TY - JOUR A1 - Semler, Elisa A1 - Anderl-Straub, Sarah A1 - Uttner, Ingo A1 - Diehl-Schmid, Janine A1 - Danek, Adrian A1 - Einsiedler, Beate A1 - Fassbender, Klaus A1 - Fliessbach, Klaus A1 - Huppertz, Hans-Jürgen A1 - Jahn, Holger A1 - Kornhuber, Johannes A1 - Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard A1 - Lauer, Martin A1 - Muche, Rainer A1 - Prudlo, Johannes A1 - Schneider, Anja A1 - Schroeter, Matthias L. A1 - Ludolph, Albert C. A1 - Otto, Markus T1 - A language-based sum score for the course and therapeutic intervention in primary progressive aphasia JF - Alzheimer's Research & Therapy N2 - Background With upcoming therapeutic interventions for patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), instruments for the follow-up of patients are needed to describe disease progression and to evaluate potential therapeutic effects. So far, volumetric brain changes have been proposed as clinical endpoints in the literature, but cognitive scores are still lacking. This study followed disease progression predominantly in language-based performance within 1 year and defined a PPA sum score which can be used in therapeutic interventions. Methods We assessed 28 patients with nonfluent variant PPA, 17 with semantic variant PPA, 13 with logopenic variant PPA, and 28 healthy controls in detail for 1 year. The most informative neuropsychological assessments were combined to a sum score, and associations between brain atrophy were investigated followed by a sample size calculation for clinical trials. Results Significant absolute changes up to 20% in cognitive tests were found after 1 year. Semantic and phonemic word fluency, Boston Naming Test, Digit Span, Token Test, AAT Written language, and Cookie Test were identified as the best markers for disease progression. These tasks provide the basis of a new PPA sum score. Assuming a therapeutic effect of 50% reduction in cognitive decline for sample size calculations, a number of 56 cases is needed to find a significant treatment effect. Correlations between cognitive decline and atrophy showed a correlation up to r = 0.7 between the sum score and frontal structures, namely the superior and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as with left-sided subcortical structures. Conclusion Our findings support the high performance of the proposed sum score in the follow-up of PPA and recommend it as an outcome measure in intervention studies. KW - frontotemporal dementia KW - cognitive neuropsychology in dementia KW - assessment of cognitive disorders/dementia KW - volumetric MRI KW - aphasia Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236277 VL - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schroeter, Matthias L. A1 - Pawelke, Sarah A1 - Bisenius, Sandrine A1 - Kynast, Jana A1 - Schuemberg, Katharina A1 - Polyakova, Maryna A1 - Anderl-Straub, Sarah A1 - Danek, Adrian A1 - Fassbender, Klaus A1 - Jahn, Holger A1 - Jessen, Frank A1 - Kornhuber, Johannes A1 - Lauer, Martin A1 - Prudlo, Johannes A1 - Schneider, Anja A1 - Uttner, Ingo A1 - Thöne-Otto, Angelika A1 - Otto, Markus A1 - Diehl-Schmid, Janine T1 - A Modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Predicts Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Better Than Executive Function Tests JF - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience N2 - Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by deep alterations in behavior and personality. Although revised diagnostic criteria agree for executive dysfunction as most characteristic, impairments in social cognition are also suggested. The study aimed at identifying those neuropsychological and behavioral parameters best discriminating between bvFTD and healthy controls. Eighty six patients were diagnosed with possible or probable bvFTD according to Rascovsky et al. (2011) and compared with 43 healthy age-matched controls. Neuropsychological performance was assessed with a modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), Stroop task, Trail Making Test (TMT), Hamasch-Five-Point Test (H5PT), and semantic and phonemic verbal fluency tasks. Behavior was assessed with the Apathy Evaluation Scale, Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale, and Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale. Each test’s discriminatory power was investigated by Receiver Operating Characteristic curves calculating the area under the curve (AUC). bvFTD patients performed significantly worse than healthy controls in all neuropsychological tests. Discriminatory power (AUC) was highest in behavioral questionnaires, high in verbal fluency tasks and the RMET, and lower in executive function tests such as the Stroop task, TMT and H5PT. As fluency tasks depend on several cognitive functions, not only executive functions, results suggest that the RMET discriminated better between bvFTD and control subjects than other executive tests. Social cognition should be incorporated into diagnostic criteria for bvFTD in the future, such as in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, as already suggested in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)-5. KW - behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia KW - diagnostic criteria KW - executive function KW - social cognition KW - theory of mind Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234254 VL - 10 ER -