TY - JOUR A1 - Rolfes, Muriel A1 - Borde, Julika A1 - Möllenhoff, Kathrin A1 - Kayali, Mohamad A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Horváth, Judit A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Auber, Bernd A1 - Rump, Andreas A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Ritter, Julia A1 - Hentschel, Julia A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Rhiem, Kerstin A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Wappenschmidt, Barbara A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Hauke, Jan T1 - Prevalence of cancer predisposition germline variants in male breast cancer patients: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer JF - Cancers N2 - Male breast cancer (mBC) is associated with a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA2 gene; however, data regarding other BC predisposition genes are limited. In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the prevalence of PVs in BRCA1/2 and 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes using a sample of 614 patients with mBC, recruited through the centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A high proportion of patients with mBC carried PVs in BRCA2 (23.0%, 142/614) and BRCA1 (4.6%, 28/614). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 11.0% in patients with mBC without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs did not show an earlier disease onset than those without. The predominant clinical presentation of tumor phenotypes was estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and HER2-negative (77.7%); further, 10.2% of the tumors were triple-positive, and 1.2% were triple-negative. No association was found between ER/PR/HER2 status and BRCA1/2 PV occurrence. Comparing the prevalence of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) between patients with mBC and control data (ExAC, n = 27,173) revealed significant associations of PTVs in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 with mBC (BRCA1: OR = 17.04, 95% CI = 10.54–26.82, p < 10\(^{−5}\); BRCA2: OR = 77.71, 95% CI = 58.71–102.33, p < 10\(^{−5}\)). A case-control investigation of 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes in 340 BRCA1/2-negative patients and ExAC controls revealed significant associations of PTVs in CHEK2, PALB2, and ATM with mBC (CHEK2: OR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.59–7.71, p = 0.002; PALB2: OR = 14.77, 95% CI = 5.02–36.02, p < 10\(^{−5}\); ATM: OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 0.89–8.96, p = 0.04). Overall, our findings support the benefit of multi-gene panel testing in patients with mBC irrespective of their family history, age at disease onset, and tumor phenotype. KW - breast neoplasms KW - male breast cancer KW - breast cancer predisposition genes KW - genetic testing KW - familial breast cancer Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281758 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 13 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dumont, Martine A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Nana A1 - Joly-Beauparlant, Charles A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Droit, Arnaud A1 - Feng, Bing-Jian A1 - Dubois, Stéphane A1 - Collin-Deschesnes, Annie-Claude A1 - Soucy, Penny A1 - Vallée, Maxime A1 - Fournier, Frédéric A1 - Lemaçon, Audrey A1 - Adank, Muriel A. A1 - Allen, Jamie A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. A1 - Berutti, Riccardo A1 - Bolla, Manjeet K. A1 - Bull, Shelley A1 - Carvalho, Sara A1 - Cornelissen, Sten A1 - Dufault, Michael R. A1 - Dunning, Alison M. A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Geurts-Giele, Willemina R. R. A1 - Gieger, Christian A1 - Green, Jessica A1 - Hackmann, Karl A1 - Helmy, Mohamed A1 - Hentschel, Julia A1 - Hogervorst, Frans B. L. A1 - Hollestelle, Antoinette A1 - Hooning, Maartje J. A1 - Horváth, Judit A1 - Ikram, M. Arfan A1 - Kaulfuß, Silke A1 - Keeman, Renske A1 - Kuang, Da A1 - Luccarini, Craig A1 - Maier, Wolfgang A1 - Martens, John W. M. A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Ott, Claus-Eric A1 - Peters, Annette A1 - Pharoah, Paul D. P. A1 - Ramirez, Alfredo A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Riedel-Heller, Steffi A1 - Schmidt, Gunnar A1 - Shah, Mitul A1 - Scherer, Martin A1 - Stäbler, Antje A1 - Strom, Tim M. A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - van Asperen, Christi J. A1 - van der Kolk, Lizet A1 - van der Luijt, Rob B. A1 - Volk, Alexander E. A1 - Wagner, Michael A1 - Waisfisz, Quinten A1 - Wang, Qin A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Weber, Bernhard H. F. A1 - Devilee, Peter A1 - Tavtigian, Sean A1 - Bader, Gary D. A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Goldgar, David E. A1 - Andrulis, Irene L. A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Easton, Douglas