@article{SteinCimanderAppel2022, author = {Stein, Jan-Philipp and Cimander, Paula and Appel, Markus}, title = {Power-posing robots: the influence of a humanoid robot's posture and size on its perceived dominance, competence, eeriness, and threat}, series = {International Journal of Social Robotics}, volume = {14}, journal = {International Journal of Social Robotics}, number = {6}, issn = {1875-4791}, doi = {10.1007/s12369-022-00878-x}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324502}, pages = {1413-1422}, year = {2022}, abstract = {When interacting with sophisticated digital technologies, people often fall back on the same interaction scripts they apply to the communication with other humans—especially if the technology in question provides strong anthropomorphic cues (e.g., a human-like embodiment). Accordingly, research indicates that observers tend to interpret the body language of social robots in the same way as they would with another human being. Backed by initial evidence, we assumed that a humanoid robot will be considered as more dominant and competent, but also as more eerie and threatening once it strikes a so-called power pose. Moreover, we pursued the research question whether these effects might be accentuated by the robot's body size. To this end, the current study presented 204 participants with pictures of the robot NAO in different poses (expansive vs. constrictive), while also manipulating its height (child-sized vs. adult-sized). Our results show that NAO's posture indeed exerted strong effects on perceptions of dominance and competence. Conversely, participants' threat and eeriness ratings remained statistically independent of the robot's depicted body language. Further, we found that the machine's size did not affect any of the measured interpersonal perceptions in a notable way. The study findings are discussed considering limitations and future research directions.}, language = {en} } @article{SteinYeo2021, author = {Stein, Jan-Philipp and Yeo, Jiyeon}, title = {Investigating meal-concurrent media use: Social and dispositional predictors, intercultural differences, and the novel media phenomenon of "mukbang" eating broadcasts}, series = {Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies}, volume = {3}, journal = {Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1002/hbe2.306}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-257482}, pages = {956-968}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Meal-concurrent media use has been linked to several problematic outcomes, including higher caloric intake and an increased risk for obesity. Nevertheless, the sociocultural and dispositional predictors of using media while eating are not yet well-understood, including potential cross-cultural differences. Inspired by the recent emergence of a new food-related media phenomenon called "mukbang"—digital eating broadcasts that have become immensely popular throughout East and Southeast Asia—we inquire 296 participants from two cultures (Germany and South Korea) about their meal-concurrent media use. Our results suggest that South Koreans tend to use media more frequently during meals than Germans, especially for social purposes. Meanwhile, younger age only predicts meal-concurrent media use in the German sample. Apart from that, however, many other examined predictors (e.g., gender, living situation, body-esteem, the Big Five) remain statistically insignificant, indicating notable universality for the behavior in question. In the second part of our study, we then put special focus on the emerging mukbang trend and conduct a theory-driven exploration of its gratifications. Doing so, we find that participants' parasocial and social experiences during eating broadcasts significantly predict their enjoyment of the genre.}, language = {en} }