@phdthesis{Wiesner2020, author = {Wiesner, Miriam}, title = {Stem Cell-based Adipose Tissue Engineering - Engineering of Prevascularized Adipose Tissue Constructs In Vitro \& Investigation on Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication in Adipose-derived Stem Cells}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-18500}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-185005}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In reconstructive and plastic surgery, there exists a growing demand of adequate tissue implants, since currently available strategies for autologous transplantation are limited by complications including transplant failure and donor site morbidity. By developing in vitro and in vivo autologous substitutes for defective tissue sites, adipose tissue engineering can address these challenges, although there are several obstacles to overcome. One of the major limitations is the sufficient vascularization of in vitro engineered large constructs that remains crucial and demanding for functional tissues. Decellularized jejunal segments may represent a suitable scaffolding system with preexisting capillary structures that can be repopulated with human microvascular endothelial cells (hMVECs), and a luminal matrix applicable for the adipogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs). Hence, co-culture of these cells in jejunal segments, utilizing a custom-made bioreactor system, was characterized in terms of vascularization and adipose tissue development. Substantial adipogenesis of hASCs was demonstrated within the jejunal lumen in contrast to non-induced controls, and the increase of key adipogenic markers was verified over time upon induction. The development of major extracellular matrix components of mature adipose tissue, such as laminin and collagen IV, was shown within the scaffold in induced samples. Successful reseeding of the vascular network with hMVECs was demonstrated in long-term culture and co-localization of vascular structures and adipogenically differentiated hASCs was observed. Therefore, these results represent a novel approach for in vitro engineering of vascularized adipose tissue constructs that warrants further investigations in preclinical studies. Another still existing obstacle in adipose tissue engineering is the insufficient knowledge about the applied cells, for instance the understanding of how cells can be optimally expanded and differentiated for successful engineering of tissue transplants. Even though hASCs can be easily isolated from liposuction of abdominal fat depots, yielding low donor site morbidity, huge numbers of cells are required to entirely seed complex and large 3D matrices or scaffolds. Thus, cells need to be large-scale expanded in vitro on the premise of not losing their differentiation capacity caused by replicative aging. Accordingly, an improved differentiation of hASCs in adipose tissue engineering approaches remains still desirable since most engineered constructs exhibit an inhomogeneous differentiation pattern. For mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), it has been shown that growth factor application can lead to a significant improvement of both proliferation and differentiation capacity. Especially basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) represents a potent mitogen for MSCs, while maintaining or even promoting their osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential. As there are currently different contradictory information present in literature about the applied bFGF concentration and the explicit effect of bFGF on ASC differentiation, here, the effect of bFGF on hASC proliferation and differentiation capacity was investigated at different concentrations and time points in 2D culture. Preculture of hASCs with bFGF prior to adipogenic induction showed a remarkable effect, whereas administration of bFGF during culture did not improve adipogenic differentiation capacity. Furthermore, the observations indicated as mode of action an impact of this preculture on cell proliferation capacity, resulting in increased cellular density at the time of adipogenic induction. The difference in cell density at this time point appeared to be pivotal for increased adipogenic capacity of the cells, which was confirmed in a further experiment employing different seeding densities. Interestingly, furthermore, the obtained results suggested a cell-cell contact-mediated mechanism positively influencing adipogenic differentiation. As a consequence, subsequently, studies were conducted focusing on intercellular communication of these cells, which has hardly been investigated to date. Despite the multitude of literature on the differentiation capacity of ASCs, little is reported about the physiological properties contributing to and controlling the process of lineage differentiation. Direct intercellular communication between adjacent cells via gap junctions has been shown to modulate differentiation processes in other cell types, with connexin 43 (Cx43) being the most abundant isoform of the gap junction-forming connexins. Thus, in the present study we focused on the expression of Cx43 and gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in hASCs, and its significance for adipogenic differentiation of these cells. Cx43 expression in hASCs was demonstrated histologically and on the gene and protein expression level and was shown to be greatly positively influenced by cell seeding density. Functionality of gap junctions was proven by dye transfer analysis in growth medium. Adipogenic differentiation of hASCs was shown to be also distinctly elevated at higher cell seeding densities. Inhibition of GJIC by 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid significantly compromised adipogenic differentiation, as demonstrated by histology, triglyceride quantification, and adipogenic marker gene expression. Flow cytometry analysis showed a lower proportion of cells undergoing adipogenesis when GJIC was inhibited, further indicating the importance of GJIC in the differentiation process. Altogether, these results demonstrate the impact of direct cell-cell communication via gap junctions on the adipogenic differentiation process of hASCs and may contribute to further integrate direct intercellular crosstalk in rationales for tissue engineering approaches.