F. A1 - Schmidt, Marjanka K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Simard, Jacques T1 - Uncovering the contribution of moderate-penetrance susceptibility genes to breast cancer by whole-exome sequencing and targeted enrichment sequencing of candidate genes in women of European ancestry JF - Cancers N2 - Rare variants in at least 10 genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, are associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, these variants, in combination with common variants identified through genome-wide association studies, explain only a fraction of the familial aggregation of the disease. To identify further susceptibility genes, we performed a two-stage whole-exome sequencing study. In the discovery stage, samples from 1528 breast cancer cases enriched for breast cancer susceptibility and 3733 geographically matched unaffected controls were sequenced. Using five different filtering and gene prioritization strategies, 198 genes were selected for further validation. These genes, and a panel of 32 known or suspected breast cancer susceptibility genes, were assessed in a validation set of 6211 cases and 6019 controls for their association with risk of breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor (ER) disease subtypes, using gene burden tests applied to loss-of-function and rare missense variants. Twenty genes showed nominal evidence of association (p-value < 0.05) with either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer. Our study had the statistical power to detect susceptibility genes with effect sizes similar to ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, however, it was underpowered to identify genes in which susceptibility variants are rarer or confer smaller effect sizes. Larger sample sizes would be required in order to identify such genes. KW - breast cancer KW - genetic susceptibility KW - whole-exome sequencing KW - moderate-penetrance genes Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281768 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 14 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sepahi, Ilnaz A1 - Faust, Ulrike A1 - Sturm, Marc A1 - Bosse, Kristin A1 - Kehrer, Martin A1 - Heinrich, Tilman A1 - Grundman-Hauser, Kathrin A1 - Bauer, Peter A1 - Ossowski, Stephan A1 - Susak, Hana A1 - Varon, Raymonda A1 - Schröck, Evelin A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Auber, Bernd A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Dworniczak, Bernd A1 - Wang-Gorke, Shan A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Weber, Bernhard H. F. A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Lemke, Johannes R. A1 - Hartkopf, Andreas A1 - Huu Phuc, Nguyen A1 - Riess, Olaf A1 - Schroeder, Christopher T1 - Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women JF - BMC Cancer N2 - Background Inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most common causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The risk of developing breast cancer by age 80 in women carrying a BRCA1 pathogenic variant is 72%. The lifetime risk varies between families and even within affected individuals of the same family. The cause of this variability is largely unknown, but it is hypothesized that additional genetic factors contribute to differences in age at onset (AAO). Here we investigated whether truncating and rare missense variants in genes of different DNA-repair pathways contribute to this phenomenon. Methods We used extreme phenotype sampling to recruit 133 BRCA1-positive patients with either early breast cancer onset, below 35 (early AAO cohort) or cancer-free by age 60 (controls). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was used to screen for variants in 311 genes involved in different DNA-repair pathways. Results Patients with an early AAO (73 women) had developed breast cancer at a median age of 27 years (interquartile range (IQR); 25.00–27.00 years). A total of 3703 variants were detected in all patients and 43 of those (1.2%) were truncating variants. The truncating variants were found in 26 women of the early AAO group (35.6%; 95%-CI 24.7 - 47.7%) compared to 16 women of controls (26.7%; 95%-CI 16.1 to 39.7%). When adjusted for environmental factors and family history, the odds ratio indicated an increased breast cancer risk for those carrying an additional truncating DNA-repair variant to BRCA1 mutation (OR: 3.1; 95%-CI 0.92 to 11.5; p-value = 0.07), although it did not reach the conventionally acceptable significance level of 0.05. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first time that the combined effect of truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on AAO in patients with hereditary breast cancer is investigated. Our results indicate that co-occurring truncating variants might be associated with an earlier onset of breast cancer in BRCA1-positive patients. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results. KW - breast cancer KW - age at onset KW - DNA-repair genes KW - next-generation-sequencing KW - panel sequencing KW - extreme phenotypes KW - hereditary breast and ovarian cancer KW - BRCA1 KW - DNA-repair Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237676 VL - 19 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Rhiem, Kerstin A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Loibl, Sibylle A1 - Weber, Karsten E. A1 - Seiler, Sabine A1 - Zachariae, Silke A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Wappenschmidt, Barbara A1 - Waha, Anke A1 - Blümcke, Britta A1 - Kiechle, Marion A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Bartram, Claus R. A1 - Speiser, Dorothee A1 - Schlegelberger, Brigitte A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Wieacker, Peter A1 - Leinert, Elena A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Briest, Susanne A1 - Kast, Karin A1 - Riess, Olaf A1 - Emons, Günter A1 - Weber, Bernhard H. F. A1 - Engel, Jutta A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. T1 - Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple-negative breast cancer without family cancer history JF - BMC Cancer N2 - Background There is no international consensus up to which age women with a diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and no family history of breast or ovarian cancer should be offered genetic testing for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA) mutations. Here, we explored the association of age at TNBC diagnosis with the prevalence of pathogenic gBRCA mutations in this patient group. Methods The study comprised 802 women (median age 40 years, range 19-76) with oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative breast cancers, who had no relatives with breast or ovarian cancer. All women were tested for pathogenic gBRCA mutations. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between age at TNBC diagnosis and the presence of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation. Results A total of 127 women with TNBC(15.8%) were gBRCA mutation carriers (BRCA1: n = 118, 14.7%; BRCA2: n = 9, 1. 1%). The mutation prevalence was 32.9% in the age group 20-29 years compared to 6.9% in the age group 60-69 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant increase of mutation frequency with decreasing age at diagnosis (odds ratio 1.87 per 10 year decrease, 95% CI 1.50-2.32, p < 0.001). gBRCA mutation risk was predicted to be > 10% for women diagnosed below approximately 50 years. Conclusions Based on the general understanding that a heterozygous mutation probability of 10% or greater justifies gBRCA mutation screening, women with TNBC diagnosed before the age of 50 years and no familial history of breast and ovarian cancer should be tested for gBRCA mutations. In Germany, this would concern approximately 880 women with newly diagnosed TNBC per year, of whom approximately 150 are expected to be identified as carriers of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation. KW - hereditary breast and ovarian cancer KW - BRCA1 KW - BRCA2 KW - triple-negative breast cancer Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226763 VL - 18 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Nana A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Richters, Lisa A1 - Groß, Eva A1 - Blümcke, Britta A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Kahlert, Anne-Karin A1 - Müller, Clemens R. A1 - Hackmann, Karl A1 - Honisch, Ellen A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Konstantin A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Borde, Julika A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Neidhardt, Guido A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Klaschik, Kristina A1 - Schroeder, Christopher A1 - Platzer, Konrad A1 - Volk, Alexander E. A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Just, Walter A1 - Auber, Bernd A1 - Kubisch, Christian A1 - Schmidt, Gunnar A1 - Horvath, Judit A1 - Wappenschmidt, Barbara A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Dworniczak, Bernd A1 - Rhiem, Kerstin A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric T1 - BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer JF - Breast Cancer Research N2 - Background Germline mutations in the BRIP1 gene have been described as conferring a moderate risk for ovarian cancer (OC), while the role of BRIP1 in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis remains controversial. Methods To assess the role of deleterious BRIP1 germline mutations in BC/OC predisposition, 6341 well-characterized index patients with BC, 706 index patients with OC, and 2189 geographically matched female controls were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging missense variants. All index patients met the inclusion criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for germline testing and tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Results BRIP1 LoF mutations confer a high OC risk in familial index patients (odds ratio (OR) = 20.