TY  - JOUR
A1  - Dech, Stefan
A1  - Holzwarth, Stefanie
A1  - Asam, Sarah
A1  - Andresen, Thorsten
A1  - Bachmann, Martin
A1  - Boettcher, Martin
A1  - Dietz, Andreas
A1  - Eisfelder, Christina
A1  - Frey, Corinne
A1  - Gesell, Gerhard
A1  - Gessner, Ursula
A1  - Hirner, Andreas
A1  - Hofmann, Matthias
A1  - Kirches, Grit
A1  - Klein, Doris
A1  - Klein, Igor
A1  - Kraus, Tanja
A1  - Krause, Detmar
A1  - Plank, Simon
A1  - Popp, Thomas
A1  - Reinermann, Sophie
A1  - Reiners, Philipp
A1  - Roessler, Sebastian
A1  - Ruppert, Thomas
A1  - Scherbachenko, Alexander
A1  - Vignesh, Ranjitha
A1  - Wolfmueller, Meinhard
A1  - Zwenzner, Hendrik
A1  - Kuenzer, Claudia
T1  - Potential and challenges of harmonizing 40 years of AVHRR data: the TIMELINE experience
JF  - Remote Sensing
N2  - Earth Observation satellite data allows for the monitoring of the surface of our planet at predefined intervals covering large areas. However, there is only one medium resolution sensor family in orbit that enables an observation time span of 40 and more years at a daily repeat interval. This is the AVHRR sensor family. If we want to investigate the long-term impacts of climate change on our environment, we can only do so based on data that remains available for several decades. If we then want to investigate processes with respect to climate change, we need very high temporal resolution enabling the generation of long-term time series and the derivation of related statistical parameters such as mean, variability, anomalies, and trends. The challenges to generating a well calibrated and harmonized 40-year-long time series based on AVHRR sensor data flown on 14 different platforms are enormous. However, only extremely thorough pre-processing and harmonization ensures that trends found in the data are real trends and not sensor-related (or other) artefacts. The generation of European-wide time series as a basis for the derivation of a multitude of parameters is therefore an extremely challenging task, the details of which are presented in this paper.
KW  - AVHRR
KW  - Earth Observation
KW  - harmonization
KW  - time series analysis
KW  - climate related trends
KW  - automatic processing
KW  - Europe
KW  - TIMELINE
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-246134
SN  - 2072-4292
VL  - 13
IS  - 18
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bell, Alexandra
A1  - Klein, Doris
A1  - Rieser, Jakob
A1  - Kraus, Tanja
A1  - Thiel, Michael
A1  - Dech, Stefan
T1  - Scientific evidence from space — a review of spaceborne remote sensing applications at the science–policy interface
JF  - Remote Sensing
N2  - On a daily basis, political decisions are made, often with their full extent of impact being unclear. Not seldom, the decisions and policy measures implemented result in direct or indirect unintended negative impacts, such as on the natural environment, which can vary in time, space, nature, and severity. To achieve a more sustainable world with equitable societies requires fundamental rethinking of our policymaking. It calls for informed decision making and a monitoring of political impact for which evidence-based knowledge is necessary. The most powerful tool to derive objective and systematic spatial information and, thus, add to transparent decisions is remote sensing (RS). This review analyses how spaceborne RS is used by the scientific community to provide evidence for the policymaking process. We reviewed 194 scientific publications from 2015 to 2020 and analysed them based on general insights (e.g., study area) and RS application-related information (e.g., RS data and products). Further, we classified the studies according to their degree of science–policy integration by determining their engagement with the political field and their potential contribution towards four stages of the policy cycle: problem identification/knowledge building, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy monitoring and evaluation. Except for four studies, we found that studies had not directly involved or informed the policy field or policymaking process. Most studies contributed to the stage problem identification/knowledge building, followed by ex post policy impact assessment. To strengthen the use of RS for policy-relevant studies, the concept of the policy cycle is used to showcase opportunities of RS application for the policymaking process. Topics gaining importance and future requirements of RS at the science–policy interface are identified. If tackled, RS can be a powerful complement to provide policy-relevant evidence to shed light on the impact of political decisions and thus help promote sustainable development from the core.
KW  - earth observation
KW  - evidence-based policy
KW  - policy cycle
KW  - decision-making
KW  - sustainable development
KW  - science–policy interface
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-303925
SN  - 2072-4292
VL  - 15
IS  - 4
ER  -