@phdthesis{Costea2016,
  author    = {Costea, Paul Igor},
  title     = {Stratification and variation of the human gut microbiota},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-139649},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The microbial communities that live inside the human gastrointestinal tract -the human gut microbiome- are important for host health and wellbeing. Characterizing this new "organ", made up of as many cells as the human body itself, has recently become possible through technological advances. Metagenomics, the high-throughput sequencing of DNA directly from microbial communities, enables us to take genomic snapshots of thousands of microbes living together in this complex ecosystem, without the need for isolating and growing them. Quantifying the composition of the human gut microbiome allows us to investigate its properties and connect it to host physiology and disease. The wealth of such connections was unexpected and is probably still underestimated. Due to the fact that most of our dietary as well as medicinal intake affects the microbiome and that the microbiome itself interacts with our immune system through a multitude of pathways, many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the observed correlations, though most have yet to be understood in depth. An obvious prerequisite to characterizing the microbiome and its interactions with the host is the accurate quantification of its composition, i.e. determining which microbes are present and in what numbers they occur. Historically, standard practices have existed for sample handling, DNA extraction and data analysis for many years. However, these were generally developed for single microbe cultures and it is not always feasible to implement them in large scale metagenomic studies. Partly because of this and partly because of the excitement that new technology brings about, the first metagenomic studies each took the liberty to define their own approach and protocols. From early meta-analysis of these studies it became clear that the differences in sample handling, as well as differences in computational approaches, made comparisons across studies very difficult. This restricts our ability to cross-validate findings of individual studies and to pool samples from larger cohorts. To address the pressing need for standardization, we undertook an extensive comparison of 21 different DNA extraction methods as well as a series of other sample manipulations that affect quantification. We developed a number of criteria for determining the measurement quality in the absence of a mock community and used these to propose best practices for sampling, DNA extraction and library preparation. If these were to be accepted as standards in the field, it would greatly improve comparability across studies, which would dramatically increase the power of our inferences and our ability to draw general conclusions about the microbiome. Most metagenomics studies involve comparisons between microbial communities, for example between fecal samples from cases and controls. A multitude of approaches have been proposed to calculate community dissimilarities (beta diversity) and they are often combined with various preprocessing techniques. Direct metagenomics quantification usually counts sequencing reads mapped to specific taxonomic units, which can be species, genera, etc. Due to technology-inherent differences in sampling depth, normalizing counts is necessary, for instance by dividing each count by the sum of all counts in a sample (i.e. total sum scaling), or by subsampling. To derive a single value for community (dis-)similarity, multiple distance measures have been proposed. Although it is theoretically difficult to benchmark these approaches, we developed a biologically motivated framework in which distance measures can be evaluated. This highlights the importance of data transformations and their impact on the measured distances. Building on our experience with accurate abundance estimation and data preprocessing techniques, we can now try and understand some of the basic properties of microbial communities. In 2011, it was proposed that the space of genus level variation of the human gut microbial community is structured into three basic types, termed enterotypes. These were described in a multi-country cohort, so as to be independent of geography, age and other host properties. Operationally defined through a clustering approach, they are "densely populated areas in a multidimensional space of community composition"(source) and were proposed as a general stratifier for the human population. Later studies that applied this concept to other datasets raised concerns about the optimum number of clusters and robustness of the clustering approach. This heralded a long standing debate about the existence of structure and the best ways to determine and capture it. Here, we reconsider the concept of enterotypes, in the context of the vastly increased amounts of available data. We propose a refined framework in which the different types should be thought of as weak attractors in compositional space and we try to implement an approach to determining which attractor a sample is closest to. To this end, we train a classifier on a reference dataset to assign membership to new samples. This way, enterotypes assignment is no longer dataset dependent and effects due to biased sampling are minimized. Using a model in which we assume the existence of three enterotypes characterized by the same driver genera, as originally postulated, we show the relevance of this stratification and propose it to be used in a clinical setting as a potential marker for disease development. Moreover, we believe that these attractors underline different rules of community assembly and we recommend they be accounted for when analyzing gut microbiome samples. While enterotypes describe structure in the community at genus level, metagenomic sequencing can in principle achieve single-nucleotide resolution, allowing us to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and other genomic variants in the gut microbiome. Analysis methodology for this level of resolution has only recently been developed and little exploration has been done to date. Assessing SNPs in a large, multinational cohort, we discovered that the landscape of genomic variation seems highly structured even beyond species resolution, indicating that clearly distinguishable subspecies are prevalent among gut microbes. In several cases, these subspecies exhibit geo-stratification, with some subspecies only found in the Chinese