TY - JOUR A1 - Herrmann, Johannes A1 - Adam, Elisabeth Hannah A1 - Notz, Quirin A1 - Helmer, Philipp A1 - Sonntagbauer, Michael A1 - Ungemach-Papenberg, Peter A1 - Sanns, Andreas A1 - Zausig, York A1 - Steinfeldt, Thorsten A1 - Torje, Iuliu A1 - Schmid, Benedikt A1 - Schlesinger, Tobias A1 - Rolfes, Caroline A1 - Reyher, Christian A1 - Kredel, Markus A1 - Stumpner, Jan A1 - Brack, Alexander A1 - Wurmb, Thomas A1 - Gill-Schuster, Daniel A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Weismann, Dirk A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Heuschmann, Peter A1 - Rücker, Viktoria A1 - Frantz, Stefan A1 - Ertl, Georg A1 - Muellenbach, Ralf Michael A1 - Mutlak, Haitham A1 - Meybohm, Patrick A1 - Zacharowski, Kai A1 - Lotz, Christopher T1 - COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — A Multicenter Observational Study JF - Frontiers in Medicine N2 - Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay. Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients. KW - COVID-19 KW - ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) KW - intensive care medicine KW - pandemia KW - Germany Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219834 SN - 2296-858X VL - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flemming, S. A1 - Hankir, M. A1 - Ernestus, R.-I. A1 - Seyfried, F. A1 - Germer, C.-T. A1 - Meybohm, P. A1 - Wurmb, T. A1 - Vogel, U. A1 - Wiegering, A. T1 - Surgery in times of COVID-19 — recommendations for hospital and patient management JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery N2 - Background The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2), has escalated rapidly to a global pandemic stretching healthcare systems worldwide to their limits. Surgeonshave had to immediately react to this unprecedented clinical challenge by systematically repurposing surgical wards. Purpose To provide a detailed set of guidelines developed in a surgical ward at University Hospital Wuerzburg to safelyaccommodate the exponentially rising cases of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients without compromising the care of emergencysurgery and oncological patients or jeopardizing the well-being of hospital staff. Conclusions The dynamic prioritization of SARS-CoV-2 infected and surgical patient groups is key to preserving life whilemaintaining high surgical standards. Strictly segregating patient groups in emergency rooms, non-intensive care wards andoperating areas prevents viral spread while adequately training and carefully selecting hospital staff allow them to confidentlyand successfully undertake their respective clinical duties. KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - COVID-19 KW - Surgery Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231766 SN - 1435-2443 VL - 405 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzmann-Littig, Christopher A1 - Braunisch, Matthias Christoph A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Popp, Maria A1 - Seeber, Christian A1 - Fichtner, Falk A1 - Littig, Bianca A1 - Carbajo-Lozoya, Javier A1 - Allwang, Christine A1 - Frank, Tamara A1 - Meerpohl, Joerg Johannes A1 - Haller, Bernhard A1 - Schmaderer, Christoph T1 - COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in germany JF - Vaccines N2 - Vaccination hesitancy is a threat to herd immunity. Healthcare workers (HCWs) play a key role in promoting Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in the general population. We therefore aimed to provide data on COVID-19 vaccination acceptance/hesitancy among German HCWs. For this exploratory, cross-sectional study, an online survey was conducted in February 2021. The survey included 54 items on demographics; previous vaccination behavior; trust in vaccines, physicians, the pharmaceutical industry and health politics; fear of adverse effects; assumptions regarding the consequences of COVID-19; knowledge about vaccines; and information seeking behavior. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and chi-square tests were performed. Four thousand five hundred surveys were analyzed. The overall vaccination acceptance was 91.7%. The age group ≤20 years showed the lowest vaccination acceptance. Factors associated with vaccination hesitancy were lack of trust in authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Attitudes among acquaintances were associated with vaccination hesitancy too. Participants with vaccination hesitancy more often obtained information about COVID-19 vaccines via messenger services or online video platforms and underperformed in the knowledge test. We found high acceptance amongst German HCWs. Several factors associated with vaccination hesitancy were identified which could be targeted in HCW vaccination campaigns. KW - COVID-19 KW - vaccine KW - vaccination KW - vaccination hesitancy KW - vaccine refusal KW - vaccination