TY - JOUR A1 - Schuhmann, Antonia A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda T1 - A combination of the frequent fungicides boscalid and dimoxystrobin with the neonicotinoid acetamiprid in field-realistic concentrations does not affect sucrose responsiveness and learning behavior of honeybees JF - Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety N2 - The increasing loss of pollinators over the last decades has become more and more evident. Intensive use of plant protection products is one key factor contributing to this decline. Especially the mixture of different plant protection products can pose an increased risk for pollinators as synergistic effects may occur. In this study we investigated the effect of the fungicide Cantus® Gold (boscalid/dimoxystrobin), the neonicotinoid insecticide Mospilan® (acetamiprid) and their mixture on honeybees. Since both plant protection products are frequently applied sequentially to the same plants (e.g. oilseed rape), their combination is a realistic scenario for honeybees. We investigated the mortality, the sucrose responsiveness and the differential olfactory learning performance of honeybees under controlled conditions in the laboratory to reduce environmental noise. Intact sucrose responsiveness and learning performance are of pivotal importance for the survival of individual honeybees as well as for the functioning of the entire colony. Treatment with two sublethal and field relevant concentrations of each plant protection product did not lead to any significant effects on these behaviors but affected the mortality rate. However, our study cannot exclude possible negative sublethal effects of these substances in higher concentrations. In addition, the honeybee seems to be quite robust when it comes to effects of plant protection products, while wild bees might be more sensitive. Highlights • Mix of SBI fungicides and neonicotinoids can lead to synergistic effects for bees. • Combination of non-SBI fungicide and neonicotinoid in field-realistic doses tested. • Synergistic effect on mortality of honeybees. • No effects on sucrose responsiveness and learning performance of honeybees. • Synergistic effects by other pesticide mixtures or on wild bees cannot be excluded. KW - Apis mellifera KW - non-SBI fungicide KW - insecticide KW - pesticide mixture KW - synergistic effect KW - sublethal effect Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-350047 VL - 256 ER - TY - THES A1 - Değirmenci [née Pölloth], Laura T1 - Sugar perception and sugar receptor function in the honeybee (\(Apis\) \(mellifera\)) T1 - Zuckerwahrnehmung und Zuckerrezeptorfunktion in der Honigbiene (\(Apis\) \(mellifera\)) N2 - In the eusocial insect honeybee (Apis mellifera), many sterile worker bees live together with a reproductive queen in a colony. All tasks of the colony are performed by the workers, undergoing age-dependent division of labor. Beginning as hive bees, they take on tasks inside the hive such as cleaning or the producing of larval food, later developing into foragers. With that, the perception of sweetness plays a crucial role for all honeybees whether they are sitting on the honey stores in the hive or foraging for food. Their ability to sense sweetness is undoubtedly necessary to develop and evaluate food sources. Many of the behavioral decisions in honeybees are based on sugar perception, either on an individual level for ingestion, or for social behavior such as the impulse to collect or process nectar. In this context, honeybees show a complex spectrum of abilities to perceive sweetness on many levels. They are able to perceive at least seven types of sugars and decide to collect them for the colony. Further, they seem to distinguish between these sugars or at least show clear preferences when collecting them. Additionally, the perception of sugar is not rigid in honeybees. For instance, their responsiveness towards sugar changes during the transition from in-hive bees (e.g. nurses) to foraging and is linked to the division of labor. Other direct or immediate factors changing responsiveness to sugars are stress, starvation or underlying factors, such as genotype. Interestingly, the complexity in their sugar perception is in stark contrast to the fact that honeybees seem to have only three predicted sugar receptors. In this work, we were able to characterize the three known sugar receptors (AmGr1, AmGr2 and AmGr3) of the honeybee fully and comprehensively in oocytes (Manuscript II, Chapter 3 and