TY - THES A1 - Campbell, Marlen Jamie-Lee T1 - Organizational cultures’ impact on employees’ corruption T1 - Der Einfluß von Organisationskultur auf die Korruption von Mitarbeitern N2 - Although many researchers refer to organizational culture as the key to explain employees' organizational corruption (= corruption on behalf of the organization), literature lacks systematic empirical evidence. Through a mixed-method approach this research tries to shed some first lights on this issue with the questions: what characteristics describe an organizational culture that promotes employees' corruption? Does a certain type of organizational culture shape a positive attitude towards organizational corruption? Does organizational culture differ in its impact on different types of corruption? Does organizational culture interact with employees’ sex to promote employees’ corruption? And, is there a main effect of sex on corruption? A qualitative study investigates the characteristics of a corrupt organizational culture in both general and in particular for managers and employees (Study 1). 14 experts of different occupations were asked about underlying assumptions, values, and norms of a corrupt organizational culture coding the frequency and relationship of their answers. The results showed specific underlying assumptions, values, and norms that were shared by the interviewees and provide first insights into their interrelatedness. In addition, the quantitative field survey (Study 2) analyzed if a corrupt organizational culture shapes a positive attitude towards organizational corruption and if both tangible rewards and lax control mechanism mediate this impact. 131 participants answered questionnaires about their perceived competition in their industry, tangible rewards, lax control mechanism, and their attitude towards both gifting and bribery. Results showed that lax control mechanism (and for gifting also tangible rewards) mediated the positive impact of a corrupt organizational culture on organizational corruption. In addition, men and women did not differ in their attitude towards organizational corruption in a corrupt organizational culture. Finally a web-based experiment investigates if organizational culture shapes employees' corruption (Study 3). In addition this approach also covers if the impact of organizational culture on corruption depends on the type of corruption (organizational corruption vs. counterproductive), and if employees’ sex influence corruption and if there is an interaction of organizational culture and sex on employees’ corruption. 563 participants had to decide whether they engage in corruption. Although a corrupt organizational culture raises both types of corruption, there was neither a notable main effect of sex nor a high impact interaction effect of both on both types of corruption. Thus, aspects of a corrupt organizational culture seem to influence employees' corruption. N2 - Obwohl Organisationskultur von vielen Wissenschaftlern als eine Schlüsseldeterminante gesehen wird um organisationale Korruption (= Korruption im Sinne der Organisation) zu erklären, fehlt es in der fachwissenschaftlichen Literatur an systematischen empiristischen Belegen: Welche Eigenschaften zeichnen eine korruptionsfördernde Organisationskultur aus? Kann ein bestimmter Typ von Organisationskultur eine positive Einstellung gegenüber organisationaler Korruption formen? Und schließlich: unterscheiden sich die Einflussfaktoren für Korruption zwischen verschiedenen Korruptionstypen? Durch die Anwendung verschiedenere methodischer Zugänge versucht diese wissenschaftliche Arbeit erste Antworten in diesem Forschungsfeld zu geben. Gibt es eine Interaktion zwischen dem Geschlecht der Mitarbeiter und der Organisationskultur und unterscheiden sich Männer und Frauen in ihrem korrupten Verhalten? Zunächst werden anhand einer qualitativen Analyse von 14 Experteninterviews grundlegende Charakteristiken einer Organisationskultur in korrupten Organisationen analysiert (Studie 1). Die Experten aus verschiedenen Berufsfeldern wurden zu ihrer Wahrnehmung der Organisationskultur von verschiedenen korrupten Organisationen befragt. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass es spezifische unbewusste Annahmen, Werte und Normen gibt, die von den verschiedenen Experten berichtet worden sind. Diese Studie ermöglicht erste Einblicke in die Wirkung der und Verbindungen zwischen den von den Experten wahrgenommenen Normen, Werten und Annahmen. Weiterführend analysierte eine Feldstudie (Studie 2), ob eine korrupte Organisationskultur eine positive Wirkung auf die Einstellung von Mitarbeitern zu organisationale Korruption hat. Weiter wurde untersucht, ob konkrete antizipierte Belohnungen und laxe Kontrollmechanismen bei der Aufgabenerfüllungen den Effekt der korrupten Organisationskultur auf organisationale Korruption mediieren. 131 Probanden beantworteten verschiedene Fragebögen zu ihrer Wahrnehmung von Wettbewerb in ihrer Branche, laxe Kontrollmechanismen von Korruption, zu konkreten Belohnungen in ihrer Organisation und zu ihrer Einstellung zu Geschenke und Bestechung. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass es einen Haupteffekt von der korrupten Organisationskultur auf organisationale Korruption vorhanden ist, dass dieser durch konkrete Belohnungen und laxe Kontrollmechanismen (bei Geschenken) und durch laxe Kontrollmechanismen (bei Bestechung) mediiert wird. Männer und Frauen unterscheiden sich in einer korrupten Organisationskultur nicht hinsichtlich ihrer Einstellung zur Korruption. Abschließend analysiert Studie 3 als web-basiertes Experiment, ob sich die Organisationskultur auf Korruption auswirkt. 