@phdthesis{Eck2018,
  author    = {Eck, Martin},
  title     = {Iron- and Copper-catalyzed Borylation of Alkyl and Aryl Halides and B-B Bond Activation and NHC Ring-expansion Reactions of the Diboron(4) Compound Bis(ethylene glycolato)diboron (B\(_2\)eg\(_2\))},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149791},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The purpose of the present work was, in the first part, to investigate the potential of iron-based metal complexes in catalytic borylation reactions with alkyl halides as substrates and B2pin2 as the borylation reagent. Moreover, extended studies of the recently reported, copper mediated borylation reactions of aryl halides were performed, including the screening of substrates and alkoxy bases as well as ligand-screening. Investigations were undertaken on the role of Cu-nanoparticles, which might be involved in this catalytic reaction. Furthermore, Cu-phosphine complexes were synthesized as precursors, but attempts to isolate Cu-boryl species which are intermediates in the proposed catalytic cycle were unsuccessful, although 11B NMR evidence for a Cu-boryl complex was obtained. In the second part of this work, the alternative, Lewis-acidic diboron(4) compound bis(ethylene glycolato)diboron (B2eg2) was synthesized to compare its reactivity with the reactivity of other diboron(4) compounds (e.g. B2neop2, B2cat2, B2pin2 and B2(NMe2)4). Therefore, reactions of B2eg2 with different Lewis-bases, such as NHCs and phosphines, were performed to investigate the possible formation of sp2-sp3 or sp3-sp3 adducts and ring-expansion reactions (RERs). The aim was to obtain a better general insight into the reactivity of diboron(4) compounds with Lewis-bases because they are both used as reactants in transition metal-catalyzed and metal-free borylation reactions. Understanding the B-B bond activation process promoted by Lewis-bases provides a new perspective on the reaction pathways available for various borylation reactions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Macha2016,
  author    = {Macha, Bret B.},
  title     = {Boron-Containing Aromatics as Communicating and Communicative Units in π-Conjugated Systems},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-137498},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Project Borylene A new borylene ligand ({BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) has been successfully synthesized bound in a terminal manner to base metal scaffolds of the type [M(CO)\(_5\)] (M = Cr, Mo, and W), yielding complexes [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19), [(OC)\(_5\)Mo{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t- Bu)}] (20), and [(OC)\(_5\)W{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (21) (Figure 5-1). Synthesis of complexes 19, 20, and 21 was accomplished by double salt elimination reactions of Na\(_2\)[M(CO)\(_5\)] (M = Cr (11), Mo (1), and W (12)) with the dihaloborane Br\(_2\)BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu) (18). This new "first generation" unsymmetrical borylene ligand is closely akin to the bis(trimethylsilyl)aminoborylene ligand and has been shown to display similar structural characteristics and reactivity. The unsymmetrical borylene ligand {BN((SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} does display some individual characteristics of note and has experimentally been shown to undergo photolytic transfer to transition metal scaffolds in a more rapid manner, and appears to be a more reactive borylene ligand, than the previously published symmetrical {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} ligand, based on NMR and IR spectroscopic evidence. Photolytic transfer reactions with this new borylene ligand ({BN((SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) were conducted with other metal scaffolds, resulting in either complete borylene transfer or partial transfer to form bridging borylene ligand interactions between the two transition metals. The unsymmetrical ligand's coordination to early transition metals (up to Group 6) indicates a preference for a terminal coordination motif while bound to these highly Lewis acidic species. The ligand appears to form more energetically stable bridging coordination modes when bound to transition metals with high Lewis basicity (beyond Group 9) and has been witnessed to transfer to transition metal scaffolds in a terminal manner and subsequently rearrange in order to achieve a more energetically stable bridging final state. Figure 5-2 lists the four different transfer reactions conducted between the chromium borylene species [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19) and the transition metal complexes [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))V(CO)\(_4\)] (51), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))Ir(CO)\(_2\)] (56), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_4\)Me)Co(CO)\(_2\)] (59), and [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Ni}\(_2\){μ-(CO)\(_2\)}] (53). These reactions successfully yielded the new "second generation" borylene complexes [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))(OC)\(_3\)V{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (55), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))Ir{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}\(_2\)] (58), [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_4\)Me)Co}\(_2\)(μ-CO)\(_2\){μ- BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (61), and [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Ni}\(_2\)(μ-CO){μ-BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (62), respectively. Analysis of the accumulated data for all of the terminal borylene species discussed in this section, particularly bond distances, infrared spectroscopy, and \(^{11}\)B{\(^1\)H} NMR spectroscopic data, has been performed, and a trend in the data has led to the following conclusions: [1] NMR spectroscopic data for the \(^{11}\)B{\(^1\)H} boron and \(^{13}\)C{\(^1\)H} carbonyl environments of the first generation borylene species ([(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Cr (19), Mo (20), and W (21))) all show progressive up-field shifting as the Group 6 metal becomes heavier (Cr (19) to Mo (20) to W (21)), indicating maximum deshielding for these nuclei in the [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19) complex. [2] The boron-metal-trans-carbon (B-M-C\(_{trans}\)) axes of the first generation borylene complexes [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Mo (20), and W (21)) are not completely linear, preventing direct IR spectroscopic comparison. The chromium analog [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19), however, is essentially linear and displays the expected three carbonyl IR stretching frequencies, all at higher energy than those of the chromium bis(trimethylsilyl)aminoborylene complex [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (13), indicating that the ({BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) ligand is either a stronger σ-donor or a poorer π-acceptor compared to the chromium metal center. [3] In transfer reactions, the {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} fragment appears to be more stable as a terminal ligand when bound to more Lewis acidic first row transition metals and appears to prefer coordination in a bridging motif when coordinated to more Lewis basic first row transition metals. Project Borirene The synthesis of the first platinum bis(borirene) complexes are presented along with findings from structural and electronic examination of the role of platinum in allowing increased coplanarity and conjugation of twin borirene systems. This series of trans-platinum-linked bis(borirene) complexes (119/120, 122/123, and 125/126) all show coplanarity in the twin ring systems and stand as the first verified structural representations of two coplanar borirene systems across a linking unit. The role of a platinum atom in mediating communication between chromophoric ligands can be generalized by an expected bathochromic (red) shift in the absorption spectrum due to an increase in the electronic delocalization between the formerly independent aromatic systems when compared to the platinum mono-σ-borirenyl systems. The trans-platinum bis(borirene) scaffold serves as a simplified monomeric system that allows not only study of the effects of transition metals in mitigating electronic conjugation, but also the tunability of the overall photophysical profile of the system by exocyclic augmentation of the three-membered aromatic ring. A series of trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complexes were prepared (Figure 5-3) to serve as stable platforms to transfer terminal borylene ligands {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} onto 95, 102, 106, and 63. Mixing of cis-[PtCl\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (93) with two equivalents of corresponding alkynes in diethylamine solutions successfully yielded trans-[Pt(C≡C-Ph)\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (95), trans-[Pt(C≡C-p-C\(_6\)H\(_4\)OMe)\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (102), trans-[Pt(C≡C-p-C\(_6\)H\(_4\)CF\(_3\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)](106), and trans-[Pt(C≡C-9-C\(_{14}\)H\(_9\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (63) through salt elimination reactions. Three of the trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complexes (95, 102, and 106) successfully yielded trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) complexes 119/120, 122/123, and 125/126 through photolytic transfer of two equivalents of the terminal borylene ligand {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} from [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (13) (Figure 