Manuscript III, Chapter 4). We could show that AmGr1 is a broad sugar receptor reacting to sucrose, glucose, maltose, melezitose and trehalose (which is the honeybees’ main blood sugar), but not fructose. AmGr2 acts as its co-receptor altering AmGr1’s specificity, AmGr3 is a specific fructose receptor and we proved the heterodimerization of all receptors. With my studies, I was able to reproduce and compare the ligand specificity of the sugar receptors in vivo by generating receptor mutants with CRISPR/Cas9. With this thesis, I was able to define AmGr1 and AmGr3 as the honeybees’ basis receptors already capable to detect all sugars of its known taste spectrum. In the expression analysis of my doctoral thesis (Manuscript I, Chapter 2) I demonstrated that both basis receptors are expressed in the antennae and the brain of nurse bees and foragers. This thesis assumes that AmGr3 (like the Drosophila homologue) functions as a sensor for fructose, which might be the satiety signal, while AmGr1 can sense trehalose as the main blood sugar in the brain. Both receptors show a reduced expression in the brain of foragers when compared with nurse bees. These results may reflect the higher concentrated diet of nurse bees in the hive. The higher number of receptors in the brain may allow nurse bees to perceive hunger earlier and to consume the food their sitting on. Forager bees have to be more persistent to hunger, when they are foraging, and food is not so accessible. The findings of reduced expression of the fructose receptor AmGr3 in the antennae of nurse bees are congruent with my other result that nurse bees are also less responsive to fructose at the antennae when compared to foragers (Manuscript I, Chapter 2). This is possible, since nurse bees sit more likely on ripe honey which contains not only higher levels of sugars but also monosaccharides (such as fructose), while foragers have to evaluate less-concentrated nectar. My investigations of the expression of AmGr1 in the antennae of honeybees found no differences between nurse bees and foragers, although foragers are more responsive to the respective sugar sucrose (Manuscript I, Chapter 2). Considering my finding that AmGr2 is the co-receptor of AmGr1, it can be assumed that AmGr1 and the mediated sucrose taste might not be directly controlled by its expression, but indirectly by its co-receptor. My thesis therefore clearly shows that sugar perception is associated with division of labor in honeybees and appears to be directly or indirectly regulated via expression. The comparison with a characterization study using other bee breeds and thus an alternative protein sequence of AmGr1 shows that co-expression of different AmGr1 versions with AmGr2 alters the sugar response differently. Therefore, this thesis provides first important indications that alternative splicing could also represent an important regulatory mechanism for sugar perception in honeybees. Further, I found out that the bitter compound quinine lowers the reward quality in learning experiments for honeybees (Manuscript IV, Chapter 5). So far, no bitter receptor has been found in the genome of honeybees and this thesis strongly assumes that bitter substances such as quinine inhibit sugar receptors in honeybees. With this finding, my work includes other molecules as possible regulatory mechanism in the honeybee sugar perception as well. We showed that the inhibitory effect is lower for fructose compared to sucrose. Considering that sugar signals might be processed as differently attractive in honeybees, this thesis concludes that the sugar receptor inhibition via quinine in honeybees might depend on the receptor (or its co-receptor), is concentration-dependent and based on the salience or attractiveness and concentration of the sugar present. With my thesis, I was able to expand the knowledge on honeybee’s sugar perception and formulate a complex, comprehensive overview. Thereby, I demonstrated the multidimensional mechanism that regulates the sugar receptors and thus the sugar perception of honeybees. With this work, I defined AmGr1 and AmGr3 as the basis of sugar perception and enlarged these components to the co-receptor AmGr2 and the possible splice variants of AmGr1. I further demonstrated how those sugar receptor components function, interact and that they are clearly involved in the division of labor in honeybees. In summary, my thesis describes the mechanisms that enable honeybees to perceive sugar in a complex way, even though they inhere