@phdthesis{RauertWunderlich2012,
  author    = {Rauert-Wunderlich, Hilka},
  title     = {Apoptoseregulation durch TNF im Multiplen Myelom},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-73998},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Der Tumornekrosefaktor (TNF) entfaltet seine vielf{\"a}ltigen biologischen Aktivit{\"a}ten durch die Stimulation der beiden TNF-Rezeptoren TNFR1 und TNFR2. Die TNFR1-vermittelte Signaltransduktion ist in vielen Details gut verstanden, wohingegen die TNFR2-vermittelte Signaltransduktion bis heute kaum untersucht ist. Mit Hilfe einer in unserer Gruppe entwickelten hochaktiven TNFR2-spezifischen TNF-Variante sowie einer bereits l{\"a}nger bekannten TNFR1-spezifischen TNF-Variante wurde in dieser Arbeit die TNF-Signaltransduktion insbesondere im Mutiplen Myelom untersucht. Mit Hilfe der beiden TNF-Varianten konnte gezeigt werden, dass die alleinige Stimulation des TNFR2 die Aktivierung des alternativen NFkappaB-Signalweges vermittelt, wohingegen TNFR1 nicht dazu in der Lage ist. So zeigte sich im Einklang mit der inhibitorischen Funktion des Adapterproteins TRAF2 in der Signaltransduktion des alternativen NFkappaB-Signalweges, dass die TNFR2-Stimulation in einer TRAF2-Depletion resultiert. Dies f{\"u}hrt weiterhin zur Akkumulation von NIK und der Prozessierung von p100 zu seiner aktiven Form p52, den klassischen biochemisch nachweisbaren Ereignissen der Aktivierung des alternativen NFkappaB-Signalweges. Aufgrund der Rolle des NFkappaB-Systems im Multiplen Myelom (MM) und der stimulierenden Wirkung des TNFR1 und TNFR2 auf das NFkappaB-System wurde die Expression und Funktion dieser beiden Rezeptoren auf Myelomzelllinien untersucht. Insbesondere wurde analysiert, welchen Effekt eine spezifische Stimulation der beiden TNF-Rezeptoren auf die apoptotische Sensitivit{\"a}t von Myelomzellen hat. Mit einer Ausnahme wiesen alle untersuchten Myelomzelllinien eine eindeutige TNFR2-Oberfl{\"a}chenexpression auf, die TNFR1-Expression hingegen war heterogen. Die TNFR1-Stimulation in den TNFR1-positiven Zelllinien zeigte keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Zellviabilit{\"a}t. Allerdings resultierte eine Vorstimulation mit TNF in einer gesteigerten Sensitivit{\"a}t f{\"u}r den CD95L-induzierten Zelltod, sch{\"u}tzte aber gleichzeitig vor der TRAIL-vermittelten Induktion der Apoptose. Der gegenl{\"a}ufige Effekt der TNF-Vorstimulation auf den CD95L- und TRAIL-induzierten Zelltod konnte auf die Hochregulation der CD95-Oberfl{\"a}chenexpression und der gesteigerten Expression des antiapoptotischen cFLIPLong-Proteins zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt werden. Beide Effekte basieren auf der TNF-induzierten Aktivierung des klassischen NFkappaB-Signalweges. Im CD95L-induzierten Zelltod {\"u}berkompensierte die Induktion der CD95-Expression offensichtlich die Hochregulation von cFLIPLong und resultierte in gesteigertem Zelltod. Der TRAIL-induzierte Zelltod hingegen wurde durch die TNF-Vorstimulation abgeschw{\"a}cht, da hier lediglich die durch den klassischen NFkappaB-Signalweg vermittelte gesteigerte Expression des antiapoptotischen cFLIPLong eine Rolle spielte. Desweiteren zeigten die Analysen in dieser Arbeit, dass die TNFR2-Stimulation zu einer Depletion von TRAF2 und z. B. in JJN3-Zellen zu einer Sensitivierung f{\"u}r den TNFR1-induzierten Zelltod f{\"u}hrte. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit zeigten in der Summe somit, dass das TNF-TNFR-Signaling durch verschiedene Mechanismen Einfluss auf den Ausgang der extrinsischen Apoptoseinduktion hat, und dass der Effekt von TNF auf das {\"U}berleben von MM-Zellen kontextabh{\"a}ngig ist.},
  subject      = {Apoptosis},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Lang2012,
  author    = {Lang, Isabell},
  title     = {Molekulare Mechanismen der CD95-Aktivierung},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-73339},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Die Stimulation des CD95-Todesrezeptors durch seinen nat{\"u}rlichen membranst{\"a}ndigen Li-ganden CD95L f{\"u}hrt zur kontextabh{\"a}ngigen Aktivierung von sowohl apoptotischen als auch nicht-apoptotischen Signalwegen. Durch Proteolyse wird aus dem membranst{\"a}ndigen CD95L l{\"o}slicher trimerer CD95L freigesetzt. Die Bindung von l{\"o}slichem trimerem CD95L an CD95 ist nicht ausreichend, um die CD95-Signaltransduktion effizient zu stimulieren. Die F{\"a}higkeit von l{\"o}slichen CD95L-Trimeren CD95-vermittelte Signalwege robust zu aktivieren kann jedoch durch Oligomerisierung und artifizielle Immobilisierung