563 Probanden spielten einen männlichen oder weiblichen Angestellten, welcher entweder in einer ethischen oder korrupten Organisationskultur in einer fiktiven Organisation arbeitet. Alle Teilnehmer mussten sich in der Rolle entscheiden, ob er oder sie in verschiedenen Arten von Korruption (organisationale vs. kontraproduktive Korruption) aktiv werden will. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass eine korrupte Organisationskultur einen ähnlich positiven Einfluss auf beide Typen von Korruption hatte. Das Geschlecht hatte weder einen nennenswert signifikanten oder keinen Einfluss auf die Annahme der Korruption. Darüber hinaus gab es keine Interaktion zwischen Geschlecht und Organisationskultur für beide Typen der Korruption. KW - Korruption KW - Organisationskultur KW - Organisationspsychologie KW - organisationale Korruption KW - Korruption von Mitarbeitern KW - korrupte Organisationskultur KW - organizational corruption KW - employees' corruption KW - corrupt organizational culture KW - corruption KW - Organisation Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-123251 ER - TY - THES A1 - Ejikeme, Ndubuisi Reginald T1 - Corruption in Nigeria: A Manifestation of Bad Governance. (A Socio-ethical Survey in the light of the Social Teachings of the Church: With particular reference to Gaudium et Spes and Populorum Progressio) T1 - Korruption in Nigeria : ein Beispiel für eine schlechte Regierung. Eine sozio-ethische Untersuchung in Hinsicht auf die Soziallehre der Kirche: mit teilweisem Bezug auf das "Gaudium et Spes" und "Populorum Progressio" N2 - Human society understands itself as a place where man enjoys an authentic human existence. In the society therefore, man should have all the basic necessities of life. The universal destination of all the created goods as God intends it, is for the good use of man in order to live a fulfilled human life. In so far as, man is the source, the focus and the end of all economic and social life, this must be respected. In order to enhance his dignity as the imago Dei , man has natural right to all the created goods. However, there are tools that make this situation possible. One of such tools is governance which is the means of organising the created things in the society for the common good. The ultimate goal and purpose of the society is the good of man. If the goods are not brought to this use, there exist socio-ethical problems. There are so many socio-ethical ills in the world today, because of the denial of the created good to some people by the organisers of the society. The social ills include armed robbery, corruption of all sorts, official lies and deceit. These constitute a complex social problem as regards their justification in the society. Subsequently, of all these social ills in the world today, corruption is the most devastating. Most people acknowledge this fact, but some others see it only as a means of survival, especially in countries that seem to appreciate or favour rigid capitalism, whereby wealth is power. Corruption is a common phenomenon in human society, and it is as old as the human society. Otive Igbuzor confirms it thus, “Corruption is as old as the society and cuts across nations, cultures, races and classes of people.” Corruption knows no bound. At any rate, corrupt practices vary from country to country and even within a country it also varies from section to section in its intensity and propensity. However, the manner with which it is manifesting itself presently accounts for its recent addition to the dictionary of the most global social problems. Unfortunately, nobody admits that he is corrupt and yet corruption as a social problem is widespread. In this light, Lightowler Brain observes that, “Worldwide corruption is by its nature generally hidden, but nevertheless insidious and as potentially dangerous to society.” It affects the society adversely, and therefore leads to misery of some members of the society. In this line, Peter Eigen argues, “Corruption is a daunting obstacle to sustainable development, and results in a major loss of public funds needed for basic necessities of life, both in developed and developing countries.” These are the devastating effects of corruption. The word corruption provokes an active discussion and condemnation among all classes of people in the society. It can be situated and discussed in any discipline but more especially in Social Ethics because this discipline deals with the interaction of human beings in the society. Problems in life are divided into private problems and social problems. Julius O. Onwuka, differentiates the two thus, “When a situation affects members of the society adversely leading to misery, regret, despair, it becomes a social problem. On the contrary, when a problem is suffered by an individual alone, without other members of the society being affected, this is a personal problem.” From Onwuka, I understand that, social problem is more problematic than personal problem, because it concerns more than one person. Social problems are seen in the societies of human beings where the basic necessities of life are denied some people by corrupt organisers of the society. N2 - Korruption in Nigeria : ein Beispiel für eine schlechte Regierung. Eine sozio-ethische Untersuchung in Hinsicht auf die Soziallehre der Kirche: mit teilweisem Bezug auf das "Gaudium et Spes" und "Populorum Progressio" KW - Nigeria KW - Korruption KW - Katholische Kirche KW - Sozialethik KW - Gaudium et Spes KW - Populorum Progressio KW - social teachings KW - church KW - Gaudium et Spes KW - Soziallehre KW - Kirche Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-79567 ER -