TY - JOUR A1 - De Palma, Adriana A1 - Abrahamczyk, Stefan A1 - Aizen, Marcelo A. A1 - Albrecht, Matthias A1 - Basset, Yves A1 - Bates, Adam A1 - Blake, Robin J. A1 - Boutin, Céline A1 - Bugter, Rob A1 - Connop, Stuart A1 - Cruz-López, Leopoldo A1 - Cunningham, Saul A. A1 - Darvill, Ben A1 - Diekötter, Tim A1 - Dorn, Silvia A1 - Downing, Nicola A1 - Entling, Martin H. A1 - Farwig, Nina A1 - Felicioli, Antonio A1 - Fonte, Steven J. A1 - Fowler, Robert A1 - Franzen, Markus Franzén A1 - Goulson, Dave A1 - Grass, Ingo A1 - Hanley, Mick E. A1 - Hendrix, Stephen D. A1 - Herrmann, Farina A1 - Herzog, Felix A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Jauker, Birgit A1 - Kessler, Michael A1 - Knight, M. E. A1 - Kruess, Andreas A1 - Lavelle, Patrick A1 - Le Féon, Violette A1 - Lentini, Pia A1 - Malone, Louise A. A1 - Marshall, Jon A1 - Martínez Pachón, Eliana A1 - McFrederick, Quinn S. A1 - Morales, Carolina L. A1 - Mudri-Stojnic, Sonja A1 - Nates-Parra, Guiomar A1 - Nilsson, Sven G. A1 - Öckinger, Erik A1 - Osgathorpe, Lynne A1 - Parra-H, Alejandro A1 - Peres, Carlos A. A1 - Persson, Anna S. A1 - Petanidou, Theodora A1 - Poveda, Katja A1 - Power, Eileen F. A1 - Quaranta, Marino A1 - Quintero, Carolina A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Richards, Miriam H. A1 - Roulston, T’ai A1 - Rousseau, Laurent A1 - Sadler, Jonathan P. A1 - Samnegård, Ulrika A1 - Schellhorn, Nancy A. A1 - Schüepp, Christof A1 - Schweiger, Oliver A1 - Smith-Pardo, Allan H. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Stout, Jane C. A1 - Tonietto, Rebecca K. A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Tylianakis, Jason M. A1 - Verboven, Hans A. F. A1 - Vergara, Carlos H. A1 - Verhulst, Jort A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Yoon, Hyung Joo A1 - Purvis, Andy T1 - Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases JF - Scientific Reports N2 - Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises. KW - bee community KW - land-use change KW - intensification KW - geographic biases KW - taxonomic biases KW - global dataset Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-167642 VL - 6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schlinkert, Hella A1 - Ludwig, Martin A1 - Batáry, Péter A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Fischer, Christina T1 - Forest specialist and generalist small mammals in forest edges and hedges JF - Wildlife Biology N2 - Agricultural intensification often leads to fragmentation of natural habitats, such as forests, and thereby negatively affects forest specialist species. However, human introduced habitats, such as hedges, may counteract negative effects of forest fragmentation and increase dispersal, particularly of forest specialists. We studied effects of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge) and hedge isolation from forests (connected versus isolated hedge) in agricultural landscapes on abundance, species richness and community composition of mice, voles and shrews in forest edges and hedges. Simultaneously to these effects of forest edge/hedge type we analysed impacts of habitat structure, namely percentage of bare ground and forest edge/hedge width, on abundance, species richness and community composition of small mammals. Total abundance and forest specialist abundance (both driven by the most abundant species Myodes glareolus, bank vole) were higher in forest edges than in hedges, while hedge isolation had no effect. In contrast, abundance of habitat generalists was higher in isolated compared to connected hedges, with no effect of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge). Species richness as well as abundance of the most abundant habitat generalist Sorex araneus (common shrew), were not affected by habitat type or hedge isolation. Decreasing percentage of bare ground and increasing forest edge/hedge width was associated with increased abundance of forest specialists, while habitat structure was unrelated to species richness or abundance of any other group. Community composition was driven by forest specialists, which exceeded habitat generalist abundance in forest edges and connected hedges, while abundances were similar to each other in isolated hedges. Our results show that small mammal forest specialists prefer forest edges as habitats over hedges, while habitat generalists are able to use unoccupied ecological niches in isolated hedges. Consequently even isolated hedges can be marginal habitats for forest specialists and habitat generalists and thereby may increase regional farmland biodiversity. KW - forest specialists KW - forest fragmentation KW - forest hedges KW - forest edges Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168333 VL - 22 IS - 3 ER -