an eine Oberfl{\"a}che drastisch gesteigert werden. In dieser Arbeit wurde zun{\"a}chst best{\"a}tigt, dass nur oligomere CD95L-Varianten, die z.B. durch Antik{\"o}rpervernetzung von N-terminal getaggten rekombinanten CD95L-Varianten oder durch eine gentechnisch erzwungene Hexamerisierung von CD95L-Molek{\"u}len erhalten wur-den, in der Lage sind, effizient apoptotische und nicht-apoptotische Signalwege zu aktivieren. Ferner zeigte sich dann, dass die Bindung von l{\"o}slichen CD95L-Trimeren nicht ausreichend ist, um die Translokation von CD95-Molek{\"u}len in detergenzunl{\"o}sliche „Lipid Raft"- Membrandom{\"a}nen zu stimulieren. Die „Lipid Raft"-Translokation ist ein zentrales Ereignis bei der CD95-Aktivierung und vor allem f{\"u}r die Induktion der Apoptose bedeutsam. Dabei ist ein selbstverst{\"a}rkender Prozess aus Caspase-8-Aktivierung und „Lipid Raft"-Assoziation des CD95 von Bedeutung. Um die Interaktion von CD95 und CD95L mit Hilfe von hoch sensitiven zellul{\"a}ren Bindungs-studien analysieren zu k{\"o}nnen, wurden in dieser Arbeit desweiteren CD95L-Fusionsproteine entwickelt und hergestellt, an welche N-terminal eine Gaussia princeps Luziferase (GpL)- Reporterdom{\"a}ne gekoppelt ist. So konnte mit den GpL-CD95L-Fusionsproteinen gezeigt werden, dass die Oligomerisierung von CD95L-Trimeren keinen Effekt auf die Ligandenbele-gung des CD95 hat. Dies spricht daf{\"u}r, dass die h{\"o}here spezifische Aktivit{\"a}t von oligomeri-sierten CD95L-Trimeren nicht auf einer Avidit{\"a}ts-vermittelten Zunahme der apparenten Affi-nit{\"a}t beruht, sondern dies deutet darauf hin, dass die sekund{\"a}re Aggregation von sich initial bildenden trimeren CD95L-CD95-Komplexen eine entscheidende Rolle in der CD95-Aktivierung spielt. Durch Scatchard-Analysen zeigte sich ferner, dass trimerer CD95L mit mindestens zwei zellul{\"a}ren Bindungsstellen unterschiedlicher Affinit{\"a}t interagiert. Bindungs-studien mit l{\"o}slichen monomeren und trimeren GpL-CD95-Rezeptoren an membranst{\"a}ndigen CD95L, als auch Inhibitionsstudien ergaben, dass trimerer CD95 weitaus besser an CD95L bindet. Dies legt nahe, dass es sich bei den zuvor beobachteten hoch- und niederaffinen Bindungsstellen f{\"u}r CD95L um monomere bzw. pr{\"a}-assemblierte CD95-Molek{\"u}le handelt. Die GpL-CD95L-Fusionsproteine wurden auch genutzt, um die CD95-Translokation in „Lipid Rafts" zu analysieren. So wurde trimerer GpL-CD95L als „Tracer" zur Markierung von inaktiven CD95-Molek{\"u}len eingesetzt. Nach Aktivierung der {\"u}brigen freien CD95-Molek{\"u}le mit hoch aktivem hexameren Fc-CD95L konnte eine Zunahme der inaktiven GpL-CD95L-markierten Rezeptoren in „Lipid Rafts" beobachtet werden. Offensichtlich stimulieren also aktivierte CD95-Molek{\"u}le in „trans" die Ko-Translokation inaktiver CD95-Rezeptoren in „Lipid Rafts". Dies best{\"a}tigte sich auch in Experimenten mit Transfektanten, die einen chim{\"a}ren CD40-CD95-Rezeptor exprimieren. Letzterer ist nach Stimulation mit CD40L in der Lage, intrazellu-l{\"a}re CD95-vermittelte Signalwege zu aktivieren. Die Aktivierung von CD95-assoziierten Sig-nalwegen durch Stimulation von endogenem CD95 in CD40-CD95-Transfektanten resultierte nun in der Ko-Translokation von unstimulierten CD40-CD95-Rezeptoren in „Lipid Rafts". Vice versa zeigte sich die Ko-Translokation von endogenem CD95 nach spezifischer Aktivierung des chim{\"a}ren CD40-CD95-Rezeptors. Schlussendlich erwiesen sich eine funktionsf{\"a}hige Todesdom{\"a}ne und die Aktivierung der Caspase-8 als essentiell f{\"u}r die „Lipid Raft"-Assoziation von aktivierten CD95-Molek{\"u}len und auch f{\"u}r die durch diese Rezeptorspezies induzierte Ko-Translokation von inaktiven Rezeptoren in „Lipid Rafts".},
  subject      = {Fas-Ligand},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Schaffstein2010,
  author    = {Schaffstein, Stella},
  title     = {Molekulare Mechanismen der nicht-apoptotischen Signaltransduktion des Todesliganden TRAIL (Apo-2 Ligand)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-55943},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand)/Apo-2 Ligand ist ein Mitglied der TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-Superfamilie, das in den vergangenen Jahren als potentielles Tumortherapeutikum breite Aufmerksamkeit auf sich gezogen hat. Denn {\"u}ber seine korrespondierenden Todesrezeptoren induziert TRAIL vornehmlich in Tumorzellen den apoptotischen Zelltod, w{\"a}hrend normale Zellen unbeschadet bleiben (Ashkenazi et al., 1999; Walczak et al., 1999; Griffith et al., 1998). Neuere Studien belegen allerdings, dass die