@article{DaViaSolimandoGaritanoTrojaolaetal.2019,
  author    = {Da Vi{\`a}, Matteo Claudio and Solimando, Antonio Giovanni and Garitano-Trojaola, Andoni and Barrio, Santiago and Munawar, Umair and Strifler, Susanne and Haertle, Larissa and Rhodes, Nadine and Vogt, Cornelia and Lapa, Constantin and Beilhack, Andreas and Rasche, Leo and Einsele, Hermann and Kort{\"u}m, K. Martin},
  title     = {CIC Mutation as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Combined BRAF-MEK Inhibition in Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma with Central Nervous System Involvement},
  series = {The Oncologist},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {The Oncologist},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0356},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219549},
  pages     = {112-118},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Combined MEK-BRAF inhibition is a well-established treatment strategy in BRAF-mutated cancer, most prominently in malignant melanoma with durable responses being achieved through this targeted therapy. However, a subset of patients face primary unresponsiveness despite presence of the activating mutation at position V600E, and others acquire resistance under treatment. Underlying resistance mechanisms are largely unknown, and diagnostic tests to predict tumor response to BRAF-MEK inhibitor treatment are unavailable. Multiple myeloma represents the second most common hematologic malignancy, and point mutations in BRAF are detectable in about 10\% of patients. Targeted inhibition has been successfully applied, with mixed responses observed in a substantial subset of patients mirroring the widespread spatial heterogeneity in this genomically complex disease. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is an extremely rare, extramedullary form of multiple myeloma that can be diagnosed in less than 1\% of patients. It is considered an ultimate high-risk feature, associated with unfavorable cytogenetics, and, even with intense treatment applied, survival is short, reaching less than 12 months in most cases. Here we not only describe the first patient with an extramedullary CNS relapse responding to targeted dabrafenib and trametinib treatment, we furthermore provide evidence that a point mutation within the capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) gene mediated the acquired resistance in this patient.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MohmeSchmalzingMuelleretal.2020,
  author    = {Mohme, Sophia and Schmalzing, Marc and M{\"u}ller, Cornelia S.L. and Vogt, Thomas and Goebeler, Matthias and Stoevesandt, Johanna},
  title     = {Immunizations in immunocompromised patients: a guide for dermatologists},
  series = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1111/ddg.14156},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-217982},
  pages     = {699 -- 723},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The increasingly frequent use of immunomodulatory agents in dermatology requires the observance of specific recommendations for immunization. These recommendations are developed and regularly updated by the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), an independent advisory group at the Robert Koch Institute. Dermatological patients on immunosuppressive treatment should ideally receive all vaccinations included in the standard immunization schedule. Additionally, it is recommended that they also undergo vaccination against the seasonal flu, pneumococci, and herpes zoster (inactivated herpes zoster subunit vaccine for patients ≥ 50 years). Additional immunizations against Haemophilus influenzae type B, hepatitis B and meningococci may be indicated depending on individual comorbidities and exposure risk. Limitations of use, specific contraindications and intervals to be observed between vaccination and immunosuppression depend on the immunosuppressive agent used and its dosing. Only under certain conditions may live-attenuated vaccines be administered in patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Given its strong suppressive effect on the humoral immune response, no vaccines - except for flu shots - should be given within six months after rituximab therapy. This CME article presents current recommendations on immunization in immunocompromised individuals, with a special focus on dermatological patients. Its goal is to enable readers to provide competent counseling and to initiate necessary immunizations in this vulnerable patient group.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MunawarZhouPrommersbergeretal.2023,
  author    = {Munawar, Umair and Zhou, Xiang and Prommersberger, Sabrina and Nerreter, Silvia and Vogt, Cornelia and Steinhardt, Maximilian J. and Truger, Marietta and Mersi, Julia and Teufel, Eva and Han, Seungbin and Haertle, Larissa and Banholzer, Nicole and Eiring, Patrick and Danhof, Sophia and Navarro-Aguadero, Miguel Angel and Fernandez-Martin, Adrian and Ortiz-Ruiz, Alejandra and Barrio, Santiago and Gallardo, Miguel and Valeri, Antonio and Castellano, Eva and Raab, Peter and Rudert, Maximilian and Haferlach, Claudia and Sauer, Markus and Hudecek, Michael and Martinez-Lopez, J. and Waldschmidt, Johannes and Einsele, Hermann and Rasche, Leo and Kort{\"u}m, K. Martin},
  title     = {Impaired FADD/BID signaling mediates cross-resistance to immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma},
  series = {Communications Biology},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Communications Biology},
  doi       = {10.1038/s42003-023-05683-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357609},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The treatment landscape in multiple myeloma (MM) is shifting from genotoxic drugs to immunotherapies. Monoclonal antibodies, immunoconjugates, T-cell engaging antibodies and CART cells have been incorporated into routine treatment algorithms, resulting in improved response rates. Nevertheless, patients continue to relapse and the underlying mechanisms of resistance remain poorly understood. While Impaired death receptor signaling has been reported to mediate resistance to CART in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, this mechanism yet remains to be elucidated in context of novel immunotherapies for MM. Here, we describe impaired death receptor signaling as a novel mechanism of resistance to T-cell mediated immunotherapies in MM. This resistance seems exclusive to novel immunotherapies while sensitivity to conventional anti-tumor therapies being preserved in vitro. As a proof of concept, we present a confirmatory clinical case indicating that the FADD/BID axis is required for meaningful responses to novel immunotherapies thus we report impaired death receptor signaling as a novel resistance mechanism to T-cell mediated immunotherapy in MM.},
  language  = {en}
}