TY - JOUR A1 - Seibold, Sebastian A1 - Hothorn, Torsten A1 - Gossner, Martin M. A1 - Simons, Nadja K. A1 - Blüthgen, Nico A1 - Müller, Jörg A1 - Ambarlı, Didem A1 - Ammer, Christian A1 - Bauhus, Jürgen A1 - Fischer, Markus A1 - Habel, Jan C. A1 - Penone, Caterina A1 - Schall, Peter A1 - Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef A1 - Weisser, Wolfgang W. T1 - Insights from regional and short‐term biodiversity monitoring datasets are valuable: a reply to Daskalova et al. 2021 JF - Insect Conservation and Diversity N2 - Reports of major losses in insect biodiversity have stimulated an increasing interest in temporal population changes. Existing datasets are often limited to a small number of study sites, few points in time, a narrow range of land‐use intensities and only some taxonomic groups, or they lack standardised sampling. While new monitoring programs have been initiated, they still cover rather short time periods. Daskalova et al. 2021 (Insect Conservation and Diversity, 14, 1‐18) argue that temporal trends of insect populations derived from short time series are biased towards extreme trends, while their own analysis of an assembly of shorter‐ and longer‐term time series does not support an overall insect decline. With respect to the results of Seibold et al. 2019 (Nature, 574, 671–674) based on a 10‐year multi‐site time series, they claim that the analysis suffers from not accounting for temporal pseudoreplication. Here, we explain why the criticism of missing statistical rigour in the analysis of Seibold et al. (2019) is not warranted. Models that include ‘year’ as random effect, as suggested by Daskalova et al. (2021), fail to detect non‐linear trends and assume that consecutive years are independent samples which is questionable for insect time‐series data. We agree with Daskalova et al. (2021) that the assembly and analysis of larger datasets is urgently needed, but it will take time until such datasets are available. Thus, short‐term datasets are highly valuable, should be extended and analysed continually to provide a more detailed understanding of insect population changes under the influence of global change, and to trigger immediate conservation actions. KW - Arthropod KW - biodiversity KW - insect decline KW - land use KW - time series Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228309 VL - 14 IS - 1 SP - 144 EP - 148 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Redlich, Sarah A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Hothorn, Torsten A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Thorn, Simon A1 - Seibold, Sebastian A1 - Mitesser, Oliver A1 - Morinère, Jérôme A1 - Bozicevic, Vedran A1 - Benjamin, Caryl S. A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Haensel, Maria A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Rojas-Botero, Sandra A1 - Rummler, Thomas A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Schmidt, Stefan A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Müller, Jörg T1 - Relationships of insect biomass and richness with land use along a climate gradient JF - Nature Communications N2 - Recently reported insect declines have raised both political and social concern. Although the declines have been attributed to land use and climate change, supporting evidence suffers from low taxonomic resolution, short time series, a focus on local scales, and the collinearity of the identified drivers. In this study, we conducted a systematic assessment of insect populations in southern Germany, which showed that differences in insect biomass and richness are highly context dependent. We found the largest difference in biomass between semi-natural and urban environments (-42%), whereas differences in total richness (-29%) and the richness of threatened species (-56%) were largest from semi-natural to agricultural environments. These results point to urbanization and agriculture as major drivers of decline. We also found that richness and biomass increase monotonously with increasing temperature, independent of habitat. The contrasting patterns of insect biomass and richness question the use of these indicators as mutual surrogates. Our study provides support for the implementation of more comprehensive measures aimed at habitat restoration in order to halt insect declines. KW - biodiversity KW - ecology Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265058 VL - 12 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Geyer, Gerd A1 - Landing, Ed T1 - The Souss lagerstatte of the Anti-Atlas, Morocco: discovery of the first Cambrian fossil lagerstatte from Africa JF - Scientific Reports N2 - Episodic low oxygenated conditions on the sea-floor are likely responsible for exceptional preservation of animal remains in the upper Amouslek Formation (lower Cambrian, Stage 3) on the northern slope of the western Anti-Atlas, Morocco. This stratigraphic interval has yielded trilobite, brachiopod, and hyolith fossils with preserved soft parts, including some of the oldest known trilobite guts. The "Souss fossil lagerstatte" (newly proposed designation) represents the first Cambrian fossil lagerstatte in Cambrian strata known from Africa and is one of the oldest trilobite-bearing fossil lagerstatten on Earth. Inter-regional correlation of the Souss fossil lagerstatte in West Gondwana suggests its development during an interval of high