TRAIL-Todesrezeptoren neben ihrer herausragenden Funktion als Ausl{\"o}ser der Apoptose zus{\"a}tzlich die F{\"a}higkeit zur Aktivierung nicht-apoptotischer Signalwege besitzen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden vornehmlich die nicht-apoptotischen Signalwege wie die MAPK-Kaskaden sowie die NFkappaB-Signalwege in Verbindung mit der Aktivierung von Apoptose sowie der Induktion des Chemokins IL-8 analysiert. Hierf{\"u}r wurde die humane Pankreasadenokarzinomzellinie Colo 357 verwendet. In den Experimenten konnte nachgewiesen werden, dass TRAIL die MAP Kinasen JNK, ERK und p38 in Colo 357 Zellen induziert. Die Induktion erfolgte hierbei unabh{\"a}ngig vom apoptotischen Zelltod aber abh{\"a}ngig von der Aktivierung der Caspasen. Desweiteren konnte eine TRAIL-vermittelte Aktivierung des Transkriptionsfaktors NFkappaB in Colo 357 Zellen demonstriert werden. Anhand von ELISA-Experimenten wurde gezeigt, dass sowohl die Aktivierung der MAP Kinasen als auch die Aktivierung von NFkappaB eine essentielle Rolle bei der TRAIL-vermittelten Induktion von IL-8 spielen. Durch die Induktion von IL-8 wiederum kann TRAIL inflammatorische Effekte induzieren. Im Hinblick auf eine potentielle Tumortherapie mit TRAIL legen die Daten dieser Studie die Notwendigkeit von Kombinationstherapien mit TRAIL nahe. So kann durch die Kombination von TRAIL mit anti-inflammatorisch wirkenden Medikamenten eine Reduktion entz{\"u}ndlicher Nebenwirkungen erzielt werden. Andererseits kann durch Verwendung von TRAIL zusammen mit Proteasom-Inhibitoren die Resistenz gegen{\"u}ber TRAIL-vermittelter Apoptose vermindert werden und gleichzeitig eine anti-inflammatorische und NFkappaB-hemmende Wirkung erzielt werden.},
  subject      = {Apoptosis},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{TrebingElMeserySchaeferetal.2014,
  author    = {Trebing, J. and El-Mesery, M. and Sch{\"a}fer, V. and Weisenberger, D. and Siegmund, D. and Silence, K. and Wajant, H.},
  title     = {CD70-restricted specific activation of TRAILR1 or TRAILR2 using scFv-targeted TRAIL mutants},
  series = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  doi       = {10.1038/cddis.2013.555},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120078},
  pages     = {e1035},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {To combine the CD27 stimulation inhibitory effect of blocking CD70 antibodies with an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-independent, cell death-inducing activity for targeting of CD70-expressing tumors, we evaluated here fusion proteins of the apoptosis-inducing TNF family member TRAIL and a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from a high-affinity llama-derived anti-human CD70 antibody (lαhCD70). A fusion protein of scFv:lαhCD70 with TNC-TRAIL, a stabilized form of TRAIL, showed strongly enhanced apoptosis induction upon CD70 binding and furthermore efficiently interfered with CD70-CD27 interaction. Noteworthy, introduction of recently identified mutations that discriminate between TRAILR1 and TRAILR2 binding into the TRAIL part of scFv:lαhCD70-TNC-TRAIL resulted in TRAIL death receptor-specific fusion proteins with CD70-restricted activity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlingseisenEhrenschwenderHeigletal.2012,
  author    = {Klingseisen, Laura and Ehrenschwender, Martin and Heigl, Ulrike and Wajant, Harald and Hehlgans, Thomas and Sch{\"u}tze, Stefan and Schneider-Brachert, Wulf},
  title     = {E3-14.7K Is Recruited to TNF-Receptor 1 and Blocks TNF Cytolysis Independent from Interaction with Optineurin},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0038348},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-135687},
  pages     = {e38348},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Escape from the host immune system is essential for intracellular pathogens. The adenoviral protein E3-14.7K (14.7K) is known as a general inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced apoptosis. It efficiently blocks TNF-receptor 1 (TNFR1) internalization but the underlying molecular mechanism still remains elusive. Direct interaction of 14.7K and/or associated proteins with the TNFR1 complex has been discussed although to date not proven. In our study, we provide for the first time evidence for recruitment of 14.7K and the 14.7K interacting protein optineurin to TNFR1. Various functions have been implicated for optineurin such as regulation of receptor endocytosis, vesicle trafficking, regulation of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) pathway and antiviral