@phdthesis{Daub2023,
  author    = {Daub, Jonas},
  title     = {Der Einfluss von Alter und {\"A}ngstlichkeit auf die Furchtgeneralisierung und die Aufmerksamkeitslenkung bei gesunden Kindern und Jugendlichen},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-30010},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300100},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Mittels einer klinischen Studie wurden die Furchtgeneralisierung und Aufmerksamkeitslenkung von 44 gesunden Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 9-17 Jahren untersucht. Eine {\"U}bergeneralisierung konditionierter Furcht sowie ver{\"a}nderte Aufmerksamkeitsprozesse werden in zahlreichen Arbeiten mit der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von Angsterkrankungen in Verbindung gebracht. Der Hauptteil der Forschung beschr{\"a}nkte sich bislang auf die Untersuchung von erwachsenen Probanden. Da Angsterkrankungen jedoch h{\"a}ufig bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter entstehen und sich in der Erforschung psychiatrischer Erkrankungen zunehmend eine dimensionale Betrachtungsweise durchsetzt, bestand das Ziel der Studie darin, etwaige Alterseffekte und den Einfluss der {\"A}ngstlichkeit auf die genannten Ph{\"a}nomene bei gesunden Probanden zu untersuchen. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wurde ein potentiell pr{\"a}ventiver Ansatz erforscht. Im Ergebnis zeigten sich in den Gruppenvergleichen keine relevanten Differenzen. Interessanterweise deutete sich in der Gruppe der {\"a}lteren Probanden entgegen der Erwartung eine verst{\"a}rkte Furchtgeneralisierung an, die wom{\"o}glich mit einer ver{\"a}nderten Beziehung zu Furcht und Risiko in der Adoleszenz zusammenh{\"a}ngt. Aus den Befunden ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit weiterer, prospektiver Arbeiten, um unser Verst{\"a}ndnis der {\"A}tiologie von Angsterkrankungen zu verbessern. Weiterhin ist noch offen, inwiefern es sich bei der {\"U}bergeneralisierung und einer ver{\"a}nderten Aufmerksamkeitslenkung um Risikofaktoren f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Angsterkrankungen oder vielmehr um Epiph{\"a}nomene handelt, die erst mit Ausbruch der Erkrankung auftreten. Der Einsatz von Methoden der virtuellen Realit{\"a}t erscheint besonders geeignet, diese Prozesse zuk{\"u}nftig noch besser zu erforschen.},
  subject      = {Angst},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Reinhard2019,
  author    = {Reinhard, Julia},
  title     = {Developmental Aspects of Fear Learning and Fear Generalization},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-16437},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164372},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {In situations of real threat, showing a fear reaction makes sense, thus, increasing the chance to survive. The question is, how could anybody differentiate between a real and an apparent threat? Here, the slogan counts "better safe than sorry", meaning that it is better to shy away once too often from nothing than once too little from a real threat. Furthermore, in a complex environment it is adaptive to generalize from one threatening situation or stimulus to another similar situation/stimulus. But, the danger hereby is to generalize in a maladaptive manner involving as it is to strong and/or fear too often "harmless" (safety) situations/stimuli, as it is known to be a criterion of anxiety disorders (AD). Fear conditioning and fear generalization paradigms are well suited to investigate fear learning processes. It is remarkable that despite increasing interest in this topic there is only little research on fear generalization. Especially, most research on human fear conditioning and its generalization has focused on adults, whereas only little is known about these processes in children, even though AD is typically developing during childhood. To address this knowledge gap, four experiments were conducted, in which a discriminative fear conditioning and generalization paradigm was used. In the first two experiments, developmental aspects of fear learning and generalization were of special interest. Therefore, in the first experiment 267 children and 285 adults were compared in the differential fear conditioning paradigm and generalization test. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings of valence and arousal were obtained to indicate fear learning. Both groups displayed robust and similar differential conditioning on subjective and physiological levels. However, children showed heightened fear generalization compared to adults as indexed by higher arousal ratings and SCRs to the generalization stimuli. Results indicate overgeneralization of conditioned fear as a developmental correlate of fear learning. The developmental change from a shallow to a steeper generalization gradient is likely related to the maturation of brain structures that modulate efficient discrimination between threatening and (ambiguous) safety cues. The question hereby is, at which developmental stage fear generalization gradients of children adapt to the gradients of adults. Following up on this question, in a second experiment, developmental changes in fear conditioning and fear generalization between children and adolescents were investigated. According to experiment 1 and previous studies in children, which showed changes in fear learning with increasing age, it was assumed