TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lodde, Georg
A1  - Forschner, Andrea
A1  - Hassel, Jessica
A1  - Wulfken, Lena M.
A1  - Meier, Friedegund
A1  - Mohr, Peter
A1  - Kähler, Katharina
A1  - Schilling, Bastian
A1  - Loquai, Carmen
A1  - Berking, Carola
A1  - Hüning, Svea
A1  - Schatton, Kerstin
A1  - Gebhardt, Christoffer
A1  - Eckardt, Julia
A1  - Gutzmer, Ralf
A1  - Reinhardt, Lydia
A1  - Glutsch, Valerie
A1  - Nikfarjam, Ulrike
A1  - Erdmann, Michael
A1  - Stang, Andreas
A1  - Kowall, Bernd
A1  - Roesch, Alexander
A1  - Ugurel, Selma
A1  - Zimmer, Lisa
A1  - Schadendorf, Dirk
A1  - Livingstone, Elisabeth
T1  - Factors influencing the adjuvant therapy decision: results of a real-world multicenter data analysis of 904 melanoma patients
JF  - Cancers
N2  - Adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT) significantly improved recurrence-free survival. This study investigates the real-world situation of 904 patients from 13 German skin cancer centers with an indication for adjuvant treatment since the approval of adjuvant ICI and TT. From adjusted log-binomial regression models, we estimated relative risks for associations between various influence factors and treatment decisions (adjuvant therapy yes/no, TT vs. ICI in BRAF mutant patients). Of these patients, 76.9% (95% CI 74–80) opted for a systemic adjuvant treatment. The probability of starting an adjuvant treatment was 26% lower in patients >65 years (RR 0.74, 95% CI 68–80). The most common reasons against adjuvant treatment given by patients were age (29.4%, 95% CI 24–38), and fear of adverse events (21.1%, 95% CI 16–28) and impaired quality of life (11.9%, 95% CI 7–16). Of all BRAF-mutated patients who opted for adjuvant treatment, 52.9% (95% CI 47–59) decided for ICI. Treatment decision for TT or ICI was barely associated with age, gender and tumor stage, but with comorbidities and affiliated center. Shortly after their approval, adjuvant treatments have been well accepted by physicians and patients. Age plays a decisive role in the decision for adjuvant treatment, while pre-existing autoimmune disease and regional differences influence the choice between TT or ICI.
KW  - melanoma
KW  - adjuvant treatment
KW  - checkpoint blocker
KW  - targeted therapy
KW  - BRAF
KW  - PD-1
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239583
SN  - 2072-6694
VL  - 13
IS  - 10
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Glutsch, Valerie
A1  - Amaral, Teresa
A1  - Garbe, Claus
A1  - Thoms, Kai-Martin
A1  - Mohr, Peter
A1  - Hauschild, Axel
A1  - Schilling, Bastian
T1  - Indirect Comparison of Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma Patients with Elevated Baseline Lactate Dehydrogenase
JF  - Acta Dermato-Venereologica
N2  - The approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has signifi-cantly improved treatment outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The 3 first-line targeted therapy trials have provided similar results, and thus the identification of predictive biomarkers may generate a more precise basis for clinical deci-sion-making. Elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has already been determined as a strong prog-nostic factor. Therefore, this indirect analysis compa-red subgroups with elevated baseline LDH across the pivotal targeted therapy trials co-BRIM, COMBI-v and COLUMBUS part 1. The Bucher method was used to compare progression-free survival, objective response rate and overall survival indirectly. The results show a non-significant risk reduction for progression in the subgroup with elevated baseline LDH receiving vemu-rafenib plus cobimetinib compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib and encorafenib plus binimetinib. Al-though an indirect comparison, these data might pro-vide some guidance for treatment recommendations in melanoma patients with elevated LDH.
KW  - melanoma
KW  - BRAF
KW  - lactate dehydrogenase
Y1  - 2020
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230190
VL  - 100
ER  -