TY - JOUR A1 - Neueder, Dorothea A1 - Andreatta, Marta A1 - Pauli, Paul T1 - Contextual fear conditioning and fear generalization in individuals with panic attacks JF - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience N2 - Context conditioning is characterized by unpredictable threat and its generalization may constitute risk factors for panic disorder (PD). Therefore, we examined differences between individuals with panic attacks (PA; N = 21) and healthy controls (HC, N = 22) in contextual learning and context generalization using a virtual reality (VR) paradigm. Successful context conditioning was indicated in both groups by higher arousal, anxiety and contingency ratings, and increased startle responses and skin conductance levels (SCLs) in an anxiety context (CTX+) where an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) occurred unpredictably vs. a safety context (CTX−). PA compared to HC exhibited increased differential responding to CTX+ vs. CTX− and overgeneralization of contextual anxiety on an evaluative verbal level, but not on a physiological level. We conclude that increased contextual conditioning and contextual generalization may constitute risk factors for PD or agoraphobia contributing to the characteristic avoidance of anxiety contexts and withdrawal to safety contexts and that evaluative cognitive process may play a major role. KW - contextual fear conditioning KW - anxiety generalization KW - startle response KW - panic disorder KW - virtual reality Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201318 VL - 13 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reicherts, Philipp A1 - Pauli, Paul A1 - Mösler, Camilla A1 - Wieser, Matthias J. T1 - Placebo manipulations reverse pain potentiation by unpleasant affective stimuli JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry N2 - According to the motivational priming hypothesis, unpleasant stimuli activate the motivational defense system, which in turn promotes congruent affective states such as negative emotions and pain. The question arises to what degree this bottom–up impact of emotions on pain is susceptible to a manipulation of top–down-driven expectations. To this end, we investigated whether verbal instructions implying pain potentiation vs. reduction (placebo or nocebo expectations)—later on confirmed by corresponding experiences (placebo or nocebo conditioning)—might alter behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of pain modulation by unpleasant pictures. We compared two groups, which underwent three experimental phases: first, participants were either instructed that watching unpleasant affective pictures would increase pain (nocebo group) or that watching unpleasant pictures would decrease pain (placebo group) relative to neutral pictures. During the following placebo/nocebo-conditioning phase, pictures were presented together with electrical pain stimuli of different intensities, reinforcing the instructions. In the subsequent test phase, all pictures were presented again combined with identical pain stimuli. Electroencephalogram was recorded in order to analyze neurophysiological responses of pain (somatosensory evoked potential) and picture processing [visually evoked late positive potential (LPP)], in addition to pain ratings. In the test phase, ratings of pain stimuli administered while watching unpleasant relative to neutral pictures were significantly higher in the nocebo group, thus confirming the motivational priming effect for pain perception. In the placebo group, this effect was reversed such that unpleasant compared with neutral pictures led to significantly lower pain ratings. Similarly, somatosensory evoked potentials were decreased during unpleasant compared with neutral pictures, in the placebo group only. LPPs of the placebo group failed to discriminate between unpleasant and neutral pictures, while the LPPs of the nocebo group showed a clear differentiation. We conclude that the placebo manipulation already affected the processing of the emotional stimuli and, in consequence, the processing of the pain stimuli. In summary, the study revealed that the modulation of pain by emotions, albeit a reliable and well-established finding, is further tuned by reinforced expectations—known to induce placebo/nocebo effects—which should be addressed in future research and considered in clinical applications. KW - placebo and nocebo effects KW - emotion processing KW - psychological pain modulation KW - late positive potential KW - somatosensory evoked potential Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201200 VL - 10 IS - 663 ER - TY - THES A1 - Hoffmann, Mareike T1 - Effector System Prioritization in Multitasking T1 - Effektorsystempriorisierung im Multitasking N2 - Multitasking, defined as performing more than one task at a time, typically yields performance decrements, for instance, in processing speed and accuracy. These performance costs are often distributed asymmetrically among the involved tasks. Under suitable conditions, this can be interpreted as a marker for prioritization of one task – the one that suffers less – over the other. One source of such task prioritization is based on the use of different effector systems (e.g., oculomotor system, vocal tract, limbs) and their characteristics. The present work explores such effector system-based task prioritization by examining to which extent associated effector systems determine which task is processed with higher priority in multitasking situations. Thus, three different paradigms are used, namely the simultaneous (stimulus) onset paradigm, the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, and the task switching paradigm. These paradigms invoke situations in which two (in the present studies basic spatial decision) tasks are a) initiated at exactly the same time, b) initiated with a short varying temporal distance (but still temporally overlapping), or c) in which tasks alternate randomly (without temporal overlap). The results allow for three major conclusions: 1. The assumption of effector system-based task prioritization according to an ordinal pattern (oculomotor > pedal > vocal > manual, indicating decreasing prioritization) is supported by the observed data in the simultaneous onset paradigm. This data pattern cannot be explained by a rigid “first come, first served” task scheduling principle. 