@article{MaggRieglerWiedmannetal.2015,
  author    = {Magg, Barbara and Riegler, Christoph and Wiedmann, Silke and Heuschmann, Peter and Sommer, Claudia and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan},
  title     = {Self-administered version of the Fabry-associated pain questionnaire for adult patients},
  series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases},
  number    = {113},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13023-015-0325-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145294},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Fabry-associated pain may be the first symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and presents with a unique phenotype including mostly acral burning triggerable pain attacks, evoked pain, pain crises, and permanent pain. We recently developed and validated the first Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) for adult patients. Here we report on the validation of the self-administered version of the FPQ that no longer requires a face-to-face interview but can be filled in by the patients themselves allowing more flexible data collection. Methods At our W{\"u}rzburg Fabry Center for Interdisciplinary Treatment, Germany, we have developed the self-administered version of the FPQ by adapting the questionnaire to a self-report version. To do this, consecutive Fabry patients with current or past pain history (n = 56) were first interviewed face-to-face. Two weeks later patients' self-reported questionnaire results were collected by mail (n = 55). We validated the self-administered version of the FPQ by assessing the inter-rater reliability agreement of scores obtained by supervised administration and self-administration of the FPQ. Results The FPQ contains 15 questions on the different pain phenotypes, on pain development during life with and without therapy, and on impairment due to pain. Statistical analysis showed that the majority of questions were answered in high agreement in both sessions with a mean AC1-statistic of 0.857 for 55 nominal-scaled items and a mean ICC of 0.587 for 9 scores. Conclusions This self-administered version of the first pain questionnaire for adult Fabry patients is a useful tool to assess Fabry-associated pain without a time-consuming face-to-face interview but via a self-reporting survey allowing more flexible usage.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UeceylerKewenigKittelSchneideretal.2015,
  author    = {{\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan and Kewenig, Susanne and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and Fallgatter, Andreas J. and Sommer, Claudia},
  title     = {Increased cortical activation upon painful stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome},
  series = {BMC Neurology},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {BMC Neurology},
  number    = {210},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12883-015-0472-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125230},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain and associated symptoms. We investigated cerebral activation in FMS patients by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Methods Two stimulation paradigms were applied: a) painful pressure stimulation at the dorsal forearm; b) verbal fluency test (VFT). We prospectively recruited 25 FMS patients, ten patients with unipolar major depression (MD) without pain, and 35 healthy controls. All patients underwent neurological examination and all subjects were investigated with questionnaires (pain, depression, FMS, empathy). Results FMS patients had lower pressure pain thresholds than patients with MD and controls (p < 0.001) and reported higher pain intensity (p < 0.001). Upon unilateral pressure pain stimulation fNIRS recordings revealed increased bilateral cortical activation in FMS patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). FMS patients also displayed a stronger contralateral activity over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in direct comparison to patients with MD (p < 0.05). While all three groups performed equally well in the VFT, a frontal deficit in cortical activation was only found in patients with depression (p < 0.05). Performance and cortical activation correlated negatively in FMS patients (p < 0.05) and positively in patients with MD (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our data give further evidence for altered central nervous processing in patients with FMS and the distinction between FMS and MD.},
  language  = {en}
}