@article{GrunzWenigKunzetal.2020,
  author    = {Grunz, Jan-Peter and Wenig, Andreas Max and Kunz, Andreas Steven and Veyhl-Wichmann, Maike and Schmitt, Rainer and Gietzen, Carsten Herbert and Pennig, Lenhard and Herz, Stefan and Erg{\"u}n, S{\"u}leyman and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Gassenmaier, Tobias},
  title     = {3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT},
  series = {European Radiology Experimental},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {European Radiology Experimental},
  doi       = {10.1186/s41747-020-00177-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229877},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Elbow imaging is challenging with conventional multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), while cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides superior options. We compared intra-individually CBCT versus MDCT image quality in cadaveric elbows. Methods A twin robotic x-ray system with new CBCT mode and a high-resolution clinical MDCT were compared in 16 cadaveric elbows. Both systems were operated with a dedicated low-dose (LD) protocol (equivalent volume CT dose index [CTDI\(_{vol(16 cm)}\)] = 3.3 mGy) and a regular clinical scan dose (RD) protocol (CTDI\(_{vol(16 cm)}\) = 13.8 mGy). Image quality was evaluated by two radiologists (R1 and R2) on a seven-point Likert scale, and estimation of signal intensity in cancellous bone was conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics were used. Results The CBCT prototype provided superior subjective image quality compared to MDCT scans (for RD, p ≤ 0.004; for LD, p ≤ 0.001). Image quality was rated very good or excellent in 100\% of the cases by both readers for RD CBCT, 100\% (R1) and 93.8\% (R2) for LD CBCT, 62.6\% and 43.8\% for RD MDCT, and 0.0\% and 0.0\% for LD MDCT. Single-measure ICC was 0.95 (95\% confidence interval 0.91-0.97; p < 0.001). Software-based assessment supported subjective findings with less "undecided" pixels in CBCT than dose-equivalent MDCT (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between LD CBCT and RD MDCT. Conclusions In cadaveric elbow studies, the tested cone-beam CT prototype delivered superior image quality compared to high-end multidetector CT and showed a potential for considerable dose reduction.},
  language  = {en}
}