@article{TamihardjaLutyjKraftetal.2021,
  author    = {Tamihardja, J{\"o}rg and Lutyj, Paul and Kraft, Johannes and Lisowski, Dominik and Weick, Stefan and Flentje, Michael and Polat, B{\"u}lent},
  title     = {Two-Weekly High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Outcome and Toxicity Analysis},
  series = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  issn      = {2234-943X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fonc.2021.764536},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250992},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Evaluation of clinical outcome of two-weekly high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods 338 patients with localized prostate cancer receiving definitive EBRT followed by a two-weekly high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT boost) in the period of 2002 to 2019 were analyzed. EBRT, delivered in 46 Gy (DMean) in conventional fractionation, was followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D90\%) two and four weeks after EBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was added in 176 (52.1\%) patients. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was evaluated utilizing the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) and biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Results Median follow-up was 101.8 months. 15 (4.4\%)/115 (34.0\%)/208 (61.5\%) patients had low-/intermediate-/high-risk cancer according to the D`Amico risk classification. Estimated 5-year and 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 84.7\% and 75.9\% for all patients. The estimated 5-year bRFS was 93.3\%, 93.4\% and 79.5\% for low-, intermediate- and high-risk disease, respectively. The estimated 10-year freedom from distant metastasis (FFM) and overall survival (OS) rates were 86.5\% and 70.0\%. Cumulative 5-year late GU toxicity and late GI toxicity grade ≥ 2 was observed in 19.3\% and 5.0\% of the patients, respectively. Cumulative 5-year late grade 3 GU/GI toxicity occurred in 3.6\%/0.3\%. Conclusions Two-weekly HDR-BT boost after EBRT for localized prostate cancer showed an excellent toxicity profile with low GU/GI toxicity rates and effective long-term biochemical control.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannRichterWeicketal.2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Marcus and Richter, Anne and Weick, Stefan and Exner, Florian and Mantel, Frederick and Diefenhardt, Markus and Fokas, Emmanouil and Kosmala, Rebekka and Flentje, Michael and Polat, B{\"u}lent},
  title     = {Acute toxicities of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with intensified chemoradiotherapy within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial: comparing conventional versus VMAT planning at a single center},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-022-25647-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301255},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is regarded as standard treatment. We assessed acute toxicities in patients receiving conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT) and correlated them with dosimetric parameters after re-planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Patients were randomized within the multicenter CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial and received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and simultaneous chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Organs at risk (OAR) were contoured in a standardized approach. Acute toxicities and dose volume histogram parameters of 3D-RT plans were compared to retrospectively calculated VMAT plans. From 08/2015 to 01/2018, 35 patients with LARC were treated at one study center. Thirty-four patients were analyzed of whom 1 (3\%) was UICC stage II and 33 (97\%) patients were UICC stage III. Grade 3 acute toxicities occurred in 5 patients (15\%). Patients with acute grade 1 cystitis (n = 9) had significantly higher D\(_{mean}\) values for bladder (29.4 Gy vs. 25.2 Gy, p < 0.01) compared to patients without bladder toxicities. Acute diarrhea was associated with small bowel volume (grade 2: 870.1 ccm vs. grade 0-1: 647.3 ccm; p < 0.01) and with the irradiated volumes V5 to V50. Using VMAT planning, we could reduce mean doses and irradiated volumes for all OAR: D\(_{mean}\) bladder (21.9 Gy vs. 26.3 Gy, p < 0.01), small bowel volumes V5-V45 (p < 0.01), D\(_{mean}\) anal sphincter (34.6 Gy vs. 35.6 Gy, p < 0.01) and D\(_{mean}\) femoral heads (right 11.4 Gy vs. 25.9 Gy, left 12.5 Gy vs. 26.6 Gy, p < 0.01). Acute small bowel and bladder toxicities were dose and volume dependent. Dose and volume sparing for all OAR could be achieved through VMAT planning and might result in less acute toxicities.},
  language  = {en}
}