@phdthesis{Kiesel2018, author = {Kiesel, Elisabeth}, title = {Pr{\"a}frontale Aktivierungsmuster bei der Emotionsregulationsstrategie der Aufmerksamkeitslenkung - eine kombinierte EKP - fNIRS - Studie -}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-163146}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Vorherige Studien beschreiben bei der Aufmerksamkeitslenkung pr{\"a}frontale Aktivierungen im rechten DLPFC und DMPFC. Diese Studie wollte untersuchen, ob die Aufmerksamkeitslenkung durch Richten des Fokus auf nicht -emotionale Bildinhalte innerhalb eines Stimulus zu pr{\"a}frontalen Effekten f{\"u}hrt. Dazu wurde eine kombinierte Messung aus EEG, fNIRS und emotionalem Arousal erhoben. Die Bedingungen beinhalteten entweder das passive Bildbetrachten oder die Aufmerksamkeitslenkung. Das EEG wurde als Kontrollbedingung erhoben, um zu replizieren, dass die Aufmerksamkeitslenkung auf nicht -emotionale Bildinhalte zu einer Reduktion des LPP und des emotionalen Arousals f{\"u}hrt. In dieser Studie konnte sowohl ein reduziertes LPP als ein geringeres emotionales Arousal bei der Aufmerksamkeitslenkung beschrieben werden. In der fNIRS zeigten sich jedoch weder ein signifikanter Emotions- noch ein signifikanter Regulationseffekt, sodass keine Aktivierungen pr{\"a}frontal bei der Aufmerksamkeitslenkung beschrieben werden konnte. Es sind somit weiterf{\"u}hrende Studien zur Aufmerksamkeitslenkung notwendig, ob die Aufmerksamkeitslenkung zu pr{\"a}frontalen Aktivierungen f{\"u}hrt, und ob diese mit der fNIRS abgebildet werden k{\"o}nnen.}, subject = {Emotionsregulation}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Baur2016, author = {Baur, Ramona}, title = {Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Emotion Processing, and Emotion Regulation in Virtual Reality}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142064}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is characterized by symptoms of inattentiveness and hyperactivity/impulsivity. Besides, increasing evidence points to ADHD patients showing emotional dysfunctions and concomitant problems in social life. However, systematic research on emotional dysfunctions in ADHD is still rare, and to date most studies lack conceptual differentiation between emotion processing and emotion regulation. The aim of this thesis was to systematically investigate emotion processing and emotion regulation in adult ADHD in a virtual reality paradigm implementing social interaction. Emotional reactions were assessed on experiential, physiological, and behavioral levels. Experiment 1 was conducted to develop a virtual penalty kicking paradigm implying social feedback and to test it in a healthy sample. This paradigm should then be applied in ADHD patients later on. Pleasant and unpleasant trials in this paradigm consisted of hits respectively misses and subsequent feedback from a virtual coach. In neutral trials, participants were teleported to different spots of the virtual stadium. Results indicated increased positive affectivity (higher valence and arousal ratings, higher zygomaticus activations, and higher expression rates of positive emotional behavior) in response to pleasant compared to neutral trials. Reactions to unpleasant trials were contradictory, indicating increased levels of both positive and negative affectivity, compared to neutral trials. Unpleasant vs. neutral trials revealed lower valence ratings, higher arousal ratings, higher zygomaticus activations, slightly lower corrugator activations, and higher expression rates of both positive and negative emotional behavior. The intensity of emotional reactions correlated with experienced presence in the virtual reality. To better understand the impact of hits or misses per se vs. hits or misses with coach feedback healthy participants' emotional reactions, only 50\% of all shots were followed by coach feedback in experiment 2. Neutral trials consisted of shots over the free soccer field which were followed by coach feedback in 50 \% of all trials. Shots and feedback evoked more extreme valence and arousal ratings, higher zygomaticus activations, lower corrugator activations, and higher skin conductance responses than shots alone across emotional conditions. Again, results speak for the induction of positive emotions in pleasant trials whereas the induction of negative emotions in unpleasant trials seems ambiguous. Technical improvements of the virtual reality were reflected in higher presence ratings than in experiment 1. Experiment 3 investigated emotional reactions of adult ADHD patients and healthy controls after emotion processing and response-focused emotion regulation. Participants successively went through an ostensible online ball-tossing game (cyber ball) inducing negative emotions, and an adapted version of the virtual penalty kicking game. Throughout cyber ball, participants were included or ostracized by two other players in different experimental blocks. Participants were instructed to explicitly show, not regulate, or hide their emotions in different experimental blocks. Results