TY - THES A1 - Reinermann, Sophie T1 - Earth Observation Time Series for Grassland Management Analyses – Development and large-scale Application of a Framework to detect Grassland Mowing Events in Germany T1 - Erdbeobachtungszeitserien zur Analyse der Grünlandbewirtschaftung – Entwicklung und großflächige Anwendung einer Prozessierungsarchitektur zur automatisierten Detektion von Grünlandmahden N2 - Grasslands shape many landscapes of the earth as they cover about one-third of its surface. They are home and provide livelihood for billions of people and are mainly used as source of forage for animals. However, grasslands fulfill many additional ecosystem functions next to fodder production, such as storage of carbon, water filtration, provision of habitats and cultural values. They play a role in climate change (mitigation) and in preserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions on a global scale. The degree to what these ecosystem functions are present within grassland ecosystems is largely determined by the management. Individual management practices and the use intensity influence the species composition as well as functions, like carbon storage, while higher use intensities (e.g. high mowing frequencies) usually show a negative impact. Especially in Central European countries, like in Germany, the determining influence of grassland management on its physiognomy and ecosystem functions leads to a large variability and small-scale alternations of grassland parcels. Large-scale information on the management and use intensity of grasslands is not available. Consequently, estimations of grassland ecosystem functions are challenging which, however, would be required for large-scale assessments of the status of grassland ecosystems and optimized management plans for the future. The topic of this thesis tackles this gap by investigating the major grassland management practice in Germany, which is mowing, for multiple years, in high spatial resolution and on a national scale. Earth Observation (EO) has the advantage of providing information of the earth’s surface on multi-temporal time steps. An extensive literature review on the use of EO for grassland management and production analyses, which was part of this thesis, showed that in particular research on grasslands consisting of small parcels with a large variety of management and use intensity, like common in Central Europe, is underrepresented. Especially the launch of the Sentinel satellites in the recent past now enables the analyses of such grasslands due to their high spatial and temporal resolution. The literature review specifically on the investigation of grassland mowing events revealed that most previous studies focused on small study areas, were exploratory, only used one sensor type and/or lacked a reference data set with a complete range of management options. Within this thesis a novel framework to detect grassland mowing events over large areas is presented which was applied and validated for the entire area of Germany for multiple years (2018–2021). The potential of both sensor types, optical (Sentinel-2) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) (Sentinel-1) was investigated regarding grassland mowing event detection. Eight EO parameters were investigated, namely the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), the backscatter intensity and the interferometric (InSAR) temporal coherence for both available polarization modes (VV and VH), and the polarimetric (PolSAR) decomposition parameters Entropy, K0 and K1. An extensive reference data set was generated based on daily images of webcams distributed in Germany which resulted in mowing information for grasslands with the entire possible range of mowing frequencies – from one to six in Germany – and in 1475 reference mowing events for the four years of interest. For the first time a observation-driven mowing detection approach including data from Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 and combining the two was developed, applied and validated on large scale. Based on a subset of the reference data (13 grassland parcels with 44 mowing events) from 2019 the EO parameters were investigated and the detection algorithm developed and parameterized. This analysis showed that a threshold-based change detection approach based on EVI captured grassland mowing events best, which only failed during periods of clouds. All SAR-based parameters showed a less consistent behavior to mowing events, with PolSAR Entropy and InSAR Coherence VH, however, revealing the highest potential among them. A second, combined approach based on EVI and a SARbased parameter