campaign Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242627 SN - 2076-393X VL - 9 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bleilevens, Christian A1 - Soppert, Josefin A1 - Hoffmann, Adrian A1 - Breuer, Thomas A1 - Bernhagen, Jürgen A1 - Martin, Lukas A1 - Stiehler, Lara A1 - Marx, Gernot A1 - Dreher, Michael A1 - Stoppe, Christian A1 - Simon, Tim-Philipp T1 - Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) plasma concentration in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a prospective observational study JF - Diagnostics N2 - Mortality in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is high and pharmacological treatment strategies remain limited. Early-stage predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients with a high risk of severe clinical courses and to stratify treatment strategies. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was previously described as a potential predictor for the outcome of critically ill patients and for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a hallmark of severe COVID-19 disease. This prospective observational study evaluates the predictive potential of MIF for the clinical outcome after severe COVID-19 infection. Plasma MIF concentrations were measured in 36 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients over three days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Increased compared to decreased MIF was significantly associated with aggravated organ function and a significantly lower 28-day survival (sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score; 8.2 ± 4.5 to 14.3 ± 3, p = 0.009 vs. 8.9 ± 1.9 to 12 ± 2, p = 0.296; survival: 56% vs. 93%; p = 0.003). Arterial hypertension was the predominant comorbidity in 85% of patients with increasing MIF concentrations (vs. decreasing MIF: 39%; p = 0.015). Without reaching significance, more patients with decreasing MIF were able to improve their ARDS status (p = 0.142). The identified association between an early MIF response, aggravation of organ function and 28-day survival may open future perspectives for biomarker-based diagnostic approaches for ICU management of COVID-19 patients. KW - Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) KW - COVID-19 KW - ICU treatment KW - acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) KW - SOFA Score KW - Horowitz Quotient Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228967 SN - 2075-4418 VL - 11 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Herrmann, Johannes A1 - Notz, Quirin A1 - Schlesinger, Tobias A1 - Stumpner, Jan A1 - Kredel, Markus A1 - Sitter, Magdalena A1 - Schmid, Benedikt A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Schulze, Harald A1 - Meybohm, Patrick A1 - Lotz, Christopher T1 - Point of care diagnostic of hypercoagulability and platelet function in COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study JF - Thrombosis Journal N2 - Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated coagulopathy (CAC) leads to thromboembolic events in a high number of critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, specific diagnostic or therapeutic algorithms for CAC have not been established. In the current study, we analyzed coagulation abnormalities with point-of-care testing (POCT) and their relation to hemostatic complications in patients suffering from COVID-19 induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Our hypothesis was that specific diagnostic patterns can be identified in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS at risk of thromboembolic complications utilizing POCT. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. Longitudinal data from 247 rotational thromboelastometries (Rotem®) and 165 impedance aggregometries (Multiplate®) were analysed in 18 patients consecutively admitted to the ICU with a COVID-19 induced ARDS between March 12th to June 30th, 2020. Results Median age was 61 years (IQR: 51–69). Median PaO2/FiO2 on admission was 122 mmHg (IQR: 87–189), indicating moderate to severe ARDS. Any form of hemostatic complication occurred in 78 % of the patients with deep vein/arm thrombosis in 39 %, pulmonary embolism in 22 %, and major bleeding in 17 %. In Rotem® elevated A10 and maximum clot firmness (MCF) indicated higher clot strength. The delta between EXTEM A10 minus FIBTEM A10 (ΔA10) > 30 mm, depicting the sole platelet-part of clot firmness, was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events (OD: 3.7; 95 %CI 1.3–10.3; p = 0.02). Multiplate® aggregometry showed hypoactive platelet function. There was no correlation between single Rotem® and Multiplate® parameters at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and thromboembolic or bleeding complications. Conclusions Rotem® and Multiplate® results indicate hypercoagulability and hypoactive platelet dysfunction