TY - JOUR A1 - Trifault, Barbara A1 - Mamontova, Victoria A1 - Burger, Kaspar T1 - In vivo proximity labeling of nuclear and nucleolar proteins by a stably expressed, DNA damage-responsive NONO-APEX2 fusion protein JF - Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences N2 - Cellular stress can induce DNA lesions that threaten the stability of genes. The DNA damage response (DDR) recognises and repairs broken DNA to maintain genome stability. Intriguingly, components of nuclear paraspeckles like the non-POU domain containing octamer-binding protein (NONO) participate in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). NONO is a multifunctional RNA-binding protein (RBP) that facilitates the retention and editing of messenger (m)RNA as well as pre-mRNA processing. However, the role of NONO in the DDR is poorly understood. Here, we establish a novel human U2OS cell line that expresses NONO fused to the engineered ascorbate peroxidase 2 (U2OS:NONO-APEX2-HA). We show that NONO-APEX2-HA accumulates in the nucleolus in response to DNA damage. Combining viability assays, subcellular localisation studies, coimmunoprecipitation experiments and in vivo proximity labeling, we demonstrate that NONO-APEX2-HA is a stably expressed fusion protein that mimics endogenous NONO in terms of expression, localisation and bona fide interactors. We propose that in vivo proximity labeling in U2OS:NONO-APEX2-HA cells is capable for the assessment of NONO interactomes by downstream assays. U2OS:NONO-APEX2-HA cells will likely be a valuable resource for the investigation of NONO interactome dynamics in response to DNA damage and other stimuli. KW - APEX2 KW - proximity labeling KW - NONO KW - paraspeckles KW - nucleolus KW - DNA damage Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276707 SN - 2296-889X VL - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mamontova, Victoria A1 - Trifault, Barbara A1 - Boten, Lea A1 - Burger, Kaspar T1 - Commuting to work: Nucleolar long non-coding RNA control ribosome biogenesis from near and far JF - Non-Coding RNA N2 - Gene expression is an essential process for cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation. The transcription of protein-coding genes and non-coding loci depends on RNA polymerases. Interestingly, numerous loci encode long non-coding (lnc)RNA transcripts that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and fine-tune the RNA metabolism. The nucleolus is a prime example of how different lncRNA species concomitantly regulate gene expression by facilitating the production and processing of ribosomal (r)RNA for ribosome biogenesis. Here, we summarise the current findings on how RNAPII influences nucleolar structure and function. We describe how RNAPII-dependent lncRNA can both promote nucleolar integrity and inhibit ribosomal (r)RNA synthesis by modulating the availability of rRNA synthesis factors in trans. Surprisingly, some lncRNA transcripts can directly originate from nucleolar loci and function in cis. The nucleolar intergenic spacer (IGS), for example, encodes nucleolar transcripts that counteract spurious rRNA synthesis in unperturbed cells. In response to DNA damage, RNAPII-dependent lncRNA originates directly at broken ribosomal (r)DNA loci and is processed into small ncRNA, possibly to modulate DNA repair. Thus, lncRNA-mediated regulation of nucleolar biology occurs by several modes of action and is more direct than anticipated, pointing to an intimate crosstalk of RNA metabolic events. KW - long non-coding RNA KW - RNA polymerase II KW - nucleolus KW - ribosome biogenesis Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242756 SN - 2311-553X VL - 7 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Thiry, Marc A1 - Scheer, Ulrich A1 - Goessens, Guy T1 - Localization of DNA within Ehrlich tumour cells nucleoli by immunoelectron microscopy N2 - The distribution of DNA in Ehrlich tumour cell nucleoli was investigated by means of an immunocytochemical approach , involving a monoclonal antibody directed against double- and single-stranded DNA. Immunolabelling was performed . either before or after the embedding process. The postembedding labelling method allows better ultrastructural preservation than the preembedding labelling method. In particular, the various nucleolar components are well preserved and identifiable. In the nucleolus, labelling is particularly concentrated over the perinucleolar chromatin and over its intranucleolar invaginations, which penetrate the nucleolar body and often terminate at the fibrillar centres. In addition, aggregates of gold particles are found in the fibrillar centres, preferentially towards the peripheral regions. By contrast, the dense fibrillar component is completely devoid of labelling. The results seem to indicate that DNA containing the rDNA genes is located in the fibrillar centres, with a preference for the peripheral regions. This finding suggests that transcription of the rDNA genes should occur within the confines of the fibrillar centre, probably close to the boundary region of the surrounding dense fibrillar component. The results are discussed in the light of present