was developed and tested for PolSAR Entropy and InSAR VH. To avoid additional false positive detections during periods in which mowing events are anyhow reliably detected using optical data, the SAR-based mowing detection was only initiated during long gaps within the optical time series (< 25 days). Application and validation of these approaches in a focus region revealed that only using EVI leads to the highest accuracies (F1-Score = 0.65) as combining this approach with SAR-based detection led to a strong increase in falsely detected mowing events resulting in a decrease of accuracies (EVI + PolSAR ENT F1-Score = 0.61; EVI + InSAR COH F1-Score = 0.61). The mowing detection algorithm based on EVI was applied for the entire area of Germany for the years 2018-2021. It was revealed that the largest share of grasslands with high mowing frequencies (at least four mowing events) can be found in southern/south-eastern Germany. Extensively used grassland (mown up to two times) is distributed within the entire country with larger shares in the center and north-eastern parts of Germany. These patterns stay constant in general, but small fluctuations between the years are visible. Early mown grasslands can be found in southern/south-eastern Germany – in line with high mowing frequency areas – but also in central-western parts. The years 2019 and 2020 revealed higher accuracies based on the 1475 mowing events of the multi-annual validation data set (F1-Scores of 0.64 and 0.63), 2018 and 2021 lower ones (F1-Score of 0.52 and 0.50). Based on this new, unprecedented data set, potential influencing factors on the mowing dynamics were investigated. Therefore, climate, topography, soil data and information on conservation schemes were related to mowing dynamics for the year 2020, which showed a high number of valid observations and detection accuracy. It was revealed that there are no strong linear relationships between the mowing frequency or the timing of the first mowing event and the investigated variables. However, it was found that for intensive grassland usage certain climatic and topographic conditions have to be fulfilled, while extensive grasslands appear on the entire spectrum of these variables. Further, higher mowing frequencies occur on soils with influence of ground water and lower mowing frequencies in protected areas. These results show the complex interplay between grassland mowing dynamics and external influences and highlight the challenges of policies aiming to protect grassland ecosystem functions and their need to be adapted to regional circumstances. N2 - Grünland prägt viele Landschaften der Erde, da es etwa ein Drittel der Erdoberfläche bedeckt. Es ist Heimat und Lebensgrundlage für Milliarden von Menschen und wird hauptsächlich als Futterquelle für die Viehhaltung genutzt. Neben der Futterproduktion erfüllen Grünlandflächen jedoch viele weitere Ökosystemfunktionen, wie die Speicherung von Kohlenstoff, die Wasserfilterung, die Bereitstellung von Lebensräumen, als auch kulturelle Werte. Sie spielen eine Rolle bei der Abschwächung des Klimawandels und bei der Erhaltung der biologischen Vielfalt und der Ökosystemfunktionen auf globaler Ebene. Das Ausmaß, in dem diese Ökosystemfunktionen in Grünlandökosystemen vorhanden sind, wird weitgehend durch die Bewirtschaftung bestimmt. Einzelne Bewirtschaftungspraktiken und die Nutzungsintensität beeinflussen sowohl die Artenzusammensetzung als auch Funktionen wie die Kohlenstoffspeicherung, wobei höhere Nutzungsintensitäten (z. B. hohe Mähfrequenzen) in der Regel einen negativen Einfluss haben. Insbesondere in mitteleuropäischen Ländern wie Deutschland, führt der bestimmende Einfluss der Grünlandbewirtschaftung auf die Physiognomie und die Ökosystemfunktionen zu einer großen Variabilität und kleinräumigen Differenziertheit einzelner Grünlandflächen. Großräumige Informationen über die Bewirtschaftungs- und Nutzungsintensität von Grünland sind nicht verfügbar. Folglich sind Schätzungen der Ökosystemfunktionen von Grünland eine Herausforderung, die jedoch für großräumige Bewertungen des Zustands von Grünlandökosystemen und optimierte Bewirtschaftungspläne für die Zukunft erforderlich wären. Das Thema dieser Arbeit greift diese Lücke auf, indem es die wichtigste Grünlandbewirtschaftungsmethode in Deutschland, die Mahd, über mehrere Jahre, mit hoher räumlicher Auflösung und auf nationaler Ebene untersucht. Die Erdbeobachtung hat den Vorteil, Informationen über die Erdoberfläche in multitemporalen Zeitschritten zu liefern. Eine umfangreiche Literaturrecherche zur Nutzung von Erdbeobachtung für Grünlandmanagement und Produktion, welche Teil dieser Arbeit