TY - JOUR A1 - Prodinger, Peter Michael A1 - Lazic, Igor A1 - Horas, Konstantin A1 - Burgkart, Rainer A1 - von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger A1 - Weissenberger, Manuel A1 - Rudert, Maximilian A1 - Holzapfel, Boris Michael T1 - Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - Despite increasing numbers of primary hip arthroplasties performed through the direct anterior approach (DAA), there is a lack of literature on DAA revision arthroplasty. The present study was performed in order to evaluate outcomes and revision rates after revision through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed prospectively collected data of 57 patients (61 hips, 43 female, 18 male) who underwent aseptic acetabular component revision through the DAA with the abovementioned implant system between January 2015 and December 2017. The mean follow-up was 40 months (12–56). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. All complications were documented and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed an estimated five-year implant survival of 97% (confidence interval CI 87–99%). The estimated five-year survival with revision for any cause was 93% (CI 83–98%). The overall revision rate was 6.6% (n = 4). Two patients had to undergo revision due to periprosthetic infection (3.3%). In one patient, the acetabular component was revised due to aseptic loosening four months postoperatively. Another patient suffered from postoperative iliopsoas impingement and was treated successfully by arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy. Two (3.3%) of the revised hips dislocated postoperatively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 (2–66) preoperatively to 86 (38–100) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The hip joint’s anatomical center of rotation was restored at a high degree of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that acetabular revision arthroplasty through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation is safe and practicable, resulting in good radiographic and clinical midterm results. KW - anterior approach KW - revision arthroplasty KW - hip joint KW - acetabular bone defect KW - asymmetric implant KW - anatomic center of rotation Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213184 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 9 IS - 9 ER - TY - THES A1 - Schillinger, Judith Hanna T1 - Schmerzen und ihre Therapie in der Hüftendoprothetik. Eine retrospektive Studie zum Vergleich des minimal-invasiven direkt anterioren mit dem transglutealen Zugang nach Bauer T1 - Pain and its therapy in hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study comparing the minimally invasive direct anterior approach with the transgluteal approach according to Bauer N2 - Hintergrund: Die Entwicklung minimal-invasiver gewebeschonender Zugangswege in der Hüftendoprothetik ist im Allgemeinen mit einer schnelleren Rehabilitation, einer Verringerung der postoperativen Schmerzen und einem erhöhten Patientenkomfort verbunden. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, einen anterioren minimal-invasiven mit einem transglutealen lateralen Zugangsweg für Hüftgelenksersatzoperationen in Bezug auf postoperatives Schmerzniveau, den Schmerzmittelgebrauch, die Länge des Krankenhausaufenthalts und die Zeit bis zum Erreichen eines definierten physiotherapeutischen Therapiezieles zu vergleichen. Methoden: In dieser retrospektiven Kohortenstudie untersuchten wir 200 Patienten, die sich einer Hüftendoprothesenimplantation unterzogen. Gruppe I (n = 100) erhielt einen minimal-invasiven anterioren Hüftzugang (modifiziert nach Smith-Peterson), Gruppe II (n = 100) erhielt einen lateralen transglutealen Zugang (nach Bauer). Die Untersuchungsziele waren der Schmerz in Ruhe und während der Physiotherapie, der Schmerzmittelgebrauch, die Länge des stationären Aufenthaltes sowie die Zeitdauer bis zum Erreichen des physiotherapeutischen Therapiezieles. Ergebnisse: Die Patienten der Gruppe I konsumierten weniger Schmerzmedikamente (19,6 ± 6,9 mg Piritramid gegenüber 23,6 ± 11,3 mg; p = 0,005) und hatten in der frühen postoperativen Phase weniger Schmerzen (Operationstag: VAS 1,3 ± 1 gegenüber 2,3 ± 1,3, p = 0,0001, erster postoperativer Tag: VAS 0,41 ± 0,8 vs. 0,66 ± 1,1, p = 0,036). Die Zeit bis zum Erreichen des definierten Therapiezieles (6,4 ± 2 Tage gegenüber 7,4 ± 2,1 Tagen; p = 0,001) und die Dauer des Krankenhausaufenthalts waren kürzer (10,2 ± 1,9 Tage gegenüber 13,4 ± 1,6 Tagen; p = 0,0001) für Gruppe I. Die Schmerzen während der Physiotherapie waren jedoch am dritten und sechsten bis neunten Tag nach der Operation im Vergleich zu Gruppe II höher (p = 0,001–0,013). Schlussfolgerung: Die Implantation einer Hüftprothese über einen minimal-invasiven anterioren Zugang führt in der direkt postoperativen Phase zu einer Reduktion des Schmerzniveaus und des Schmerzmittelgebrauchs. Zusätzlich werden das Erreichen des physiotherapeutischen Therapiezieles und die Länge des stationären Aufenthaltes positiv beeinflusst. Den höheren Schmerzen während der Physiotherapie könnte durch eine Reduktion der erlaubten Gewichtsbelastung in der frühen postoperativen Phase entgegengewirkt werden. N2 - Purpose: The development of minimal-incision techniques for total hip replacement with preservation of soft tissue is generally associated with faster rehabilitation, reduction of postoperative pain and increased patient comfort. The aim of this study was to compare a minimal-incision anterior approach with a transgluteal lateral technique for hip replacement surgery with respect to postoperative pain, consumption of rescue medication, length of hospital stay and time to reach a defined range of motion. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated 100 patients with a minimal-incision anterior approach (group I) and 100 patients with a transgluteal lateral approach (group II) retrospectively undergoing unilateral hip replacement. The study variables were pain at rest and during physiotherapy, amount of rescue medication, the time to reach a defined flexion and time in hospital. Results: The patients of group I consumed less rescue medication (19.6 ± 6.9 mg vs. 23.6 ± 11.3 mg;  p = 0.005) and experienced less pain on the day of surgery (1.3 ± 1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.0001) and the first postoperative day (0.41 ± 0.8 vs. 0.66 ± 1.1, p = 0.036). The time to reach the defined range of motion (6.4 ± 2 days vs. 7.4 ± 2.1 days; p = 0.001) and the length of hospital stay were shorter (10.2 ± 1.9 days vs. 13.4 ± 1.6 days; p = 0.0001) for group I. However, pain during physiotherapy was higher on the third and sixth through ninth days after surgery in comparison to group II (p = 0.001–0.013). Conclusion: The implantation of a hip prosthesis through a minimal-incision anterior approach is successful in reducing postoperative pain and consumption of pain medication. Time to recovery and length of hospital stay are also influenced positively. Pain increases during physiotherapy, and may be mitigated by adopting limited weight bearing during the early postoperative period. KW - minimal-invasiv KW - vorderer Zugang KW - Hüftendoprothetik KW - Postoperativer Schmerz KW - minimally invasiv KW - THA KW - anterior approach KW - total hip arthroplasty KW - postoperative pain KW - minimalinvasive KW - hip KW - arthroplasty Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225745 ER -