Dokument-ID Dokumenttyp Verfasser/Autoren Herausgeber Haupttitel Abstract Auflage Verlagsort Verlag Erscheinungsjahr Seitenzahl Schriftenreihe Titel Schriftenreihe Bandzahl ISBN Quelle der Hochschulschrift Konferenzname Quelle:Titel Quelle:Jahrgang Quelle:Heftnummer Quelle:Erste Seite Quelle:Letzte Seite URN DOI Abteilungen OPUS4-23045 Wissenschaftlicher Artikel Römer, Daniela; Cosarinsky, Marcela I.; Roces, Flavio Selection and spatial arrangement of building materials during the construction of nest turrets by grass-cutting ants Ants build complex nest structures by reacting to simple, local stimuli. While underground nests result from the space generated by digging, some leaf- and grass-cutting ants also construct conspicuous aboveground turrets around nest openings. We investigated whether the selection of specific building materials occurs during turret construction in Acromyrmex fracticornis grass-cutting ants, and asked whether single building decisions at the beginning can modify the final turret architecture. To quantify workers' material selection, the original nest turret was removed and a choice between two artificial building materials, thin and thick sticks, was offered for rebuilding. Workers preferred thick sticks at the very beginning of turret construction, showed varying preferences thereafter, and changed to prefer thin sticks for the upper, final part of the turret, indicating that they selected different building materials over time to create a stable structure. The impact of a single building choice on turret architecture was evaluated by placing artificial beams that divided a colony's nest entrance at the beginning of turret rebuilding. Splitting the nest entrance led to the self-organized construction of turrets with branched galleries ending in multiple openings, showing that the spatial location of a single building material can strongly influence turret morphology. 2020 Royal Society Open Science 7 urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230458 10.1098/rsos.201312 Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften OPUS4-20068 Wissenschaftlicher Artikel Cosarinsky, Marcela I.; Römer, Daniela; Roces, Flavio Nest Turrets of Acromyrmex Grass-Cutting Ants: Micromorphology Reveals Building Techniques and Construction Dynamics Acromyrmex fracticornis grass-cutting ants construct conspicuous chimney-shaped nest turrets made of intermeshed grass fragments. We asked whether turrets are constructed by merely piling up nearby materials around the entrance, or whether ants incorporate different materials as the turret develops. By removing the original nest turrets and following their rebuilding process over three consecutive days, age-dependent changes in wall morphology and inner lining fabrics were characterized. Micromorphological descriptions based on thin sections of turret walls revealed the building behaviors involved. Ants started by collecting nearby twigs and dry grass fragments that are piled up around the nest entrance. Several large fragments held the structure like beams. As a net-like structure grew, soil pellets were placed in between the intermeshed plant fragments from the turret base to the top, reinforcing the structure. Concomitantly, the turret inner wall was lined with soil pellets, starting from the base. Therefore, the consolidation of the turret occurred both over time and from its base upwards. It is argued that nest turrets do not simply arise by the arbitrary deposition of nearby materials, and that workers selectively incorporate large materials at the beginning, and respond to the developing structure by reinforcing the intermeshed plant fragments over time. 2020 Insects 11 2 urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200680 10.3390/insects11020140 Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften OPUS4-10940 Dissertation Römer, Daniela Where and how to build? Influence of social and environmental cues on nest building behavior in leaf-cutting ants This thesis explores the influence of social and environmental cues on the nest building behavior of leaf-cutting ants. Especially, the investigations are aimed at evaluating the mechanisms of nest building and how the nest environment can spatially guide building responses that lead to an adaptive nest architecture. The emergence of nest chambers in the nest of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lundi were evaluated. Rather than excavating nest chambers in advance, at places where workers encounter suitable environmental conditions for brood and fungus rearing, these items have to be present at a site. When presented in the laboratory with a choice between two otherwise identical digging sites, offering suitable environmental conditions, but one containing brood, the workers displayed a higher excavation activity at the site where they encountered the putative content of a chamber. The shape of the excavated cavity was also more round and chamber-like. It is concluded that leaf-cutting ants respond to social cues during nest building. Excavation is a costly process and colonies have to spend a part of their energy stores on nest building, so that regulatory responses for the control of nest excavation are expected to occur. Worker density at the beginning of the digging process influenced digging activity while the presence of in-nest stores did not. Stored brood and fungus did however influence the architecture of the excavated nest, leading to the excavation of larger chambers and smaller tunnels. While self-organized mechanisms appear to be involved in the nest building process, the social cues of the ants' environment during building clearly influence the nest architecture and lead to an adjustment of the nest size to the current space needs of the colony. Workers secondarily regulated nest size by the opportunistic refilling of unused space with excavated soil pellets. As the ants should provide suitable conditions for brood and fungus rearing, they should show a behavioral response to CO2 concentrations, as the gas is known to hinder fungus respiration. Workers of A. lundi did indeed avoid high CO2-levels for fungus rearing but actually preferred CO2-values in the range encountered close to the soil surface, where this species excavates their nests. However, different CO2-levels did not affect their excavation behavior. While fungus chambers make up part of a leaf-cutting ant nest, most leaf-cutting ants of the genus Atta also spent part of the colony's energy on excavating large, voluminous chambers for waste disposal, rather than scattering the material aboveground. It is expected that leaf-cutting ants also show environmental preferences for waste management. In experiments Atta laevigata workers preferred deposition in a warm and dry environment and showed no preference for specific CO2-levels. The continued accumulation of waste particles in a waste chamber seems to be based on the use of volatiles. These originate from the waste itself, and seem to be used as an orientation cue by workers relocating the material. The ensuing large accumulation of waste at one site should result in the emergence of more voluminous chambers for waste disposal. 