war, hat gezeigt, dass insbesondere die Forschung zu kleinparzelligem Grünland mit einer großen Vielfalt an Bewirtschaftungs- und Nutzungsintensitäten, wie in Mitteleuropa gängig, unterrepräsentiert ist. Insbesondere die vor wenigen Jahren erfolgte Start der Sentinel-Satellitenmissionen ermöglicht nun auch die Analyse solcher Grünlandflächen aufgrund der hohen räumlichen und zeitlichen Auflösung ihrer Aufnahmen. Die Literaturrecherche speziell zur Untersuchung von Mähereignissen auf Grünland ergab, dass die meisten bisherigen Studien sich auf kleine Untersuchungsgebiete konzentrierten, explorativ waren, nur einen Sensortyp verwendeten und/oder keinen Referenzdatensatz mit einer vollständigen Palette von Managementoptionen enthielten. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird eine neuartige Methodik zur Erkennung von Grünlandmahdereignissen vorgestellt, welches über mehrere Jahre (2018-2021) flächendeckend in Deutschland angewendet und validiert wurde. Beide Sensortypen – optisch (Sentinel-2) und SAR (Sentinel-1) – wurden hinsichtlich ihres Potentials zur Detektion von Grünlandmahdereignissen ausgewertet. Acht EO-Parameter wurden untersucht, nämlich der Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), die Rückstreuintensität und die interferometrische zeitliche Kohärenz (InSAR) für beide verfügbaren Polarimetrien (VV und VH), sowie die polarimetrischen (PolSAR) Zerlegungsparameter Entropie, K0 und K1. Ein umfangreicher Referenzdatensatz wurde auf der Basis täglicher Bilder von Webcams generiert, welche über Deutschland verteilt sind. Dieser enthält Mahdinformationen für Grünland mit dem gesamten möglichen Spektrum an Mähfrequenzen – von eins bis sechs Mahden – und 1475 Referenz-Mähereignisse für die Untersuchungsjahre. Zum ersten Mal wurde ein Ansatz basierend auf tatsächlichen Beobachtungen zur Erkennung der Mahd entwickelt, angewandt und großflächig validiert, der Daten von Sentinel - 2 und Sentinel - 1 verwendet und beide miteinander kombiniert. Anhand eines Subset der Referenzdaten (13 Grünlandparzellen) wurden die EO-Parameter untersucht und der Algorithmus zur Mahddetektion entwickelt und parametrisiert. Die Analyse hat gezeigt, dass ein schwellenwertbasierter Ansatz zur Erkennung von Veränderungen auf der Grundlage des EVI die Ereignisse der Grünlandmahd am besten erfasst, und nur während Bewölkungsperioden Mahden nicht erfolgreich detektiert. Alle SAR-basierten Parameter zeigten ein inkonsistenteres Verhalten gegenüber Mähaktivitäten als EVI, wobei PolSAR Entropie und InSAR Kohärenz VH noch das höchste Potenzial aufwiesen. Ein zweiter, kombinierter Ansatz, der auf EVI und einem SAR Parameter basiert, wurde entwickelt und für PolSAR Entropie und InSAR VH getestet. Aufgrund vieler zusätzlicher Veränderungen, die in den Zeitreihen erkennbar sind, wurde die SAR-basierte Mahddetektion nur während langer Lücken in den optischen Zeitreihen (< 25 Tage) initiiert. Die Anwendung und Validierung dieser Ansätze in einer Fokusregion ergab, dass die Verwendung des EVI-Ansatzes zu den höchsten Genauigkeiten führt (F1-Score = 0.65), da die Kombination dieses Ansatzes mit der SAR-basierten Detektion zu einem starken Anstieg der falsch erkannten Mähereignisse und damit zu einer Abnahme der Genauigkeiten führte (EVI + PolSAR ENT F1-Score=0.61; EVI + InSAR COH F1-Score = 0.61). Der auf EVI basierende Mahddetektionsalgorithmus wurde für die gesamte Fläche Deutschlands für die Jahre 2018–2021 angewendet. Es zeigte sich, dass der größte Anteil an Grünland mit hoher Mähfrequenz (mindestens vier Mähereignisse) im Süden/Südosten Deutschlands zu finden ist. Extensiv genutztes Grünland (bis zu zweimal gemäht) ist über das gesamte Bundesgebiet verteilt, mit größeren Anteilen in der Mitte und im Nordosten Deutschlands. Diese Muster bleiben im Allgemeinen konstant, aber es sind kleine Schwankungen zwischen den Jahren erkennbar. Früh gemähtes Grünland findet sich in Süd-/Südostdeutschland - entsprechend den Gebieten mit hoher Mähfrequenz -, aber auch in Mittel- und Westdeutschland. Die Jahre 2019 und 2020 zeigen höhere Genauigkeiten (F1- Scores von 0.64 und 0.63), 2018 und 2021 niedrigere (F1-Score von 0.52 und 0.50). Darüber hinaus wurden mögliche Einflussfaktoren auf die Mahddynamik untersucht. So wurden Klima, Topografie, Bodendaten und Informationen über Schutzmaßnahmen mit der Mahddynamik für das Jahr 2020 in Verbindung gebracht, für welches eine hohe Anzahl gültiger Beobachtungen und eine hohe Erfassungsgenauigkeit erzielt werden konnten. Es zeigte sich, dass es keine starken linearen Beziehungen zwischen der Mahdhäufigkeit oder dem Zeitpunkt der ersten Mahd und den untersuchten Variablen gibt. Es wurde jedoch festgestellt, dass für eine intensive Grünlandnutzung bestimmte klimatische und topografische Bedingungen erfüllt sein müssen, wohingegen extensive Grünlandflächen im gesamten Spektrum dieser Variablen auftreten. Außerdem treten auf Böden mit Grundwassereinfluss höhere und in Schutzgebieten niedrigere Mahdhäufigkeiten auf. Diese Ergebnisse zeigen das komplexe Zusammenspiel zwischen der Dynamik der Grünlandmahd und äußeren Einflüssen und verdeutlichen die Herausforderungen in der gezielten Erstellung von Maßnahmen zum Schutz von Grünland-Ökosystemfunktionen und die Notwendigkeit diese regional anzupassen. KW - Grünland KW - Erdbeobachtung KW - Fernerkundung KW - Mähen KW - Grünlandnutzung KW - Zeitreihe KW - Erde KW - Sentinel-1 KW - Sentinel-2 KW - Enhanced Vegetation Index KW - PolSAR KW - InSAR Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-322737 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinermann, Sophie A1 - Asam, Sarah A1 - Gessner, Ursula A1 - Ullmann, Tobias A1 - Kuenzer, Claudia T1 - Multi-annual grassland mowing dynamics in Germany BT - spatio-temporal patterns and the influence of climate, topographic and socio-political conditions JF - Frontiers in Environmental Science N2 - Introduction: Grasslands cover one third of the agricultural area in Germany and are mainly used for fodder production. However, grasslands fulfill many other ecosystem functions, like carbon storage, water filtration and the provision of habitats. In Germany, grasslands are mown and/or grazed multiple times during the year. The type and timing of management activities and the use intensity vary strongly, however co-determine grassland functions. Large-scale spatial information on grassland activities and use intensity in Germany is limited and not openly provided. In addition, the cause for patterns of varying mowing intensity are usually not known on a spatial scale as data on the incentives of farmers behind grassland management decisions is not available. Methods: We applied an algorithm based on a thresholding approach utilizing Sentinel-2 time series to detect grassland mowing events to investigate mowing dynamics in Germany in 2018–2021. The detected mowing events were validated with an independent dataset based on the examination of public webcam images. We analyzed spatial and temporal patterns of the mowing dynamics and relationships to climatic, topographic, soil or socio-political conditions. Results: We found that most intensively used grasslands can be found in southern/south-eastern Germany, followed by areas in northern Germany. This pattern stays the same among the investigated years, but we found variations on smaller scales. The mowing event detection shows higher accuracies in 2019 and 2020 (F1 = 0.64 and 0.63) compared to 2018 and 2021 (F1 = 0.52 and 0.50). We found a significant but weak (R2 of 0–0.13) relationship for a spatial correlation of mowing frequency and climate as well as topographic variables for the grassland areas in Germany. Further results indicate a clear value range of topographic and climatic conditions, characteristic for intensive grassland use. Extensive grassland use takes place everywhere in Germany and on the entire spectrum of topographic and climatic conditions in Germany. Natura 2000 grasslands are used less intensive but this pattern is not consistent among all sites. Discussion: Our findings on mowing dynamics and relationships to abiotic and socio-political conditions in Germany reveal important aspects of grassland management, including incentives of farmers. KW - remote sensing KW - Sentinel-2 KW - time series KW - cutting KW - management KW - pasture KW - meadow KW - Earth observation Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-320700 SN - 2296-665X VL - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinermann, Sophie A1 - Gessner, Ursula A1 - Asam, Sarah A1 - Ullmann, Tobias A1 - Schucknecht, Anne A1 - Kuenzer, Claudia T1 - Detection of grassland mowing events for Germany by combining Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series JF - Remote Sensing N2 - Grasslands cover one-third of the agricultural area in Germany and play an important economic role by providing fodder for livestock. In addition, they fulfill important ecosystem services, such as carbon storage, water purification, and the provision of habitats. These ecosystem services usually depend on the grassland management. In central Europe, grasslands are grazed and/or mown, whereby the management type and intensity vary in space and time. Spatial information on the mowing timing and frequency on larger scales are usually not available but would be required in order to assess the ecosystem services, species composition, and grassland yields. Time series of high-resolution satellite remote sensing data can be used to analyze the temporal and spatial dynamics of grasslands. Within this study, we aim to overcome the drawbacks identified by previous studies, such as optical data availability and the lack of comprehensive reference data, by testing the time series of various Sentinel-2 (S2) and Sentinal-1 (S1) parameters and combinations of them in order to detect mowing events in Germany in 2019. We developed a threshold-based algorithm by using information from a comprehensive reference dataset of heterogeneously managed grassland parcels in Germany, obtained by RGB cameras. The developed approach using the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) derived from S2 led to a successful mowing event detection in Germany (60.3% of mowing events detected, F1-Score = 0.64). However, events shortly before, during, or shortly after cloud gaps were missed and in regions with lower S2 orbit coverage fewer mowing events were detected. Therefore, S1-based backscatter, InSAR, and PolSAR features were investigated during S2 data gaps. From these, the PolSAR entropy detected mowing events most reliably. For a focus region, we tested an integrated approach by combining S2 and S1 parameters. This approach detected additional mowing events, but also led to many false positive events, resulting in a reduction in the F1-Score (from 0.65 of S2 to 0.61 of S2 + S1 for the focus region). According to our analysis, a majority of grasslands in Germany are only mown zero to two times (around 84%) and are probably additionally used for grazing. A small proportion is mown more often than four times (3%). Regions with a generally higher grassland mowing frequency are located in southern, south-eastern, and northern Germany. KW - earth observation KW - remote sensing KW - harvests KW - cutting events KW - grazing KW - pasture KW - meadow KW - optical KW - SAR KW - PolSAR KW - InSAR Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267164 SN - 2072-4292 VL - 14 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dech, Stefan A1 - Holzwarth, Stefanie A1 - Asam, Sarah A1 - Andresen, Thorsten A1 - Bachmann, Martin A1 - Boettcher, Martin A1 - Dietz, Andreas A1 - Eisfelder, Christina A1 - Frey, Corinne A1 - Gesell, Gerhard A1 - Gessner, Ursula A1 - Hirner, Andreas A1 - Hofmann, Matthias A1 - Kirches, Grit A1 - Klein, Doris A1 - Klein, Igor A1 - Kraus, Tanja A1 - Krause, Detmar A1 - Plank, Simon A1 - Popp, Thomas A1 - Reinermann, Sophie A1 - Reiners, Philipp A1 - Roessler, Sebastian A1 - Ruppert, Thomas A1 - Scherbachenko, Alexander A1 - Vignesh, Ranjitha A1 - Wolfmueller, Meinhard A1 - Zwenzner, Hendrik A1 - Kuenzer, Claudia T1 - Potential and challenges of harmonizing 40 years of AVHRR data: the TIMELINE experience JF - Remote Sensing N2 - Earth Observation satellite data allows for the monitoring of the surface of our planet at predefined intervals covering large areas. However, there is only one medium resolution sensor family in orbit that enables an observation time span of 40 and more years at a daily repeat interval. This is the AVHRR sensor family. If we want to investigate the long-term impacts of climate change on our environment, we can only do so based on data that remains available for several decades. If we then want to investigate processes with respect to climate change, we need very high temporal resolution enabling the generation of long-term time series and the derivation of related statistical parameters such as mean, variability, anomalies, and trends. The challenges to generating a well calibrated and harmonized 40-year-long time series based on AVHRR sensor data flown on 14 different platforms are enormous. However, only extremely thorough pre-processing and harmonization ensures that trends found in the data are real trends and not sensor-related (or other) artefacts. The generation of European-wide time series as a basis for the derivation of a multitude of parameters is therefore an extremely challenging task, the details of which are presented in this paper. KW - AVHRR KW - Earth Observation KW - harmonization KW - time series analysis KW - climate related trends KW - automatic processing KW - Europe KW - TIMELINE Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-246134 SN - 2072-4292 VL - 13 IS - 18 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinermann, Sophie A1 - Asam, Sarah A1 - Kuenzer, Claudia T1 - Remote Sensing of Grassland Production and Management - A Review JF - Remote Sensing N2 - Grasslands cover one third of the earth’s terrestrial surface and are mainly used for livestock production. The usage type, use intensity and condition of grasslands are often unclear. Remote sensing enables the analysis of grassland production and management on large spatial scales and with high temporal resolution. Despite growing numbers of studies in the field, remote sensing applications in grassland biomes are underrepresented in literature and less streamlined compared to other vegetation types. By reviewing articles within research on satellite-based remote sensing of grassland production traits and management, we describe and evaluate methods and results and reveal spatial and temporal patterns of existing work. In addition, we highlight research gaps and suggest research opportunities. The focus is on managed grasslands and pastures and special emphasize is given to the assessment of studies on grazing intensity and mowing detection based on earth observation data. Grazing and mowing highly influence the production and ecology of grassland and are major grassland management types. In total, 253 research articles were reviewed. The majority of these studies focused on grassland production traits and only 80 articles were about grassland management and use intensity. While the remote sensing-based analysis of grassland production heavily relied on empirical relationships between ground-truth and satellite data or radiation transfer models, the used methods to detect and investigate grassland management differed. In addition, this review identified that studies on grassland production traits with satellite data often lacked including spatial management information into the analyses. Studies focusing on grassland management and use intensity mostly investigated rather small study areas with homogeneous intensity levels among the grassland parcels. Combining grassland production estimations with management information, while accounting for the variability among grasslands, is recommended to facilitate the development of large-scale continuous monitoring and remote sensing grassland products, which have been rare thus far. KW - pasture KW - use intensity KW - grazing KW - mowing KW - productivity KW - biomass KW - yield KW - satellite data KW - optical KW - SAR Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-207799 SN - 2072-4292 VL - 12 IS - 12 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reinermann, Sophie A1 - Gessner, Ursula A1 - Asam, Sarah A1 - Kuenzer, Claudia A1 - Dech, Stefan T1 - The Effect of Droughts on Vegetation Condition in Germany: An Analysis Based on Two Decades of Satellite Earth Observation Time Series and Crop Yield Statistics JF - Remote Sensing N2 - Central Europe experienced several droughts in the recent past, such as in the year 2018, which was characterized by extremely low rainfall rates and high temperatures, resulting in substantial agricultural yield losses. Time series of satellite earth observation data enable the characterization of past drought events over large temporal and spatial scales. Within this study, Moderate Resolution Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) (MOD13Q1) 250 m time series were investigated for the vegetation periods of 2000 to 2018. The spatial and temporal development of vegetation in 2018 was compared to other dry and hot years in Europe, like the drought year 2003. Temporal and spatial inter- and intra-annual patterns of EVI anomalies were analyzed for all of Germany and for its cropland, forest, and grassland areas individually. While vegetation development in spring 2018 was above average, the summer months of 2018 showed negative anomalies in a similar magnitude as in 2003, which was particularly apparent within grassland and cropland areas in Germany. In contrast, the year 2003 showed negative anomalies during the entire growing season. The spatial pattern of vegetation status in 2018 showed high regional variation, with north-eastern Germany mainly affected in June, north-western parts in July, and western Germany in August. The temporal pattern of satellite-derived EVI deviances within the study period 2000-2018 were in good agreement with crop yield statistics for Germany. The study shows that the EVI deviation of the summer months of 2018 were among the most extreme in the study period compared to other years. The spatial pattern and temporal development of vegetation condition between the drought years differ. KW - drought KW - time series KW - heat wave KW - agriculture KW - climate extremes KW - climate change KW - crop statistics KW - MODIS KW - Germany Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225165 VL - 11 IS - 15 ER -