2. The data from the PRP paradigm confirmed the assumption of vocal-over-manual prioritization and showed that classic PRP effects (as a marker for task order-based prioritization) can be modulated by effector system characteristics. 3. The mere cognitive representation of task sets (that must be held active to switch between them) differing in effector systems without an actual temporal overlap in task processing, however, is not sufficient to elicit the same effector system prioritization phenomena observed for overlapping tasks. In summary, the insights obtained by the present work support the assumptions of parallel central task processing and resource sharing among tasks, as opposed to exclusively serial processing of central processing stages. Moreover, they indicate that effector systems are a crucial factor in multitasking and suggest an integration of corresponding weighting parameters in existing dual-task control frameworks. N2 - Das gleichzeitige Bearbeiten von mehreren Aufgaben (Multitasking) führt in der Regel zu schlechterer Performanz, zum Beispiel bezüglich Geschwindigkeit und Genauigkeit der Aufgabenausführung. Diese sogenannten Doppelaufgaben- (oder Multitasking-) Kosten sind oft asymmetrisch auf die involvierten Aufgaben verteilt. Dies kann unter bestimmten Gegebenheiten als Priorisierung von jenen Aufgaben, die mit geringeren Kosten assoziiert sind über jene, die stärker durch die Doppelaufgabensituation leiden, interpretiert werden. Eine Quelle für solch eine Aufgabenpriorisierung sind unterschiedliche Effektorsysteme (z.B. Blickbewegungsapparat, Extremitäten, Vokaltrakt), mit denen die Aufgaben jeweils ausgeführt werden sollen. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht solche effektorsystembasierte Priorisierung, das heißt, inwiefern assoziierte Effektorsysteme determinieren, ob Aufgaben in Multitasking-Situationen priorisiert verarbeitet werden. Dazu wurden drei verschiedene experimentelle Paradigmen genutzt: a) das „Simultane Stimulus-Darbietungs-Paradigma“, b) das „Psychologische Refraktärperioden-Paradigma“ und c) das „Aufgabenwechsel-Paradigma“. Innerhalb dieser Paradigmen werden Reaktionen (Reaktionszeiten und Fehlerraten) gemessen und zwischen verschiedenen Effektorsystemen verglichen, die a) zum genau gleichen Zeitpunkt gestartet werden, b) mit einem kurzen, variierten zeitlichen Versatz gestartet werden, aber in ihrer Ausführung überlappen, oder c) zwischen denen in unvorhersehbarer Reihenfolge hin und her gewechselt werden soll. Entsprechend dieser drei Ansätze erlauben die Ergebnisse drei wichtige Schlussfolgerungen: 1. Unter simultanem Einsetzen der Aufgabenverarbeitung (und damit ohne extern suggerierte Reihenfolge) folgen Doppelaufgabenkontrollprozesse einem ordinalen Priorisierungsmuster auf Basis der mit den Aufgaben assoziierten Effektorsysteme in der Reihenfolge: okulomotorisch > pedal > vokal > manuell (im Sinne einer absteigenden Priorisierung). Dieses Muster ist nicht durch Bearbeitungsgeschwindigkeit im Sinne eines „wer zuerst kommt, mahlt zuerst“-Prinzips erklärbar. 2. Eine Aufgabenpriorisierung, die auf einer externen Aufgabenreihenfolge basiert (gemessen im PRP-Effekt), kann durch die mit den Aufgaben assoziierten Effektorsysteme moduliert werden. 3. Systematische effektorsystembasierte Aufgabenpriorisierung ist nur dann konsistent zu beobachten, wenn Teile der Aufgabenverarbeitung zeitlich überlappen. Eine rein mentale Repräsentation einer Aufgabe, die in einem anderen Effektorsystem ausgeführt werden soll, reicht nicht dazu aus, um das oben beschriebene Priorisierungsmuster vollständig zu instanziieren. Alles in allem sprechen die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit für parallele (und gegen ausschließlich serielle) Reaktionsauswahlprozesse und dafür, dass limitierte kognitive Ressourcen zwischen Aufgaben aufgeteilt werden. Außerdem zeigen die vorliegenden Ergebnisse den substantiellen Einfluss von Effektorsystemen auf Ressourcenzuweisungsprozesse in Mehrfachaufgabensituationen und legen nahe, entsprechende Gewichtungsparameter in bestehende Modelle zu Doppelaufgabenkontrolle zu integrieren. KW - Mehrfachtätigkeit KW - task prioritization KW - response modalities KW - cognitive control KW - Multitasking KW - Effektorsysteme Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201084 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schneider, Norbert A1 - Huestegge, Lynn T1 - Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach–avoidance steering task JF - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications N2 - Background While the coordination of oculomotor and manual behavior is essential for driving a car, surprisingly little is known about this interaction, especially in situations requiring a quick steering