a limited number of sugar receptors. My data strongly suggest that honeybees overall might not only differentiate sugars and their diet by their general sweetness (as expected with only one main sugar receptor). The found sugar receptor mechanisms and their interplay further suggest that honeybees might be able to discriminate directly between monosaccharides and disaccharides or sugar molecules and with that their diet (honey and nectar). N2 - Beim dem eusozialen Insekt Honigbiene (Apis mellifera) leben tausende sterile Arbeitsbienen zusammen mit einer fortpflanzungsfähigen Königin in einem Volk. Alle Aufgaben in der Kolonie werden von diesen Arbeiterinnen erledigt, während sie eine altersabhängige Arbeitsteilung durchlaufen. Als Stockbienen beginnend übernehmen sie Aufgaben im Stock wie die Reinigung oder die Produktion von Larvenfutter und entwickeln sich später zu Sammlerinnen. Das Wahrnehmung von Süße spielt für alle Honigbienen eine entscheidende Rolle, egal ob sie auf den Honigvorräten im Stock sitzen oder nach Nahrung suchen. Ihre Fähigkeit Süße zu wahrzunehmen ist zweifellos notwendig, um Nahrungsquellen zu identifizieren und zu bewerten. Viele der Verhaltensentscheidungen bei Honigbienen basieren auf ihrer Zuckerwahrnehmung, entweder auf individueller Ebene für die Nahrungsaufnahme oder für soziales Verhalten wie beispielsweise das Sammeln oder Verarbeiten von Nektar. Honigbienen zeigen auf vielen Ebenen ein komplexes Spektrum bei der Wahrnehmung von Süße. Sie können mindestens sieben Zuckerarten wahrnehmen und sammeln diese für ihren Stock. Darüber hinaus scheinen sie zwischen diesen Zuckern unterscheiden zu können oder zeigen zumindest klare Präferenzen beim Sammeln. Außerdem ist die Zuckerwahrnehmung bei Honigbienen nicht starr. Ihre Zuckerwahrnehmung ändert sich, wenn sie von einer Stockbiene (z. B. Ammen) zum Nahrungssammeln außerhalb des Stockes übergehen, und ist somit mit ihrer Arbeitsteilung verbunden. Andere direkte oder unmittelbare Faktoren, die die Reaktion auf Zucker verändern, sind Stress, Hunger oder zugrunde liegende Faktoren wie der Genotyp. Interessanterweise steht die Komplexität der Zuckerwahrnehmung in starkem Kontrast zu der Tatsache, dass Honigbienen bisher anscheinend nur drei mögliche Zuckerrezeptoren haben. In dieser Arbeit konnten wir die drei bekannten Honigbienenzuckerrezeptoren (AmGr1, AmGr2 und AmGr3) in Xenopus-Oozyten vollständig und umfassend charakterisieren (Manuscript II, Chapter 3 und Manuscript III, Chapter 4). Wir konnten zeigen, dass AmGr1 ein breitdetektierender Zuckerrezeptor ist, der auf Saccharose, Glukose, Maltose, Melezitose und Trehalose (der Hauptblutzucker bei Honigbienen), aber nicht auf Fruktose reagiert. AmGr2 fungiert als ein Co-Rezeptor, der die Spezifität von AmGr1 verändert. AmGr3 ist ein spezifischer Fruktoserezeptor und wir haben die Heterodimerisierung der Rezeptoren überprüft. Mit meinen Studien konnte ich die gefundene Ligandenspezifität der Zuckerrezeptoren in vivo reproduzieren und vergleichen, indem ich Rezeptormutanten mit CRISPR/Cas9 generierte. Dabei konnte ich AmGr1 und AmGr3 als die Basisrezeptoren von Honigbienen definieren, die bereits alle Zucker ihres bekannten Geschmacksspektrums detektieren können. In der Expressionsanalyse meiner Doktorarbeit (Manuscript I, Chapter 2) konnte ich zeigen, dass beide Basisrezeptoren in den Antennen und im Gehirn von Ammenbienen und Sammlerinnen exprimiert werden. Diese Arbeit geht davon aus, dass AmGr3 (wie das Homologe in Drosophila) als Sensor für Fruktose fungiert, die das Sättigungssignal sein könnte, während AmGr1 Trehalose als Hauptblutzucker im Gehirn wahrnehmen kann. Beide Rezeptoren zeigen eine reduzierte Expression im Gehirn von Sammlerinnen im Vergleich zu Ammenbienen. Diese Ergebnisse könnten die höher konzentrierte Ernährung der Ammenbienen im Stock widerspiegeln. Die höhere Anzahl an Rezeptoren im Gehirn könnte es den Ammenbienen ermöglichen frühzeitiger Hunger wahrzunehmen und die Nahrung, auf der sie sitzen aufzunehmen. Sammelbienen dagegen müssen beim Sammeln und dem reduzierten Nahrungsangebot ausdauernder sein. Die gemessene reduzierte Expression des Fruktoserezeptors AmGr3 in den Antennen von Ammenbienen entsprechen meinen anderen Ergebnissen, wonach Ammenbienen im Vergleich zu Sammelbienen an den Antennen auch weniger empfindlich auf Fruktose reagieren (Manuscript I, Chapter 2). Dies ist möglich, da Ammenbienen eher auf reifem Honig sitzen, der nicht nur einen höheren Zuckergehalt, sondern auch vermehrt Monosaccharide (wie Fructose) enthält, während Sammelbienen weniger konzentrierten Nektar bewerten müssen. Meine Untersuchungen zur Expression von AmGr1 in den Antennen von Honigbienen ergaben keine Unterschiede zwischen Ammenbienen und Sammlerinnen, obwohl Sammlerinnen empfindlicher auf den entsprechenden Zucker Saccharose reagieren. Angesichts unserer Ergebnisse, dass AmGr2 der Co-Rezeptor von AmGr1 ist, kann die Hypothese aufgestellt werden, dass AmGr1 und der vermittelte Saccharose-Geschmack möglicherweise nicht direkt durch seine Expression, sondern indirekt durch seinen Co-Rezeptor reguliert werden. Meine Dissertation zeigt somit deutlich, dass die Zuckerwahrnehmung bei Honigbienen mit Arbeitsteilung verbunden ist und direkt oder indirekt über die Expression geregelt zu werden scheint. Der Vergleich mit einer anderen Charakterisierungsstudie, durchgeführt an anderen Bienenrassen und damit einer alternativen Proteinsequenz von AmGr1, zeigt, dass die Co-Expression verschiedener AmGr1-Varianten mit AmGr2 die Zuckerantwort unterschiedlich verändert. Daher liefert diese Arbeit erste wichtige Hinweise darauf, dass alternatives Spleißen auch bei Honigbienen einen wichtigen Regulationsmechanismus für die Zuckerwahrnehmung darstellen könnte. Des Weiteren habe ich herausgefunden, dass der Bitterstoff Chinin die Qualität der Belohnung in Lernexperimenten für Honigbienen senkt (Manuscript IV, Chapter 5). Bisher wurde kein Bitterrezeptor im Genom von Honigbienen gefunden und diese Arbeit deutet darauf hin, dass Bitterstoffe wie Chinin Zuckerrezeptoren in Honigbienen hemmen. Mit dieser Erkenntnis schließt meine Dissertation auch andere Moleküle als mögliche Regulationsmechanismen in die Zuckerwahrnehmung der Honigbiene ein. Wir haben gezeigt, dass die hemmende Wirkung bei Fruktose im Vergleich zu Saccharose geringer ist. Unter der Berücksichtigung, dass Zuckersignale bei Honigbienen möglicherweise unterschiedlich attraktiv verarbeitet werden, kommt meine Arbeit zu dem Schluss, dass die Hemmung der Zuckerrezeptoren durch Chinin bei Honigbienen abhängig ist von der verwendeten Konzentration, der Bedeutung bzw. Attraktivität des Zuckers und seiner Konzentration. Mit meiner Doktorarbeit konnte ich das Wissen über die Zuckerwahrnehmung der Honigbiene insgesamt erweitern und einen komplexen, umfassenden Überblick formulieren. Ich konnte den mehrdimensionalen Mechanismus aufzeigen, der die Zuckerrezeptoren und damit die Zuckerwahrnehmung von Honigbienen reguliert. Ich konnte AmGr1 und AmGr3 als Basis der Zuckerwahrnehmung definieren und diese Komponenten auf den Co-Rezeptor AmGr2 und die möglichen Spleißvarianten von AmGr1 erweitern. Ich habe außerdem gezeigt, wie diese Zuckerrezeptorkomponenten funktionieren, interagieren, und dass sie eindeutig an der Arbeitsteilung bei Honigbienen beteiligt sind. Zusammenfassend beschreibt meine Dissertation die Mechanismen, die es Honigbienen ermöglichen, Zucker auf komplexe Weise wahrzunehmen, selbst wenn sie eine begrenzte Anzahl von Zuckerrezeptoren besitzen. Meine Daten deuten stark darauf hin, dass Honigbienen Zucker und ihre Nahrung nicht nur aufgrund ihrer generellen Süße unterscheiden können (wie dies mit nur einem Hauptzuckerrezeptor zu erwarten wäre). Die gefundenen Zuckerrezeptormechanismen und deren Zusammenspiel legen nahe, dass Honigbienen möglicherweise direkt zwischen Monosacchariden und Disacchariden bzw. Zuckermolekülen und damit zwischen ihrer Nahrung (Honig und Nektar) unterscheiden können. KW - Biene KW - Apis mellifera KW - responsiveness KW - honeybee KW - sugar receptor KW - sugar perception (fructose, sucrose) KW - AmGr1, AmGr2, AmGr3 KW - PER KW - division of labor KW - CRISPR/Cas9 KW - bitter taste Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-321873 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda A1 - Lim, Kayun A1 - Meixner, Marina D. A1 - Gabel, Martin S. T1 - Comparing the appetitive learning performance of six European honeybee subspecies in a common apiary JF - Insects N2 - The Western honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) is one of the most widespread insects with numerous subspecies in its native range. How far adaptation to local habitats has affected the cognitive skills of the different subspecies is an intriguing question that we investigate in this study. Naturally mated queens of the following five subspecies from different parts of Europe were transferred to Southern Germany: A. m. iberiensis from Portugal, A. m. mellifera from Belgium, A. m. macedonica from