosed with ADHD. The study design was a two-stage, two-arm parallel group trial (Step 1 treatment group [TG]: intensive treatment of the mother including psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy; Step 1 control group [CG]: supportive counseling only for mother; Step 2 TG and CG: PCT). Single- and multi-group analyses with piecewise linear latent growth curve models were applied to test for the effects of group and phase. Child symptoms (e.g., ADHD symptoms, disruptive behavior) were rated by three informants (blinded clinician, mother, teacher). Results Children in the TG showed a stronger improvement of their disruptive behavior as rated by mothers than those in the CG during Step 1 (Step 1: TG vs. CG). In the CG, according to reports of the blinded clinician and the mother, the reduction of children's disruptive behavior was stronger during Step 2 than during Step 1 (CG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). In the TG, improvement of child outcome did not differ across treatment steps (TG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). Conclusions Intensive treatment of the mother including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy may have small positive effects on the child's disruptive behavior. PCT may be a valid treatment option for children with ADHD regarding disruptive behavior, even if mothers are not intensively treated beforehand. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN73911400. Registered 29 March 2007.}, language = {en} } @article{HuebnerWolfgangTheisetal.2022, author = {H{\"u}bner, Theresa and Wolfgang, Tanja and Theis, Ann-Catrin and Steber, Magdalena and Wiedenmann, Lea and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and Diessner, Joachim and Hein, Grit and Gr{\"u}ndahl, Marthe and K{\"a}mmerer, Ulrike and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and Bartmann, Catharina}, title = {The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and other psychological factors in pregnant women giving birth during the first wave of the pandemic}, series = {Reproductive Health}, volume = {19}, journal = {Reproductive Health}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s12978-022-01493-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300189}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background The onset of mental illness such as depression and anxiety disorders in pregnancy and postpartum period is common. The coronavirus induced disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting public policy responses represent an exceptional situation worldwide and there are hints for adverse psychosocial impact, hence, the study of psychological effects of the pandemic in women during hospitalization for delivery and in the postpartum period is highly relevant. Methods Patients who gave birth during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany (March to June 2020) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of W{\"u}rzburg, Germany, were recruited at hospital admission for delivery. Biosamples were collected for analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and various stress hormones and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In addition to sociodemographic and medical obstetric data, survey questionnaires in relation to concerns about and fear of COVID-19, depression, stress, anxiety, loneliness, maternal self-efficacy and the mother-child bonding were administered at T1 (delivery stay) and T2 (3-6 months postpartum). Results In total, all 94 recruited patients had a moderate concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at T1 with a significant rise at T2. This concern correlated with low to low-medium general psychosocial stress levels and stress symptoms, and the women showed a significant increase of active coping from T1 to T2. Anxiety levels were low and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale showed a medium score of 5 with a significant (T1), but only week correlation with the concerns about SARS-CoV-2. In contrast to the overall good maternal bonding without correlation to SARS-CoV-2 concern, the maternal self-efficiency correlated negatively with the obstetric impairment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion Obstetric patients` concerns regarding SARS-CoV-2 and the accompanying pandemic increased during the course of the pandemic correlating positively with stress and depression. Of note is the increase in active coping over time and the overall good mother-child-bonding. Maternal self-efficacy was affected in part by the restrictions of the pandemic.