@article{KuzkinaRoessleSegeretal.2023,
  author    = {Kuzkina, A. and R{\"o}ßle, J. and Seger, A. and Panzer, C. and Kohl, A. and Maltese, V. and Musacchio, T. and Blaschke, S. J. and Tamg{\"u}ney, G. and Kaulitz, S. and Rak, K. and Scherzad, A. and Zimmermann, P. H. and Klussmann, J. P. and Hackenberg, S. and Volkmann, J. and Sommer, C. and Sommerauer, M. and Doppler, K.},
  title     = {Combining skin and olfactory α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAA)—towards biomarker-driven phenotyping in synucleinopathies},
  series = {npj Parkinson's Disease},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {npj Parkinson's Disease},
  issn      = {2373-8057},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41531-023-00519-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357687},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Seed amplification assays (SAA) are becoming commonly used in synucleinopathies to detect α-synuclein aggregates. Studies in Parkinson's disease (PD) and isolated REM-sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) have shown a considerably lower sensitivity in the olfactory epithelium than in CSF or skin. To get an insight into α-synuclein (α-syn) distribution within the nervous system and reasons for low sensitivity, we compared SAA assessment of nasal brushings and skin biopsies in PD (n = 27) and iRBD patients (n = 18) and unaffected controls (n = 30). α-syn misfolding was overall found less commonly in the olfactory epithelium than in the skin, which could be partially explained by the nasal brushing matrix exerting an inhibitory effect on aggregation. Importantly, the α-syn distribution was not uniform: there was a higher deposition of misfolded α-syn across all sampled tissues in the iRBD cohort compared to PD (supporting the notion of RBD as a marker of a more malignant subtype of synucleinopathy) and in a subgroup of PD patients, misfolded α-syn was detectable only in the olfactory epithelium, suggestive of the recently proposed brain-first PD subtype. Assaying α-syn of diverse origins, such as olfactory (part of the central nervous system) and skin (peripheral nervous system), could increase diagnostic accuracy and allow better stratification of patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JordanZimmermannGhoetal.2016,
  author    = {Jordan, Martin C. and Zimmermann, Christina and Gho, Sheridan A. and Frey, S{\"o}nke P. and Blunk, Torsten and Meffert, Rainer H. and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie},
  title     = {Biomechanical analysis of different osteosyntheses and the combination with bone substitute in tibial head depression fractures},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  number    = {287},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-016-1118-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-161201},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Tibial head depression fractures demand a high level of fracture stabilization to prevent a secondary loss of reduction after surgery. Elderly individuals are at an increased risk of developing these fractures, and biomechanical investigations of the fractures are rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically analyze different types of osteosyntheses in combination with two commonly used bone substitutes. Methods Lateral tibial head depression fractures were created in synthetic bones. After reduction, the fractures were stabilized with eight different treatment options of osteosynthesis alone or in combination with a bone substitute. Two screws, 4 screws and a lateral buttress plate were investigated. As a bone substitute, two common clinically used calcium phosphate cements, Norian® Drillable and ChronOS™ Inject, were applied. Displacement of the articular fracture fragment (mm) during cyclic loading, stiffness (N/mm) and maximum load (N) in Load-to-Failure tests were measured. Results The three different osteosyntheses (Group 1: 2 screws, group 2: 4 screws, group 3: plate) alone revealed a significantly higher displacement compared to the control group (Group 7: ChronOS™ Inject only) (Group 1, 7 [p < 0.01]; group 2, 7 [p = 0.04]; group 3, 7 [p < 0.01]). However, the osteosyntheses in combination with bone substitute exhibited no differences in displacement compared to the control group. The buttress plate demonstrated a higher normalized maximum load than the 2 and 4 screw osteosynthesis. Comparing the two different bone substitutes to each other, ChronOS™ inject had a significantly higher stiffness and lower displacement than Norian® Drillable. Conclusions The highest biomechanical stability under maximal loading was provided by a buttress plate osteosynthesis. A bone substitute, such as the biomechanically favorable ChronOS™ Inject, is essential to reduce the displacement under lower loading.},
  language  = {en}
}