TY  - JOUR
A1  - Manchia, Mirko
A1  - Adli, Mazda
A1  - Akula, Nirmala
A1  - Arda, Raffaella
A1  - Aubry, Jean-Michel
A1  - Backlund, Lena
A1  - Banzato, Claudio E. M.
A1  - Baune, Bernhard T.
A1  - Bellivier, Frank
A1  - Bengesser, Susanne
A1  - Biernacka, Joanna M.
A1  - Brichant-Petitjean, Clara
A1  - Bui, Elise
A1  - Calkin, Cynthia V.
A1  - Cheng, Andrew Tai Ann
A1  - Chillotti, Caterina
A1  - Cichon, Sven
A1  - Clark, Scott
A1  - Czerski, Piotr M.
A1  - Dantas, Clarissa
A1  - Del Zompo, Maria
A1  - DePaulo, J. Raymond
A1  - Detera-Wadleigh, Sevilla D.
A1  - Etain, Bruno
A1  - Falkai, Peter
A1  - Frisén, Louise
A1  - Frye, Mark A.
A1  - Fullerton, Jan
A1  - Gard, Sébastien
A1  - Garnham, Julie
A1  - Goes, Fernando S.
A1  - Grof, Paul
A1  - Gruber, Oliver
A1  - Hashimoto, Ryota
A1  - Hauser, Joanna
A1  - Heilbronner, Urs
A1  - Hoban, Rebecca
A1  - Hou, Liping
A1  - Jamain, Stéphane
A1  - Kahn, Jean-Pierre
A1  - Kassem, Layla
A1  - Kato, Tadafumi
A1  - Kelsoe, John R.
A1  - Kittel-Schneider, Sarah
A1  - Kliwicki, Sebastian
A1  - Kuo, Po-Hsiu
A1  - Kusumi, Ichiro
A1  - Laje, Gonzalo
A1  - Lavebratt, Catharina
A1  - Leboyer, Marion
A1  - Leckband, Susan G.
A1  - López Jaramillo, Carlos A.
A1  - Maj, Mario
A1  - Malafosse, Alain
A1  - Martinsson, Lina
A1  - Masui, Takuya
A1  - Mitchell, Philip B.
A1  - Mondimore, Frank
A1  - Monteleone, Palmiero
A1  - Nallet, Audrey
A1  - Neuner, Maria
A1  - Novák, Tomás
A1  - O'Donovan, Claire
A1  - Ösby, Urban
A1  - Ozaki, Norio
A1  - Perlis, Roy H.
A1  - Pfennig, Andrea
A1  - Potash, James B.
A1  - Reich-Erkelenz, Daniela
A1  - Reif, Andreas
A1  - Reininghaus, Eva
A1  - Richardson, Sara
A1  - Rouleau, Guy A.
A1  - Rybakowski, Janusz K.
A1  - Schalling, Martin
A1  - Schofield, Peter R.
A1  - Schubert, Oliver K.
A1  - Schweizer, Barbara
A1  - Seemüller, Florian
A1  - Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria
A1  - Severino, Giovanni
A1  - Seymour, Lisa R.
A1  - Slaney, Claire
A1  - Smoller, Jordan W.
A1  - Squassina, Alessio
A1  - Stamm, Thomas
A1  - Steele, Jo
A1  - Stopkova, Pavla
A1  - Tighe, Sarah K.
A1  - Tortorella, Alfonso
A1  - Turecki, Gustavo
A1  - Wray, Naomi R.
A1  - Wright, Adam
A1  - Zandi, Peter P.
A1  - Zilles, David
A1  - Bauer, Michael
A1  - Rietschel, Marcella
A1  - McMahon, Francis J.
A1  - Schulze, Thomas G.
A1  - Alda, Martin
T1  - Assessment of Response to Lithium Maintenance Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report
JF  - PLoS ONE
N2  - Objective: The assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the "Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder" scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. 
Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (\(\kappa\))] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling. 
Results: Substantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (\(\kappa\) = 0.66 and \(\kappa\) = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (\(ICC_1 = 0.71\) and \(ICC_2 = 0.75\), respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders). 
Conclusions: We identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.
KW  - age
KW  - observer agreement
KW  - prophylactic lithium
KW  - mapping susceptibility genes
KW  - mood disorders
KW  - onset
KW  - association
KW  - reliability
KW  - morality
KW  - illness
Y1  - 2013
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130938
VL  - 8
IS  - 6
ER  - 
TY  - THES
A1  - Stemmler, Thomas
T1  - Just do it! Guilt as a moral intuition to cooperate - A parallel constraint satisfaction approach
T1  - Schuld als moralische Intuition zu Kooperation - ein parallel constraint satisfaction Ansatz
N2  - Nach langer Dominanz rationaler Urteils- und Entscheidungsmodelle in der Moralpsychologie (z.B. Kohlberg, 1969) besteht seit einiger Zeit verstärktes Interesse an intuitiven, emotionalen Einflüssen auf moralische Urteile und Entscheidungen (z.B. Greene, 2007; Haidt, 2001; Monin, Pizarro, & Beer, 2007). Der Einfluss von Emotionen auf moralische Entscheidungen wird in der Literatur u.a. mittels heuristischer, non-kompensatorischer Informationsverarbeitung erklärt (z.B. Sinnott-Armstrong, Young, & Cushman, 2010; Sunstein, 2005; Tobler, Kalis, & Kalenscher, 2008). Hierbei wird jedoch der Prozess der Emotionsentstehung ignoriert. Appraisaltheorien postulieren, dass Emotionen durch die Inkohärenz (oder Diskrepanz) von Verhaltensrepräsentationen wie Zielen und Aktionen entstehen (Moors, 2009). Emotionsentstehung und (intuitives) Entscheiden kann in einem Modell vereint werden sobald man bei beiden Prozessen eine konnektionistische Struktur (z.B. Barnes & Thagard, 1996) zugrunde legt. Die vorliegende Arbeit kontrastiert beide Perspektiven intuitiv-emotionalen Entscheidens im Hinblick auf Schuld und Kooperation.
N2  - After a long dominance of rational models of judgment and decision-making in moral psychology (e.g. Kohlberg, 1969) there is now a strong interest in how intuitions and emotions influence moral judgments and decisions (e.g. Greene, 2007; Haidt, 2001; Monin, Pizarro, & Beer, 2007). In the literature, the influence of emotions on moral decisions is explained by heuristic or non-compensatory information processing (e.g. Sinnott-Armstrong, Young, & Cushman, 2010; Sunstein, 2005; Tobler, Kalis, & Kalenscher, 2008). However, the process of emotion elicitation is ignored. Appraisal theories postulate that emotion elicitation is due to the incoherence (or discrepancy) of behavioral representations like goals and actions (Moors, 2009). Emotion elicitation and intuitive decision-making can be combined if both processes apply a connectionist information processing structure (e.g. Barnes & Thagard, 1996). The current work contrasts both perspectives of intuitive-emotional decision-making with respect to guilt and cooperation.
KW  - Kooperation
KW  - Schuldgefühl
KW  - Moralisches Handeln
KW  - parallel constraint satisfaction
KW  - Intuition
KW  - Entscheidung
KW  - Gefühl
KW  - Informationsverarbeitung
KW  - morality
KW  - guilt
KW  - cooperation
KW  - emotion
KW  - intuition
KW  - decision-making
KW  - parallel constraint satisfaction
Y1  - 2011
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-74873
ER  -