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerGirardHopfneretal.2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Stefanie H. and Girard, Simon L. and Hopfner, Franziska and Merner, Nancy D. and Bourassa, Cynthia V. and Lorenz, Delia and Clark, Lorraine N. and Tittmann, Lukas and Soto-Ortolaza, Alexandra I. and Klebe, Stephan and Hallett, Mark and Schneider, Susanne A. and Hodgkinson, Colin A. and Lieb, Wolfgang and Wszolek, Zbigniew K. and Pendziwiat, Manuela and Lorenzo-Betancor, Oswaldo and Poewe, Werner and Ortega-Cubero, Sara and Seppi, Klaus and Rajput, Alex and Hussl, Anna and Rajput, Ali H. and Berg, Daniela and Dion, Patrick A. and Wurster, Isabel and Shulman, Joshua M. and Srulijes, Karin and Haubenberger, Dietrich and Pastor, Pau and Vilari{\~n}o-G{\"u}ell, Carles and Postuma, Ronald B. and Bernard, Genevi{\`e}ve and Ladwig, Karl-Heinz and Dupr{\´e}, Nicolas and Jankovic, Joseph and Strauch, Konstantin and Panisset, Michel and Winkelmann, Juliane and Testa, Claudia M. and Reischl, Eva and Zeuner, Kirsten E. and Ross, Owen A. and Arzberger, Thomas and Chouinard, Sylvain and Deuschl, G{\"u}nther and Louis, Elan D. and Kuhlenb{\"a}umer, Gregor and Rouleau, Guy A.}, title = {Genome-wide association study in essential tremor identifies three new loci}, series = {Brain}, volume = {139}, journal = {Brain}, doi = {10.1093/brain/aww242}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186541}, pages = {3163-3169}, year = {2016}, abstract = {We conducted a genome-wide association study of essential tremor, a common movement disorder characterized mainly by a postural and kinetic tremor of the upper extremities. Twin and family history studies show a high heritability for essential tremor. The molecular genetic determinants of essential tremor are unknown. We included 2807 patients and 6441 controls of European descent in our two-stage genome-wide association study. The 59 most significantly disease-associated markers of the discovery stage were genotyped in the replication stage. After Bonferroni correction two markers, one (rs10937625) located in the serine/threonine kinase STK32B and one (rs17590046) in the transcriptional coactivator PPARGC1A were associated with essential tremor. Three markers (rs12764057, rs10822974, rs7903491) in the cell-adhesion molecule CTNNA3 were significant in the combined analysis of both stages. The expression of STK32B was increased in the cerebellar cortex of patients and expression quantitative trait loci database mining showed association between the protective minor allele of rs10937625 and reduced expression in cerebellar cortex. We found no expression differences related to disease status or marker genotype for the other two genes. Replication of two lead single nucleotide polymorphisms of previous small genome-wide association studies (rs3794087 in SLC1A2, rs9652490 in LINGO1) did not confirm the association with essential tremor.}, language = {en} } @article{TibkenRichterLindenetal.2022, author = {Tibken, Catharina and Richter, Tobias and Linden, Nicole von der and Schmiedeler, Sandra and Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {The role of metacognitive competences in the development of school achievement among gifted adolescents}, series = {Child Development}, volume = {93}, journal = {Child Development}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/cdev.13640}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258376}, pages = {117-133}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Gifted underachievers perform worse in school than would be expected based on their high intelligence. Possible causes for underachievement are low motivational dispositions (need for cognition) and metacognitive competences. This study tested the interplay of these variables longitudinally with gifted and non-gifted students from Germany (N = 341, 137 females) in Grades 6 (M = 12.02 years at t1) and 8 (M = 14.07 years). Declarative and procedural metacognitive competences were assessed in the domain of reading comprehension. Path analyses showed incremental effects of procedural metacognition over and above intelligence on the development of school achievement in gifted students (β = .139). Moreover, declarative metacognition and need for cognition interactively predicted procedural metacognition (β = .169), which mediated their effect on school achievement.