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.02–36.57, P < 0.0001) and in the subgroup of index patients with late-onset OC (OR = 29.91, 95% CI = 14.99–59.66, P < 0.0001). No significant association of BRIP1 LoF mutations with familial BC was observed (OR = 1.81 95% CI = 1.00–3.30, P = 0.0623). In the subgroup of familial BC index patients without a family history of OC there was also no apparent association (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.70–2.90, P = 0.3030). In 1027 familial BC index patients with a family history of OC, the BRIP1 mutation prevalence was significantly higher than that observed in controls (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.43–9.01; P = 0.0168). Based on the negative association between BRIP1 LoF mutations and familial BC in the absence of an OC family history, we conclude that the elevated mutation prevalence in the latter cohort was driven by the occurrence of OC in these families. Compared with controls, predicted damaging rare missense variants were significantly more prevalent in OC (P = 0.0014) but not in BC (P = 0.0693) patients. Conclusions To avoid ambiguous results, studies aimed at assessing the impact of candidate predisposition gene mutations on BC risk might differentiate between BC index patients with an OC family history and those without. In familial cases, we suggest that BRIP1 is a high-risk gene for late-onset OC but not a BC predisposition gene, though minor effects cannot be excluded. KW - breast cancer KW - ovarian cancer KW - BRIP1 gene KW - germline mutations Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233433 VL - 20 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harter, Philipp A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Heitz, Florian A1 - Reuss, Alexander A1 - Kommoss, Stefan A1 - Marmé, Frederik A1 - Heimbach, André A1 - Prieske, Katharina A1 - Richters, Lisa A1 - Burges, Alexander A1 - Neidhardt, Guido A1 - de Gregorio, Nikolaus A1 - El-Balat, Ahmed A1 - Hilpert, Felix A1 - Meier, Werner A1 - Kimmig, Rainer A1 - Kast, Karin A1 - Sehouli, Jalid A1 - Baumann, Klaus A1 - Jackisch, Christian A1 - Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won A1 - Hanker, Lars A1 - Kröber, Sandra A1 - Pfisterer, Jacobus A1 - Gevensleben, Heidrun A1 - Schnelzer, Andreas A1 - Dietrich, Dimo A1 - Neunhöffer, Tanja A1 - Krockenberger, Mathias A1 - Brucker, Sara Y. A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Lamla, Josefin A1 - Elser, Gabriele A1 - du Bois, Andreas A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Schmutzler, Rita T1 - Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including \(BRCA1/2\) in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1) JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Background Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated. Methods Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (\(ATM\), \(BRCA1\), \(BRCA2\), \(CDH1\), \(CHEK2\), \(MLH1\), \(MSH2\), \(MSH6\), \(NBN\), \(PMS2\), \(PTEN\), \(PALB2\), \(RAD51C\), \(RAD51D\), \(STK11\), \(TP53\)) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history. Results In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16–93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the \(BRCA1\) (15.5%), \(BRCA2\) (5.5%), \(RAD51C\) (2.5%) and \(PALB2\) (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients \(\geq\)60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for \(BRCA1/2\) would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes. Conclusions 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to \(BRCA1/2\) seems to be not sufficient. KW - medicine KW - Genetic causes of cancer KW - ovarian cancer KW - cancer risk factors KW - histology KW - cancer detection and diagnosis KW - breast cancer KW - genetic testing KW - human genetics Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173553 VL - 12 IS - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Silvestri, Valentina A1 - Barrowdale, Daniel A1 - Mulligan, Anna Marie A1 - Neuhausen, Susan L. A1 - Fox, Stephen A1 - Karlan, Beth Y. A1 - Mitchell, Gillian A1 - James, Paul A1 - Thull, Darcy L. A1 - Zorn, Kristin K. A1 - Carter, Natalie J. A1 - Nathanson, Katherine L. A1 - Domchek, Susan M. A1 - Rebbeck, Timothy R. A1 - Ramus, Susan J. A1 - Nussbaum, Robert L. A1 - Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. A1 - Rantala, Johanna A1 - Yoon, Sook-Yee A1 - Caligo, Maria A. A1 - Spugnesi, Laura A1 - Bojesen, Anders A1 - Pedersen, Inge Sokilde A1 - Thomassen, Mads A1 - Jensen, Uffe Birk