signaling. We therefore hypothesized that binding of optineurin to 14.7K and recruitment of both proteins to the TNFR1 complex is essential for protection against TNF-induced cytotoxic effects. To precisely dissect the individual role of 14.7K and optineurin, we generated and characterized a 14.7K mutant that does not confer TNF-resistance but is still able to interact with optineurin. In H1299 and KB cells expressing 14.7K wild-type protein, neither decrease in cell viability nor cleavage of caspases was observed upon stimulation with TNF. In sharp contrast, cells expressing the non-protective mutant of 14.7K displayed reduced viability and cleavage of initiator and effector caspases upon TNF treatment, indicating ongoing apoptotic cell death. Knockdown of optineurin in 14.7K expressing cells did not alter the protective effect as measured by cell viability and caspase activation. Taken together, we conclude that optineurin despite its substantial role in vesicular trafficking, endocytosis of cell surface receptors and recruitment to the TNFR1 complex is dispensable for the 14.7K-mediated protection against TNF-induced apoptosis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RauertStuehmerBargouetal.2011,
  author    = {Rauert, H. and St{\"u}hmer, T. and Bargou, R. and Wajant, H. and Siegmund, D.},
  title     = {TNFR1 and TNFR2 regulate the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in myeloma cells by multiple mechanisms},
  series = {Cell Death and Disease},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Cell Death and Disease},
  doi       = {10.1038/cddis.2011.78},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133486},
  pages     = {e194},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {The huge majority of myeloma cell lines express TNFR2 while a substantial subset of them failed to show TNFR1 expression. Stimulation of TNFR1 in the TNFR1-expressing subset of MM cell lines had no or only a very mild effect on cellular viability. Surprisingly, however, TNF stimulation enhanced cell death induction by CD95L and attenuated the apoptotic effect of TRAIL. The contrasting regulation of TRAIL- and CD95L-induced cell death by TNF could be traced back to the concomitant NFjBmediated upregulation of CD95 and the antiapoptotic FLIP protein. It appeared that CD95 induction, due to its strength, overcompensated a rather moderate upregulation of FLIP so that the net effect of TNF-induced NFjB activation in the context of CD95 signaling is pro-apoptotic. TRAIL-induced cell death, however, was antagonized in response to TNF because in this context only the induction of FLIP is relevant. Stimulation of TNFR2 in myeloma cells leads to TRAF2 depletion. In line with this, we observed cell death induction in TNFR1-TNFR2-costimulated JJN3 cells. Our studies revealed that the TNF-TNF receptor system adjusts the responsiveness of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in myeloma cells by multiple mechanisms that generate a highly context-dependent net effect on myeloma cell survival},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StolpmannBrinkmannSalzmannetal.2012,
  author    = {Stolpmann, K. and Brinkmann, J. and Salzmann, S. and Genkinger, D. and Fritsche, E. and Hutzler, C. and Wajant, H. and Luch, A. and Henkler, F.},
  title     = {Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor sensitises human keratinocytes for CD95L-and TRAIL-induced apoptosis},
  series = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  number    = {e388},
  doi       = {10.1038/cddis.2012.127},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133501},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {In this study, we have analysed the apoptotic effects of the ubiquitous environmental toxin benzo[ a] pyrene (BP) in HaCaT cells and human keratinocytes. Although prolonged exposure to BP was not cytotoxic on its own, a strong enhancement of CD95 (Fas)-mediated apoptosis was observed with BP at concentrations activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Importantly, the ultimately mutagenic BP-metabolite, that is, (+)-anti-BP-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), failed to enhance CD95-mediated cell death, suggesting that the observed pro-apoptotic effect of BP is neither associated with DNA adducts nor DNA-damage related signalling. CD95-induced apoptosis was also enhanced by beta-naphtoflavone, a well-known agonist of the AhR that does not induce DNA damage, thus suggesting a crucial role for AhR activation. Consistently, BP failed to sensitise for CD95L-induced apoptosis