@article{StanglHaasEichneretal.2020, author = {Stangl, Stephanie and Haas, Kirsten and Eichner, Felizitas A. and Grau, Anna and Selig, Udo and Ludwig, Timo and Fehm, Tanja and St{\"u}bner, Tanja and Rashid, Asarnusch and Kerscher, Alexander and Bargou, Ralf and Hermann, Silke and Arndt, Volker and Meyer, Martin and Wildner, Manfred and Faller, Hermann and Schrauder, Michael G. and Weigel, Michael and Schlembach, Ulrich and Heuschmann, Peter U. and W{\"o}ckel, Achim}, title = {Development and proof-of-concept of a multicenter, patient-centered cancer registry for breast cancer patients with metastatic disease — the "Breast cancer care for patients with metastatic disease" (BRE-4-MED) registry}, series = {Pilot and Feasibility Studies}, volume = {6}, journal = {Pilot and Feasibility Studies}, doi = {10.1186/s40814-019-0541-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229149}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are treated with a palliative approach with focus oncontrolling for disease symptoms and maintaining high quality of life. Information on individual needs of patients andtheir relatives as well as on treatment patterns in clinical routine care for this specific patient group are lacking or arenot routinely documented in established Cancer Registries. Thus, we developed a registry concept specifically adaptedfor these incurable patients comprising primary and secondary data as well as mobile-health (m-health) data. Methods: The concept for patient-centered "Breast cancer care for patients with metastatic disease"(BRE-4-MED)registry was developed and piloted exemplarily in the region of Main-Franconia, a mainly rural region in Germanycomprising about 1.3 M inhabitants. The registry concept includes data on diagnosis, therapy, progression, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and needs of family members from several sources of information includingroutine data from established Cancer Registries in different federal states, treating physicians in hospital as well as inoutpatient settings, patients with metastatic breast cancer and their family members. Linkage with routine cancerregistry data was performed to collect secondary data on diagnosis, therapy, and progression. Paper and online-basedquestionnaires were used to assess PROMs. A dedicated mobile application software (APP) was developed to monitorneeds, progression, and therapy change of individual patients. Patient's acceptance and feasibility of data collection inclinical routine was assessed within a proof-of-concept study. Results: The concept for the BRE-4-MED registry was developed and piloted between September 2017 and May 2018.In total n= 31 patients were included in the pilot study, n= 22 patients were followed up after 1 month. Recordlinkage with the Cancer Registries of Bavaria and Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg demonstrated to be feasible. The voluntary APP/online questionnaire was used by n= 7 participants. The feasibility of the registry concept in clinical routine waspositively evaluated by the participating hospitals. Conclusion: The concept of the BRE-4-MED registry provides evidence that combinatorial evaluation of PROMs, needsof family members, and raising clinical parameters from primary and secondary data sources as well as m-healthapplications are feasible and accepted in an incurable cancer collective.}, language = {en} } @article{SchoenBerkingBiedermannetal.2020, author = {Sch{\"o}n, Michael P. and Berking, Carola and Biedermann, Tilo and Buhl, Timo and Erpenbeck, Luise and Eyerich, Kilian and Eyerich, Stefanie and Ghoreschi, Kamran and Goebeler, Matthias and Ludwig, Ralf J. and Sch{\"a}kel, Knut and Schilling, Bastian and Schlapbach, Christoph and Stary, Georg and von Stebut, Esther and Steinbrink, Kerstin}, title = {COVID-19 and immunological regulations - from basic and translational aspects to clinical implications}, series = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft}, volume = {18}, journal = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1111/ddg.14169}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218205}, pages = {795 -- 807}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has far-reaching direct and indirect medical consequences. These include both the course and treatment of diseases. It is becoming increasingly clear that infections with SARS-CoV-2 can cause considerable immunological alterations, which particularly also affect pathogenetically and/or therapeutically relevant factors. Against this background we summarize here the current state of knowledge on the interaction of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 with mediators of the acute phase of inflammation (TNF, IL-1, IL-6), type 1 and type 17 immune responses (IL-12, IL-23, IL-17, IL-36), type 