A1 - Toland, Amanda Ewart A1 - Senter, Leigha A1 - Andrulis, Irene L. A1 - Glendon, Gord A1 - Hulick, Peter J. A1 - Imyanitov, Evgeny N. A1 - Greene, Mark H. A1 - Mai, Phuong L. A1 - Singer, Christian F. A1 - Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christine A1 - Kramer, Gero A1 - Vijai, Joseph A1 - Offit, Kenneth A1 - Robson, Mark A1 - Lincoln, Anne A1 - Jacobs, Lauren A1 - Machackova, Eva A1 - Foretova, Lenka A1 - Navratilova, Marie A1 - Vasickova, Petra A1 - Couch, Fergus J. A1 - Hallberg, Emily A1 - Ruddy, Kathryn J. A1 - Sharma, Priyanka A1 - Kim, Sung-Won A1 - Teixeira, Manuel R. A1 - Pinto, Pedro A1 - Montagna, Marco A1 - Matricardi, Laura A1 - Arason, Adalgeir A1 - Johannsson, Oskar Th A1 - Barkardottir, Rosa B. A1 - Jakubowska, Anna A1 - Lubinski, Jan A1 - Izquierdo, Angel A1 - Pujana, Miguel Angel A1 - Balmaña, Judith A1 - Diez, Orland A1 - Ivady, Gabriella A1 - Papp, Janos A1 - Olah, Edith A1 - Kwong, Ava A1 - Nevanlinna, Heli A1 - Aittomäki, Kristiina A1 - Segura, Pedro Perez A1 - Caldes, Trinidad A1 - Van Maerken, Tom A1 - Poppe, Bruce A1 - Claes, Kathleen B. M. A1 - Isaacs, Claudine A1 - Elan, Camille A1 - Lasset, Christine A1 - Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique A1 - Barjhoux, Laure A1 - Belotti, Muriel A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Steinemann, Doris A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Kast, Karin A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda A1 - Wand, Dorothea A1 - Godwin, Andrew K. A1 - Evans, D. Gareth A1 - Frost, Debra A1 - Perkins, Jo A1 - Adlard, Julian A1 - Izatt, Louise A1 - Platte, Radka A1 - Eeles, Ros A1 - Ellis, Steve A1 - Hamann, Ute A1 - Garber, Judy A1 - Fostira, Florentia A1 - Fountzilas, George A1 - Pasini, Barbara A1 - Giannini, Giuseppe A1 - Rizzolo, Piera A1 - Russo, Antonio A1 - Cortesi, Laura A1 - Papi, Laura A1 - Varesco, Liliana A1 - Palli, Domenico A1 - Zanna, Ines A1 - Savarese, Antonella A1 - Radice, Paolo A1 - Manoukian, Siranoush A1 - Peissel, Bernard A1 - Barile, Monica A1 - Bonanni, Bernardo A1 - Viel, Alessandra A1 - Pensotti, Valeria A1 - Tommasi, Stefania A1 - Peterlongo, Paolo A1 - Weitzel, Jeffrey N. A1 - Osorio, Ana A1 - Benitez, Javier A1 - McGuffog, Lesley A1 - Healey, Sue A1 - Gerdes, Anne-Marie A1 - Ejlertsen, Bent A1 - Hansen, Thomas V. O. A1 - Steele, Linda A1 - Ding, Yuan Chun A1 - Tung, Nadine A1 - Janavicius, Ramunas A1 - Goldgar, David E. A1 - Buys, Saundra S. A1 - Daly, Mary B. A1 - Bane, Anita A1 - Terry, Mary Beth A1 - John, Esther M. A1 - Southey, Melissa A1 - Easton, Douglas F. A1 - Chenevix-Trench, Georgia A1 - Antoniou, Antonis C. A1 - Ottini, Laura T1 - Male breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: pathology data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 JF - Breast Cancer Research N2 - Background BRCA1 and, more commonly, BRCA2 mutations are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). However, only a paucity of data exists on the pathology of breast cancers (BCs) in men with BRCA1/2 mutations. Using the largest available dataset, we determined whether MBCs arising in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers display specific pathologic features and whether these features differ from those of BRCA1/2 female BCs (FBCs). Methods We characterised the pathologic features of 419 BRCA1/2 MBCs and, using logistic regression analysis, contrasted those with data from 9675 BRCA1/2 FBCs and with population-based data from 6351 MBCs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Among BRCA2 MBCs, grade significantly decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (P = 0.005). Compared with BRCA2 FBCs, BRCA2 MBCs were of significantly higher stage (P for trend = 2 × 10−5) and higher grade (P for trend = 0.005) and were more likely to be oestrogen receptor–positive [odds ratio (OR) 10.59; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 5.15–21.80] and progesterone receptor–positive (OR 5.04; 95 % CI 3.17–8.04). With the exception of grade, similar patterns of associations emerged when we compared BRCA1 MBCs and FBCs. BRCA2 MBCs also presented with higher grade than MBCs from the SEER database (P for trend = 4 × 10−12). Conclusions On the basis of the largest series analysed to date, our results show that BRCA1/2 MBCs display distinct pathologic characteristics compared with BRCA1/2 FBCs, and we identified a specific BRCA2-associated MBC phenotype characterised by a variable suggesting greater biological aggressiveness (i.e., high histologic grade). These findings could lead to the development of gender-specific risk prediction models and guide clinical strategies appropriate for MBC management. KW - Male breast cancer KW - BRCA1/2 KW - Pathology KW - Histologic grade KW - Genotype–phenotype correlations Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164769 VL - 18 IS - 15 ER -