TY - JOUR A1 - Huestegge, Lynn A1 - Rohrßen, Julia A1 - van Ermingen-Marbach, Muna A1 - Pape-Neumann, Julia A1 - Heim, Stefan T1 - Devil in the details ? Developmental dyslexia and visual long-term memory for details JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Cognitive theories on causes of developmental dyslexia can be divided into language-specific and general accounts. While the former assume that words are special in that associated processing problems are rooted in language-related cognition (e.g., phonology) deficits, the latter propose that dyslexia is rather rooted in a general impairment of cognitive (e.g., visual and/or auditory) processing streams. In the present study, we examined to what extent dyslexia (typically characterized by poor orthographic representations) may be associated with a general deficit in visual long-term memory (LTM) for details. We compared object- and detail-related visual LTM performance (and phonological skills) between dyslexic primary school children and IQ-, age-, and gender-matched controls. The results revealed that while the overall amount of LTM errors was comparable between groups, dyslexic children exhibited a greater portion of detail-related errors. The results suggest that not only phonological, but also general visual resolution deficits in LTM may play an important role in developmental dyslexia. KW - anguage and word processing KW - picture processing KW - memory errors KW - orthographic representations KW - visual resolution deficit KW - phonology and reading KW - word form area KW - reading disability KW - spatial attention KW - ventral stream Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115887 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 5 IS - 686 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pieczykolan, Aleksandra A1 - Huestegge, Lynn T1 - Oculomotor dominance in multitasking: Mechanisms of conflict resolution in cross-modal action N2 - In daily life, eye movement control usually occurs in the context of concurrent action demands in other effector domains. However, little research has focused on understanding how such cross-modal action demands are coordinated, especially when conflicting information needs to be processed conjunctly in different action modalities. In two experiments, we address this issue by studying vocal responses in the context of spatially conflicting eye movements (Experiment 1) and in the context of spatially conflicting manual actions (Experiment 2, under controlled eye fixation conditions). Crucially, a comparison across experiments allows us to assess resource scheduling priorities among the three effector systems by comparing the same (vocal) response demands in the context of eye movements in contrast to manual responses. The results indicate that in situations involving response conflict, eye movements are prioritized over concurrent action demands in another effector system. This oculomotor dominance effect corroborates previous observations in the context of multiple action demands without spatial response conflict. Furthermore, and in line with recent theoretical accounts of parallel multiple action control, resource scheduling patterns appear to be flexibly adjustable based on the temporal proximity of the two actions that need to be performed. KW - saccades KW - oculomotor dominance KW - dual-task control KW - divided attention KW - resource scheduling KW - crosstalk Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-111024 ER -