in AhR knockdown HaCaT cells. Furthermore, inhibition of CYP1A1 and/or 1B1 expression did not affect the pro-apoptotic crosstalk. Exposure to BP did not increase expression of CD95, but led to augmented activation of caspase-8. Enhancement of apoptosis was also observed with the TRAIL death receptors that activate caspase-8 and apoptosis by similar mechanisms as CD95. Together, these observations indicate an interference of AhR signalling with the activity of receptor-associated signalling intermediates that are shared by CD95 and TRAIL receptors. Our data thus suggest that AhR agonists can enhance cytokine-mediated adversity upon dermal exposure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ElMeseryTrebingSchaferetal.2013,
  author    = {El-Mesery, M. and Trebing, J. and Schafer, V. and Weisenberger, D. and Siegmund, D. and Wajant, H.},
  title     = {CD40-directed scFv-TRAIL fusion proteins induce CD40-restricted tumor cell death and activate dendritic cells},
  series = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Cell Death \& Disease},
  number    = {e916},
  doi       = {10.1038/cddis.2013.402},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128777},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Targeted cancer therapy concepts often aim at the induction of adjuvant antitumor immunity or stimulation of tumor cell apoptosis. There is further evidence that combined application of immune stimulating and tumor apoptosis-inducing compounds elicits a synergistic antitumor effect. Here, we describe the development and characterization of bifunctional fusion proteins consisting of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) domain derived from the CD40-specific monoclonal antibody G28-5 that is fused to the N-terminus of stabilized trimeric soluble variants of the death ligand TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). As shown before by us and others for other cell surface antigen-targeted scFv-TRAIL fusion proteins, scFv:G28-TRAIL displayed an enhanced capacity to induce apoptosis upon CD40 binding. Studies with scFv:G28 fusion proteins of TRAIL mutants that discriminate between the two TRAIL death receptors, TRAILR1 and TRAILR2, further revealed that the CD40 binding-dependent mode of apoptosis induction of scFv:G28-TRAIL is operable with each of the two TRAIL death receptors. Binding of scFv:G28-TRAIL fusion proteins to CD40 not only result in enhanced TRAIL death receptor signaling but also in activation of the targeted CD40 molecule. In accordance with the latter, the scFv:G28-TRAIL fusion proteins triggered strong CD40-mediated maturation of dendritic cells. The CD40-targeted TRAIL fusion proteins described in this study therefore represent a novel type of bifunctional fusion proteins that couple stimulation of antigen presenting cells and apoptosis induction.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Warnke2007,
  author    = {Warnke, Clemens},
  title     = {Mechanismen TNF-induzierter Genexpression},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-23989},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {TNF wird zun{\"a}chst als TypII-Transmembranprotein (mTNF) gebildet und erst anschließend durch spezifische Spaltung durch die Metalloprotease TACE zum l{\"o}slichen Zytokin sTNF prozessiert. Da mTNF der alleinige Hauptaktivator des TNFR2 ist und sich bisherige Untersuchungen zum TNF-Signaling weitgehend auf sTNF konzentrierten, ist vergleichsweise wenig {\"u}ber TNFR2-vermittelte Signaltransduktion bekannt. An TNFR1 sind dagegen beide TNF-Varianten bioaktiv. Trotz intensiver Untersuchung des TNFR1-Signaling sind jedoch auch hier viele Fragen noch unbeantwortet. Derzeit existieren deshalb zum TNFR1-Signaling zwei verschiedene Modellvorstellungen nebeneinander. Im ersten Modell, dem Modell der Kompartmentalisation, bindet TRADD erst nach Rezeptorinternalisierung an TNFR1, genauso wie FADD und Caspase-8. Die Rezeptorinternalisierung nach Ligandenbindung gilt hier daher als Voraussetzung f{\"u}r die TRADD-Rekrutierung und f{\"u}r die Apoptoseinduktion. Im zweiten Modell, dem Modell zweier sequentiell arbeitender Signalkomplexe, bindet TRADD dagegen bereits im membrangebundenen Signalkomplex an TNFR1. Anschließend dissoziiert TRADD vom Rezeptor, um im Zytoplasma einen zweiten, apoptoseinduzierenden Komplex mit FADD und Caspase-8 zu formen. Um mehr {\"u}ber TNFR2 zu erfahren und um das TNFR1-Signaling besser zu verstehen, wurden in dieser Arbeit die Signaltransduktion und die Geninduktion {\"u}ber TNFR1 und TNFR2 nach Stimulation mit mTNF untersucht. Ziel