reaction. In the present study, we analyzed oculomotor gaze and manual steering behavior in approach and avoidance tasks. Three task blocks were implemented within a dynamic simulated driving environment requiring the driver either to steer away from/toward a visual stimulus or to switch between both tasks. Results Task blocks requiring task switches were associated with higher manual response times and increased error rates. Manual response times did not significantly differ depending on whether drivers had to steer away from vs toward a stimulus, whereas oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability were increased when drivers had to steer away from a stimulus compared to steering toward a stimulus. Conclusion The increased manual response times and error rates in mixed tasks indicate performance costs associated with cognitive flexibility, while the increased oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability indicate a parsimonious cross-modal action control strategy (avoiding stimulus fixation prior to steering away from it) for the avoidance scenario. Several discrepancies between these results and typical eye–hand interaction patterns in basic laboratory research suggest that the specific goals and complex perceptual affordances associated with driving a vehicle strongly shape cross-modal control of behavior. KW - steering KW - driving simulation KW - gaze control KW - visual orientation Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200419 VL - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pfister, Roland A1 - Frings, Christian A1 - Moeller, Birte T1 - The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat JF - Advances in Cognitive Psychologe N2 - Responding in the presence of stimuli leads to an integration of stimulus features and response features into event fles, which can later be retrieved to assist action control. This integration mechanism is not limited to target stimuli, but can also include distractors (distractor-response binding). A recurring research question is which factors determine whether or not distractors are integrated. One suggested candidate factor is target-distractor congruency: Distractor-response binding effects were reported to be stronger for congruent than for incongruent target-distractor pairs. Here, we discuss a general problem with including the factor of congruency in typical analyses used to study distractor-based binding effects. Integrating this factor leads to a confound that may explain any differences between distractor-response binding effects of congruent and incongruent distractors with a simple congruency effect. Simulation data confrmed this argument. We propose to interpret previous data cautiously and discuss potential avenues to circumvent this problem in the future. KW - action control KW - distractor-response binding KW - congruency sequences KW - sequence analysis Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200265 VL - 15 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wallmann-Sperlich, Birgit A1 - Hoffmann, Sophie A1 - Salditt, Anne A1 - Bipp, Tanja A1 - Froboese, Ingo T1 - Moving to an “active” biophilic designed office workplace: a pilot study about the effects on sitting time and sitting habits of office-based workers JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - Promising initial insights show that offices designed to permit physical activity (PA) may reduce workplace sitting time. Biophilic approaches are intended to introduce natural surroundings into the workplace, and preliminary data show positive effects on stress reduction and elevated productivity within the workplace. The primary aim of this pilot study was to analyze changes in workplace sitting time and self-reported habit strength concerning uninterrupted sitting and PA during work, when relocating from a traditional office setting to “active” biophilic-designed surroundings. The secondary aim was to assess possible changes in work-associated factors such as satisfaction with the office environment, work engagement, and work performance, among office staff. In a pre-post designed field study, we collected data through an online survey on health behavior at work. Twelve participants completed the survey before (one-month pre-relocation, T1) and twice after the office relocation (three months (T2) and seven months post-relocation (T3)). Standing time per day during office hours increased from T1 to T3 by about 40 min per day (p < 0.01). Other outcomes remained unaltered. The results suggest that changing office surroundings to an active-permissive biophilic design increased standing time during working hours. Future larger-scale controlled studies are warranted to investigate the influence of office design on sitting time and work-associated factors during working hours in depth. KW - desk-based KW - office-workers KW - standing KW - online survey KW - walking KW - work engagement KW - habit strength KW - work performance KW - office environment Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-197371 SN - 1660-4601 VL - 16 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eder, Andreas B. A1 - Dignath, David T1 - Expected value of control and the motivational control of habitual action JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - A hallmark of habitual actions is that, once they are established, they become insensitive to changes in the values of action outcomes. In this article, we review empirical research that examined effects of posttraining changes in outcome values in