@phdthesis{İşbilir2022,
  author    = {İ{\c{s}}bilir, Ali},
  title     = {Localization and Trafficking of CXCR4 and CXCR7},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-24937},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-249378},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest class of membrane proteins, and are the master components that translate extracellular stimulus into intracellular signaling, which in turn modulates key physiological and pathophysiological processes. Research within the last three decades suggests that many GPCRs can form complexes with each other via mechanisms that are yet unexplored. Despite a number of functional evidence in favor of GPCR dimers and oligomers, the existence of such complexes remains controversial, as different methods suggest diverse quaternary organizations for individual receptors. Among various methods, high resolution fluorescence microscopy and imagebased fluorescence spectroscopy are state-of-the-art tools to quantify membrane protein oligomerization with high precision. This thesis work describes the use of single molecule fluorescence microscopy and implementation of two confocal microscopy based fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy based methods for characterizing the quaternary organization of two class A GPCRs that are important clinical targets: the C-X-C type chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and 7 (CXCR7), or recently named as the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3). The first part of the results describe that CXCR4 protomers are mainly organized as monomeric entities that can form transient dimers at very low expression levels allowing single molecule resolution. The second part describes the establishment and use of spatial and temporal brightness methods that are based on fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. Results from this part suggests that ACKR3 forms clusters and surface localized monomers, while CXCR4 forms increasing amount of dimers as a function of receptor density in cells. Moreover, CXCR4 dimerization can be modulated by its ligands as well as receptor conformations in distinct manners. Further results suggest that antagonists of CXCR4 display distinct binding modes, and the binding mode influences the oligomerization and the basal activity of the receptor: While the ligands that bind to a "minor" subpocket suppress both dimerization and constitutive activity, ligands that bind to a distinct, "major" subpocket only act as neutral antagonists on the receptor, and do not modulate neither the quaternary organization nor the basal signaling of CXCR4. Together, these results link CXCR4 dimerization to its density and to its activity, which may represent a new strategy to target CXCR4.},
  subject      = {G-Protein gekoppelter Rezeptor},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{BathePeters2022,
  author    = {Bathe-Peters, Marc},
  title     = {Spectroscopic approaches for the localization and dynamics of β\(_1\)- and β\(_2\)-adrenergic receptors in cardiomyocytes},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-25812},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258126},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In the heart the β\(_1\)-adrenergic receptor (AR) and the β\(_2\)-AR, two prototypical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are both activated by the same hormones, namely adrenaline and noradrenaline. Both receptors couple to stimulatory G\(_s\) proteins, mediate an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and influence the contractility and frequency of the heart upon stimulation. However, activation of the β\(_1\)-AR, not the β\(_2\)-AR, lead to other additional effects, such as changes in gene transcription resulting in cardiac hypertrophy, leading to speculations on how distinct effects can arise from receptors coupled to the same downstream signaling pathway. In this thesis the question of whether this distinct behavior may originate from a differential localization of these two receptors in adult cardiomyocytes is addressed. Therefore, fluorescence spectroscopy tools are developed and implemented in order to elucidate the presence and dynamics of these endogenous receptors at the outer plasma membrane as well as on the T-tubular network of intact adult cardiomyocytes. This allows the visualization of confined localization and diffusion of the β\(_2\)-AR to the T-tubular network at endogenous expression. In contrast, the β\(_1\)-AR is found diffusing at both the outer plasma membrane and the T-tubules. Upon overexpression of the β\(_2\)-AR in adult transgenic cardiomyocytes, the receptors experience a loss of this compartmentalization and are also found at the cell surface. These data suggest that distinct signaling and functional effects can be controlled by specific cell surface targeting of the receptor subtypes. The tools at the basis of this thesis work are a fluorescent adrenergic antagonist in combination of fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy to monitor the localization and dynamics of the lowly expressed adrenergic receptors. Along the way to optimizing these approaches, I worked on combining widefield and confocal imaging in one setup, as well as implementing a stable autofocus mechanism using electrically tunable lenses.},
  subject      = {G-Protein gekoppelte Rezeptoren},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Moeller2022,
  author    = {M{\"o}ller, Jan},
  title     = {Mechanisms and consequences of µ-opioid receptor dimerization},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-21986},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219862},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {One third of all market approved drugs target G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), covering a highly diverse spectrum of indications reaching from acute anti-allergic treatment over bloodpressure regulation, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia up to the treatment of severe pain. GPCRs are key signaling proteins that mostly function as monomers, but for several receptors constitutive dimer formation has been described and in some cases is essential for function. I have investigated this problem using the μ-opioid receptor (µOR) as a model system - based both on its pharmacological importance and on specific biochemical data suggesting that it may present a particularly intriguing case of mono- vs- dimerization. The µOR is the prime target for the treatment of severe pain. In its inactive conformation it crystallizes as homodimer when bound to the antagonist β- funaltrexamine (β-FNA), whereas the active, agonist-bound receptor crystallizes as a monomer. Using single-molecule microscopy combined with superresolution techniques on intact cells, I describe here a dynamic monomer-dimer equilibrium of µORs where dimer formation is driven by specific agonists. The agonist DAMGO, but not morphine, induces dimer formation in a process that correlates temporally and, in its agonist, and phosphorylation dependence with β-arrestin2 binding to the receptors. This dimerization is independent from but may precede µOR internalization. Furthermore, the results show that the μOR tends to stay, on the cell surface, within compartments defined by actin fibers and its mobility is modulated by receptor activation. These data suggest a new level of GPCR regulation that links receptor compartmentalization and dimer formation to specific agonists and their downstream signals.},
  subject      = {Opiatrezeptor},
  language  = {en}
}