war es letztlich, eine Methode zu etablieren, die es erlaubt, membrangebundene TNFR1- und TNFR2-Signalkomplexe getrennt zu isolieren. Dazu wurden zun{\"a}chst nicht zu sTNF spaltbare TNFR1- bzw. TNFR2-spezifische mTNF-Varianten mit GST-Tag hinsichtlich Rezeptorbindung und Rezeptoraktivierung n{\"a}her charakterisiert. Die selektive Bindung dieser mTNF-Varianten an TNFR1 bzw. TNFR2 konnte gezeigt werden. Auch der Nachweis ihre Funktionalit{\"a}t in Versuchen zur IL8-Induktion war m{\"o}glich. Mit Hilfe der TNFR1-spezifischen mTNF-Variante gelang im GST-Fishing die Koimmunopr{\"a}zipitation von TNFR1, TRADD und TRAF2 und damit die Isolierung des membrangebundenen Signalkomplexes des TNFR1. Mit Hilfe einer TNFR2-spezifischen Variante konnten dagegen TNFR2 und TRAF2 koimmunopr{\"a}zipitiert werden, TRADD dagegen nicht. Somit ließen sich mit den rezeptorspezifischen Varianten von mTNF die Rezeptorsignalkomplexe des TNFR1 und TNFR2 getrennt isolieren. Interessant war dabei insbesondere die TRADD-Rekrutierung an TNFR1 im membrangebundenen TNFR1-Signalkomplex. Da die Internalisierung von TNFR1 nach mTNF-Stimulation schwer vorstellbar ist, bindet TRADD offensichtlich an TNFR1, ohne dass eine Rezeptorinternalisierung Voraussetzung w{\"a}re. Damit erscheint das Modell der Kompartmentalisation zumindest f{\"u}r mTNF wenig plausibel. Dagegen sind die bisher f{\"u}r mTNF erhobenen Daten mit einer TRADD-Dissoziation vom Rezeptor vereinbar, weshalb ein Modell zweier sequentiell arbeitender Signalkomplexe durchaus auch f{\"u}r mTNF G{\"u}ltigkeit besitzen k{\"o}nnte.},
  subject      = {Tumor-Nekrose-Faktor},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LaglerElMeseryKuebleretal.2017,
  author    = {Lagler, Charlotte and El-Mesery, Mohamed and K{\"u}bler, Alexander Christian and M{\"u}ller-Richter, Urs Dietmar Achim and St{\"u}hmer, Thorsten and Nickel, Joachim and M{\"u}ller, Thomas Dieter and Wajant, Harald and Seher, Axel},
  title     = {The anti-myeloma activity of bone morphogenetic protein 2 predominantly relies on the induction of growth arrest and is apoptosis-independent},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {10},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158993},
  pages     = {e0185720},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of the bone marrow, is characterized by a pathological increase in antibody-producing plasma cells and an increase in immunoglobulins (plasmacytosis). In recent years, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been reported to be activators of apoptotic cell death in neoplastic B cells in MM. Here, we use bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) to show that the "apoptotic" effect of BMPs on human neoplastic B cells is dominated by anti-proliferative activities and cell cycle arrest and is apoptosis-independent. The anti-proliferative effect of BMP2 was analysed in the human cell lines KMS12-BM and L363 using WST-1 and a Coulter counter and was confirmed using CytoTox assays with established inhibitors of programmed cell death (zVAD-fmk and necrostatin-1). Furthermore, apoptotic activity was compared in both cell lines employing western blot analysis for caspase 3 and 8 in cells treated with BMP2 and FasL. Additionally, expression profiles of marker genes of different cell death pathways were analysed in both cell lines after stimulation with BMP2 for 48h using an RT-PCR-based array. In our experiments we observed that there was rather no reduction in absolute cell number, but cells stopped proliferating following treatment with BMP2 instead. The time frame (48-72 h) after BMP2 treatment at which a reduction in cell number is detectable is too long to indicate a directly BMP2-triggered apoptosis. Moreover, in comparison to robust apoptosis induced by the approved apoptotic factor FasL, BMP2 only marginally induced cell death. Consistently, neither the known inhibitor of apoptotic cell death zVAD-fmk nor the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 was able to rescue myeloma cell growth in the presence of BMP2.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wajant2019,
  author    = {Wajant, Harald},
  title     = {Molecular mode of action of TRAIL receptor agonists—common principles and their translational exploitation},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11070954},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202416},
