@article{HalfmannCastioniWetzeletal.2024,
  author    = {Halfmann, Marie and Castioni, Noah and Wetzel, Lea and Koopmann, Anne and K{\"o}nig, Sarah and Schmieder, Astrid},
  title     = {Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of medical students and young physicians in Germany: Gender-specific results of an online survey},
  series = {Heliyon},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Heliyon},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {2405-8440},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23727},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-350502},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Background Healthcare workers and medical students faced new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Processes within many hospitals were completely disrupted. In addition, the face to face teaching of medical students was drastically reduced. Those at risk of developing mental health problems appear to be younger health care workers and women. Objective To investigate potential COVID-19 pandemic-related gender differences in psychological distress among medical students and physicians in their first years of practice. Design and setting An anonymous survey was carried out online between December 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, at the Mannheim Medical Faculty and the W{\"u}rzburg Medical Faculty, Germany, after obtaining informed consent. Primary outcome measures were changes in anxiety and depression symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and changes in participants' current quality of life using the WHO Quality of Life BREF. Results The results show wave-like courses for perceived anxiety and burden overlapping with the course of the COVID-19 incidence. In comparison to men, women showed a significant higher increase in HADS (p = 0.005) and a reduced life quality (p = 0.007) after COVID-19. Both sexes showed different frequencies of the factors influencing quality of life, with the presence of a previous mental illness and mean anxiety having a significant higher negative impact in women. Conclusion Future and young female physicians reported a disproportionate higher burden during COVID-19 compared to their male colleges. These observations suggest an increased need for support and prevention efforts especially in this vulnerable population.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WidderBackhausWierlemannetal.,
  author    = {Widder, A. and Backhaus, J. and Wierlemann, A. and Hering, I. and Flemming, S. and Hankir, M. and Germer, C.-T. and Wiegering, A. and Lock, J. F. and K{\"o}nig, S. and Seyfried, F.},
  title     = {Optimizing laparoscopic training efficacy by 'deconstruction into key steps': a randomized controlled trial with novice medical students},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-022-09408-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323969},
  pages     = {8726-8736},
  abstract  = {Background Simulator training is an effective way of acquiring laparoscopic skills but there remains a need to optimize teaching methods to accelerate learning. We evaluated the effect of the mental exercise 'deconstruction into key steps' (DIKS) on the time required to acquire laparoscopic skills. Methods A randomized controlled trial with undergraduate medical students was implemented into a structured curricular laparoscopic training course. The intervention group (IG) was trained using the DIKS approach, while the control group (CG) underwent the standard course. Laparoscopic performance of all participants was video-recorded at baseline (t0), after the first session (t1) and after the second session (t2) nine days later. Two double-blinded raters assessed the videos. The Impact of potential covariates on performance (gender, age, prior laparoscopic experience, self-assessed motivation and self-assessed dexterity) was evaluated with a self-report questionnaire. Results Both the IG (n = 58) and the CG (n = 68) improved their performance after each training session (p < 0.001) but with notable differences between sessions. Whereas the CG significantly improved their performance from t0 -t1 (p < 0.05), DIKS shortened practical exercise time by 58\% so that the IG outperformed the CG from t1 -t2, (p < 0.05). High self-assessed motivation and dexterity associated with significantly better performance (p < 0.05). Male participants demonstrated significantly higher overall performance (p < 0.05). Conclusion Mental exercises like DIKS can improve laparoscopic performance and shorten practice times. Given the limited exposure of surgical residents to simulator training, implementation of mental exercises like DIKS is highly recommended. Gender, self-assessed dexterity, and motivation all appreciably influence performance in laparoscopic training.},
  language  = {en}
}