TY - JOUR A1 - Nürnberger, Fabian A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Härtel, Stephan T1 - Combined effects of waggle dance communication and landscape heterogeneity on nectar and pollen uptake in honey bee colonies JF - PeerJ N2 - The instructive component of waggle dance communication has been shown to increase resource uptake of Apis mellifera colonies in highly heterogeneous resource environments, but an assessment of its relevance in temperate landscapes with different levels of resource heterogeneity is currently lacking. We hypothesized that the advertisement of resource locations via dance communication would be most relevant in highly heterogeneous landscapes with large spatial variation of floral resources. To test our hypothesis, we placed 24 Apis mellifera colonies with either disrupted or unimpaired instructive component of dance communication in eight Central European agricultural landscapes that differed in heterogeneity and resource availability. We monitored colony weight change and pollen harvest as measure of foraging success. Dance disruption did not significantly alter colony weight change, but decreased pollen harvest compared to the communicating colonies by 40%. There was no general effect of resource availability on nectar or pollen foraging success, but the effect of landscape heterogeneity on nectar uptake was stronger when resource availability was high. In contrast to our hypothesis, the effects of disrupted bee communication on nectar and pollen foraging success were not stronger in landscapes with heterogeneous compared to homogenous resource environments. Our results indicate that in temperate regions intra-colonial communication of resource locations benefits pollen foraging more than nectar foraging, irrespective of landscape heterogeneity. We conclude that the so far largely unexplored role of dance communication in pollen foraging requires further consideration as pollen is a crucial resource for colony development and health. KW - Apis mellifera KW - orientation KW - recruitment KW - landscape ecology KW - foraging behaviour KW - floral resource distribution Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170813 VL - 5 IS - e3441 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kato, Hiroki A1 - Lu, Qiping A1 - Rapaport, Doron A1 - Kozjak-Pavlovic, Vera T1 - Tom70 Is Essential for PINK1 Import into Mitochondria JF - PLoS ONE N2 - PTEN induced kinase 1 (PINK1) is a serine/threonine kinase in the outer membrane of mitochondria (OMM), and known as a responsible gene of Parkinson's disease (PD). The precursor of PINK1 is synthesized in the cytosol and then imported into the mitochondria via the translocase of the OMM (TOM) complex. However, a large part of PINK1 import mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we examined using cell-free system the mechanism by which PINK1 is targeted to and assembled into mitochondria. Surprisingly, the main component of the import channel, Tom40 was not necessary for PINK1 import. Furthermore, we revealed that the import receptor Tom70 is essential for PINK1 import. In addition, we observed that although PINK1 has predicted mitochondrial targeting signal, it was not processed by the mitochondrial processing peptidase. Thus, our results suggest that PINK1 is imported into mitochondria by a unique pathway that is independent of the TOM core complex but crucially depends on the import receptor Tom70. KW - binding KW - outer-membrane proteins KW - Parkinsons diesease KW - intracellular membranes KW - quality control KW - pathway KW - recruitment KW - biogenesis KW - mechanisms KW - complex Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131061 VL - 8 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sommerlandt, F. M. J. A1 - Huber, W. A1 - Spaethe, J. T1 - Social Information in the Stingless Bee, Trigona corvina Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae): The Use of Visual and Olfactory Cues at the Food Site JF - Sociobiology N2 - For social insects, colony performance is largely dependent on the quantity and quality of food intake and thus on the efficiency of its foragers. In addition to innate preferences and previous experience, foragers can use social information to decide when and where to forage. In some stingless bee (Meliponini) species, individual foraging decisions are shown to be influenced by the presence of social information at resource sites. In dual choice tests, we studied whether visual and/or olfactory cues affect individual decision-making in rigona corvina Cockerell and if this information is species-specific. We found that T. corvina foragers possess local enhancement: they are attracted by olfactory and visual cues released by conspecifics but avoid feeders associated with heterospecific individuals of the species Tetragona ziegleri (Friese). Overall, olfactory cues seem to be more important than visual cues, but information by visual cues alone is sufficient for discrimination. KW - visual cues KW - recruitment KW - local enhancement KW - odor marks KW - communication Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-118120 VL - 61 IS - 4 ER - TY - THES A1 - Dornhaus, Anna T1 - The role of communication in the foraging process of social bees T1 - Die Rolle der Kommunikation beim Fouragieren von sozialen Bienen N2 - In the various groups of social bees, different systems of communication about food sources occur. These communication systems are different solutions to a common problem of social insects: efficiently allocating the necessary number of workers first to the task of foraging and second to the most profitable food sources. The solution chosen by each