@article{LinhardtZiebuhrMeyeretal.1992, author = {Linhardt, F. and Ziebuhr, W. and Meyer, P. and Witte, W. and Hacker, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments as a tool for the epidemiological analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-59811}, year = {1992}, abstract = {Thirtccn StttJ1hylococcus dw·eus and s: <'pid<'l'· midis strains ohtaincd from nnsc and hand nf twn cmployccs and onc paticnt uf a mcdical ward as weil as two S. hemol.\"licus strains wcrc analyscd according to thcir rcstrktion fmgmcnt lcngth pattcrns ( RFLP) hy pulscd-ficld gcl clcctrophorcsis (PFGE) using thc rcslriction cnzymcs SmaJ and s.. .· tll. Spccics idcntification nf thc isolatcs was pcrformcd hy a systcm which includcs :!O hiochcmical rc"ctions. Furthcrmorc. thc antillintic resistancc pattcrns of thc stmins wcrc dctcrmincd. Whilc scvcral isolatcs cxhihitcd idcnticaf antihiotic susccptihilitics and hiochcmical prnfilcs. diffcrences in thc RFLP wcrc ohtaincd. ln thrcc cascs, S. epiderm{\"u}lis strains colonizing thc skin showcd an idcntical rcstriction profilc as isollltcs from thc mucous mcmhrancs of thc samc pcrson. Wc C(mcludcd that thc analysis of staphylococcal strains hy PFGE is an important cpidcmiolngical tnnl with high discrimination power.}, subject = {Infektionsbiologie}, language = {en} } @article{EdgecockCarettaDavenneetal.2013, author = {Edgecock, T. R. and Caretta, O. and Davenne, T. and Densam, C. and Fitton, M. and Kelliher, D. and Loveridge, P. and Machida, S. and Prior, C. and Rogers, C. and Rooney, M. and Thomason, J. and Wilcox, D. and Wildner, E. and Efthymiopoulos, I. and Garoby, R. and Gilardoni, S. and Hansen, C. and Benedetto, E. and Jensen, E. and Kosmicki, A. and Martini, M. and Osborne, J. and Prior, G. and Stora, T. and Melo Mendonca, T. and Vlachoudis, V. and Waaijer, C. and Cupial, P. and Chanc{\´e}, A. and Longhin, A. and Payet, J. and Zito, M. and Baussan, E. and Bobeth, C. and Bouquerel, E. and Dracos, M. and Gaudiot, G. and Lepers, B. and Osswald, F. and Poussot, P. and Vassilopoulos, N. and Wurtz, J. and Zeter, V. and Bielski, J. and Kozien, M. and Lacny, L. and Skoczen, B. and Szybinski, B. and Ustrycka, A. and Wroblewski, A. and Marie-Jeanne, M. and Balint, P. and Fourel, C. and Giraud, J. and Jacob, J. and Lamy, T. and Latrasse, L. and Sortais, P. and Thuillier, T. and Mitrofanov, S. and Loiselet, M. and Keutgen, Th. and Delbar, Th. and Debray, F. and Trophine, C. and Veys, S. and Daversin, C. and Zorin, V. and Izotov, I. and Skalyga, V. and Burt, G. and Dexter, A. C. and Kravchuk, V. L. and Marchi, T. and Cinausero, M. and Gramegna, F. and De Angelis, G. and Prete, G. and Collazuol, G. and Laveder, M. and Mazzocco, M. and Mezzetto, M. and Signorini, C. and Vardaci, E. and Di Nitto, A. and Brondi, A. and La Rana, G. and Migliozzi, P. and Moro, R. and Palladino, V. and Gelli, N. and Berkovits, D. and Hass, M. and Hirsh, T. Y. and Schuhmann, M. and Stahl, A. and Wehner, J. and Bross, A. and Kopp, J. and Neuffer, D. and Wands, R. and Bayes, R. and Laing, A. and Soler, P. and Agarwalla, S. K. and Cervera Villanueva, A. and Donini, A. and Ghosh, T. and G{\´o}mez Cadenas, J. J. and Hern{\´a}ndez, P. and Mart{\´i}n-Albo, J. and Mena, O. and Burguet-Castell, J. and Agostino, L. and Buizza-Avanzini, M. and Marafini, M. and Patzak, T. and Tonazzo, A. and Duchesneau, D. and Mosca, L. and Bogomilov, M. and Karadzhov, Y. and Matev, R. and Tsenov, R. and Akhmedov, E. and Blennow, M. and Lindner, M. and Schwetz, T. and Fern{\´a}ndez Martinez, E. and Maltoni, M. and Men{\´e}ndez, J. and Giunti, C. and Gonz{\´a}lez Garc{\´i}a, M. C. and Salvado, J. and Coloma, P. and Huber, P. and Li, T. and L{\´o}pez Pav{\´o}n, J. and Orme, C. and Pascoli, S. and Meloni, D. and Tang, J. and Winter, W. and Ohlsson, T. and Zhang, H. and Scotto-Lavina, L. and Terranova, F. and Bonesini, M. and Tortora, L. and Alekou, A. and Aslaninejad, M. and Bontoiu, C. and Kurup, A. and Jenner, L. J. and Long, K. and Pasternak, J. and Pozimski, J. and Back, J. J. and Harrison, P. and Beard, K. and Bogacz, A. and Berg, J. S. and Stratakis, D. and Witte, H. and Snopok, P. and Bliss, N. and Cordwell, M. and Moss, A. and Pattalwar, S. and Apollonio, M.}, title = {High intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe}, series = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, volume = {16}, journal = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.021002}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126611}, pages = {21002}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Frejus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of mu(+) and mu(-) beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt magnetized iron neutrino detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular He-6 and Ne-18, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Frejus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.}, language = {en} } @article{GrafRahmatiMajorosetal.2022, author = {Graf, J{\"u}rgen and Rahmati, Vahid and Majoros, Myrtill and Witte, Otto W. and Geis, Christian and Kiebel, Stefan J. and Holthoff, Knut and Kirmse, Knut}, title = {Network instability dynamics drive a transient bursting period in the developing hippocampus in vivo}, series = {eLife}, volume = {11}, journal = {eLife}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.82756}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300906}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Spontaneous correlated activity is a universal hallmark of immature neural circuits. However, the cellular dynamics and intrinsic mechanisms underlying network burstiness in the intact developing brain are largely unknown. Here, we use two-photon Ca\(^{2+}\) imaging to comprehensively map the developmental trajectories of spontaneous network activity in the hippocampal area CA1 of mice in vivo. We unexpectedly find that network burstiness peaks after the developmental emergence of effective synaptic inhibition in the second postnatal week. We demonstrate that the enhanced network burstiness reflects an increased functional coupling of individual neurons to local population activity. However, pairwise neuronal correlations are low, and network bursts (NBs) recruit CA1 pyramidal cells in a virtually random manner. Using a dynamic systems modeling approach, we reconcile these experimental findings and identify network bi-stability as a potential regime underlying network burstiness at this age. Our analyses reveal an important role of synaptic input characteristics and network instability dynamics for NB generation. Collectively, our data suggest a mechanism, whereby developing CA1 performs extensive input-discrimination learning prior to the onset of environmental exploration.}, language = {en} }