@article{EckardtStasikKrameretal.2021,
  author    = {Eckardt, Jan-Niklas and Stasik, Sebastian and Kramer, Michael and R{\"o}llig, Christoph and Kr{\"a}mer, Alwin and Scholl, Sebastian and Hochhaus, Andreas and Crysandt, Martina and Br{\"u}mmendorf, Tim H. and Naumann, Ralph and Steffen, Bj{\"o}rn and Kunzmann, Volker and Einsele, Hermann and Schaich, Markus and Burchert, Andreas and Neubauer, Andreas and Sch{\"a}fer-Eckart, Kerstin and Schliemann, Christoph and Krause, Stefan W. and Herbst, Regina and H{\"a}nel, Mathias and Frickhofen, Norbert and Noppeney, Richard and Kaiser, Ulrich and Baldus, Claudia D. and Kaufmann, Martin and R{\´a}cil, Zdenek and Platzbecker, Uwe and Berdel, Wolfgang E. and Mayer, Jiř{\´i} and Serve, Hubert and M{\"u}ller-Tidow, Carsten and Ehninger, Gerhard and St{\"o}lzel, Friedrich and Kroschinsky, Frank and Schetelig, Johannes and Bornh{\"a}user, Martin and Thiede, Christian and Middeke, Jan Moritz},
  title     = {Loss-of-function mutations of BCOR are an independent marker of adverse outcomes in intensively treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13092095},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236735},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by recurrent genetic events. The BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) and its homolog, the BCL6 corepressor-like 1 (BCORL1), have been reported to be rare but recurrent mutations in AML. Previously, smaller studies have reported conflicting results regarding impacts on outcomes. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of 1529 patients with newly diagnosed and intensively treated AML. BCOR and BCORL1 mutations were found in 71 (4.6\%) and 53 patients (3.5\%), respectively. Frequently co-mutated genes were DNTM3A, TET2 and RUNX1. Mutated BCORL1 and loss-of-function mutations of BCOR were significantly more common in the ELN2017 intermediate-risk group. Patients harboring loss-of-function mutations of BCOR had a significantly reduced median event-free survival (HR = 1.464 (95\%-Confidence Interval (CI): 1.005-2.134), p = 0.047), relapse-free survival (HR = 1.904 (95\%-CI: 1.163-3.117), p = 0.01), and trend for reduced overall survival (HR = 1.495 (95\%-CI: 0.990-2.258), p = 0.056) in multivariable analysis. Our study establishes a novel role for loss-of-function mutations of BCOR regarding risk stratification in AML, which may influence treatment allocation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AngerDoeringvanDametal.2021,
  author    = {Anger, Friedrich and D{\"o}ring, Anna and van Dam, Jacob and Lock, Johann Frisco and Klein, Ingo and Bittrich, Max and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin and Kunzmann, Volker and van Eijck, Casper and L{\"o}b, Stefan},
  title     = {Impact of Borderline Resectability in Pancreatic Head Cancer on Patient Survival: Biology Matters According to the New International Consensus Criteria},
  series = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1068-9265},
  doi       = {10.1245/s10434-020-09100-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235251},
  pages     = {2325-2336},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background International consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important. Methods Patients' tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed. Results A total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS. Conclusions Preoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable.},
  language  = {en}
}