in COVID-19 induced ARDS but were all in all poorly related to hemostatic complications.. KW - COVID-19 KW - acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome KW - point of care testing KW - thromboelastometry KW - impedance aggregometry; WHOLE-BLOOD THROMBOELASTOMETRY; DEFINITION; DISEASE Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-260739 VL - 19 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Notz, Quirin A1 - Lotz, Christopher A1 - Herrmann, Johannes A1 - Vogt, Marius A1 - Schlesinger, Tobias A1 - Kredel, Markus A1 - Muellges, Wolfgang A1 - Weismann, Dirk A1 - Westermaier, Thomas A1 - Meybohm, Patrick A1 - Kranke, Peter T1 - Severe neurological complications in critically ill COVID‑19 patients JF - Journal of Neurology N2 - No abstract available. KW - COVID-19 KW - neurological complications Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232429 SN - 0340-5354 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Werner, Anne A1 - Popp, Maria A1 - Fichtner, Falk A1 - Holzmann-Littig, Christopher A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Steckelberg, Anke A1 - Lühnen, Julia A1 - Redlich, Lisa Marie A1 - Dickel, Steffen A1 - Grimm, Clemens A1 - Moerer, Onnen A1 - Nothacker, Monika A1 - Seeber, Christian T1 - COVID-19 intensive care — Evaluation of public information sources and current standards of care in German intensive care units: a cross sectional online survey on intensive care staff in Germany JF - Healthcare N2 - Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high. KW - COVID-19 KW - implementation KW - guideline usage KW - guideline adherence KW - intensive care KW - Germany KW - ICU staff Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281865 SN - 2227-9032 VL - 10 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmid, Benedikt A1 - Griesel, Mirko A1 - Fischer, Anna-Lena A1 - Romero, Carolina S. A1 - Metzendorf, Maria-Inti A1 - Weibel, Stephanie A1 - Fichtner, Falk T1 - Awake prone positioning, high-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation as non-invasive respiratory strategies in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - Background: Acute respiratory failure is the most important organ dysfunction of COVID-19 patients. While non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen are frequently used, efficacy and safety remain uncertain. Benefits and harms of awake prone positioning (APP) in COVID-19 patients are unknown. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC vs. NIV and APP vs. standard care. We meta-analyzed data for mortality, intubation rate, and safety. Results: Five RCTs (2182 patients) were identified. While it remains uncertain whether HFNC compared to NIV alters mortality (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.65–1.33), HFNC may increase rate of intubation or death (composite endpoint; RR 1.22, 1.03–1.45). We do not know if HFNC alters risk for harm. APP compared to standard care probably decreases intubation rate (RR 0.83, 0.71–0.96) but may have little or no effect on mortality (RR: 1.08, 0.51–2.31). Conclusions: Certainty of evidence is moderate to very low. There is no compelling evidence for either HFNC or NIV, but both carry substantial risk for harm. The use of APP probably has benefits although mortality appears unaffected. KW - respiratory failure KW - non-invasive ventilation KW - high-flow nasal cannula KW - awake prone positioning KW - COVID-19 KW - systematic review Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-255225 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 11 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzmann-Littig, Christopher A1 - Frank, Tamara A1 - Schmaderer, Christoph A1 - Braunisch, Matthias C. A1 - Renders, Lutz A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Popp, Maria A1 - Seeber, Christian A1 - Fichtner, Falk A1 - Littig, Bianca A1 - Carbajo-Lozoya, Javier A1 - Meerpohl, Joerg J. A1 - Haller, Bernhard A1 - Allwang, Christine T1 - COVID-19 Vaccines: Fear of side effects among German health care workers JF - Vaccines N2 - (1) Background: Health care workers (HCWs) play a key role in increasing anti-COVID vaccination rates. Fear of potential side effects is one of the main reasons for vaccine hesitancy. We investigated which side effects are of concern to HCWs and how these are associated with vaccine hesitancy. (2) Methods: Data were collected in an online survey in February 2021 among HCWs from across Germany with 4500 included participants. Free-text comments on previously experienced vaccination side effects, and fear of short- and long-term side effects of the COVID-19 vaccination were categorized and analyzed. (3) Results: Most feared short-term side effects were vaccination reactions, allergic reactions, and limitations in daily life. Most feared long-term side effects were (auto-) immune