2 immune reactions (IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IL-31, IgE), B-cell immunity, checkpoint regulators (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4), and orally druggable signaling pathways (JAK, PDE4, calcineurin). In addition, we discuss in this context non-specific immune modulation by glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate, antimalarial drugs, azathioprine, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil and fumaric acid esters, as well as neutrophil granulocyte-mediated innate immune mechanisms. From these recent findings we derive possible implications for the therapeutic modulation of said immunological mechanisms in connection with SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Although, of course, the greatest care should be taken with patients with immunologically mediated diseases or immunomodulating therapies, it appears that many treatments can also be carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic; some even appear to alleviate COVID-19.}, language = {en} } @article{HeuschmannMontellanoUngethuemetal.2021, author = {Heuschmann, Peter U. and Montellano, Felipe A. and Ungeth{\"u}m, Kathrin and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Wiedmann, Silke and Mackenrodt, Daniel and Quilitzsch, Anika and Ludwig, Timo and Kraft, Peter and Albert, Judith and Morbach, Caroline and Frantz, Stefan and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Haeusler, Karl Georg and Kleinschnitz, Christoph}, title = {Prevalence and determinants of systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction and heart failure in acute ischemic stroke patients: The SICFAIL study}, series = {ESC Heart Failure}, volume = {8}, journal = {ESC Heart Failure}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1002/ehf2.13145}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225656}, pages = {1117-1129}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Aims Ischaemic stroke (IS) might induce alterations of cardiac function. Prospective data on frequency of cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (HF) after IS are lacking. We assessed prevalence and determinants of diastolic dysfunction (DD), systolic dysfunction (SD), and HF in patients with acute IS. Methods and results The Stroke-Induced Cardiac FAILure in mice and men (SICFAIL) study is a prospective, hospital-based cohort study. Patients with IS underwent a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function in the acute phase (median 4 days after IS) including clinical examination, standardized transthoracic echocardiography by expert sonographers, and determination of blood-based biomarkers. Information on demographics, lifestyle, risk factors, symptoms suggestive of HF, and medical history was collected by a standardized personal interview. Applying current guidelines, cardiac dysfunction was classified based on echocardiographic criteria into SD (left ventricular ejection fraction < 52\% in men or <54\% in women) and DD (≥3 signs of DD in patients without SD). Clinically overt HF was classified into HF with reduced, mid-range, or preserved ejection fraction. Between January 2014 and February 2017, 696 IS patients were enrolled. Of them, patients with sufficient echocardiographic data on SD were included in the analyses {n = 644 patients [median age 71 years (interquartile range 60-78), 61.5\% male]}. In these patients, full assessment of DD was feasible in 549 patients without SD (94\%). Prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and HF was as follows: SD 9.6\% [95\% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-12.2\%]; DD in patients without SD 23.3\% (95\% CI 20.0-27.0\%); and clinically overt HF 5.4\% (95\% CI 3.9-7.5\%) with subcategories of HF with preserved ejection fraction 4.35\%, HF with mid-range ejection fraction 0.31\%, and HF with reduced ejection fraction 0.78\%. In multivariable analysis, SD and fulfilment of HF criteria were associated with history of coronary heart disease [SD: odds ratio (OR) 3.87, 95\% CI 1.93-7.75, P = 0.0001; HF: OR 2.29, 95\% CI 1.04-5.05, P = 0.0406] and high-sensitive troponin T at baseline (SD: OR 1.78, 95\% CI 1.31-2.42, P = 0.0003; HF: OR 1.66, 95\% CI 1.17-2.33, P = 0.004); DD was associated with older age (OR 1.08, 95\% CI 1.05-1.11, P < 0.0001) and treated hypertension vs. no hypertension (OR 2.84, 95\% CI 1.23-6.54, P = 0.0405). Conclusions A substantial proportion of the study population exhibited subclinical and clinical cardiac dysfunction. SICFAIL provides reliable data on prevalence and determinants of SD, DD, and clinically overt HF in patients with acute IS according to current guidelines, enabling further clarification of its aetiological and prognostic role.}, language = {en} }