}, language = {en} } @article{SchneiderNiklas2017, author = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Niklas, Frank}, title = {Intelligence and verbal short-term memory/working memory: their interrelationships from childhood to young adulthood and their impact on academic achievement}, series = {Journal of Intelligence}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of Intelligence}, number = {2}, issn = {2079-3200}, doi = {10.3390/jintelligence5020026}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-198004}, pages = {26}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Although recent developmental studies exploring the predictive power of intelligence and working memory (WM) for educational achievement in children have provided evidence for the importance of both variables, findings concerning the relative impact of IQ and WM on achievement have been inconsistent. Whereas IQ has been identified as the major predictor variable in a few studies, results from several other developmental investigations suggest that WM may be the stronger predictor of academic achievement. In the present study, data from the Munich Longitudinal Study on the Genesis of Individual Competencies (LOGIC) were used to explore this issue further. The secondary data analysis included data from about 200 participants whose IQ and WM was first assessed at the age of six and repeatedly measured until the ages of 18 and 23. Measures of reading, spelling, and math were also repeatedly assessed for this age range. Both regression analyses based on observed variables and latent variable structural equation modeling (SEM) were carried out to explore whether the predictive power of IQ and WM would differ as a function of time point of measurement (i.e., early vs. late assessment). As a main result of various regression analyses, IQ and WM turned out to be reliable predictors of academic achievement, both in early and later developmental stages, when previous domain knowledge was not included as additional predictor. The latter variable accounted for most of the variance in more comprehensive regression models, reducing the impact of both IQ and WM considerably. Findings from SEM analyses basically confirmed this outcome, indicating IQ impacts on educational achievement in the early phase, and illustrating the strong additional impact of previous domain knowledge on achievement at later stages of development.}, language = {en} } @article{DoerkPeterlongoMannermaaetal.2019, author = {D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Peterlongo, Peter and Mannermaa, Arto and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Wang, Qin and Dennis, Joe and Ahearn, Thomas and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Augustinsson, Annelie and Beane Freeman, Laura E. and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia and Behrens, Sabine and Bermisheva, Marina and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Burwinkel, Barbara and Canzian, Federico and Chan, Tsun L. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Choi, Ji-Yeob and Christiansen, Hans and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ekici, Arif B. and Eriksson, Mikael and Evans, D. Gareth and Fasching, Peter A. and Figueroa, Jonine and Flyger, Henrik and Fritschi, Lin and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Gao, Chi and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haeberle, Lothar and Haimann, Christopher A. and H{\aa}kansson, Niclas and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and Hartman, Mikael and Hauke, Jan and Hein, Alexander and Hillemanns, Peter and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hooning, Maartje J. and Hopper, John L. and Howell, Tony and Huo, Dezheng and Ito, Hidemi and Iwasaki, Motoki and Jakubowska, Anna and Janni, Wolfgang and John, Esther M. and Jung, Audrey and Kaaks, Rudolf and Kang, Daehee and Kapoor, Pooja Middha and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kim, Sung-Won and Kitahara, Cari M. and Koutros, Stella and Kraft, Peter and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Kwong, Ava and Lambrechts, Diether and Le Marchand, Loic and Li, Jingmei and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Linet, Martha and Lo, Wing-Yee and Long, Jirong and Lophatananon, Artitaya and Lubiński, Jan and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Manoukian, Siranoush and Margolin, Sara and Martinez, Elena and Matsuo, Keitaro and Mavroudis, Dimitris and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Milne, Roger L. and Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah and Muir, Kenneth and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Neven, Patrick and Newman, William G. and Offit, Kenneth and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olshan, Andrew F. and Olson, Janet E. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Park, Sue K. and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Peto, Julian and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Pohl-Rescigno, Esther and Presneau, Nadege and Rack, Brigitte and Radice, Paolo and Rashid, Muhammad U. and Rennert, Gad and Rennert, Hedy S. and Romero, Atocha and Ruebner, Matthias and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Schneider, Michael O. and Schoemaker, Minouk J. and Scott, Christopher and Shen, Chen-Yang and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Slager, Susan and Smichkoska, Snezhana and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Stone, Jennifer and Surowy, Harald and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tamimi, Rulla M. and Tapper, William J. and Teo, Soo H. and Terry, Mary Beth and Toland, Amanda E. and Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. and Torres, Diana and Torres-Mej{\´i}a, Gabriela and Troester, Melissa A. and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tsugane, Shoichiro and Untch, Michael and Vachon, Celine M. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Veen, Elke M. and Vijai, Joseph and Wendt, Camilla and Wolk, Alicja and Yu, Jyh-Cherng and Zheng, Wei and Ziogas, Argyrios and Ziv, Elad and Dunnig, Alison and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Schindler, Detlev and Devilee, Peter and Easton, Douglas F.}, title = {Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {9}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, organization = {ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-48804-y}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222838}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95\%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.}, language = {en} } @article{HollaenderSchwenderBoehmeetal.2021, author = {Holl{\"a}nder, Olivia and Schwender, Kristina and B{\"o}hme, Petra and Fleckhaus, Jan and Haas, Cordula and Han, Yang and Heidorn, Frank and Klein-Unseld, Rachel and Lichtenwald, Julia and Naue, Jana and Neubauer, Jacqueline and Poetsch, Micaela and Schneider, Peter M. and Wagner, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Marielle}, title = {Forensische DNA-Methylierungsanalyse}, series = {Rechtsmedizin}, volume = {31}, journal = {Rechtsmedizin}, number = {3}, organization = {Arbeitsgemeinschaft Molekulare Alterssch{\"a}tzung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Rechtsmedizin (DGRM)}, issn = {0937-9819}, doi = {10.1007/s00194-021-00492-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307131}, pages = {192-201}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Die quantitative Analyse der relativen DNA-Methylierung gilt als eine der vielversprechendsten Methoden der molekularen Alterssch{\"a}tzung. Viele Studien der letzten Jahre identifizierten geeignete Positionen im Genom, deren DNA-Methylierung sich altersabh{\"a}ngig ver{\"a}ndert. F{\"u}r den Einsatz dieser Methode in der Routine- bzw. Fallarbeit ist es von großer Bedeutung, angewandte Analysetechniken zu validieren. Als ein Teilaspekt dieser Validierung sollte die Vergleichbarkeit der Analyseergebnisse zur DNA-Methylierung mithilfe der Mini- und Pyrosequenzierung zwischen verschiedenen Laboren evaluiert werden. Die Arbeitsgruppe „Molekulare Alterssch{\"a}tzung" der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Rechtsmedizin (DGRM) f{\"u}hrte hierzu den ersten, technischen Ringversuch durch, der 4 Positionen in den Genen PDE4C, EDARADD, SST und KLF14 umfasste. Diese Marker waren in vorangegangenen Studien als altersabh{\"a}ngige Biomarker charakterisiert worden. Am Ringversuch nahmen 12 Labore teil, wobei jedes die Wahl zwischen der Minisequenzierung und/oder der Pyrosequenzierung f{\"u}r die quantitative Methylierungsanalyse hatte. Jedem teilnehmenden Labor wurden Blut- und Speichelproben von 3 Personen unterschiedlichen Alters {\"u}bersandt. Die Wahl der Reagenzien f{\"u}r die Probenbearbeitung wurde den Teilnehmern freigestellt. Die Ergebnisse der Minisequenzierung zeigten systematische Abweichungen zwischen den Laboren, die am ehesten auf die Verwendung unterschiedlicher Reagenzien und Analyseplattformen zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren sein k{\"o}nnen. Die Resultate der Pyrosequenzierung hingegen wiesen nicht auf systematische Abweichungen zwischen den Laboren hin, hier zeigte sich jedoch die Tendenz einer markerabh{\"a}ngigen Abweichung. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus konnten Unterschiede hinsichtlich technischer Probleme zwischen Laboren mit mehr Erfahrung in der jeweiligen Sequenzierungsmethode und Laboren mit weniger Erfahrung festgestellt werden. Sowohl die Beobachtung von systematischen als auch die von markerabh{\"a}ngigen Abweichungen l{\"a}sst den Schluss zu, dass eine {\"U}bertragung von Analysemethoden zwischen Laboren grunds{\"a}tzlich m{\"o}glich ist, eine Anpassung des jeweiligen Modells zur Alterssch{\"a}tzung jedoch notwendig sein kann.}, language = {de} }