that older children were better at discriminating threat and safety stimuli. Therefore, 396 healthy participants (aged 8 to 12 years) were examined with the fear conditioning and generalization paradigm. Again, ratings of valence, arousal, and SCRs were obtained. SCRs indicated differences in fear generalization with best fear discrimination in 12-year-old children suggesting that the age of 12 years seems to play an important role, since generalization gradients were similar to that of adults. These age differences were seen in boys and girls, but best discrimination was found in 12-year-old boys, indicating different development of generalization gradients according to sex. This result fits nicely with the fact that the prevalence of AD is higher in women than in men. In a third study, it was supposed that the developmental trajectory from increased trait anxiety in childhood to manifest AD could be mediated by abnormal fear conditioning and generalization processes. To this end, 394 children aged 8 to 12 years with different scores in trait anxiety were compared with each other. Results provided evidence that children with high trait anxiety showed stronger responses to threat cues and impaired safety signal learning contingent on awareness as indicated by arousal at acquisition. Furthermore, analyses revealed that children with high trait anxiety showed overall higher arousal ratings at generalization. Contrary to what was expected, high trait anxious children did not show significantly more fear generalization than children with low trait anxiety. However, high-trait-anxious (HA) participants showed a trend for a more linear gradient, whereas moderate-trait-anxious (MA) and low-trait-anxious (LA) participants showed more quadratic gradients according to arousal. Additionally, after controlling for age, sex and negative life experience, SCR to the safety stimulus predicted the trait anxiety level of children suggesting that impaired safety signal learning may be a risk factor for the development of AD. Results provide hints that frontal maturation could develop differently according to trait anxiety resulting in different stimuli discrimination. Thus, in a fourth experiment, 40 typically developing volunteers aged 10 to 18 years were screened for trait anxiety and investigated with the differential fear conditioning and generalization paradigm in the scanner. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were used to identify the neural mechanisms of fear learning and fear generalization investigating differences in this neural mechanism according to trait anxiety, developmental aspects and sex. At acquisition, HA participants showed reduced activation in frontal brain regions, but at generalization, HA participants showed an increase in these frontal regions with stronger linear increase in activation with similarity to CS+ in HA when compared to LA participants. This indicates that there is a hyper-regulation in adolescents to compensate the higher difficulties at generalization in form of a compensatory mechanism, which decompensates with adulthood and/or may be collapsed in manifest AD. Additionally, significant developmental effects were found: the older the subjects the stronger the hippocampus and frontal activation with resemblance to CS+, which could explain the overgeneralization of younger children. Furthermore, there were differences according to sex: males showed stronger activation with resemblance to CS+ in the hippocampus and frontal regions when compared to females fitting again nicely with the observation that prevalence rates for AD are higher for females than males. In sum, the studies suggest that investigating developmental aspects of (maladaptive) overgeneralization may lead to better understanding of the mechanisms of manifest anxiety disorders, which could result in development and provision of prevention strategies. Although, there is need for further investigations, the present work gives some first hints for such approaches.},
  subject      = {Furcht},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Slyschak2022,
  author    = {Slyschak, Anna},
  title     = {Fear conditioning, its generalization and extinction in children and adolescents under consideration of trait anxiety and anxiety sensitivity},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-26780},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267806},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The propounded thesis investigated fear learning including fear conditioning, its generalization as well as its extinction in 133 healthy children and adolescents aged 8 to 17 years. The main goal was to analyze these processes also in the course of childhood and adolescence due to far less research in this age span compared to adults. Of note, childhood is the typical period for the onset of anxiety disorders. To achieve this, an aversive discriminative fear conditioning, generalization and extinction paradigm, which based on the "screaming lady paradigm" from Lau et al. (2008) and was adapted by Schiele \& Reinhard et al. (2016), was applied. All probands traversed the pre-acquisition (4 x CS-, 4 x CS+, no US), the acquisition (12 x CS-, 12 x CS+, reinforcement rate: 83\%), the generalization (12 x CS-, 12 x GS4, 12 x GS3, 12 x GS2, 12 x GS1, 12 x CS+, reinforcement rate: 50\%) and the extinction (18 x CS-, 18 x CS+, no US). The generalization