@article{ReppenhagenBeckerKugleretal.2023,
  author    = {Reppenhagen, Stephan and Becker, Roland and Kugler, Andreas and John, Dominik and Kopf, Sebastian and Anetzberger, Hermann},
  title     = {Hand dominance is not of significance in performing fundamental arthroscopic skills simulation training tasks},
  series = {Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {2666-061X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100767},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-350432},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose To compare the performance of the dominant and nondominant hand during fundamental arthroscopic simulator training. Methods Surgical trainees who participated in a 2-day simulator training course between 2021 and 2023 were classified, according to their arthroscopic experience in beginners and competents. Only right-handed individuals with complete data sets were included in the study. Ambidexterity was trained using a box trainer (Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training, Virtamed AG, Schlieren, Switzerland).Two tasks, periscoping for learning camera guidance and triangulation for additional instrument handling, were performed 4 times with the camera in the dominant hand and then in the nondominant hand. For each task, exercise time, camera path length, and instrument path length were recorded and analyzed. Results Out of 94 participants 74 right-handed individuals (22 females, 52 males) were classified to novices (n = 43, less than 10 independently performed arthroscopies) and competents (n = 31, more than 10 independently performed arthroscopies). Competents performed significantly better than novices. No significant difference was found after changing the guiding hand for the camera from the dominant to the nondominant hand regarding the camera path length and the instrument path length. Notably, tasks were performed even faster when using the camera in the nondominant hand. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that the learned manual skills during basic arthroscopic training are quickly transferred to the contralateral side. In consequence, additional fundamental skills training for camera guidance and instrument handling of the nondominant hand are not necessary. Clinical Relevance For skillful arthroscopy, camera guidance and instrument handing must be equally mastered with both hands. It is important to understand how hand dominance may affect learning during arthroscopic simulator training.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HeinzMellerLuetkensetal.2023,
  author    = {Heinz, Tizian and Meller, Felix and Luetkens, Karsten Sebastian and Anderson, Philip Mark and Stratos, Ioannis and Horas, Konstantin and Rudert, Maximilian and Reppenhagen, Stephan and Weißenberger, Manuel},
  title     = {The AMADEUS score is not a sufficient predictor for functional outcome after high tibial osteotomy},
  series = {Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40634-023-00575-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357765},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose The Area Measurement And Depth Underlying Structures (AMADEUS) classification system has been proposed as a valuable tool for magnetic resonance (MR)-based grading of preoperatively encountered chondral defects of the knee joint. However, the potential relationship of this novel score with clinical data was yet to determine. It was the primary intention of this study to assess the correlative relationship of the AMADEUS with patient reported outcome scores in patients undergoing medial open-wedge high tibial valgus osteotomy (HTO). Furthermore, the arthroscopic ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) grade evaluation was tested for correlation with the AMADEUS classification system. Methods This retrospective, monocentric study found a total of 70 individuals that were indicated for HTO due to degenerative chondral defects of the medial compartment between 2008 and 2019. A preoperative MR image as well as a pre-osteotomy diagnostic arthroscopy for ICRS grade evaluation was mandatory for all patients. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) including its five subscale scores (KOOS-ADL, KOOS-QOL, KOOS-Sports, KOOS-Pain, KOOS-Symptoms) was obtained preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 41.2 ± 26.3 months. Preoperative chondral defects were evaluated using the AMADEUS classification system and the final AMADEUS scores were correlated with the pre- and postoperative KOOS subscale sores. Furthermore, arthroscopic ICRS defect severity was correlated with the AMADEUS classification system. Results There was a statistically significant correlation between the AMADEUS BME (bone marrow edema) subscore and the KOOS Symptoms subscore at the preoperative visit (r = 0.25, p = 0.04). No statistically significant monotonic association between the AMADEUS total score and the AMADEUS grade with pre- and postoperative KOOS subscale scores were found. Intraoperatively obtained ICRS grade did reveal a moderate correlative relation with the AMADEUS total score and the AMADEUS grade (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). Conclusions The novel AMADEUS classification system largely lacks correlative capacity with patient reported outcome measures in patients undergoing HTO. The MR tomographic appearance of bone marrow edema is the only parameter predictive of the clinical outcome at the preoperative visit.},
  language  = {en}
}