5-4). Attempted borylene transfer reactions to the trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complex trans-[Pt(C≡C-9-C\(_{14}\)H\(_9\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (63) failed due to the complex's photoinstability. Although a host of other variants of platinum alkynyl species were prepared and attempted, these three were the only ones that successfully yielded trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) units. Attempts were also made to create a cis variant for direct UV-vis comparison to the trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) variants, however, these attempts were also not successful. Gladysz-type platinum end-capped alkynyl species were also synthesized to serve as transfer platforms for borirene synthesis in sequential order, however, these species were also shown to not be photolytically stable. A host of new monoborirenes: Ph-(μ-{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)-Ph (148), trans- [PtCl{(μ-{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)-Ph}(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (149), and [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))(OC)\(_2\)Fe(μ- {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)Ph] (150) were synthesized by photo- and thermolytic transfer of the unsymmetrical {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} ligand from the complexes [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Cr (19), Mo (20), and W (21)) to organic and organometallic alkynyl species to verify that the borylene complexes all display similar reactivity to the symmetrical terminal borylenes of the type [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (M = Cr (13), Mo (14), and W (15)). These monoborirenes are all found to be oils when in their pure states and X-ray structural determination was impossible for these species. Project Boratabenzene The bis(boratabenzene) complex [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Co}\(_2\){μ:η\(^6\),η\(^6\)-(BC\(_5\)H\(_5\))\(_2\)}] (189) was successfully prepared by treatment of tetrabromodiborane (65) with six equivalents of cobaltocene (176) in a unique reaction that utilized cobaltocene as both a reagent and reductant (Figure 5-5). The bimetallic transition metal complex features a new bridging bis(boratabenzene) ligand linked through a boron-boron single bond that can manifest delocalization of electron density by providing an accessible LUMO orbital for π-communication between the cobalt centers and heteroaromatic rings. This dianionic diboron ligand was shown to facilitate electronic coupling between the cobalt metal sites, as evidenced by the potential separations between successive single-electron redox events in the cyclic voltammogram. Four formal redox potentials for complex 189 were found: E\(_{1/2}\)(1) = -0.84 V, E\(_{1/2}\)(2) = -0.94 V, E\(_{1/2}\)(3) = -2.09 V, and E\(_{1/2}\)(4) = -2.36 V (relative to the Fc/Fc+ couple) (Figure 5-6). These potentials correlate to two closely-spaced oxidation waves and two well-resolved reduction waves ([(189)]\(^{0/+1}\), [(189)]\(^{+1/+2}\), [(189)]\(^{0/-1}\), and [(189)]\(^{-1/-2}\) redox couples, respectively). The extent of metal-metal communication was found to be relative to the charge of the metal atoms, with the negative charge being more efficiently delocalized across the bis(boratabenzene) unit (class II Robin-Day system). Magnetic studies indicate that the Co(II) ions are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled across the B-B bridge. While reduction of the bis(boratabenzene) system resulted in decomposition of the complex, oxidation of the system by one- and two-electron steps resulted in isolable stable monocationic (194) and dicationic (195) forms of the bis(boratabenzene) complex (Figure 5-7). Study of these systems verified the results of the cyclic voltammetry studies performed on the neutral species. These species are unfortunately not stable in acetonitrile or nitromethane solutions, which until this point are the only solvents that have been observed to dissolve the cationic species. Unfortunately, this instability in solution complicates reactivity studies of these cationic complexes. Finally, reactivity studies were performed on the neutral bis(boratabenzene) complex 189 in which the compound was tested for: (A) cleavage of the boratabenzene (cyclo-BC\(_5\)H\(_5\)) ring from the cobalt center, and (B) oxidative addition of the B-B bond to a transition metal scaffold to attempt synthesis of the first ever L\(_x\)M-η\(^1\)-(BC\(_5\)H\(_5\)) complex. Both of these reactivity studies, however, proved unsuccessful and typically witnessed decomposition of the bis(boratabenzene) complex or no reactivity. After repeated attempts of these reactions, no oxidative addition of the bis(boratabenzene) system could be confirmed.},
  subject      = {Borverbindungen},
  language  = {en}
}