  pages     = {954},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its death receptors TRAILR1/death receptor 4 (DR4) and TRAILR2/DR5 trigger cell death in many cancer cells but rarely exert cytotoxic activity on non-transformed cells. Against this background, a variety of recombinant TRAIL variants and anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies have been developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Despite promising results from mice tumor models, TRAIL death receptor targeting has failed so far in clinical studies to show satisfying anti-tumor efficacy. These disappointing results can largely be explained by two issues: First, tumor cells can acquire TRAIL resistance by several mechanisms defining a need for combination therapies with appropriate sensitizing drugs. Second, there is now growing preclinical evidence that soluble TRAIL variants but also bivalent anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies typically require oligomerization or plasma membrane anchoring to achieve maximum activity. This review discusses the need for oligomerization and plasma membrane attachment for the activity of TRAIL death receptor agonists in view of what is known about the molecular mechanisms of how TRAIL death receptors trigger intracellular cell death signaling. In particular, it will be highlighted which consequences this has for the development of next generation TRAIL death receptor agonists and their potential clinical application.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wajant2019,
  author    = {Wajant, Harald},
  title     = {Molecular mode of action of TRAIL receptor agonists—common principles and their translational exploitation},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11070954},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201833},
  pages     = {954},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its death receptors TRAILR1/death receptor 4 (DR4) and TRAILR2/DR5 trigger cell death in many cancer cells but rarely exert cytotoxic activity on non-transformed cells. Against this background, a variety of recombinant TRAIL variants and anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies have been developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Despite promising results from mice tumor models, TRAIL death receptor targeting has failed so far in clinical studies to show satisfying anti-tumor efficacy. These disappointing results can largely be explained by two issues: First, tumor cells can acquire TRAIL resistance by several mechanisms defining a need for combination therapies with appropriate sensitizing drugs. Second, there is now growing preclinical evidence that soluble TRAIL variants but also bivalent anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies typically require oligomerization or plasma membrane anchoring to achieve maximum activity. This review discusses the need for oligomerization and plasma membrane attachment for the activity of TRAIL death receptor agonists in view of what is known about the molecular mechanisms of how TRAIL death receptors trigger intracellular cell death signaling. In particular, it will be highlighted which consequences this has for the development of next generation TRAIL death receptor agonists and their potential clinical application.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OthmanBekhitAnanyetal.2021,
  author    = {Othman, Eman M. and Bekhit, Amany A. and Anany, Mohamed A. and Dandekar, Thomas and Ragab, Hanan M. and Wahid, Ahmed},
  title     = {Design, Synthesis, and Anticancer Screening for Repurposed Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Derivatives on Four Mammalian Cancer Cell Lines},
  series = {Molecules},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Molecules},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1420-3049},
  doi       = {10.3390/molecules26102961},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239734},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The present study reports the synthesis of new purine bioisosteres comprising a pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold linked to mono-, di-, and trimethoxy benzylidene moieties through hydrazine linkages. First, in silico docking experiments of the synthesized compounds against Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase-3, Ki67, p21, and p53 were performed in a trial to rationalize the observed cytotoxic activity for the tested compounds. The anticancer activity of these compounds was evaluated in vitro against Caco-2, A549, HT1080, and Hela cell lines. Results revealed that two (5 and 7) of the three synthesized compounds (5, 6, and 7) showed high cytotoxic activity against all tested cell lines with IC50 values in the micro molar concentration. Our in vitro results show that there is no significant apoptotic effect for the treatment with the experimental compounds on the viability of cells against A549 cells. Ki67 expression was found to decrease significantly following the treatment of cells with the most promising candidate: drug 7. The overall results indicate that these pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives possess anticancer activity at varying doses. The suggested mechanism of action involves the inhibition of the proliferation of cancer cells.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WajantSiegmund2019,