}, subject = {Tissue Engineering}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Koschitzki2020, author = {Koschitzki, Kim Christine Cornelia}, title = {Evaluation of preclinical animal models in bone tissue engineering and their success in clinical translation}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-20759}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-207593}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Autologous bone still represents today's gold standard for the treatment of critical size bone defects and fracture non-unions despite associated disadvantages regarding limitations in availability, donor site morbidity, costs and efficacy. Bone tissue engineered constructs would present a promising alternative to currently available treatments. However, research on preclinical animal studies still fails to provide clinical applicable results able to allow the replacement of currently applied methods. It seems that the idea of bone tissue engineering, which has now been integral part of academic studies for over 30 years, got somehow stuck at an intermediate level, in between intense preclinical research and striven stages of initial clinical trial phases. A clear discrepancy exists between the number of studies with preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering and the number of clinically approved bone tissue engineered constructs available to patients. The aim of this thesis was hence to evaluate preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering as well as the perception of scientists and clinicians towards these models. Moreover, the general role of bone tissue engineering and its clinical need assessed by scientists and surgeons was investigated. A survey was conducted questioning both scientific and clinical opinions on currently available study designs and researchers' satisfaction with preclinical animal models. Additionally, a literature research was conducted, resulting in 167 papers from the last 10 years that report current designs of preclinical orthotopic animal studies in bone tissue engineering. Thereby, the focus lied on the description of the models regarding animal species, strain, age, gender and defect design. The outcome of the literature search was evaluated and compared to the outcome obtained from the survey. The survey data revealed that both scientists and surgeons generally remain positive about the future role of bone tissue engineering and its step to clinical translation, at least in the distant future, where it then might replace the current gold standard, autologous bone. Moreover, most of the participants considered preclinical animal models as relevant and well developed but the results as not yet realizable in the clinics. Surgeons thereby demonstrated a slightly more optimistic perception of currently conducted research with animal models compared to scientists. However, a rather inconsistent description of present preclinical study designs could be discerned when evaluating the reported study designs in the survey and the papers of the literature search. Indeed, defining an appropriate animal species, strain, age, gender, observation time, observation method and surgical design often depends on different indications and research questions and represents a highly challenging task for the establishment of a preclinical animal model. The existing lack of valid guidelines for preclinical testing of bone tissue engineering leads hence to a lack of well standardized preclinical animal models. Moreover, still existing knowledge gaps regarding aspects that affect the process of fracture healing, such as vascularization or immunological aspects, were found to hinder clinical translation of bone tissue engineered constructs. Using literature review and survey, this thesis points out critical issues that need to be addressed to allow clinical translation of bone tissue engineered constructs. It can be concluded that currently existing study designs with preclinical animal models cannot live up to the claim of providing suitable results for clinical implementation. The here presented comprehensive summary of currently used preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering reveals a missing consensus on the usage of models such as an apparent lack of reporting and standardization regarding the study designs described in both papers from the literature review and the survey. It thereby indicates a crucial need to improve preclinical animal models in order to allow clinical translation. Despite the fact that participants of the survey generally revealed a positive perception towards the use of bone tissue engineered constructs and affirmed the clinical need for such novel designs, the missing standardization constitutes a main weak point for the provision of reliable study outcome and the translational success of the models. The optimization of reproducibility and reliability, as well as the further understanding of ongoing mechanisms in bone healing in order to develop effective tissue engineered constructs, need to form the basis of all study designs. The study outcomes might then fulfill the requirements of maybe today's and hopefully tomorrow's aging population.}, language = {en} }