provided some evidence for deficient processing of positive emotions in ADHD. Patients reported slightly lower positive affect than controls during cyber ball, gave lower valence ratings than controls in response to pleasant penalty kicking trials, and showed lower zygomaticus activations than controls especially during penalty kicking. Patients in comparison with controls showed slightly increased processing of unpleasant events during cyber ball (higher ratings of negative affect, especially in response to ostracism), but not during penalty kicking. Patients showed lower baseline skin conductance levels than controls, and impaired skin conductance modulations. Compared to controls, patients showed slight over-expression of positive as well as negative emotional behavior. Emotion regulation analyses revealed no major difficulties of ADHD vs. controls in altering their emotional reactions through deliberate response modulation. Moreover, patients reported to habitually apply adaptive emotion regulation strategies even more frequently than controls. The analyses of genetic high-risk vs. low-risk groups for ADHD across the whole sample revealed similar results as analyses for patients vs. controls for zygomaticus modulations during emotion processing, and for modulations of emotional reactions due to emotion regulation. To sum up, the virtual penalty kicking paradigm proved to be successful for the induction of positive, but not negative emotions. The importance of presence in virtual reality for the intensity of induced emotions could be replicated. ADHD patients showed impaired processing of primarily positive emotions. Aberrations in negative emotional responding were less clear and need further investigation. Results point to adult ADHD in comparison to healthy controls suffering from baseline deficits in autonomic arousal and deficits in arousal modulation. Deficits of ADHD in the deliberate application of response-focused emotion regulation could not be found.}, subject = {Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Syndrom}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Tupak2013, author = {Tupak, Sara}, title = {Modulators of Prefrontal Fear Network Function: An Integrative View}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85673}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Regulating our immediate feelings, needs, and urges is a task that we are faced with every day in our lives. The effective regulation of our emotions enables us to adapt to society, to deal with our environment, and to achieve long-term goals. Deficient emotion regulation, in contrast, is a common characteristic of many psychiatric and neurological conditions. Particularly anxiety disorders and subclinical states of increased anxiety are characterized by a range of behavioral, autonomic, and neural alterations impeding the efficient down-regulation of acute fear. Established fear network models propose a downstream prefrontal-amygdala circuit for the control of fear reactions but recent research has shown that there are a range of factors acting on this network. The specific prefrontal cortical networks involved in effective regulation and potential mediators and modulators are still a subject of ongoing research in both the animal and human model. The present research focused on the particular role of different prefrontal cortical regions during the processing of fear-relevant stimuli in healthy subjects. It is based on four studies, three of them investigating a different potential modulator of prefrontal top-down function and one directly challenging prefrontal regulatory processes. Summarizing the results of all four studies, it was shown that prefrontal functioning is linked to individual differences in state anxiety, autonomic flexibility, and genetic predisposition. The T risk allele of the neuropeptide S receptor gene, a recently suggested candidate gene for pathologically elevated anxiety, for instance, was associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activation to particularly fear-relevant stimuli. Furthermore, the way of processing has been found to crucially determine if regulatory processes are engaged at all and it was shown that anxious individuals display generally reduced prefrontal activation but may engage in regulatory processes earlier than non-anxious subjects. However, active manipulation of prefrontal functioning in healthy subjects did not lead to the typical behavioral and neural patterns observed in anxiety disorder patients suggesting that other subcortical or prefrontal structures can compensate for an activation loss in one specific region. Taken together, the current studies support prevailing theories of the central role of the prefrontal cortex for regulatory processes in response to fear-eliciting stimuli but point out that there are a range of both individual differences and peculiarities in experimental design that impact on or may even mask potential effects in neuroimaging research on fear regulation.}, subject = {Neurogenetik}, language = {en} }