Greece, A. m. ligustica from Italy, and A. m. ruttneri from Malta. We also included the local subspecies A. m. carnica in our study. New colonies were built up in a common apiary where the respective queens were introduced. Worker offspring from the different subspecies were compared in classical olfactory learning performance using the proboscis extension response. Prior to conditioning, we measured individual sucrose responsiveness to investigate whether possible differences in learning performances were due to differential responsiveness to the sugar water reward. Most subspecies did not differ in their appetitive learning performance. However, foragers of the Iberian honeybee, A. m. iberiensis, performed significantly more poorly, despite having a similar sucrose responsiveness. We discuss possible causes for the poor performance of the Iberian honeybees, which may have been shaped by adaptation to the local habitat. KW - adaptation KW - Apis mellifera KW - olfactory learning KW - proboscis extension response KW - sucrose responsiveness KW - genetic diversity Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245180 SN - 2075-4450 VL - 12 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda A1 - Strauß, Sina A1 - Thamm, Markus A1 - Farré-Armengol, Gerard A1 - Junker, Robert R. T1 - The bacterium Pantoea ananatis modifies behavioral responses to sugar solutions in honeybees JF - Insects N2 - 1. Honeybees, which are among the most important pollinators globally, do not only collect pollen and nectar during foraging but may also disperse diverse microbes. Some of these can be deleterious to agricultural crops and forest trees, such as the bacterium Pantoea ananatis, an emerging pathogen in some systems. P. ananatis infections can lead to leaf blotches, die-back, bulb rot, and fruit rot. 2. We isolated P. ananatis bacteria from flowers with the aim of determining whether honeybees can sense these bacteria and if the bacteria affect behavioral responses of the bees to sugar solutions. 3. Honeybees decreased their responsiveness to different sugar solutions when these contained high concentrations of P. ananatis but were not deterred by solutions from which bacteria had been removed. This suggests that their reduced responsiveness was due to the taste of bacteria and not to the depletion of sugar in the solution or bacteria metabolites. Intriguingly, the bees appeared not to taste ecologically relevant low concentrations of bacteria. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our data suggest that honeybees may introduce P.ananatis bacteria into nectar in field-realistic densities during foraging trips and may thus affect nectar quality and plant fitness. KW - plant bacteria KW - bacterial spread KW - sucrose responsiveness KW - Apis mellifera Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-216247 SN - 2075-4450 VL - 11 IS - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Villagomez, Gemma N. A1 - Nürnberger, Fabian A1 - Requier, Fabrice A1 - Schiele, Susanne A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingo T1 - Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the seasonal timing of Western honey bee colonies and an early spring flowering plant JF - Ecology and Evolution N2 - Temperature and photoperiod are important Zeitgebers for plants and pollinators to synchronize growth and reproduction with suitable environmental conditions and their mutualistic interaction partners. Global warming can disturb this temporal synchronization since interacting species may respond differently to new combinations of photoperiod and temperature under future climates, but experimental studies on the potential phenological responses of plants and pollinators are lacking. We simulated current and future combinations of temperature and photoperiod to assess effects on the overwintering and spring phenology of an early flowering plant species (Crocus sieberi) and the Western honey bee (Apis mellifera). We could show that increased mean temperatures in winter and early spring advanced the flowering phenology of C. sieberi and intensified brood rearing activity of A. mellifera but did not advance their brood rearing activity. Flowering phenology of C. sieberi also relied on photoperiod, while brood rearing activity of A. mellifera did not. The results confirm that increases in temperature can induce changes in phenological responses and suggest that photoperiod can also play a critical role in these responses, with currently unknown consequences for real-world ecosystems in a warming climate. KW - Apis mellifera KW - climate change KW - rocus sieberi KW - phenology KW - plant–pollinator interaction KW - temporal mismatch Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258770 VL - 11 IS - 12 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schilcher, Felix A1 - Thamm, Markus A1 - Strube-Bloss, Martin A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda T1 - Opposing actions of octopamine and tyramine on honeybee vision JF - Biomolecules N2 - The biogenic amines octopamine and tyramine are important neurotransmitters in insects and other protostomes. They play a pivotal role in the sensory responses, learning and memory and social organisation of honeybees. Generally, octopamine and tyramine are believed to fulfil similar roles as their deuterostome counterparts epinephrine and norepinephrine. In some cases opposing functions of both amines have been observed. In this study, we examined the functions of tyramine and octopamine in honeybee responses to light. As a first step, electroretinography was used to analyse the effect of both amines on sensory sensitivity at the photoreceptor level. Here, the maximum receptor response was increased by octopamine and decreased by tyramine. As a second step, phototaxis experiments were performed to quantify the behavioural responses to light following treatment with either amine. Octopamine increased the walking speed towards different light sources while tyramine decreased it. This was independent of locomotor activity. Our results indicate that tyramine and octopamine act as functional opposites in processing responses to light. KW - biogenic amines KW - neurotransmitter KW - phototaxis KW - ERG KW - behaviour KW - modulation KW - visual system KW - octopamine KW - tyramine KW - Apis mellifera Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-246214 SN - 2218-273X VL - 11 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hensgen, Ronja A1 - England, Laura A1 - Homberg, Uwe A1 - Pfeiffer, Keram T1 - Neuroarchitecture of the central complex in the brain of the honeybee: Neuronal cell types JF - Journal of Comparative Neurology N2 - The central complex (CX) in the insect brain is a higher order integration center that controls a number of behaviors, most prominently goal directed locomotion. The CX comprises the protocerebral bridge (PB), the upper division of the central body (CBU), the lower division of the central body (CBL), and the paired noduli (NO). Although spatial orientation has been extensively studied in honeybees at the behavioral level, most electrophysiological and anatomical analyses have been carried out in other insect species, leaving the morphology and physiology of neurons that constitute the CX in the honeybee mostly enigmatic. The goal of this study was to morphologically identify neuronal cell types of the CX in the honeybee Apis mellifera. By performing iontophoretic dye injections into the CX, we traced 16 subtypes of neuron that connect a subdivision of the CX with other regions in the bee's central brain, and eight subtypes that mainly interconnect different subdivisions of the CX. They establish extensive connections between the CX and the lateral complex, the superior protocerebrum and the posterior protocerebrum. Characterized neuron classes and subtypes are morphologically similar to those described in other insects, suggesting considerable conservation in the neural network relevant for orientation. KW - RRID: AB_2337244 KW - RRID: AB_2315425 KW - central complex KW - insect brain KW - neuroanatomy KW - sky compass KW - Apis mellifera Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-215566 VL - 529 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kablau, Arne A1 - Berg, Stefan A1 - Rutschmann, Benjamin A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda T1 - Short-term hyperthermia at larval age reduces sucrose responsiveness of adult honeybees and can increase life span JF - Apidologie N2 - Honeybees are very sensitive to their breeding temperature. Even slightly lower temperatures during larval development can significantly affect adult behavior. Several devices which are employed for killing the honeybee ectoparasite Varroa destructor rely on short-term hyperthermia in the honeybee hive. The device used here applies 43.7 °C for 2 h, which is highly effective in killing the mites. We study how short-term hyperthermia affects worker brood and behavior of emerging adult bees. Sucrose responsiveness