2014 urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-109409 Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften OPUS4-200 Dissertation Weidenmüller, Anja From individual behavior to collective structure The social organization of insect colonies has long fascinated naturalists. One of the main features of colony organization is division of labor, whereby each member of the colony specializes in a subset of all tasks required for successful group functioning. The most striking aspect of division of labor is its plasticity: workers switch between tasks in response to external challenges and internal perturbations. The mechanisms underlying flexible division of labor are far from being understood. In order to comprehend how the behavior of individuals gives rise to flexible collective behavior, several questions need to be addressed: We need to know how individuals acquire information about their colony's current demand situation; how they then adjust their behavior according; and which mechanisms integrate dozens or thousands of insect into a higher-order unit. With these questions in mind I have examined two examples of collective and flexible behavior in social bees. First, I addressed the question how a honey bee colony controls its pollen collection. Pollen foraging in honey bees is precisely organized and carefully regulated according to the colony's needs. How this is achieved is unclear. I investigated how foragers acquire information about their colony's pollen need and how they then adjust their behavior. A detailed documentation of pollen foragers in the hive under different pollen need conditions revealed that individual foragers modulate their in-hive working tempo according to the actual pollen need of the colony: Pollen foragers slowed down and stayed in the hive longer when pollen need was low and spent less time in the hive between foraging trips when pollen need of their colony was high. The number of cells inspected before foragers unloaded their pollen load did not change and thus presumably did not serve as cue to pollen need. In contrast, the trophallactic experience of pollen foragers changed with pollen need conditions: trophallactic contacts were shorter when pollen need was high and the number and probability of having short trophallactic contacts increased when pollen need increased. Thus, my results have provided support for the hypothesis that trophallactic experience is one of the various information pathways used by pollen foragers to assess their colony's pollen need. The second example of collective behavior I have examined in this thesis is the control of nest climate in bumble bee colonies, a system differing from pollen collection in honey bees in that information about task need (nest climate parameters) is directly available to all workers. I have shown that an increase in CO2 concentration and temperature level elicits a fanning response whereas an increase in relative humidity does not. The fanning response to temperature and CO2 was graded; the number of fanning bees increased with stimulus intensity. Thus, my study has evidenced flexible colony level control of temperature and CO2. Further, I have shown that the proportion of total work force a colony invests into nest ventilation does not change with colony size. However, the dynamic of the colony response changes: larger colonies show a faster response to perturbations of their colony environment than smaller colonies. Thus, my study has revealed a size-dependent change in the flexible colony behavior underlying homeostasis. I have shown that the colony response to perturbations in nest climate is constituted by workers who differ in responsiveness. Following a brief review of current ideas and models of self-organization and response thresholds in insect colonies, I have presented the first detailed investigation of interindividual variability in the responsiveness of all workers involved in a collective behavior. My study has revealed that bumble bee workers evidence consistent responses to certain stimulus levels and differ in their response thresholds. Some consistently respond to low stimulus intensities, others consistently respond to high stimulus intensities. Workers are stimulus specialists rather than task specialists. Further, I have demonstrated that workers of a colony differ in two other parameters of responsiveness: response probability and fanning activity. Response threshold, response probability and fanning activity are independent parameters of individual behavior. Besides demonstrating and quantifying interindividual variability, my study has provided empirical support for the idea of specialization through reinforcement. Response thresholds of fanning bees decreased over successive trials. I have discussed the importance of interindividual variability for specialization and the collective control of nest climate and present a general discussion of self-organization and selection. This study contributes to our understanding of individual behavior and collective structure in social insects. A fascinating picture of social organization is beginning to emerge. In place of centralized systems of communication and information transmission, insect societies frequently employ mechanisms based upon self-organization. Self-organization promises to be an important and unifying principle in physical, chemical and biological systems. 2001 urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-2448 Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften