TY - JOUR A1 - Gerner, Bettina A1 - Aghai-Trommeschlaeger, Fatemeh A1 - Kraus, Sabrina A1 - Grigoleit, Götz Ulrich A1 - Zimmermann, Sebastian A1 - Kurlbaum, Max A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Isberner, Nora A1 - Scherf-Clavel, Oliver T1 - A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of ruxolitinib and posaconazole to predict CYP3A4-mediated drug–drug interaction frequently observed in graft versus host disease patients JF - Pharmaceutics N2 - Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). It is predominantly metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As patients with GvHD have an increased risk of invasive fungal infections, RUX is frequently combined with posaconazole (POS), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Knowledge of RUX exposure under concomitant POS treatment is scarce and recommendations on dose modifications are inconsistent. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to investigate the drug–drug interaction (DDI) between POS and RUX. The predicted RUX exposure was compared to observed concentrations in patients with GvHD in the clinical routine. PBPK models for RUX and POS were independently set up using PK-Sim\(^®\) Version 11. Plasma concentration-time profiles were described successfully and all predicted area under the curve (AUC) values were within 2-fold of the observed values. The increase in RUX exposure was predicted with a DDI ratio of 1.21 (C\(_{max}\)) and 1.59 (AUC). Standard dosing in patients with GvHD led to higher RUX exposure than expected, suggesting further dose reduction if combined with POS. The developed model can serve as a starting point for further simulations of the implemented DDI and can be extended to further perpetrators of CYP-mediated PK-DDIs or disease-specific physiological changes. KW - physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling KW - ruxolitinib KW - posaconazole KW - drug–drug interactions (DDIs) KW - graft versus host disease KW - cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) KW - pharmacokinetics Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297261 SN - 1999-4923 VL - 14 IS - 12 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Chopra, Martin A1 - Lang, Isabell A1 - Salzmann, Steffen A1 - Pachel, Christina A1 - Kraus, Sabrina A1 - Bäuerlein, Carina A. A1 - Brede, Christian A1 - Jordán Garrote, Ana-Laura A1 - Mattenheimer, Katharina A1 - Ritz, Miriam A1 - Schwinn, Stefanie A1 - Graf, Carolin A1 - Schäfer, Viktoria A1 - Frantz, Stefan A1 - Einsele, Hermann A1 - Wajant, Harald A1 - Beilhack, Andreas T1 - Tumor Necrosis Factor Induces Tumor Promoting and Anti-Tumoral Effects on Pancreatic Cancer via TNFR1 JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Multiple activities are ascribed to the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in health and disease. In particular, TNF was shown to affect carcinogenesis in multiple ways. This cytokine acts via the activation of two cell surface receptors, TNFR1, which is associated with inflammation, and TNFR2, which was shown to cause anti-inflammatory signaling. We assessed the effects of TNF and its two receptors on the progression of pancreatic cancer by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in a syngeneic orthotopic tumor mouse model with Panc02 cells. Mice deficient for TNFR1 were unable to spontaneously reject Panc02 tumors and furthermore displayed enhanced tumor progression. In contrast, a fraction of wild type (37.5%), TNF deficient (12.5%), and TNFR2 deficient mice (22.2%) were able to fully reject the tumor within two weeks. Pancreatic tumors in TNFR1 deficient mice displayed increased vascular density, enhanced infiltration of CD4+ T cells and CD4+ forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)+ regulatory T cells (Treg) but reduced numbers of CD8+ T cells. These alterations were further accompanied by transcriptional upregulation of IL4. Thus, TNF and TNFR1 are required in pancreatic ductal carcinoma to ensure optimal CD8+ T cell-mediated immunosurveillance and tumor rejection. Exogenous systemic administration of human TNF, however, which only interacts with murine TNFR1, accelerated tumor progression. This suggests that TNFR1 has basically the capability in the Panc02 model to trigger pro-and anti-tumoral effects but the spatiotemporal availability of TNF seems to determine finally the overall outcome. KW - Bioluminescence KW - cancer treatment KW - cell staining KW - cytokines KW - immune cells KW - metastasis KW - regulatory T cells KW - T cells Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97246 ER -