species depends on the particular ecological circumstances as well as the evolutionary history of that species. For example, the outstanding difference between the bumble bee and the honey bee system is that honey bees can communicate the location of profitable food sources to nestmates, which bumble bees cannot. To identify possible selection pressures that could explain this difference, I have quantified the benefits of communicating location in honey bees. I show that these strongly depend on the habitat, and that communicating location might not benefit bees in temperate habitats. This could be due to the differing spatial distributions of resources in different habitats, in particular between temperate and tropical regions. These distributions may be the reason why the mostly temperate-living bumble bees have never evolved a communication system that allows them to transfer information on location of food sources, whereas most tropical social bees (all honey bees and many stingless bees) are able to recruit nestmates to specific points in their foraging range. Nevertheless, I show that in bumble bees the allocation of workers to foraging is also regulated by communication. Successful foragers distribute in the nest a pheromone which alerts other bees to the presence of food. This pheromone stems from a tergite gland, the function of which had not been identified previously. Usage of a pheromone in the nest to alert other individuals to forage has not been described in other social insects, and might constitute a new mode of communicating about food sources. The signal might be modulated depending on the quality of the food source. Bees in the nest sample the nectar that has been brought into the nest. Their decision whether to go out and forage depends not only on the pheromone signal, but also on the quality of the nectar they have sampled. In this way, foraging activity of a bumble bee colony is adjusted to foraging conditions, which means most bees are allocated to foraging only if high-quality food sources are available. In addition, foraging activity is adjusted to the amount of food already stored. In a colony with full honeypots, no new bees are allocated to foraging. These results help us understand how the allocation of workers to the task of food collection is regulated according to external and internal nest conditions in bumble bees. N2 - Innerhalb der sozialen Bienen tritt eine Vielzahl verschiedender Systeme zur Kommunikation über Futterquellen auf. Diese Kommunikationssysteme sind verschiedene Lösungen eines Problems, mit dem alle sozialen Insekten konfrontiert sind: wie lässt sich regulieren, daß die benötigte Anzahl an Arbeiterinnen der Aufgabe des Futtersammelns, und dazu möglichst den besten vorhandenen Futterquellen, zugeteilt wird? Die von einer Art gewählte Lösung hängt von den speziellen ökologischen Rahmenbedingungen, aber auch von der evolutionären Vorgeschichte dieser Art ab. Ein herausragender Unterschied zwischen Honigbienen und Hummeln beispielsweise ist, daß Honigbienen den Ort einer profitablen Futterquelle ihren Nestgenossinnen mitteilen können, was Hummeln nicht tun. Um Selektionsdrücke zu identifizieren, die diesen Unterschied bewirken könnten, habe ich den Nutzen einer solchen Kommunikation quantifiziert. Es zeigt sich, daß dieser Nutzen stark vom Habitat der Bienen abhängt, und daß Kommunikation über den Ort von Futterquellen in temperaten Habitaten unter Umständen keine Vorteile für Bienen bedeutet. Das könnte daran liegen, daß sich die räumliche Verteilung der Ressourcen zwischen Habitaten, und besonders zwischen temperaten Gebieten und den Tropen, unterscheidet. Dieser Umstand könnte der Grund dafür sein, daß die hauptsächlich in temperaten Regionen lebenden Hummeln nie eine Methode zur Kommunikation von Information über den Ort von Futterquellen evolviert haben, während die meisten tropischen sozialen Bienenarten (alle Honigbienen und viele stachellose Bienen) Nestgenossinnen zu bestimmten Orten rekrutieren können. Jedoch stellte sich in meinen Experimenten heraus, daß auch bei Hummeln die Zuordnung von Arbeiterinnen zur Aufgabe des Futtersammelns über Kommunikation reguliert wird. Erfolgreiche Sammlerinnen produzieren ein Pheromon, welches andere Hummeln auf die Präsenz einer Futterquelle aufmerksam macht. Dieses Pheromon stammt aus einer Tergaldrüse am Abdomen, deren Funktion bisher nicht bekannt war. Die Benutzung eines Pheromons zur Kommunikation über Futterquellen im Nest ist von anderen sozialen Insekten bisher nicht bekannt. Das Pheromonsignal wird vermutlich abhängig von der Qualität der Futterquelle moduliert. Hummeln im Nest kosten außerdem den neu eingetragenen Nektar. Ihre Entscheidung auszufliegen und zu sammeln ist sowohl vom Pheromonsignal als auch von der Qualität des von ihnen gekosteten Nektars abhängig. Die Sammelaktivität der Hummelkolonie wird damit an die Sammelbedingungen angepasst – nur wenn profitable Futterquellen vorhanden sind, werden viele Sammlerinnen aktiviert. Zusätzlich hängt die Sammelaktivität von der Vorratssituation im Stock ab. Sind die Honigtöpfe gefüllt, werden keine neuen Arbeiterinnen zum Sammeln aktiviert. Diese Ergebnisse helfen uns zu verstehen, wie bei Hummeln die Anzahl der aktiven Sammlerinnen je nach den Bedingungen innerhalb und außerhalb der Kolonie reguliert wird. KW - Hummel KW - Bienen KW - Kommunikation KW - Nahrungserwerb KW - Evolution KW - Pheromon KW - Schwänzeltanz KW - Evolution KW - Rekrutierung KW - Hummeln KW - Bombus KW - Futtersammeln KW - foraging KW - recruitment KW - evolution KW - bumble bees KW - Bombus KW - waggle dance Y1 - 2002 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-3468 ER -