TY - JOUR A1 - Koehler, Viktoria Florentine A1 - Adam, Pia A1 - Fuss, Carmina Teresa A1 - Jiang, Linmiao A1 - Berg, Elke A1 - Frank-Raue, Karin A1 - Raue, Friedhelm A1 - Hoster, Eva A1 - Knösel, Thomas A1 - Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich A1 - Negele, Thomas A1 - Siebolts, Udo A1 - Lorenz, Kerstin A1 - Allelein, Stephanie A1 - Schott, Matthias A1 - Spitzweg, Christine A1 - Kroiss, Matthias T1 - Treatment of RET-positive advanced medullary thyroid cancer with multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors — a retrospective multi-center registry analysis JF - Cancers N2 - Background: RET (rearranged during transfection) variants are the most prevalent oncogenic events in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). In advanced disease, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MKIs) cabozantinib and vandetanib are the approved standard treatment irrespective of RET status. The actual outcome of patients with RET-positive MTC treated with MKIs is ill described. Methods: We here retrospectively determined the RET oncogene variant status with a targeted DNA Custom Panel in a prospectively collected cohort of 48 patients with advanced MTC treated with vandetanib and/or cabozantinib at four German referral centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In total, 44/48 (92%) patients had germline or somatic RET variants. The M918T variant was found in 29/44 (66%) cases. In total, 2/32 (6%) patients with a somatic RET variant had further somatic variants, while in 1/32 (3%) patient with a germline RET variant, additional variants were found. Only 1/48 (2%) patient had a pathogenic HRAS variant, and no variants were found in 3 cases. In first-line treatment, the median OS was 53 (95% CI (95% confidence interval), 32–NR (not reached); n = 36), and the median PFS was 21 months (12–39; n = 33) in RET-positive MTC patients. In second-line treatment, the median OS was 18 (13–79; n = 22), and the median PFS was 3.5 months (2–14; n = 22) in RET-positive cases. Conclusions: RET variants were highly prevalent in patients with advanced MTC. The treatment results in RET-positive cases were similar to those reported in unselected cohorts. KW - medullary thyroid cancer KW - rearranged during transfection KW - variant KW - multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor KW - survival KW - treatment outcome Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281776 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 14 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Assfalg, Volker A1 - Selig, Katharina A1 - Tolksdorf, Johanna A1 - van Meel, Marieke A1 - de Vries, Erwin A1 - Ramsoebhag, Anne‐Marie A1 - Rahmel, Axel A1 - Renders, Lutz A1 - Novotny, Alexander A1 - Matevossian, Edouard A1 - Schneeberger, Stefan A1 - Rosenkranz, Alexander R. A1 - Berlakovich, Gabriela A1 - Ysebaert, Dirk A1 - Knops, Noël A1 - Kuypers, Dirk A1 - Weekers, Laurent A1 - Muehlfeld, Anja A1 - Rump, Lars‐Christian A1 - Hauser, Ingeborg A1 - Pisarski, Przemyslaw A1 - Weimer, Rolf A1 - Fornara, Paolo A1 - Fischer, Lutz A1 - Kliem, Volker A1 - Sester, Urban A1 - Stippel, Dirk A1 - Arns, Wolfgang A1 - Hau, Hans‐Michael A1 - Nitschke, Martin A1 - Hoyer, Joachim A1 - Thorban, Stefan A1 - Weinmann‐Menke, Julia A1 - Heller, Katharina A1 - Banas, Bernhard A1 - Schwenger, Vedat A1 - Nadalin, Silvio A1 - Lopau, Kai A1 - Hüser, Norbert A1 - Heemann, Uwe T1 - Repeated kidney re‐transplantation—the Eurotransplant experience: a retrospective multicenter outcome analysis JF - Transplant International N2 - In Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS), candidates can be considered unlimitedly for repeated re‐transplantation. Data on outcome and benefit are indeterminate. We performed a retrospective 15‐year patient and graft outcome data analysis from 1464 recipients of a third or fourth or higher sequential deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) from 42 transplant centers. Repeated re‐DDRT recipients were younger (mean 43.0 vs. 50.2 years) compared to first DDRT recipients. They received grafts with more favorable HLA matches (89.0% vs. 84.5%) but thereby no statistically significant improvement of patient and graft outcome was found as comparatively demonstrated in 1st DDRT. In the multivariate modeling accounting for confounding factors, mortality and graft loss after 3rd and ≥4th DDRT (P < 0.001 each) and death with functioning graft (DwFG) after 3rd DDRT (P = 0.001) were higher as compared to 1st DDRT. The incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was also significantly higher in re‐DDRT (12.7%) than in 1st DDRT (7.1%; P < 0.001). Facing organ shortage, increasing waiting time, and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of repeated re‐DDRT. The data from this survey propose better HLA matching in first DDRT and second DDRT and careful selection of candidates, especially for ≥4th DDRT. KW - allocation KW - child KW - fourth KW - graft KW - kidney KW - loss KW - repeated KW - re‐transplantation KW - survival KW - third Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214161 VL - 33 IS - 6 SP - 617 EP - 631 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pippias, Maria A1 - Stel, Vianda S. A1 - Diez, José Maria Abad A1 - Afentakis, Nikolaos A1 - Herrero-Calvo, Jose Antonio A1 - Arias, Manuel A1 - Tomilina, Natalia A1 - Caamaño, Encarnación Bouzas A1 - Buturovic-Ponikvar, Jadranka A1 - Čala, Svjetlana A1 - Caskey, Fergus J. A1 - de la Nuez, Pablo Castro A1 - Cernevskis, Harijs A1 - Collart, Frederic A1 - de la Torre, Ramón Alonso A1 - de los Ángeles García Bazaga, Maria A1 - De Meester, Johan A1 - Díaz, Joan Manuel A1 - Djukanovic, Ljubica A1 - Alamar, Manuel Ferrer A1 - Finne, Patrik A1 - Garneata, Liliana A1 - Golan, Eliezer A1 - González Fernández, Raquel A1 - Gutiérrez Avila, Gonzalo A1 - Heaf, James A1 - Hoitsma, Andries A1 - Kantaria, Nino A1 - Kolesnyk, Mykola A1 - Kramar, Reinhard A1 - Kramer, Anneke A1 - Lassalle, Mathilde A1 - Leivestad, Torbjørn A1 - Lopot, Frantisek A1 - Macário, Fernando A1 - Magaz, Angela A1 - Martín-Escobar, Eduardo A1 - Metcalfe, Wendy A1 - Noordzij, Marlies A1 - Palsson, Runolfur A1 - Pechter, Ülle A1 - Prütz, Karl G. A1 - Ratkovic, Marina A1 - Resić, Halima A1 - Rutkowski, Boleslaw A1 - de Pablos, Carmen Santiuste A1 - Spustová, Viera A1 - Süleymanlar, Gültekin A1 - Van Stralen, Karlijn A1 - Thereska, Nestor A1 - Wanner, Christoph A1 - Jager, Kitty J. T1 - Renal replacement therapy in Europe: a summary of the 2012 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report JF - Clinical Kidney Journal N2 - Background This article summarizes the 2012 European Renal Association—European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry Annual Report (available at www.era-edta-reg.org) with a specific focus on older patients (defined as ≥65 years). Methods Data provided by 45 national or regional renal registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea were used. Individual patient level data were received from 31 renal registries, whereas 14 renal registries contributed data in an aggregated form. The incidence, prevalence and survival probabilities of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) and renal transplantation rates for 2012 are presented. Results In 2012, the overall unadjusted incidence rate of patients with ESRD receiving RRT was 109.6 per million population (pmp) (n = 69 035), ranging from 219.9 pmp in Portugal to 24.2 pmp in Montenegro. The proportion of incident patients ≥75 years varied from 15 to 44% between countries. The overall unadjusted prevalence on 31 December 2012 was 716.7 pmp (n = 451 270), ranging from 1670.2 pmp in Portugal to 146.7 pmp in the Ukraine. The proportion of prevalent patients ≥75 years varied from 11 to 32% between countries. The overall renal transplantation rate in 2012 was 28.3 pmp (n = 15 673), with the highest rate seen in the Spanish region of Catalonia. The proportion of patients ≥65 years receiving a transplant ranged from 0 to 35%. Five-year adjusted survival for all RRT patients was 59.7% (95% confidence interval, CI: 59.3–60.0) which fell to 39.3% (95% CI: 38.7–39.9) in patients 65–74 years and 21.3% (95% CI: 20.8–21.9) in patients ≥75 years. KW - end-stage renal disease KW - incidence KW - prevalence KW - renal replacement therapy KW - survival Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150054 VL - 8 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Altieri, Barbara A1 - La Salvia, Anna A1 - Modica, Roberta A1 - Marciello, Francesca A1 - Mercier, Olaf A1 - Filosso, Pier Luigi A1 - de Latour, Bertrand Richard A1 - Giuffrida, Dario A1 - Campione, Severo A1 - Guggino, Gianluca A1 - Fadel, Elie A1 - Papotti, Mauro A1 - Colao, Annamaria A1 - Scoazec, Jean-Yves A1 - Baudin, Eric A1 - Faggiano, Antongiulio T1 - Recurrence-free survival in early and locally advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung after complete tumor resection JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine N2 - Background: Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer with poor clinical outcomes. Data on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early and locally advanced pure LCNEC after complete resection (R0) are lacking. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in this subgroup of patients and to identify potential prognostic markers. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study including patients with pure LCNEC stage I-III and R0 resection. Clinicopathological characteristics, RFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: 39 patients (M:F = 26:13), with a median age of 64 years (44–83), were included. Lobectomy (69.2%), bilobectomy (5.1%), pneumonectomy (18%), and wedge resection (7.7%) were performed mostly associated with lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant therapy included platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 58.9% of cases. After a median follow-up of 44 (4–169) months, the median RFS was 39 months with 1-, 2- and 5-year RFS rates of 60.0%, 54.6%, and 44.9%, respectively. Median DSS was 72 months with a 1-, 2- and 5-year rate of 86.8, 75.9, and 57.4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, age (cut-off 65 years old) and pN status were independent prognostic factors for both RFS (HR = 4.19, 95%CI = 1.46–12.07, p = 0.008 and HR = 13.56, 95%CI 2.45–74.89, p = 0.003, respectively) and DSS (HR = 9.30, 95%CI 2.23–38.83, p = 0.002 and HR = 11.88, 95%CI 2.28–61.84, p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: After R0 resection of LCNEC, half of the patients recurred mostly within the first two years of follow-up. Age and lymph node metastasis could help to stratify patients for adjuvant therapy. KW - neuroendocrine tumor KW - LCNEC KW - pulmonary cancer KW - prognostic marker KW - prognosis KW - survival KW - lymph nodes KW - age KW - surgery KW - adjuvant therapy Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304000 SN - 2075-4426 VL - 13 IS - 2 ER -