TY  - JOUR
A1  - Morris, E. Kathryn
A1  - Caruso, Tancredi
A1  - Buscot, Francois
A1  - Fischer, Markus
A1  - Hancock, Christine
A1  - Maier, Tanja S.
A1  - Meiners, Torsten
A1  - Müller, Caroline
A1  - Obermaier, Elisabeth
A1  - Prati, Daniel
A1  - Socher, Stephanie A.
A1  - Sonnemann, Ilja
A1  - Wäschke, Nicola
A1  - Wubet, Tesfaye
A1  - Wurst, Susanne
A1  - Rillig, Matthias C.
T1  - Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories
JF  - Ecology and Evolution
N2  - Biodiversity, a multidimensional property of natural systems, is difficult to quantify partly because of the multitude of indices proposed for this purpose. Indices aim to describe general properties of communities that allow us to compare different regions, taxa, and trophic levels. Therefore, they are of fundamental importance for environmental monitoring and conservation, although there is no consensus about which indices are more appropriate and informative. We tested several common diversity indices in a range of simple to complex statistical analyses in order to determine whether some were better suited for certain analyses than others. We used data collected around the focal plant Plantago lanceolata on 60 temperate grassland plots embedded in an agricultural landscape to explore relationships between the common diversity indices of species richness (S), Shannon's diversity (H'), Simpson's diversity (D-1), Simpson's dominance (D-2), Simpson's evenness (E), and Berger-Parker dominance (BP). We calculated each of these indices for herbaceous plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, aboveground arthropods, belowground insect larvae, and P.lanceolata molecular and chemical diversity. Including these trait-based measures of diversity allowed us to test whether or not they behaved similarly to the better studied species diversity. We used path analysis to determine whether compound indices detected more relationships between diversities of different organisms and traits than more basic indices. In the path models, more paths were significant when using H', even though all models except that with E were equally reliable. This demonstrates that while common diversity indices may appear interchangeable in simple analyses, when considering complex interactions, the choice of index can profoundly alter the interpretation of results. Data mining in order to identify the index producing the most significant results should be avoided, but simultaneously considering analyses using multiple indices can provide greater insight into the interactions in a system.
KW  - molecular diversity
KW  - plant diversity
KW  - plantago lanceolata
KW  - shannon index
KW  - simpson's index
KW  - arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
KW  - Hill's powers
KW  - chemical diversity
KW  - Berger-Parker
KW  - arthropods
Y1  - 2014
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115462
SN  - 2045-7758
VL  - 4
IS  - 18
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kleijn, David
A1  - Winfree, Rachael
A1  - Bartomeus, Ignasi
A1  - Carvalheiro, Luísa G.
A1  - Henry, Mickael
A1  - Isaacs, Rufus
A1  - Klein, Alexandra-Maria
A1  - Kremen, Claire
A1  - M'Gonigle, Leithen K.
A1  - Rader, Romina
A1  - Ricketts, Taylor H.
A1  - Williams, Neal M.
A1  - Adamson, Nancy Lee
A1  - Ascher, John S.
A1  - Báldi, András
A1  - Batáry, Péter
A1  - Benjamin, Faye
A1  - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
A1  - Blitzer, Eleanor J.
A1  - Bommarco, Riccardo
A1  - Brand, Mariette R.
A1  - Bretagnolle, Vincent
A1  - Button, Lindsey
A1  - Cariveau, Daniel P.
A1  - Chifflet, Rémy
A1  - Colville, Jonathan F.
A1  - Danforth, Bryan N.
A1  - Elle, Elizabeth
A1  - Garratt, Michael P. D.
A1  - Herzog, Felix
A1  - Holzschuh, Andrea
A1  - Howlett, Brad G.
A1  - Jauker, Frank
A1  - Jha, Shalene
A1  - Knop, Eva
A1  - Krewenka, Kristin M.
A1  - Le Féon, Violette
A1  - Mandelik, Yael
A1  - May, Emily A.
A1  - Park, Mia G.
A1  - Pisanty, Gideon
A1  - Reemer, Menno
A1  - Riedinger, Verena
A1  - Rollin, Orianne
A1  - Rundlöf, Maj
A1  - Sardiñas, Hillary S.
A1  - Scheper, Jeroen
A1  - Sciligo, Amber R.
A1  - Smith, Henrik G.
A1  - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
A1  - Thorp, Robbin
A1  - Tscharntke, Teja
A1  - Verhulst, Jort
A1  - Viana, Blandina F.
A1  - Vaissière, Bernard E.
A1  - Veldtman, Ruan
A1  - Ward, Kimiora L.
A1  - Westphal, Catrin
A1  - Potts, Simon G.
T1  - Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
JF  - Nature Communications
N2  - There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
KW  - ecosystem services
KW  - european countries
KW  - abundance
KW  - native bees
KW  - biodiversity conservation
KW  - plant diversity
KW  - fruit set
KW  - productivity
KW  - decline
KW  - pollen
Y1  - 2015
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879
VL  - 6
IS  - 7414
ER  -