@article{SchmidTarauRossietal.2018,
  author    = {Schmid, Richard and Tarau, Ioana-Sandra and Rossi, Angela and Leonhardt, Stefan and Schwarz, Thomas and Schuerlein, Sebastian and Lotz, Christian and Hansmann, Jan},
  title     = {In Vivo-Like Culture Conditions in a Bioreactor Facilitate Improved Tissue Quality in Corneal Storage},
  series = {Biotechnology Journal},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Biotechnology Journal},
  number    = {1,1700344},
  doi       = {10.1002/biot.201700344},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228620},
  pages     = {1-7},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The cornea is the most-transplanted tissue worldwide. However, the availability and quality of grafts are limited due to the current methods of corneal storage. In this study, a dynamic bioreactor system is employed to enable the control of intraocular pressure and the culture at the air-liquid interface. Thereby, in vivo-like storage conditions are achieved. Different media combinations for endothelium and epithelium are tested in standard and dynamic conditions to enhance the viability of the tissue. In contrast to culture conditions used in eye banks, the combination of the bioreactor and biochrom medium 1 allows to preserve the corneal endothelium and the epithelium. Assessment of transparency, swelling, and the trans-epithelial-electrical-resistance (TEER) strengthens the impact of the in vivo-like tissue culture. For example, compared to corneas stored under static conditions, significantly lower optical densities and significantly higher TEER values were measured (p-value <0.05). Furthermore, healing of epithelial defects is enabled in the bioreactor, characterized by re-epithelialization and initiated stromal regeneration. Based on the obtained results, an easy-to-use 3D-printed bioreactor composed of only two parts was derived to translate the technology from the laboratory to the eye banks. This optimized bioreactor facilitates noninvasive microscopic monitoring. The improved storage conditions ameliorate the quality of corneal grafts and the storage time in the eye banks to increase availability and reduce re-grafting.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KaemmererTribiusCohrsetal.2023,
  author    = {K{\"a}mmerer, Peer W. and Tribius, Silke and Cohrs, Lena and Engler, Gabriel and Ettl, Tobias and Freier, Kolja and Frerich, Bernhard and Ghanaati, Shahram and Gosau, Martin and Haim, Dominik and Hartmann, Stefan and Heiland, Max and Herbst, Manuel and Hoefert, Sebastian and Hoffmann, J{\"u}rgen and H{\"o}lzle, Frank and Howaldt, Hans-Peter and Kreutzer, Kilian and Leonhardt, Henry and Lutz, Rainer and Moergel, Maximilian and Modabber, Ali and Neff, Andreas and Pietzka, Sebastian and Rau, Andrea and Reichert, Torsten E. and Smeets, Ralf and Sproll, Christoph and Steller, Daniel and Wiltfang, J{\"o}rg and Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich and Kronfeld, Kai and Al-Nawas, Bilal},
  title     = {Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx and solitary ipsilateral lymph node metastasis (pN1) — a prospective multicentric cohort study},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers15061833},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311024},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Evaluation of impact of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity/oropharynx (OSCC) of up to 4 cm (pT1/pT2) and solitary ipsilateral lymph node metastasis (pN1). A non-irradiated group with clinical follow-up was chosen for control, and survival and quality of life (QL) were compared; (2) Methods: This prospective multicentric comprehensive cohort study included patients with resected OSCC (pT1/pT2, pN1, and cM0) who were allocated into adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) or observation. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and QL after surgery; (3) Results: Out of 27 centers, 209 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 3.4 years. An amount of 137 patients were in the observation arm, and 72 received adjuvant irradiation. Overall survival did not differ between groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98 [0.55-1.73], p = 0.94). There were fewer neck metastases (HR 0.34 [0.15-0.77]; p = 0.01), as well as fewer local recurrences (HR 0.41 [0.19-0.89]; p = 0.02) under adjuvant RT. For QL, irradiated patients showed higher values for the symptom scale pain after 0.5, two, and three years (all p < 0.05). After six months and three years, irradiated patients reported higher symptom burdens (impaired swallowing, speech, as well as teeth-related problems (all p < 0.05)). Patients in the RT group had significantly more problems with mouth opening after six months, one, and two years (p < 0.05); (4) Conclusions: Adjuvant RT in patients with early SCC of the oral cavity and oropharynx does not seem to influence overall survival, but it positively affects progression-free survival. However, irradiated patients report a significantly decreased QL up to three years after therapy compared to the observation group.},
  language  = {en}
}