@article{HerzbergDornTrummetal.2022,
  author    = {Herzberg, Moriz and Dorn, Franziska and Trumm, Christoph and Kellert, Lars and Tiedt, Steffen and Feil, Katharina and K{\"u}pper, Clemens and Wollenweber, Frank and Liebig, Thomas and Zimmermann, Hanna},
  title     = {Middle cerebral artery M2 thrombectomy: safety and technical considerations in the German Stroke Registry (GSR)},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {15},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm11154619},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286052},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {There is ongoing debate concerning the safety and efficacy of various mechanical thrombectomy (MT) approaches for M2 occlusions. We compared these for MT in M2 versus M1 occlusions. Subgroup analyses of different technical approaches within the M2 MT cohort were also performed. Patients were included from the German Stroke Registry (GSR), a multicenter registry of consecutive MT patients. Primary outcomes were reperfusion success events. Secondary outcomes were early clinical improvement (improvement in NIHSS score > 4) and independent survival at 90 days (mRS 0-2). Out of 3804 patients, 2689 presented with M1 (71\%) and 1115 with isolated M2 occlusions (29\%). The mean age was 76 (CI 65-82) and 77 (CI 66-83) years, respectively. Except for baseline NIHSS (15 (CI 10-18) vs. 11 (CI 6-16), p < 0.001) and ASPECTS (9 (CI 7-10) vs. 9 (CI 8-10, p < 0.001), baseline demographics were balanced. Apart from a more frequent use of dedicated small vessel stent retrievers (svSR) in M2 (17.4\% vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), intraprocedural aspects were balanced. There was no difference in ICH at 24 h (11\%; p = 1.0), adverse events (14.4\% vs. 18.1\%; p = 0.63), clinical improvement (62.5\% vs. 61.4 \%; p = 0.57), mortality (26.9\% vs. 22.9\%; p = 0.23). In M2 MT, conventional stent retriever (cSR) achieved higher rates of mTICI3 (54.0\% vs. 37.7-42.0\%; p < 0.001), requiring more MT-maneuvers (7, CI 2-8) vs. 2 (CI 2-7)/(CI 2-2); p < 0.001) and without impact on efficacy and outcome. Real-life MT in M2 can be performed with equal safety and efficacy as in M1 occlusions. Different recanalization techniques including the use of svSR did not result in significant differences regarding safety, efficacy and outcome.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerzbergScherlingStahletal.2021,
  author    = {Herzberg, Moritz and Scherling, Korbinian and Stahl, Robert and Tiedt, Steffen and Wollenweber, Frank A. and K{\"u}pper, Clemens and Feil, Katharina and Forbrig, Robert and Patzig, Maximilian and Kellert, Lars and Kunz, Wolfgang G. and Reidler, Paul and Zimmermann, Hanna and Liebig, Thomas and Dieterich, Marianne and Dorn, Franziska},
  title     = {Late Thrombectomy in Clinical Practice: Retrospective Application of DAWN/DEFUSE3 Criteria within the German Stroke Registry},
  series = {Clinical Neuroradiology},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {Clinical Neuroradiology},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00062-021-01033-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264765},
  pages     = {799-810},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background and Purpose To provide real-world data on outcome and procedural factors of late thrombectomy patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients from the multicenter German Stroke Registry. The primary endpoint was clinical outcome on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months. Trial-eligible patients and the subgroups were compared to the ineligible group. Secondary analyses included multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of good outcome (mRS ≤ 2). Results Of 1917 patients who underwent thrombectomy, 208 (11\%) were treated within a time window ≥ 6-24 h and met the baseline trial criteria. Of these, 27 patients (13\%) were eligible for DAWN and 39 (19\%) for DEFUSE3 and 156 patients were not eligible for DAWN or DEFUSE3 (75\%), mainly because there was no perfusion imaging (62\%; n = 129). Good outcome was not significantly higher in trial-ineligible (27\%) than in trial-eligible (20\%) patients (p = 0.343). Patients with large trial-ineligible CT perfusion imaging (CTP) lesions had significantly more hemorrhagic complications (33\%) as well as unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion In clinical practice, the high number of patients with a good clinical outcome after endovascular therapy ≥ 6-24 h as in DAWN/DEFUSE3 could not be achieved. Similar outcomes are seen in patients selected for EVT ≥ 6 h based on factors other than CTP. Patients triaged without CTP showed trends for shorter arrival to reperfusion times and higher rates of independence.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BohmannKurkaduMesnildeRochemontetal.2019,
  author    = {Bohmann, Ferdinand O. and Kurka, Natalia and du Mesnil de Rochemont, Richard and Gruber, Katharina and Guenther, Joachim and Rostek, Peter and Rai, Heike and Zickler, Philipp and Ertl, Michael and Berlis, Ansgar and Poli, Sven and Mengel, Annerose and Ringleb, Peter and Nagel, Simon and Pfaff, Johannes and Wollenweber, Frank A. and Kellert, Lars and Herzberg, Moriz and Koehler, Luzie and Haeusler, Karl Georg and Alegiani, Anna and Schubert, Charlotte and Brekenfeld, Caspar and Doppler, Christopher E. J. and Onur, Oezguer A. and Kabbasch, Christoph and Manser, Tanja and Pfeilschifter, Waltraud},
  title     = {Simulation-based training of the rapid evaluation and management of acute stroke (STREAM) — a prospective single-arm multicenter trial},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2019.00969},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-369239},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Acute stroke care delivered by interdisciplinary teams is time-sensitive. Simulation-based team training is a promising tool to improve team performance in medical operations. It has the potential to improve process times, team communication, patient safety, and staff satisfaction. We aim to assess whether a multi-level approach consisting of a stringent workflow revision based on peer-to-peer review and 2-3 one-day in situ simulation trainings can improve acute stroke care processing times in high volume neurocenters within a 6 months period. Methods and Analysis: The trial is being carried out in a pre-test-post-test design at 7 tertiary care university hospital neurocenters in Germany. The intervention is directed at the interdisciplinary multiprofessional stroke teams. Before and after the intervention, process times of all direct-to-center stroke patients receiving IV thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) will be recorded. The primary outcome measure will be the "door-to-needle" time of all consecutive stroke patients directly admitted to the neurocenters who receive IVT. Secondary outcome measures will be intervention-related process times of the fraction of patients undergoing EVT and effects on team communication, perceived patient safety, and staff satisfaction via a staff questionnaire. Interventions: We are applying a multi-level intervention in cooperation with three "STREAM multipliers" from each center. First step is a central meeting of the multipliers at the sponsor's institution with the purposes of algorithm review in a peer-to-peer process that is recorded in a protocol and an introduction to the principles of simulation training and debriefing as well as crew resource management and team communication. Thereafter, the multipliers cooperate with the stroke team trainers from the sponsor's institution to plan and execute 2-3 one-day simulation courses in situ in the emergency department and CT room of the trial centers whereupon they receive teaching materials to perpetuate the trainings. Clinical Trial Registration: STREAM is a registered trial at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03228251.},
  language  = {en}
}