was strongly reduced after treatment of larvae early or late of larval development. Hyperthermia significantly enhanced life span, particularly in bees receiving treated early in larval development. To ask whether increased life span correlated with foraging performance, we used radio frequency identification (RFID). Onset and offset of foraging behavior as well as foraging trip duration and lifetime foraging effort were unaffected by hyperthermia treatment as prepupa. KW - temperature KW - Varroa destructor KW - worker behavior KW - Apis mellifera KW - RFID KW - température KW - Varroa destructor KW - comportement des travailleurs KW - Apis mellifera KW - RFID KW - Temperatur KW - Varroa destructor KW - Bienenverhalten KW - Apis mellifera KW - RFID Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232462 SN - 0044-8435 VL - 51 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beer, Katharina A1 - Helfrich-Förster, Charlotte T1 - Model and Non-model Insects in Chronobiology JF - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience N2 - The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an established model organism in chronobiology, because genetic manipulation and breeding in the laboratory are easy. The circadian clock neuroanatomy in D. melanogaster is one of the best-known clock networks in insects and basic circadian behavior has been characterized in detail in this insect. Another model in chronobiology is the honey bee Apis mellifera, of which diurnal foraging behavior has been described already in the early twentieth century. A. mellifera hallmarks the research on the interplay between the clock and sociality and complex behaviors like sun compass navigation and time-place-learning. Nevertheless, there are aspects of clock structure and function, like for example the role of the clock in photoperiodism and diapause, which can be only insufficiently investigated in these two models. Unlike high-latitude flies such as Chymomyza costata or D. ezoana, cosmopolitan D. melanogaster flies do not display a photoperiodic diapause. Similarly, A. mellifera bees do not go into “real” diapause, but most solitary bee species exhibit an obligatory diapause. Furthermore, sociality evolved in different Hymenoptera independently, wherefore it might be misleading to study the social clock only in one social insect. Consequently, additional research on non-model insects is required to understand the circadian clock in Diptera and Hymenoptera. In this review, we introduce the two chronobiology model insects D. melanogaster and A. mellifera, compare them with other insects and show their advantages and limitations as general models for insect circadian clocks. KW - circadian clock KW - complex behavior KW - diapause KW - sociality KW - Drosophila melanogaster KW - Apis mellifera Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218721 SN - 1662-5153 VL - 14 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Requier, Fabrice A1 - Paillet, Yoan A1 - Laroche, Fabienne A1 - Rutschmann, Benjamin A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Lombardi, Fabio A1 - Svoboda, Miroslav A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Contribution of European forests to safeguard wild honeybee populations JF - Conservation Letters N2 - Abstract Recent studies reveal the use of tree cavities by wild honeybee colonies in European forests. This highlights the conservation potential of forests for a highly threatened component of the native entomofauna in Europe, but currently no estimate of potential wild honeybee population sizes exists. Here, we analyzed the tree cavity densities of 106 forest areas across Europe and inferred an expected population size of wild honeybees. Both forest and management types affected the density of tree cavities. Accordingly, we estimated that more than 80,000 wild honeybee colonies could be sustained in European forests. As expected, potential conservation hotspots were identified in unmanaged forests, and, surprisingly, also in other large forest areas across Europe. Our results contribute to the EU policy strategy to halt pollinator declines and reveal the potential of forest areas for the conservation of so far neglected wild honeybee populations in Europe. KW - Apis mellifera KW - Conservation KW - forest management KW - honeybees KW - native populations KW - protected forests KW - tree cavities KW - unmanaged broadleaved forests Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204407 VL - 13 IS - 2 ER -