@article{WirtzGraviusAscherletal.2014, author = {Wirtz, Dieter C. and Gravius, Sascha and Ascherl, Rudolf and Thorweihe, Miguel and Forst, Raimund and Noeth, Ulrich and Maus, Uwe M. and Wimmer, Matthias D. and Zeiler, Guenther and Deml, Moritz C.}, title = {Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem 5-to 16-year results of 163 cases}, series = {Acta Orthopaedica}, volume = {85}, journal = {Acta Orthopaedica}, number = {6}, issn = {1745-3674}, doi = {10.3109/17453674.2014.958809}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-114555}, pages = {562 - 569}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background and purpose - Due to the relative lack of reports on the medium- to long-term clinical and radiographic results of modular femoral cementless revision, we conducted this study to evaluate the medium- to long-term results of uncemented femoral stem revisions using the modular MRP-TITAN stem with distal diaphyseal fixation in a consecutive patient series. Patients and methods - We retrospectively analyzed 163 femoral stem revisions performed between 1993 and 2001 with a mean follow-up of 10 (5-16) years. Clinical assessment included the Harris hip score (HHS) with reference to comorbidities and femoral defect sizes classified by Charnley and Paprosky. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed and the failure rate of the MRP stem for any reason was examined. Results - Mean HHS improved up to the last follow-up (37 (SD 24) vs. 79 (SD 19); p < 0.001). 99 cases (61\%) had extensive bone defects (Paprosky IIB-III). Radiographic evaluation showed stable stem anchorage in 151 cases (93\%) at the last follow-up. 10 implants (6\%) failed for various reasons. Neither a breakage of a stem nor loosening of the morse taper junction was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a 10-year survival probability of 97\% (95\% CI: 95-100). Interpretation - This is one of the largest medium- to longterm analyses of cementless modular revision stems with distal diaphyseal anchorage. The modular MRP-TITAN was reliable, with a Kaplan-Meier survival probability of 97\% at 10 years.}, language = {en} } @article{HorasvanHerckMaieretal.2020, author = {Horas, Konstantin and van Herck, Ulrike and Maier, Gerrit S. and Maus, Uwe and Harrasser, Norbert and Jakob, Franz and Weissenberger, Manuel and Arnholdt, J{\"o}rg and Holzapfel, Boris M. and Rudert, Maximilian}, title = {Does vitamin D deficiency predict tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours? Data from a multi-center cohort analysis}, series = {Journal of Bone Oncology}, volume = {25}, journal = {Journal of Bone Oncology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100329}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230314}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Vitamin D deficiency is a global health concern that is estimated to afflict over one billion people globally. The major role of vitamin D is that of a regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism, thus, being essential for proper bone mineralisation. Concomitantly, vitamin D is known to exert numerous extra-skeletal actions. For example, it has become evident that vitamin D has direct anti-proliferative, pro-differentiation and pro-apoptotic actions on cancer cells. Hence, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased cancer risk and worse prognosis in several malignancies. We have recently demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency promotes secondary cancer growth in bone. These findings were partly attributable to an increase in bone remodelling but also through direct effects of vitamin D on cancer cells. To date, very little is known about vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess vitamin D status of patients with diverse bone tumours. Moreover, the aim was to elucidate whether or not there is an association between pre-diagnostic vitamin D status and tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours. In a multi-center analysis, 25(OH)D, PTH and calcium levels of 225 patients that presented with various bone tumours between 2017 and 2018 were assessed. Collectively, 76\% of all patients had insufficient vitamin D levels with a total mean 25(OH)D level of 21.43 ng/ml (53.58 nmol/L). In particular, 52\% (117/225) of patients were identified as vitamin D deficient and further 24\% of patients (55/225) were vitamin D insufficient. Notably, patients diagnosed with malignant bone tumours had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than patients diagnosed with benign bone tumours [19.3 vs. 22.75 ng/ml (48.25 vs. 56.86 nmol/L); p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found a widespread and distressing rate of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with bone tumours. However, especially for patients with bone tumours sufficient vitamin D levels seem to be of great importance. Thus, we believe that 25(OH)D status should routinely be monitored in these patients. Collectively, there should be an increased awareness for physicians to assess and if necessary correct vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general or of those at great risk of developing bone tumours.}, language = {en} }