TY - JOUR A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Redlich, Sarah A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Rojas-Botero, Sandra A1 - Peters, Marcell K. A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Benjamin, Caryl S. A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Haensel, Maria A1 - Kollmann, Johannes A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Müller, Jörg A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Interactive effects of climate and land use on pollinator diversity differ among taxa and scales JF - Science Advances N2 - Changes in climate and land use are major threats to pollinating insects, an essential functional group. Here, we unravel the largely unknown interactive effects of both threats on seven pollinator taxa using a multiscale space-for-time approach across large climate and land-use gradients in a temperate region. Pollinator community composition, regional gamma diversity, and community dissimilarity (beta diversity) of pollinator taxa were shaped by climate-land-use interactions, while local alpha diversity was solely explained by their additive effects. Pollinator diversity increased with reduced land-use intensity (forest < grassland < arable land < urban) and high flowering-plant diversity at different spatial scales, and higher temperatures homogenized pollinator communities across regions. Our study reveals declines in pollinator diversity with land-use intensity at multiple spatial scales and regional community homogenization in warmer and drier climates. Management options at several scales are highlighted to mitigate impacts of climate change on pollinators and their ecosystem services. KW - climate KW - land use KW - pollinator diversity Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301303 VL - 8 IS - 18 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Rojas-Botero, Sandra A1 - Benjamin, Caryl S. A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Haensel, Maria A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Kollmann, Johannes A1 - Redlich, Sarah T1 - Landscape diversity and local temperature, but not climate, affect arthropod predation among habitat types JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Arthropod predators are important for ecosystem functioning by providing top-down regulation of insect herbivores. As predator communities and activity are influenced by biotic and abiotic factors on different spatial scales, the strength of top-down regulation (‘arthropod predation’) is also likely to vary. Understanding the combined effects of potential drivers on arthropod predation is urgently needed with regard to anthropogenic climate and land-use change. In a large-scale study, we recorded arthropod predation rates using artificial caterpillars on 113 plots of open herbaceous vegetation embedded in contrasting habitat types (forest, grassland, arable field, settlement) along climate and land-use gradients in Bavaria, Germany. As potential drivers we included habitat characteristics (habitat type, plant species richness, local mean temperature and mean relative humidity during artificial caterpillar exposure), landscape diversity (0.5–3.0-km, six scales), climate (multi-annual mean temperature, ‘MAT’) and interactive effects of habitat type with other drivers. We observed no substantial differences in arthropod predation rates between the studied habitat types, related to plant species richness and across the Bavarian-wide climatic gradient, but predation was limited when local mean temperatures were low and tended to decrease towards higher relative humidity. Arthropod predation rates increased towards more diverse landscapes at a 2-km scale. Interactive effects of habitat type with local weather conditions, plant species richness, landscape diversity and MAT were not observed. We conclude that landscape diversity favours high arthropod predation rates in open herbaceous vegetation independent of the dominant habitat in the vicinity. This finding may be harnessed to improve top-down control of herbivores, e.g. agricultural pests, but further research is needed for more specific recommendations on landscape management. The absence of MAT effects suggests that high predation rates may occur independent of moderate increases of MAT in the near future. KW - arthropod predators KW - habitat types KW - landscape diversity Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301292 VL - 17 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Redlich, Sarah A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Benjamin, Caryl A1 - Dhillon, Maninder Singh A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Haensel, Maria A1 - Hovestadt, Thomas A1 - Kollmann, Johannes A1 - Koellner, Thomas A1 - Kübert‐Flock, Carina A1 - Kunstmann, Harald A1 - Menzel, Annette A1 - Moning, Christoph A1 - Peters, Wibke A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Rummler, Thomas A1 - Rojas‐Botero, Sandra A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Müller, Jörg A1 - Steffan‐Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services—A multi‐scale experimental design JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution N2 - Climate and land-use change are key drivers of environmental degradation in the Anthropocene, but too little is known about their interactive effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Long-term data on biodiversity trends are currently lacking. Furthermore, previous ecological studies have rarely considered climate and land use in a joint design, did not achieve variable independence or lost statistical power by not covering the full range of environmental gradients. Here, we introduce a multi-scale space-for-time study design to disentangle effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services. The site selection approach coupled extensive GIS-based exploration (i.e. using a Geographic information system) and correlation heatmaps with a crossed and nested design covering regional, landscape and local scales. Its implementation in Bavaria (Germany) resulted in a set of study plots that maximise the potential range and independence of environmental variables at different spatial scales. Stratifying the state of Bavaria into five climate zones (reference period 1981–2010) and three prevailing land-use types, that is, near-natural, agriculture and urban, resulted in 60 study regions (5.8 × 5.8 km quadrants) covering a mean annual temperature gradient of 5.6–9.8°C and a spatial extent of ~310 × 310 km. Within these regions, we nested 180 study plots located in contrasting local land-use types, that is, forests, grasslands, arable land or settlement (local climate gradient 4.5–10°C). This approach achieved low correlations between climate and land use (proportional cover) at the regional and landscape scale with |r ≤ 0.33| and |r ≤ 0.29| respectively. Furthermore, using correlation heatmaps for local plot selection reduced potentially confounding relationships between landscape composition and configuration for plots located in forests, arable land and settlements. The suggested design expands upon previous research in covering a significant range of environmental