knowledge of the functional organization of the nucleolus. KW - nucleolus KW - DNA KW - monoclonal antibody Y1 - 1988 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-39327 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Scheer, Ulrich A1 - Rose, Kathleen M. T1 - Localization of RNA polymerase I in interphase cells and mitotic chromosomes by light and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry N2 - Rabbit antibodies to RNA polymerase I from a rat hepatoma have been used to localize the enzyme in a variety of cells at the light and electron microscopic level. In interphase cells the immunofluorescence pattern indicated that polymerase I is contained exclusively within the nucleolus. That this fluorescence, which appeared punctated rather than uniform, represented transcriptional complexes of RNA polymerase I and rRNA genes was suggested by the observation that it was enhanced in regenerating liver and in a hepatoma and was markedly diminished in cells treated with actinomycin D. Electron microscopic immunolocalization using gold-coupled second antibodies showed that transcribed rRNA genes are located in, and probably confined to, the fibrillar centers of the nucleolus. In contrast, the surrounding dense fibrillar component, previously thought to be the site of nascent prerRNA, did not contain detectable amounts of polymerase I. During mitosis, polymerase I molecules were detected by immunofluorescence microscopy at the chromosomal nucleolus organizer region, indicating that a considerable quantity of the enzyme remains bound to the rRNA genes. From this we conclude that rRNA genes loaded with polymerase I molecules are transmitted from one cell generation to the next one and that factors other than the polymerase itself are involved in the modulation of transcription of DNA containing rRNA genes during the cell cycle. KW - nucleolus KW - nucleolus organizer KW - fibrillar centers KW - rRNA genes KW - anti-RNA polymerase I antibodies Y1 - 1984 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-33223 ER - TY - THES A1 - Krüger, Timothy T1 - Zur funktionellen Architektur des Nukleolus in lebenden Zellen T1 - Functional architecture of the nucleolus in living cells: Dynamics of nucleolar proteins. N2 - In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden Fusionsprodukte aus verschiedenen nukleolären Proteinen mit fluoreszierenden Proteinen (GFP und dsRed: rot fluoreszierendes Protein) in lebenden Zellen von Säugern und Xenopus laevis exprimiert und lokalisiert. Dadurch standen "Marker" für die drei Hauptkomponenten des Nukleolus zur Verfügung. Die dynamischen Eigenschaften dieser Fusionsproteine wurden quantitativ mit Hilfe von "Photobleaching"-Experimenten analysiert (FRAP: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). Im einzelnen wurde durch die Untersuchung von RNA-Polymerase I der rDNA Transkriptionsort im fibrillären Zentrum des Nukleolus bestätigt. Die kinetischen Analysen von zwei pol I-Untereinheiten (RPA194 und RPA53) durch FRAP in transkriptionell aktiven und inaktiven Nukleoli erlaubten direkte Rückschlüsse auf die Transkriptionsdauer der rRNA-Gene in vivo. Die individuellen pol I-Untereinheiten bewegen sich rasch zwischen Nukleoplasma und Nukleolus und interagieren in den fibrillären Zentren mit dem rDNA-Promoter. Dann werden sie in produktive Transkriptionskomplexe integriert, die während der Elongationsphase, die bei Raumtemperatur etwa fünf Minuten dauert, stabil bleiben und erst nach der Termination dissoziieren. Zumindest ein Teil der Untereinheiten wandert anschließend in das Nukleoplasma. Die Ergebnisse widersprechen Modellen, welche die dichte fibrilläre Komponente als Transkriptionsort ansehen oder immobile RNA Polymerase I-Moleküle postulieren. Die Identifizierung des fibrillären Zentrums als rDNA-Transkriptionsort wurde durch die Koexpression der pol I-Untereinheiten mit Fibrillarin, einem Leitprotein der dichten fibrillären Komponente, ermöglicht. Durch die Expression der beiden Proteine als unterschiedlich fluoreszierende Fusionsproteine konnten die Orte der Transkription (die fibrillären Zentren) und die Orte der ersten Prozessierungsschritte, an denen Fibrillarin beteiligt ist (die dichte fibrilläre Komponente), in lebenden Zellen als direkt benachbarte, aber räumlich getrennte Kompartimente identifiziert werden. Die Rolle der granulären Komponente als Ort späterer Prozessierungschritte und Integration ribosomaler Proteine wurde durch die Expression von B23 und der ribosomalen Proteine L4, L5 und L10 verdeutlicht. Dabei wurde die nukleoläre Lokalisation von L10 erstmals belegt. In der Literatur wurde bisher angenommen, L10 würde erst im Cytoplasma mit Ribosomen assoziieren. Dies ist nicht der Fall, wie insbesondere Experimente mit Leptomycin B gezeigt haben. Diese Droge hemmt den CRM1-abhängigen Kernexport und führte zu einer deutlichen Akkumulation von L10-haltigen Präribosomen im Nukleoplasma von menschlichen Zellen. Schließlich sollte ein neues nukleoläres Protein von Xenopus laevis molekular charakterisiert werden, das mit verschiedenen Antikörpern in der granulären Komponente des Nukleolus lokalisiert wurde. Durch massenspektrometrische