reactions, neurological side effects, and currently unknown long-term consequences. Concerns about serious vaccination side effects were associated with vaccination refusal. There was a clear association between refusal of COVID-19 vaccination in one's personal environment and fear of side effects. (4) Conclusions: Transparent information about vaccine side effects is needed, especially for HCW. Especially when the participants' acquaintances advised against vaccination, they were significantly more likely to fear side effects. Thus, further education of HCW is necessary to achieve good information transfer in clusters as well. KW - COVID-19 KW - vaccine hesitancy KW - health care workers KW - side-effects KW - fears Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270561 SN - 2076-393X VL - 10 IS - 5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sitter, Magdalena A1 - Pecks, Ulrich A1 - Rüdiger, Mario A1 - Friedrich, Sabine A1 - Fill Malfertheiner, Sara A1 - Hein, Alexander A1 - Königbauer, Josefine T. A1 - Becke-Jakob, Karin A1 - Zöllkau, Janine A1 - Ramsauer, Babett A1 - Rathberger, Katharina A1 - Pontones, Constanza A. A1 - Kraft, Katrina A1 - Meybohm, Patrick A1 - Härtel, Christoph A1 - Kranke, Peter T1 - Pregnant and postpartum women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 — first data from the CRONOS-registry JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - (1) Background: Data on coronavirus 2 infection during pregnancy vary. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 positive women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 during pregnancy and postpartum period based on data of a comprehensive German surveillance system in obstetric patients. (2) Methods: Data from COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a prospective multicenter registry for SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, was analyzed with respect to ICU treatment. All women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 were included and compared regarding maternal characteristics, course of disease, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes. (3) Results: Of 2650 cases in CRONOS, 101 women (4%) had a documented ICU stay. Median maternal age was 33 (IQR, 30–36) years. COVID-19 was diagnosed at a median gestational age of 33 (IQR, 28–35) weeks. As the most invasive form of COVID-19 treatment interventions, patients received either continuous monitoring of vital signs without further treatment requirement (n = 6), insufflation of oxygen (n = 30), non-invasive ventilation (n = 22), invasive ventilation (n = 28), or escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 15). No significant clinical differences were identified between patients receiving different forms of ventilatory support for COVID-19. Prevalence of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women receiving invasive respiratory treatments. Four women died of COVID-19 and six fetuses were stillborn. (4) Conclusions: Our cohort shows that progression of COVID-19 is rare in pregnant and postpartum women treated in the ICU. Preterm birth rate is high and COVID-19 requiring respiratory support increases the risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcome. KW - maternal critical care KW - COVID-19 KW - ARDS KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - pregnancy KW - obstetrics Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-255257 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 11 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lambertini, Alessandro A1 - Hartrampf, Philipp E. A1 - Higuchi, Takahiro A1 - Serfling, Sebastian E. A1 - Meybohm, Patrick A1 - Schirbel, Andreas A1 - Buck, Andreas K. A1 - Werner, Rudolf A. T1 - CXCR4-targeted molecular imaging after severe SARS-Cov-2 infection JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging N2 - No abstract available. KW - CXCR4-targeting KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - COVID-19 KW - molecular imaging Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324619 VL - 50 IS - 1 ER - TY - THES A1 - Sitter, Magdalena Maria T1 - Intensivmedizinische Behandlungen bei SARS-CoV-2 in der Schwangerschaft - Daten aus dem CRONOS-Register T1 - Intensive Care Treatment at SARS-CoV-2 Infection during Pregnancy — First Data from the CRONOS-Registry N2 - Mit dem Auftreten des SARS-CoV-2 Virus im Jahr 2020 war der Informationsgewinn für vulnerable Patientengruppen essentiell. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es maternale Charakteristika und das klinische Bild SARS-CoV-2 positiver Frauen mit Notwendigkeit einer intensivmedizinischen Behandlung während der Schwangerschaft und postpartal darzustellen, und diese Kohorte mit den SARS-CoV-2 positiven Schwangeren ohne intensivmedizinischen Handlungsbedarf zu vergleichen. Die Daten stammten aus dem deutschen CRONOS-Register, einem prospektiven, multizentrischen Register für SARS-CoV-2 positive schwangere Frauen. Eingeschlossen wurden alle schwangeren und postpartalen Frauen, die während ihrer SARS-CoV-2 Infektion auf eine ITS aufgenommen wurden. Diese wurden hinsichtlich maternaler Charakteristika, Krankheitsverlauf, sowie Outcomes verglichen. In 101 von 2650 Fällen (4%) der Patientinnen des CRONOS-Registers, kam es zu einer Aufnahme auf die ITS. Als invasivste Form der COVID-19 Behandlung war bei 6 Patientinnen nur eine Überwachung notwendig, 30 Patientinnen benötigten eine Sauerstoffinsufflation, 22 wurden nicht-invasiv beatmet, 28 erhielten eine invasive Beatmung und bei 15 Frauen wurde die Behandlung zur ECMO-Therapie eskaliert. Es wurden keine klinisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen Patientinnen gefunden, die unterschiedliche Behandlungsformen benötigten. Die Gruppe der ITS und Non-ITS Patientinnen unterschied sich statistisch signifikant beim Einfluss von Alter, BMI bei Einschluss und der Herkunft. Die Prävalenz der Frühgeburtlichkeit war unter den invasiv behandelten Patientinnen signifikant höher und auch im Vergleich der ITS mit den Non-ITS Patientinnen zeigte sich ein signifikanter Unterschied. Vier Frauen verstarben an COVID-19 und sechs Feten der ITS-Gruppe waren Totgeburten. Diese Kohorte zeigt, dass schwere COVID-19 Erkrankung bei schwangeren Frauen und Wöchnerinnen selten sind. Die Frühgeburtenrate ist hoch und COVID-19 mit Notwendigkeit einer Atemunterstützung erhöht das Risiko für ein schlechtes maternales und neonatales Outcome. Unter anderem ein höheres Alter und BMI sind mit einem höheren Risiko für eine ITS-Aufnahme verbunden. N2 - With the spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the year 2020, gain of information regarding vulnerable groups of patients was essential. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 positive women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 during pregnancy and postpartum period, based on data of a comprehensive German surveillance system in obstetric patients. Data from COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a prospective multicenter registry for SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, was analyzed with respect to ICU treatment. All women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 were included and compared regarding maternal characteristics, course of disease, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes. Also the ICU-cohort was compared to the cohort of pregnant and postpartum women not requiring intensive care treatment searching for characteristics and risk factors. Of 2650 cases in CRONOS, 101 women (4%) had a documented ICU stay. As the most invasive form of COVID-19 treatment interventions, patients received either continuous monitoring of vital signs without further treatment requirement (n = 6), insufflation of oxygen (n = 30), non-invasive ventilation (n = 22), invasive ventilation (n = 28), or escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 15). No significant clinical differences were identified between patients receiving different forms of ventilatory support for COVID-19. Prevalence of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women receiving invasive respiratory treatments as well as in women receiving intensive care treatment in general. Four women died of COVID-19 and six fetuses were stillborn. Our cohort shows that progression of COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women with admission to ICU is rare. Preterm birth rate is high and COVID-19 requiring respiratory support increases the risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcome. Admission to ICU in this cohort was associated with a higher maternal age and maternal BMI before pregnancy. KW - Schwangerschaft KW - Intensivmedizin KW - COVID-19 KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - Pregnancy KW - Critical Care Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325462 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzmann-Littig, Christopher A1 - Stadler, David A1 - Popp, Maria A1 - Kranke, Peter A1 - Fichtner, Falk A1 - Schmaderer, Christoph A1 - Renders, Lutz A1 - Braunisch, Matthias Christoph A1 - Assali, Tarek A1 - Platen, Louise A1 - Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo A1 - Lühnen, Julia A1 - Steckelberg, Anke A1 - Pfadenhauer, Lisa A1 - Haller, Bernhard A1 - Fuetterer, Cornelia A1 - Seeber, Christian A1 - Schaaf, Christian T1 - Locating medical information during an infodemic: information seeking behavior and strategies of health-care workers in Germany JF - Healthcare N2 - Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a flood of — often contradictory — evidence. HCWs had to develop strategies to locate information that supported their work. We investigated the