population. Generally however, they present only minor dispersion limitations and are seen across most of our study populations. Within one individual, one subspecies is commonly found to dominate and only rarely are several subspecies observed to co-occur in the same ecosystem. Analysis of longitudinal data indicates that the dominant subspecies remains stable over periods of more than three years. When interrogating their functional properties we find many differences, with specific ones appearing relevant to the host. For example, we identify a subspecies of E. rectale that is lacking the flagellum operon and find its presence to be significantly associated with lower body mass index and lower insulin resistance of their hosts; it also correlates with higher microbial community diversity. These associations could not be seen at the species level (where multiple subspecies are convoluted), which illustrates the importance of this increased resolution for a more comprehensive understanding of microbial interactions within the microbiome and with the host. Taken together, our results provide a rigorous basis for performing comparative metagenomics of the human gut, encompassing recommendations for both experimental sample processing and computational analysis. We furthermore refine the concept of community stratification into enterotypes, develop a reference-based approach for enterotype assignment and provide compelling evidence for their relevance. Lastly, by harnessing the full resolution of metagenomics, we discover a highly structured genomic variation landscape below the microbial species level and identify common subspecies of the human gut microbiome. By developing these high-precision metagenomics analysis tools, we thus hope to contribute to a greatly improved understanding of the properties and dynamics of the human gut microbiome.},
  subject      = {Mensch},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Zhu2015,
  author    = {Zhu, Ana Cheng},
  title     = {Metagenomic analysis of genetic variation in human gut microbial species},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-113890},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Microbial species (bacteria and archaea) in the gut are important for human health in various ways. Not only does the species composition vary considerably within the human population, but each individual also appears to have its own strains of a given species. While it is known from studies of bacterial pan-genomes, that genetic variation between strains can differ considerably, such as in Escherichia coli, the extent of genetic variation of strains for abundant gut species has not been surveyed in a natural habitat. This is mainly due to the fact that most of these species cannot be cultured in the laboratory. Genetic variation can range from microscale genomic rearrangements such as small nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) to macroscale large genomic rearrangements like structural variations. Metagenomics offers an alternative solution to study genetic variation in prokaryotes, as it involves DNA sequencing of the whole community directly from the environment. However, most metagenomic studies to date only focus on variation in gene abundance and hence are not able to characterize genetic variation (in terms of presence or absence of SNPs and genes) of gut microbial strains of individuals. The aim of my doctorate studies was therefore to study the extent of genetic variation in the genomic sequence of gut prokaryotic species and its phenotypic effects based on: (1) the impact of SNP variation in gut bacterial species, by focusing on genes under selective pressure and (2) the gene content variation (as a proxy for structural variation) and their effect on microbial species and the phenotypic traits of their human host. In the first part of my doctorate studies, I was involved in a project in which we created a catalogue of 10.3 million SNPs in gut prokaryotic species, based on metagenomes. I used this to perform the first SNP-based comparative study of prokaryotic species evolution in a natural habitat. Here, I found that strains of gut microbial species in different individuals evolve at more similar rates than the strains within an individual. In addition, I found that gene evolution can be uncoupled from the evolution of its originating species, and that this could be related to selective pressure such as diet, exemplified by galactokinase gene (galK). Despite the individuality (i.e. uniqueness of each individual within the studied metagenomic dataset) in the SNP profile of the gut microbiota that we found, for most cases it is not possible to link SNPs with phenotypic differences. For this reason I also used gene content as a proxy to study structural variation in metagenomes. In the second part of my doctorate studies, I developed a methodology to characterize the variability of gene content in gut bacterial species, using metagenomes. My approach is based on gene deletions, and was applied to abundant species (demonstrated using a set of 11 species). The method is sufficiently robust as it captures a similar range of gene content variability as has been detected in completely sequenced genomes. Using this procedure I found individuals differ by an average of 13\% in their gene content of gut bacterial strains within the same species. Interestingly no two individuals shared the same gene content across bacterial species. However, this variation corresponds to a lower limit, as it is only accounts for gene deletion and not insertions. This large variation in the gene content of gut strain was found to affect important functions, such as polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) and capsular polysaccharide synthesis (CPS), which are related with digestion of dietary fibers. In summary, I have shown that metagenomics based approaches can be robust in characterizing genetic variation in gut bacterial species. I also illustrated, using examples both for SNPs and gene content (galK, PULs and CPS), that this genetic variation can be used to predict the phenotypic characteristics of the microbial species, as well as predicting the phenotype of their human host (for example, their capacity to digest different food components). Overall, the results of my thesis highlight the importance of characterizing the strains in the gut microbiome analogous to the emerging variability and importance of human genomics.},
  subject      = {Darmflora},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Somody2023,
  author    = {Somody, Joseph Christian Campbell},
