TY - JOUR A1 - Neudecker, Jens A1 - Malzahn, Uwe A1 - Heuschmann, Peter A1 - Behrens, Uwe A1 - Walles, Thorsten T1 - Pulmonary wedge resection plus parietal pleurectomy (WRPP) versus parietal pleurectomy (PP) for the treatment of recurrent primary pneumothorax (WOPP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial JF - Trials N2 - Background For the surgical treatment of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothoraces (rPSP) different operative therapies are applied to achieve permanent freedom from recurrence. Methods/design This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the long-term results of two commonly applied surgical techniques for the treatment of rPSP. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and after obtaining the patients’ informed consent, participants are randomized into the two surgical treatment arms: pulmonary wedge resection plus parietal pleurectomy (WRPP) or parietal pleurectomy alone (PP). Consecutively, all study participants will be followed up for two years to evaluate the surgical long-term effect. The primary efficacy endpoint is the recurrence rate of pneumothorax within 24 months after surgery. The calculated sample size is 360 patients (n = 180 per treatment arm) to prove superiority of one of the two treatments. So far, 22 surgical sites have submitted their declaration of commitment, giving the estimated number of participating patients. Discussion A prospective randomized clinical trial has been started to compare two established surgical therapies to evaluate the long-term results regarding recurrence rates. Furthermore, cost of treatment, and influence on the perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as on quality of life are analyzed. If the study reveals equivalence for both surgical techniques, unnecessary pulmonary resections could be avoided. KW - multicenter KW - prospective randomized trial KW - pulmonary wedge resection KW - parietal pleurectomy KW - recurrent primary pneumothorax Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145869 VL - 16 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Magg, Barbara A1 - Riegler, Christoph A1 - Wiedmann, Silke A1 - Heuschmann, Peter A1 - Sommer, Claudia A1 - Üçeyler, Nurcan T1 - Self-administered version of the Fabry-associated pain questionnaire for adult patients JF - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases N2 - Background Fabry-associated pain may be the first symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and presents with a unique phenotype including mostly acral burning triggerable pain attacks, evoked pain, pain crises, and permanent pain. We recently developed and validated the first Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) for adult patients. Here we report on the validation of the self-administered version of the FPQ that no longer requires a face-to-face interview but can be filled in by the patients themselves allowing more flexible data collection. Methods At our Würzburg Fabry Center for Interdisciplinary Treatment, Germany, we have developed the self-administered version of the FPQ by adapting the questionnaire to a self-report version. To do this, consecutive Fabry patients with current or past pain history (n = 56) were first interviewed face-to-face. Two weeks later patients’ self-reported questionnaire results were collected by mail (n = 55). We validated the self-administered version of the FPQ by assessing the inter-rater reliability agreement of scores obtained by supervised administration and self-administration of the FPQ. Results The FPQ contains 15 questions on the different pain phenotypes, on pain development during life with and without therapy, and on impairment due to pain. Statistical analysis showed that the majority of questions were answered in high agreement in both sessions with a mean AC1-statistic of 0.857 for 55 nominal-scaled items and a mean ICC of 0.587 for 9 scores. Conclusions This self-administered version of the first pain questionnaire for adult Fabry patients is a useful tool to assess Fabry-associated pain without a time-consuming face-to-face interview but via a self-reporting survey allowing more flexible usage. KW - Fabry disease KW - Fabry-associated pain KW - pain questionnaire Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145294 VL - 10 IS - 113 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gyberg, Viveca A1 - De Bacquer, Dirk A1 - De Backer, Guy A1 - Jennings, Catriona A1 - Kotseva, Kornelia A1 - Mellbin, Linda A1 - Schnell, Oliver A1 - Tuomilehto, Jaakko A1 - Wood, David A1 - Ryden, Lars A1 - Amouyel, Philippe A1 - Bruthans, Jan A1 - Conde, Almudena Castro A1 - Cifkova, Renata A1 - Deckers, Jaap W. A1 - De Sutter, Johan A1 - Dilic, Mirza A1 - Dolzhenko, Maryna A1 - Erglis, Andrejs A1 - Fras, Zlatko A1 - Gaita, Dan A1 - Gotcheva, Nina A1 - Goudevenos, John A1 - Heuschmann, Peter A1 - Laucevicius, Aleksandras A1 - Lehto, Seppo A1 - Lovic, Dragan A1 - Milicic, Davor A1 - Moore, David A1 - Nicolaides, Evagoras A1 - Oganov, Raphae A1 - Pajak, Andrzej A1 - Pogosova, Nana A1 - Reiner, Zeljko A1 - Stagmo, Martin A1 - Störk, Stefan A1 - Tokgözoglu, Lale A1 - Vulic, Dusko T1 - Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology JF - Cardiovascular Diabetology N2 - Background: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. Methods: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. Results: A total of 2846 (46 %) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 %) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 %) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 %, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 % and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 %. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 % and 11 % of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 % (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 % reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (approximate to 40 %) and only 27 % of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Conclusions: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. KW - heart KW - glycaemic control KW - cardiovascular diseases KW - myocardial infarction KW - glucose control KW - blood-glucose KW - risk factors KW - follow-up KW - mellitus KW - mortality KW - guidelines KW - coronary artery disease KW - type 2 diabetes KW - secondary prevention KW - management KW - guideline adherence KW - blood pressure KW - blood lipids Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141358 VL - 14 IS - 133 ER -