eustatic levels recorded by dark shales that occur in informal upper Cambrian Series 2 in Siberia, South China, and East Gondwana. KW - biodiversity KW - palaeontology KW - sedimentology Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259236 VL - 11 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Drenckhahn, Detlev T1 - Zur Vegetation der Seedeiche der Nordseeküste Schleswig-Holsteins − Implikationen für die Umsetzung des Generalplans Küstenschutz T1 - On the vegetation of the sea dikes of the North Sea coast of Schleswig-Holstein − Implications for the implementation of the General Plan for Coastal Protection JF - Forum Geobotanicum N2 - Bis zum Jahr 2100 prognostiziert der Weltklimarat (IPCC 2021) einen Anstieg des Meeresspiegels von bis zu 63-101 cm gegenüber heutigen Wasserständen. Im Rahmen des Generalplans Küstenschutz Schleswig-Holstein(GKSH) soll als Klimafolgeanpassung eine Erhöhung und Profiländerung der meisten Nordseedeiche und Elbedeiche erfolgen (zusammen 363,3 km mit einer Vegetationsfläche von 3.500 ha). Diese Maßnahmen werden mit einem vollständigen Verlust der alten Deichvegetation einhergehen und zur Freisetzung von großen Mengen an CO₂ aus dem Bodenkohlenstoff führen. Die Seedeiche der Nordseeküste (262 km) zählen zu den artenreichen, semi-natürlichen und von Schafen beweideten Grasländern (Fläche von 2600 ha) in Schleswig-Holstein mit bis zu 18 Gras- und 64 zweikeim-blättrigen Blütenpflanzen und an die Vegetation gebundene 800-1000 Arten von Invertebraten (darunter 200 Käferarten). Auf die Außenböschung dringen Pflanzen der Salzwiesengesellschaften vor. Die steileren, wärmeexponierten (überwiegend nach Osten und Süden ausgerichtet) und durch Vertritt lückigen Innenböschungen der Seedeiche sind wertvolle Refugien wärmeliebender, konkurrenzschwacher Arten von Magerstandorten und Trittgesellschaften wie die folgenden mediterran-subatlantischen Arten: Knotenklettenkerbel (Torilis nodosa), Zwergklee/Armblütiger Klee (Trifolium micranthum) und Vogelfußklee (Trifolium ornithopodioides). Für die Erhaltung beider Kleearten (die aktuelle Verbreitung wird dokumentiert) besitzt Schleswig-Holstein eine nationale und nordwest-europäisch-kontinentale Verantwortlichkeit. Folgende Maßnahmen zum Schutz der reichhaltigen Deichvegetation und Teilen seiner Invertebratenfauna bei der Deichverstärkung im Rahmen des GKSH werden vorgeschlagen: 1. Abheben der Grasnarbe mit Wurzelraum und zeitnahe Wiederverlegung der alten Grasnarbe (Soden) auf das neue Deichprofil; das ist auch wichtig zum Erhalt des Bodenkohlenstoffs (Klimaschutz). 2. Einsaat von neuen Deichprofilen mit Saatgut von artenreichen Deichabschnitten. 3. Aufnahme substanzieller Forschungsprogramme/Forschungsförderung zur Ökologie der Seedeiche. Weiterhin sollte auf den Einsatz von Herbiziden auf Deichen zur Bekämpfung von Disteln verzichtet werden. N2 - Climate change is expected by the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC 2021) to cause a rise in the sea level of up to 63-101 cm by 2100. The general plan for coastal protection in Schleswig-Holstein (GKSH) is to increase in the height of most of the North Sea-dikes and dikes of River Elbe (together 363.3 km with a vegetation cover of ca. 3,500 ha). These actions will be accompanied by a complete loss of old dike vegetation and will result in the release of large amounts of CO₂ from soil carbon. The sea dikes of the North Sea coast (262 km) are covered by a diverse semi-natural grassland (area of 2,600 ha) grazed by sheep and comprising up to 18 grass species, 64 dicotyledonous flowering plant species and 800-1000 invertebrate species (among them 200 beetle species). Plants of the salt marsh communities invade the vegetation on the lower outer slopes. The steeper, warmer, drier and wind-protected inner slopes of the sea dikes (oriented mainly to the East and South) contain frequent ground injuries (by sheep claws) and are preferentially settled by thermophilic and less competitive species such as the following Mediterranean-Subatlantic plants: Knotted hedgeparsley (Torilis nodosa), the rare Slender trefoil (Trifolium micranthum) and Bird's-foot clover (Trifolium ornithopodioides) (only natural sites in Germany, red list categories 1 and 2). Schleswig-Holstein has a great responsibility for the survival of these clover species at their continental North-Western boundary (the current distribution is documented). The following measures are proposed to protect the rich dike vegetation and parts of their invertebrate fauna during dike strengthening within the GKSH: 1. lifting of the turf with root space and re-laying of the old turf (sods) on the new dike profile which is also important for protection of soil carbon storage (climate protection). 2. Seeding of new dike profiles with seeds from species-rich dike sections. 3. Inclusion of substantial research programs/funding on the ecology of sea dikes. Furthermore, the use of herbicides on dikes to control thistles should be avoided. KW - Sea dikes KW - biodiversity KW - climate KW - Trifolium micranthum KW - Trifolium ornithopodioides KW - Seedeich KW - Vegetation KW - Küstenschutz KW - Schleswig-Holstein KW - Biodiversität Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-243795 UR - http://www.forum-geobotanicum.net/articles/vol_10-2021/drenckhahn_seedeiche/FG---drenckhahn_vegetation_der_seedeiche.pdf SN - 1867-9315 VL - 10 ER -