information-seeking of different HCW groups in Germany. Methods: In December 2020, we conducted online surveys on COVID-19 information sources, strategies, assigned trustworthiness, and barriers — and in February 2021, on COVID-19 vaccination information sources. Results were analyzed descriptively; group comparisons were performed using χ\(^2\)-tests. Results: For general COVID-19-related medical information (413 participants), non-physicians most often selected official websites (57%), TV (57%), and e-mail/newsletters (46%) as preferred information sources — physicians chose official websites (63%), e-mail/newsletters (56%), and professional journals (55%). Non-physician HCWs used Facebook/YouTube more frequently. The main barriers were insufficient time and access issues. Non-physicians chose abstracts (66%), videos (45%), and webinars (40%) as preferred information strategy; physicians: overviews with algorithms (66%), abstracts (62%), webinars (48%). Information seeking on COVID-19 vaccination (2700 participants) was quite similar, however, with newspapers being more often used by non-physicians (63%) vs. physician HCWs (70%). Conclusion: Non-physician HCWs more often consulted public information sources. Employers/institutions should ensure the supply of professional, targeted COVID-19 information for different HCW groups. KW - COVID-19 KW - infodemic KW - health-care workers KW - HCW KW - information strategies KW - emergency information Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319306 SN - 2227-9032 VL - 11 IS - 11 ER - TY - THES A1 - Reis, Stefanie T1 - Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit der halbtherapeutischen und therapeutischen Antikoagulation bei hospitalisierten Patientinnen und Patienten mit COVID-19: eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Meta-Analyse T1 - Safety and efficacy of intermediate and therapeutic dose anticoagulation in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis N2 - COVID-19 Patientinnen und Patienten haben ein hohes thrombotisches Risiko. Die Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit verschiedener Antikoagulationsschemata bei COVID-19 Patientinnen und Patienten sind unklar. Acht RCTs mit 5580 Patientinnen und Patienten wurden identifiziert, wovon zwei RCTs Antikoagulation in halbtherapeutischer und sechs RCTs Antikoagulation in therapeutischer Dosierung mit der Standard Thromboembolieprophylaxe verglichen haben. Die halbtherapeutische Antikoagulation kann wenig oder gar keinen Einfluss auf thrombotische Ereignisse oder Todesfälle haben (RR 1,03, 95% KI 0,86-1,24), kann aber schwere Blutungen (RR 1,48, 95% KI 0,53-4,15) bei mittelschweren bis schweren COVID-19 Patientinnen und Patienten verstärken. Therapeutische Antikoagulation kann thrombotische Ereignisse oder den Tod bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit mittelschwerem COVID-19 (RR 0,64, 95% KI 0,38-1,07) verringern, kann aber bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit schwerer Erkrankung (RR 0,98, 95% KI 0,86-1,12) wenig oder keine Wirkung haben. Das Risiko schwerer Blutungen kann unabhängig vom Schweregrad der Erkrankung zunehmen (RR 1,78, 95% KI 1,15-2,74). Die Evidenzsicherheit ist immer noch gering. Mäßig betroffene COVID-19 Patientinnen und Patienten können von einer therapeutischen Antikoagulation profitieren, jedoch ist das Blutungsrisiko erhöht. N2 - COVID-19 patients have a high risk of thrombotic disease. The safety and efficacy of various anticoagulation regimens in COVID-19 patients remains unclear. Eight RCTs with 5580 patients were identified, with two comparing anticoagulation in intermediate doses and six comparing therapeutic doses to standard thromboembolism prophylaxis. Intermediate anticoagulation may have little or no effect on thrombotic events or deaths (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.24), but may increase major bleeding (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.53-4.15) in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. Therapeutic anticoagulation may reduce thrombotic events or death in patients with moderate COVID-19 (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.07), but may have little or no effect in patients with severe disease (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.12). The risk of major bleeding may increase regardless of the severity of the disease (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.15-2.74). The certainty of evidence is still low. Moderately affected COVID-19 patients may benefit from therapeutic anticoagulation, but the risk of bleeding is increased. KW - Metaanalyse KW - COVID-19 KW - Blutgerinnungshemmung KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - Systematische Übersichtsarbeit KW - Antikoagulation Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-359607 ER - TY - THES A1 - Menger, Kristina Rebekka T1 - Bauchlagerung für nicht-intubierte ARDS- und COVID-19 Patient/innen: eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit T1 - Prone Positioning for non-intubated ARDS and COVID-19 patients: a systematic review N2 - Die Bauchlagerung von intubierten ARDS-Patient/innen mit einer schlechten Oxygenierung wird laut Leitlinie seit mehreren Jahren als supportive Therapiemaßnahme empfohlen. Im Rahmen der COVID-19 Pandemie wurde nun erstmalig die Bauchlagerung auch bei hypoxämischen, nicht-intubierten Patient/innen untersucht. Diese Fragestellung wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit mittels einer systematischen Übersichtsarbeit betrachtet. Aufgrund der aktuellen Pandemiesituation wurden neben ARDS-Patient/innen im Allgemeinen insbesondere COVID-19 Patient/innen mit einem akuten Lungenversagen als Subgruppe untersucht. Am 21.11.2020 wurde eine systematische Suche nach Studien in den Datenbanken MEDLINE, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register und Living Overview of the Evidence platform durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse wurden, wo möglich, in Form einer Meta-Analyse zusammengefasst, in Tabellen darstellt oder deskriptiv beschrieben. Das Risiko für Bias wurde jeweils für die eingeschlossenen kontrollierten Studien mittels ROBINS-I beurteilt. Die Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz der gesamten Arbeit wurde mit Hilfe des GRADE-Ansatzes untersucht. Insgesamt wurden 30 Studien eingeschlossen, davon 4 kontrollierte Studien, keine RCTs. In 3 der kontrollierten Studien wurde die Bauchlagerung bei COVID-19 Patient/innen untersucht, in einer bei Patient/innen mit einem anderweitig verursachten ARDS. Es ist unklar, ob die Bauchlagerung die Intubationsrate (RR = 0,92; 95% KI: 0,59 - 1,44; I² = 65%; sehr niedrige Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz), die Mortalität (RR = 0,55; 95% KI: 0,23 - 1,30; I² = 60%; sehr niedrige Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz) und die Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Aufnahme auf die Intensivstation (RR = 0,94; 95% KI: 0,54 - 1,63; I2 = 71%; sehr niedrige Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz) verringern kann. Auch für die anderen betrachteten Endpunkte konnte kein signifikanter Effekt der Bauchlagerung nachgewiesen werden Im Vergleich der Subgruppen „Nicht-COVID-19“ (8 Studien) und „COVID-19“ (22 Studien) konnten in Bezug auf alle betrachteten Endpunkte keine relevanten Unterschiede festgestellt werden. Insgesamt ist die Evidenz nicht ausreichend, um Vor- und Nachteile der Bauchlagerung für nicht-intubierte ARDS Patient/innen gegenüber der üblichen Rückenlagerung aufzuzeigen und diese für die Praxis zu empfehlen. N2 - Prone positioning of intubated ARDS patients with poor oxygenation has been recommended as a supportive therapy for several years. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, prone positioning has now been investigated for the first time in hypoxemic, non-intubated patients. This issue was examined by our systematic review. Because of the current pandemic situation, we assessed the effects of prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure in particular as a subgroup in addition to ARDS patients in general. A systematic search for studies was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and Living Overview of the Evidence platform databases on 21 November 2020. Where possible, results were analyzed in the form of meta-analysis, presented in tables, or described descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed for each of the included controlled studies using ROBINS-I. The quality of evidence for the entire systematic review was assessed using the GRADE approach. A total of 30 studies were included, 4 of which were controlled trials, but no RCTs. 3 of the controlled trials investigated prone positioning in COVID-19 patients, one trial in patients with ARDS caused by other means. It is unclear whether prone positioning can reduce intubation rate (RR =0.92; 95% CI: 0.59-1.44; I²=65%; very low quality evidence), mortality (RR =0.55; 95% CI: 0.23-1.30; I²=60%; very low quality evidence), and the likelihood of ICU admission (RR =0.94; 95% CI: 0.54-1.63; I2 =71%; very low quality evidence). No significant effect of prone positioning was demonstrated for the other outcomes considered either. When comparing the "non-COVID-19" (8 studies) and "COVID-19" (22 studies) subgroups, no relevant differences were found for all outcomes assessed. Overall, the evidence is insufficient to demonstrate benefits and harms of prone positioning for non-intubated ARDS patients compared with usual care and to translate the results into practice. KW - Bauchlage KW - ARDS KW - COVID-19 KW - Nicht-invasive Beatmung Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-359865 ER -