  title     = {Leveraging deep learning for identification and structural determination of novel protein complexes from \(in\) \(situ\) electron cryotomography of \(Mycoplasma\) \(pneumoniae\)},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-31344},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-313447},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The holy grail of structural biology is to study a protein in situ, and this goal has been fast approaching since the resolution revolution and the achievement of atomic resolution. A cell's interior is not a dilute environment, and proteins have evolved to fold and function as needed in that environment; as such, an investigation of a cellular component should ideally include the full complexity of the cellular environment. Imaging whole cells in three dimensions using electron cryotomography is the best method to accomplish this goal, but it comes with a limitation on sample thickness and produces noisy data unamenable to direct analysis. This thesis establishes a novel workflow to systematically analyse whole-cell electron cryotomography data in three dimensions and to find and identify instances of protein complexes in the data to set up a determination of their structure and identity for success. Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a very small parasitic bacterium with fewer than 700 protein-coding genes, is thin enough and small enough to be imaged in large quantities by electron cryotomography, and can grow directly on the grids used for imaging, making it ideal for exploratory studies in structural proteomics. As part of the workflow, a methodology for training deep-learning-based particle-picking models is established. As a proof of principle, a dataset of whole-cell Mycoplasma pneumoniae tomograms is used with this workflow to characterize a novel membrane-associated complex observed in the data. Ultimately, 25431 such particles are picked from 353 tomograms and refined to a density map with a resolution of 11 {\AA}. Making good use of orthogonal datasets to filter search space and verify results, structures were predicted for candidate proteins and checked for suitable fit in the density map. In the end, with this approach, nine proteins were found to be part of the complex, which appears to be associated with chaperone activity and interact with translocon machinery. Visual proteomics refers to the ultimate potential of in situ electron cryotomography: the comprehensive interpretation of tomograms. The workflow presented here is demonstrated to help in reaching that potential.},
  subject      = {Kryoelektronenmikroskopie},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Ferretti2022,
  author    = {Ferretti, Pamela},
  title     = {\(Clostridioides\) \(difficile\) beyond the disease-centred perspective: Beneficial properties in healthy infants and over-diagnosis in diseased adults identified by species- and SNV-based metagenomic analysis},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-25417},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254170},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Clostridioides difficile is a bacterial species well known for its ability to cause C. difficile infection (also known as CDI). The investigation of the role of this species in the human gut has been so far dominated by a disease-centred perspective, focused on studying C. difficile in relation to its associated disease. In this context, the first aim of this thesis was to combine publicly available metagenomic data to analyse the microbial composition of stool samples from patients diagnosed with CDI, with a particular focus on identifying a CDI-specific microbial signature. However, similarly to many other bacterial species inhabiting the human gut, C. difficile association with disease is not valid in absolute terms, as C. difficile can be found also among healthy subjects. Further aims of this thesis were to 1) identify potential C. difficile reservoirs by screening a wide range of habitats, hosts, body sites and age groups, and characterize the biotic context associated with C. difficile presence, and 2) investigate C. difficile within-species diversity and its toxigenic potential across different age groups. The first part of the thesis starts with the description of the concepts and definitions used to identify bacterial species and within-species diversity, and then proceeds to provide an overview of the bacterial species at the centre of my investigation, C. difficile. The first Chapter includes a detailed description of the discovery, biology and physiology of this clinically relevant species, followed by an overview of the diagnostic protocols used in the clinical setting to diagnose CDI. The second part of the thesis describes the methodology used to investigate the questions mentioned above, while the third part presents the results of such investigative effort. I first show that C. difficile could be found in only a fraction of the CDI samples and that simultaneous colonization of multiple enteropathogenic species able to cause CDI-like clinical manifestations is more common than previously thought, raising concerns about CDI overdiagnosis. I then show that the CDIassociated gut microbiome is characterized by a specific microbial signature, distinguishable from the community composition associated with non-CDI diarrhea. Beyond the nosocomial and CDI context, I show that while rarely found in adults, C. difficile is a common member of the infant gut microbiome, where its presence is associated with multiple indicators typical of a desirable healthy microbiome development. In addition, I describe C. difficile extensive carriage among asymptomatic subjects, of all age groups and a potentially novel clade of C. difficile identified exclusively among infants. Finally, I discuss the limitations, challenges and future perspectives of my investigation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Romanov2019,
  author    = {Romanov, Natalie},
  title     = {Characterizing Variation of Protein Complexes and Functional Modules on a Temporal Scale and across Individuals},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-16813},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168139},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {A fundamental question in current biology concerns the translational mechanisms leading from genetic variability to phenotypes. Technologies have evolved to the extent that they can efficiently and economically determine an individual's genomic composition, while at the same time big data on clinical profiles and diagnostics have substantially accumulated. Genome-wide association studies linking genomic loci to certain traits, however, remain limited in their capacity to explain the cellular mechanisms that underlie the given association. For most associations, gene expression has been blamed; yet given that transcript and protein abundance oftentimes do not correlate, that finding does not necessarily decrypt the underlying mechanism. Thus, the integration of further information is crucial to establish a model that could prove more accurate in predicting genotypic effects on the human organism. In this work we describe the so-called proteotype as a feature of the cell that could provide a substantial link between genotype and phenotype. Rather than looking at the proteome as a set of independent molecules, we demonstrate a consistent modular architecture of the proteome that is driven by molecular cooperativity. Functional modules, especially protein complexes, can be further interrogated for differences between individuals and tackled as imprints of genetic and environmental variability. We also show that subtle stoichiometric changes of protein modules could have broader effects on the cellular system, such as the transport of specific molecular cargos. The presented work also delineates to what extent temporal events and processes influence the stoichiometry of protein complexes and functional modules. The re-wiring of the glycolytic pathway for example is illustrated as a potential cause for an increased Warburg effect during the ageing of the human bone marrow. On top of analyzing protein abundances we also interrogate proteome dynamics in terms of stability and solubility transitions during the short temporal progression of the cell cycle. One of our main observations in the thesis encompass the delineation of protein complexes into respective sub-complexes according to distinct stability patterns during the cell cycle. This has never been demonstrated before, and is functionally relevant for our understanding of the dis- and assembly of large protein modules. The insights presented in this work imply that the proteome is more than the sum of its parts, and primarily driven by variability in entire protein ensembles and their cooperative nature. Analyzing protein complexes and functional modules as molecular reflections of genetic and environmental variations could indeed prove to be a stepping stone in closing the gap between genotype and phenotype and customizing clinical treatments in the future.},
  subject      = {Proteotype},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Maistrenko2021,
  author    = {Maistrenko, Oleksandr},
  title     = {Pangenome analysis of bacteria and its application in metagenomics},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-21499},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214996},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The biosphere harbors a large quantity and diversity of microbial organisms that can thrive in all environments. Estimates of the total number of microbial species reach up to 1012, of which less than 15,000 have been characterized to date. It has been challenging to delineate phenotypically, evolutionary and ecologically meaningful lineages such as for example, species, subspecies and strains. Even within recognized species, gene content can vary considerably between sublineages (for example strains), a problem that can be addressed by analyzing pangenomes, defined as the non-redundant set of genes within a phylogenetic clade, as evolutionary units. Species considered to be ecologically and evolutionary coherent units, however to date it is still not fully understood what are primary habitats and ecological niches of many prokaryotic species and how environmental preferences drive their genomic diversity. Majority of comparative genomics studies focused on a single prokaryotic species in context of clinical relevance and ecology. With accumulation of sequencing data due to genomics and metagenomics, it is now possible to investigate trends across many species, which will facilitate understanding of pangenome evolution, species and subspecies delineation. The major aims of this thesis were 1) to annotate habitat preferences of prokaryotic species and strains; 2) investigate to what extent these environmental preferences drive genomic diversity of prokaryotes and to what extent phylogenetic constraints limit this diversification; 3) explore natural nucleotide identity thresholds to delineate species in bacteria in metagenomics gene catalogs; 4) explore species delineation for applications in subspecies and strain delineation in metagenomics. The first part of the thesis describes methods to infer environmental preferences of microbial species. This data is a prerequisite for the analyses performed in the second part of the thesis which explores how the structure of bacterial pangenomes is predetermined by past evolutionary history and how is it linked to environmental preferences of the species. The main finding in this subchapter that habitat preferences explained up to 49\% of the variance for pangenome structure, compared to 18\% by phylogenetic inertia. In general, this trend indicates that phylogenetic inertia does not limit evolution of pangenome size and diversity, but that convergent evolution may overcome phylogenetic constraints. In this project we show that core genome size is associated with higher environmental ubiquity of species. It is likely this is due to the fact that species need to have more versatile genomes and most necessary genes need to be present in majority of genomes of that species to be highly prevalent. Taken together these findings may be useful for future predictive analyses of ecological niches in newly discovered species. The third part of the thesis explores data-driven, operational species boundaries. I show that homologous genes from the same species from different genomes tend to share at least 95\% of nucleotide identity, while different species within the same genus have lower nucleotide identity. This is in line with other studies showing that genome-wide natural species boundary might be in range of 90-95\% of nucleotide identity. Finally, the fourth part of the thesis discusses how challenges in species delineation are relevant for the identification of meaningful within-species groups, followed by a discussion on how advancements in species delineation can be applied for classification of within-species genomic diversity in the age of metagenomics.},
  subject      = {Pangenom},
  language  = {en}
}