gradients and including a diversity of dominant land-use types at different scales within different climatic contexts. It allows independent assessment of the relative contribution of multi-scale climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Understanding potential interdependencies among global change drivers is essential to develop effective restoration and mitigation strategies against biodiversity decline, especially in expectation of future climatic changes. Importantly, this study also provides a baseline for long-term ecological monitoring programs. KW - study design KW - biodiversity KW - climate change KW - ecosystem functioning KW - insect monitoring KW - land use KW - space-for-time approach KW - spatial scales Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258270 VL - 13 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ambrožová, Lucie A1 - Finnberg, Sven A1 - Feldmann, Benedikt A1 - Buse, Jörn A1 - Preuss, Henry A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Thorn, Simon T1 - Coppicing and topsoil removal promote diversity of dung‐inhabiting beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae, Staphylinidae) in forests JF - Agricultural and Forest Entomology N2 - Central European forests experience a substantial loss of open-forest organisms due to forest management and increasing nitrogen deposition. However, management strategies, removing different levels of nitrogen, have been rarely evaluated simultaneously. We tested the additive effects of coppicing and topsoil removal on communities of dung-inhabiting beetles compared to closed forests. We sampled 57 021 beetles, using baited pitfall traps exposed on 27 plots. Experimental treatments resulted in significantly different communities by promoting open-habitat species. While alpha diversity did not differ among treatments, gamma diversity of Geotrupidae and Scarabaeidae and beta diversity of Staphylinidae were higher in coppice than in forest. Functional diversity of rove beetles was higher in both, coppice and topsoil-removed plots, compared to control plots. This was likely driven by higher habitat heterogeneity in established forest openings. Five dung beetle species and four rove beetle species benefitted from coppicing, one red-listed dung beetle and two rove beetle species benefitted from topsoil removal. Our results demonstrate that dung-inhabiting beetles related to open forest patches can be promoted by both, coppicing and additional topsoil removal. A mosaic of coppice and bare-soil-rich patches can hence promote landscape-level gamma diversity of dung and rove beetles within forests. KW - nitrogen uptake KW - dung beetle KW - forest management KW - functional diversity KW - insect decline KW - rove beetle Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258296 VL - 24 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Redlich, Sarah A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Rojas-Botero, Sandra A1 - Benjamin, Caryl S. A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Kollmann, Johannes A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Plant richness, land use and temperature differently shape invertebrate leaf-chewing herbivory on plant functional groups JF - Oecologia N2 - Higher temperatures can increase metabolic rates and carbon demands of invertebrate herbivores, which may shift leaf-chewing herbivory among plant functional groups differing in C:N (carbon:nitrogen) ratios. Biotic factors influencing herbivore species richness may modulate these temperature effects. Yet, systematic studies comparing leaf-chewing herbivory among plant functional groups in different habitats and landscapes along temperature gradients are lacking. This study was conducted on 80 plots covering large gradients of temperature, plant richness and land use in Bavaria, Germany. We investigated proportional leaf area loss by chewing invertebrates (‘herbivory’) in three plant functional groups on open herbaceous vegetation. As potential drivers, we considered local mean temperature (range 8.4–18.8 °C), multi-annual mean temperature (range 6.5–10.0 °C), local plant richness (species and family level, ranges 10–51 species, 5–25 families), adjacent habitat type (forest, grassland, arable field, settlement), proportion of grassland and landscape diversity (0.2–3 km scale). We observed differential responses of leaf-chewing herbivory among plant functional groups in response to plant richness (family level only) and habitat type, but not to grassland proportion, landscape diversity and temperature—except for multi-annual mean temperature influencing herbivory on grassland plots. Three-way interactions of plant functional group, temperature and predictors of plant richness or land use did not substantially impact herbivory. We conclude that abiotic and biotic factors can assert different effects on leaf-chewing herbivory among plant functional groups. At present, effects of plant richness and habitat type outweigh effects of temperature and landscape-scale land use on herbivory among legumes, forbs and grasses. KW - climate KW - ecosystem function KW - land use KW - plant guilds KW - plant–insect interactions Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325079 VL - 199 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Uhler, Johannes A1 - Redlich, Sarah A1 - Zhang, Jie A1 - Hothorn, Torsten A1 - Tobisch, Cynthia A1 - Ewald, Jörg A1 - Thorn, Simon A1 - Seibold, Sebastian A1 - Mitesser, Oliver A1 - Morinère, Jérôme A1 - Bozicevic, Vedran A1 - Benjamin, Caryl S. A1 - Englmeier, Jana A1 - Fricke, Ute A1 - Ganuza, Cristina A1 - Haensel, Maria A1 - Riebl, Rebekka A1 - Rojas-Botero, Sandra A1 - Rummler, Thomas A1 - Uphus, Lars A1 - Schmidt, Stefan A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Müller, Jörg T1 - Relationships of insect biomass and richness with land use along a climate gradient JF - Nature Communications N2 - Recently reported insect declines have raised both political and social concern. Although the declines have been attributed to land use and climate change, supporting evidence suffers from low taxonomic resolution, short time series, a focus on local scales, and the collinearity of the identified drivers. In this study, we conducted a systematic assessment of insect populations in southern Germany, which showed that differences in insect biomass and richness are highly context dependent. We found the largest difference in biomass between semi-natural and urban environments (-42%), whereas differences in total richness (-29%) and the richness of threatened species (-56%) were largest from semi-natural to agricultural environments. These results point to urbanization and agriculture as major drivers of decline. We also found that richness and biomass increase monotonously with increasing temperature, independent of habitat. The contrasting patterns of insect biomass and richness question the use of these indicators as mutual surrogates. Our study provides support for the implementation of more comprehensive measures aimed at habitat restoration in order to halt insect declines. KW - biodiversity KW - ecology Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265058 VL - 12 IS - 1 ER -