outcome-selective Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) tasks. This review suggests that cue-instigated action tendencies in these tasks are not affected by weak and/or incomplete revaluation procedures (e.g., selective satiety) and substantially disrupted by a strong and complete devaluation of reinforcers. In a second part, we discuss two alternative models of a motivational control of habitual action: a default-interventionist framework and expected value of control theory. It is argued that the default-interventionist framework cannot solve the problem of an infinite regress (i.e., what controls the controller?). In contrast, expected value of control can explain control of habitual actions with local computations and feedback loops without (implicit) references to control homunculi. It is argued that insensitivity to changes in action outcomes is not an intrinsic design feature of habits but, rather, a function of the cognitive system that controls habitual action tendencies. KW - habit KW - outcome devaluation KW - Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer KW - default-interventionist framework KW - expected value of control KW - cognitive control Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195703 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 10 IS - 1812 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rösler, Lara A1 - Rubo, Marius A1 - Gamer, Matthias T1 - Artificial faces predict gaze allocation in complex dynamic scenes JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Both low-level physical saliency and social information, as presented by human heads or bodies, are known to drive gaze behavior in free-viewing tasks. Researchers have previously made use of a great variety of face stimuli, ranging from photographs of real humans to schematic faces, frequently without systematically differentiating between the two. In the current study, we used a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) approach to investigate to what extent schematic artificial faces can predict gaze when they are presented alone or in competition with real human faces. Relative differences in predictive power became apparent, while GLMMs suggest substantial effects for real and artificial faces in all conditions. Artificial faces were accordingly less predictive than real human faces but still contributed significantly to gaze allocation. These results help to further our understanding of how social information guides gaze in complex naturalistic scenes. KW - social attention KW - faces KW - physical saliency KW - visual perception KW - naturalistic scenes KW - eye movements Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-193024 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 10 IS - 2877 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Rodríguez-Martín, Boris C. A1 - Meule, Adrian T1 - Food craving: new contributions on its assessment, moderators, and consequences T2 - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - No abstract available. KW - food KW - cravings KW - emotional eating KW - obesity KW - pregnancy KW - binge eating KW - food addiction Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190299 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 6 IS - 21 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Matuz, Tamara A1 - Birbaumer, Niels A1 - Hautzinger, Martin A1 - Kübler, Andrea T1 - Psychosocial adjustment to ALS: a longitudinal study JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - For the current study the Lazarian stress-coping theory and the appendant model of psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disabilities (Pakenham, 1999) has shaped the foundation for identifying determinants of adjustment to ALS. We aimed to investigate the evolution of psychosocial adjustment to ALS and to determine its long-term predictors. A longitudinal study design with four measurement time points was therefore, used to assess patients' quality of life, depression, and stress-coping model related aspects, such as illness characteristics, social support, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies during a period of 2 years. Regression analyses revealed that 55% of the variance of severity of depressive symptoms and 47% of the variance in quality of life at T2 was accounted for by all the T1 predictor variables taken together. On the level of individual contributions, protective buffering, and appraisal of own coping potential accounted for a significant percentage in the variance in severity of depressive symptoms, whereas problem management coping strategies explained variance in quality of life scores. Illness characteristics at T2 did not explain any variance of both adjustment outcomes. Overall, the pattern of the longitudinal results indicated stable depressive symptoms and quality of life indices reflecting a successful adjustment to the disease across four measurement time points during a period of about two years. Empirical evidence is provided for the predictive value of social support, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies, but not illness parameters such as severity and duration for adaptation to ALS. The current study contributes to a better conceptualization of adjustment, allowing us to provide evidence-based support beyond medical and physical intervention for people with ALS. KW - ALS KW - coping KW - depression KW - quality of life KW - longitudinal assessment Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190208 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 6 IS - 1197 ER -