stimuli, i.e. GS1-GS4, were built out of CS- and CS+ in different mixtures on a percentage basis in steps of 20\% from CS- to CS+. Pictures of faces of two actresses with a neutral expression were used for the discriminative conditioning, whereby the CS+ was paired with a 95-dB loud female scream at the same time together with a fearful facial expression (US). CS- and GS1-GS4 were never followed by the US. Subjective ratings (arousal, valence and US expectancy) were collected and further the psychophysiological measure of the skin conductance response (SCR). The hypotheses were 1) that underage probands show a negative correlation between age and overgeneralization and 2) that anxiety is positively correlated with overgeneralization in the same sample. ANOVAs with repeated measures were conducted for all four dependent variables with phase (pre-acquisition phase, 1. + 2. acquisition phase, 1. + 2. generalization phase, 1. - 3. extinction phase) and stimulus type (CS-, CS+, GS1-GS4) as within-subject factors. For the analyses of the modulatory effects of age and anxiety in additional separate ANCOVAs were conducted including a) age, b) the STAIC score for trait anxiety and c) the CASI score for anxiety sensitivity as covariates. Sex was always included as covariate of no interest. On the one hand, findings indicated that the general extent of the reactions (arousal, valence and US expectancy ratings and the SCR) decreased with growing age, i.e. the older the probands the lower their reactions towards the stimuli regardless of the type of dependent variable. On the other hand, ratings of US expectancy, i.e. the likelihood that a stimulus is followed by a US (here: female scream coupled with a fearful facial expression), showed better discrimination skills the older the probands were, resulting in a smaller overgeneralization within older probands. It must be emphasized very clearly that no causality can be derived. Thus, it was only an association revealed between 15 age and generalization of conditioned fear, which is negative. Furthermore, no obvious impact of trait anxiety could be detected on the different processes of fear learning. Especially, no overgeneralization was expressed by the probands linked to higher trait anxiety. In contrast to trait anxiety, for anxiety sensitivity there was an association between its extent and the level of fear reactions. This could be described best with a kind of parallel shifts: the higher the anxiety sensitivity, the stronger the fear reactions. Likewise, for anxiety sensitivity no overgeneralization due to a stronger extent of anxiety sensitivity could be observed. Longitudinal follow-up examinations and, furthermore, neurobiological investigations are needed for replication purposes and purposes of gaining more supporting or opposing insights, but also for the profound exploration of the impact of hormonal changes during puberty and of the maturation processes of different brain structures. Finally, the question whether enhanced generalization of conditioned fear facilitates the development of anxiety disorders or vice versa remains unsolved yet.},
  subject      = {Furcht},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schneider2020,
  author    = {Schneider, Caroline},
  title     = {Modulation der Extinktion einer konditionierten Furchtreaktion durch Stimulation des pr{\"a}frontalen Kortex mittels tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation)},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-20875},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-208752},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Angstst{\"o}rungen geh{\"o}ren zu den h{\"a}ufigsten psychischen Erkrankungen in Deutschland, dabei k{\"o}nnten Hirnstimulationstechniken unterst{\"u}tzend zu bisherigen Therapieverfahren Anwendung finden. F{\"u}r die Entstehung und Behandlung von Angstst{\"o}rungen spielen die Prozesse der Konditionierung und Extinktion eine große Rolle, wobei im pr{\"a}frontalen Kortex eine erh{\"o}hte Aktivit{\"a}t gemessen werden kann. 51 gesunde Probanden nahmen an einem Furchtkonditionierungsexperiment mit zwei m{\"a}nnlichen Gesichtern als CS+ und CS- sowie einem Schrei als aversiven Stimulus teil. Es wurde untersucht, inwieweit die bilaterale transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) des dorsolateralen pr{\"a}frontalen Kortex die Extinktion moduliert. Die Stimulation erfolgte mittels tDCS links-kathodal {\"u}ber Position F3, rechts-anodal {\"u}ber Position F4 f{\"u}r 20 Minuten mit 2 mA und einer Elektrodengr{\"o}ße von 35 cm². Es wurden die Hautleitf{\"a}higkeit und der Startle-Reflex als physiologische Parameter der Furcht erfasst sowie Valenz und Arousal f{\"u}r die Stimuli durch subjektive Ratings erhoben. Bei den erfolgreich konditionierten Probanden (n = 28) kam es in der verum-tDCS-Gruppe w{\"a}hrend der fr{\"u}hen Extinktion zu einer signifikanten Zunahme der Hautleitf{\"a}higkeit auf CS-. M{\"o}glicherweise wurde durch die tDCS-Stimulation des dorsolateralen pr{\"a}frontalen Kortex eine Furchtgeneralisierung ausgel{\"o}st. Ein anderer Erkl{\"a}rungsansatz f{\"u}r die gefundenen Ergebnisse ist die Modulation von Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen durch die Stimulation. Weitere Forschung ist n{\"o}tig, bevor eine klinische tDCS-Anwendung bei Patienten mit Angstst{\"o}rungen m{\"o}glich ist.},
  subject      = {pr{\"a}frontale},
  language  = {de}
}