  author    = {Wajant, Harald and Siegmund, Daniela},
  title     = {TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the control of the life and death balance of macrophages},
  series = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  number    = {91},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcell.2019.00091},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201551},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Macrophages stand in the first line of defense against a variety of pathogens but are also involved in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. To fulfill their functions macrophages sense a broad range of pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs) by plasma membrane and intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Intriguingly, the overwhelming majority of PPRs trigger the production of the pleiotropic cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF). TNF affects almost any type of cell including macrophages themselves. TNF promotes the inflammatory activity of macrophages but also controls macrophage survival and death. TNF exerts its activities by stimulation of two different types of receptors, TNF receptor-1 (TNFR1) and TNFR2, which are both expressed by macrophages. The two TNF receptor types trigger distinct and common signaling pathways that can work in an interconnected manner. Based on a brief general description of major TNF receptor-associated signaling pathways, we focus in this review on research of recent years that revealed insights into the molecular mechanisms how the TNFR1-TNFR2 signaling network controls the life and death balance of macrophages. In particular, we discuss how the TNFR1-TNFR2 signaling network is integrated into PRR signaling.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SiegmundZaitsevaWajant2023,
  author    = {Siegmund, Daniela and Zaitseva, Olena and Wajant, Harald},
  title     = {Fn14 and TNFR2 as regulators of cytotoxic TNFR1 signaling},
  series = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  issn      = {2296-634X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcell.2023.1267837},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-354304},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1 (TNFR1), TNFR2 and fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) belong to the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF). From a structural point of view, TNFR1 is a prototypic death domain (DD)-containing receptor. In contrast to other prominent death receptors, such as CD95/Fas and the two TRAIL death receptors DR4 and DR5, however, liganded TNFR1 does not instruct the formation of a plasma membrane-associated death inducing signaling complex converting procaspase-8 into highly active mature heterotetrameric caspase-8 molecules. Instead, liganded TNFR1 recruits the DD-containing cytoplasmic signaling proteins TRADD and RIPK1 and empowers these proteins to trigger cell death signaling by cytosolic complexes after their release from the TNFR1 signaling complex. The activity and quality (apoptosis versus necroptosis) of TNF-induced cell death signaling is controlled by caspase-8, the caspase-8 regulatory FLIP proteins, TRAF2, RIPK1 and the RIPK1-ubiquitinating E3 ligases cIAP1 and cIAP2. TNFR2 and Fn14 efficiently recruit TRAF2 along with the TRAF2 binding partners cIAP1 and cIAP2 and can thereby limit the availability of these molecules for other TRAF2/cIAP1/2-utilizing proteins including TNFR1. Accordingly, at the cellular level engagement of TNFR2 or Fn14 inhibits TNFR1-induced RIPK1-mediated effects reaching from activation of the classical NFκB pathway to induction of apoptosis and necroptosis. In this review, we summarize the effects of TNFR2- and Fn14-mediated depletion of TRAF2 and the cIAP1/2 on TNFR1 signaling at the molecular level and discuss the consequences this has in vivo.},
  language  = {en}
}