Analysen nach zweidimensionaler Gelelektrophorese wurden die Antigene überraschenderweise als Cytokeratin-Homologe identifiziert. Im Verlauf dieser Arbeit wurden drei bisher unveröffentlichte Cytokeratin 19 Isoformen von Xenopus kloniert, sequenziert und als GFP-Fusionsproteine exprimiert. Diese wurden allerdings wie reguläre Cytokeratine in cytoplasmatische Intermediärfilamente integriert und konnten, auch nach Translokation in den Zellkern durch ein experimentell eingefügtes Lokalisationssignal, nicht im Nukleolus nachgewiesen werden. Nach der Kotransfektion mit verschiedenen Zellkern-Proteinen wurde Cytokeratin 19 mit diesen in den Zellkern und mit nukleolären Proteinen in den Nukleolus transportiert. Obwohl diese Versuche auf einen "Huckepack"-Transportmechanismus für ein normalerweise cytoplasmatisches Protein hinweisen, konnte Cytokeratin 19 nicht spezifisch in der granulären Komponente des Nukleolus lokalisiert werden. Daher konnte bisher, trotz intensiver Bemühungen, die Identität des in der Immunfluoreszenz nachgewiesenen nukleolären Proteins leider nicht aufgeklärt werden. N2 - In the present work, nucleolar proteins were expressed as fusions with fluorescent proteins (GFP: green fluorescent protein or dsRed: red fluorescent protein) in living mammalian and Xenopus laevis cells. These tagged proteins were used as markers for the three main components of the nucleolus. The dynamic properties of the fusion proteins were analyzed quantitatively in photobleaching experiments (FRAP: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). The analysis of RNA polymerase I allowed the conclusion that the fibrillar centers are the site of rDNA transcription. The kinetic FRAP analysis of two pol I subunits (RPA194 and RPA53) in transcriptionally active and inactive nucleoli allowed an estimate of the transcription time of rDNA genes in vivo. The individual pol I subunits move rapidly between the nucleoplasm and the nucleolus and associate at rDNA promoter sites. Then they are integrated into productive transcription complexes, which remain stable for the elongation phase of about five minutes at room temperature, and dissociate after termination. At least part of the subunits migrate to the nucleoplasm. The obtained results disagree with models that assume the site of transcription to be in the dense fibrillar component, as well as proposing immobile RNA Polymerase I molecules. The designation of the fibrillar center as site of rDNA transcription was further corroborated by the coexpression of pol I subunits with fibrillarin, a major protein of the dense fibrillar component. Using two differently fluorescing tags, the sites of transcription (fibrillar centers) and the sites of early processing steps, in which fibrillarin participates (dense fibrillar components), could be identified in living cells as closely neighboured but clearly separated compartments. The granular component as the site of late processing steps and assembly of ribosomal proteins was visualized by the expression of B23 and ribosomal proteins L4, L5 and L10. In the course of this work L10 was shown to be localized in the nucleolus for the first time. In the literature, human L10 was assumed to associate with ribosomes only in the cytoplasm. This is not the case, as was shown in particular by experiments with Leptomycin B. This drug inhibits the CRM1 dependent nuclear export pathway and resulted in a clear accumulation of L10 containing preribosomes in the nucleoplasm of human cells. Finally, a novel nucleolar protein (p52) of Xenopus laevis was studied in detail. Antigens of various p52 antibodies, localized in the granular component of nucleoli by immunofluorescence were surprisingly identified as cytokeratin homologs by two-dimensional immunoblot analysis and mass spectrometry. In the course of this work three hitherto unpublished Cytokeratin 19 isoforms of Xenopus were cloned, sequenced and expressed as GFP-fusion proteins. However, these proteins behaved like regular cytokeratins and were integrated into intermediate filaments. They were not detectable in the nucleolus, even after translocation into the nucleus by means of an experimentally added localization signal. Following cotransfection with various nuclear RFP-fusion proteins, GFP-CK19 was transported into the nucleus and localized with ist coexpressed partner. When coexpressed with nucleolar proteins, Cytokeratin 19 was also transported into the nucleolus. Although these experiments indicate a possible piggyback transport mechanism for a normally cytoplasmic protein, Cytokeratin 19 was not specifically located in the granular component of the nucleolus. Therefore, despite all efforts, until now the identity of the nucleolar protein originally identified by immunofluorescence remains to be clarified. KW - Nucleolus KW - Grün fluoreszierendes Protein KW - RNS-Polymerase I KW - Ribosomenproteine KW - Cytokeratine KW - Nukleolus KW - GFP KW - RNA-Polymerase I KW - ribosomale Proteine KW - Cytokeratin KW - nucleolus KW - GFP KW - RNA-Polymerase I KW - ribosomal proteins KW - cytokeratin Y1 - 2002 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-4000 ER -