@article{JordanJaeckleScheidtetal.2021,
  author    = {Jordan, Martin C. and J{\"a}ckle, Veronika and Scheidt, Sebastian and Gilbert, Fabian and H{\"o}lscher-Doht, Stefanie and Erg{\"u}n, S{\"u}leyman and Meffert, Rainer H. and Heintel, Timo M.},
  title     = {Trans-obturator cable fixation of open book pelvic injuries},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-021-92755-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-261212},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Operative treatment of ruptured pubic symphysis by plating is often accompanied by complications. Trans-obturator cable fixation might be a more reliable technique; however, have not yet been tested for stabilization of ruptured pubic symphysis. This study compares symphyseal trans-obturator cable fixation versus plating through biomechanical testing and evaluates safety in a cadaver experiment. APC type II injuries were generated in synthetic pelvic models and subsequently separated into three different groups. The anterior pelvic ring was fixed using a four-hole steel plate in Group A, a stainless steel cable in Group B, and a titan band in Group C. Biomechanical testing was conducted by a single-leg-stance model using a material testing machine under physiological load levels. A cadaver study was carried out to analyze the trans-obturator surgical approach. Peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, plastic deformation and stiffness revealed a tendency for higher stability for trans-obturator cable/band fixation but no statistical difference to plating was detected. The cadaver study revealed a safe zone for cable passage with sufficient distance to the obturator canal. Trans-obturator cable fixation has the potential to become an alternative for symphyseal fixation with less complications.},
  language  = {en}
}