TY - JOUR A1 - Fickl, Stefan A1 - Therese Kröger, Annika A1 - Dietrich, Thomas A1 - Kebschull, Moritz T1 - Influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures around dental implants on marginal bone level changes-A systematic review JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research N2 - Objectives This systematic review assessed the influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures on marginal bone level changes in partial or fully edentulous patients. Material and Methods We identified three relevant PICO questions related to soft tissue augmentation procedures and conducted a systematic search of four major electronic databases for clinical studies in systemically healthy patients receiving at least one dental implant and a minimum follow-up of one year after implant placement. The primary outcome was mean difference in marginal bone levels, and secondary outcomes were clinical and patient-related outcomes such as thickness of peri-implant mucosa, bleeding indices, and Pink Esthetic Score. Results We identified 20 publications reporting on 16 relevant comparisons. Studies varied considerably and thus only two meta-analyses could be performed. This systematic review showed that: Soft tissue augmentation either for augmentation of keratinized mucosa or soft tissue volume inconsistently had an effect on marginal bone level changes when compared to no soft tissue augmentation, but consistently improved secondary outcomes. The combination soft and hard tissue augmentation showed no statistically significant difference in terms of marginal bone level changes when compared to hard tissue augmentation alone, but resulted in less marginal soft tissue recession as shown by a meta-analysis. Soft or hard tissue augmentation performed as contour augmentations resulted in comparable marginal bone level changes. Conclusions Peri-implant soft and hard tissues seem to have a bidirectional relationship: “Bone stands hard, but soft tissue is the guard”. KW - soft tissue augmentation KW - alveolar ridge augmentation KW - bone augmentation KW - dental implants KW - guided bone regeneration KW - guided tissue regeneration Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258394 VL - 32 IS - S21 ER - TY - THES A1 - Lux, Sophia Ellen T1 - Einfluss von Tenting Screws auf die bukkale Volumenstabilität nach Augmentation mit zwei verschiedenen Kollagenmembranen - ein in vitro Versuch im Schweinekiefer T1 - Graft stability comparing two collagen membranes with and without Tenting Screws after wound closure - an in vitro study in pig jaws N2 - Zahnverlust geht bekannter Weise mit einem Verlust von Hart- und Weichgewebe einher. Mit der relativ neuen Tent-Pole Technik könnte der Volumenverlust durch den Wundverschluss bei Knochenaugmentation nach der GBR-Methode geringer ausfallen. In 10 Schweineunterkiefern wurden mit beiden Methoden augmentiert und mithilfe von Cerec- und DVT-Scans das Volumen vor und nach dem Wundverschluss verglichen. Dabei konnte festgestellt werden, dass bei Verwendung einer Tenting Screw signifikant weniger Volumenverlust als bei Augmentation mit der GBR-Technik resultierte. Ein zusätzlicher Vergleich von zwei Kollagenmembranen, OssixPlus und BioGide, im Hinblick auf den Widerstand gegen den Nahtverschluss zeigte im Signifikanztest keinen Vorteil der ribosekreuzvernetzten und steiferen OssixPlus Membran. Zahlreiche klinische Untersuchungen berichten im Zusammenhang mit der Tent Pole-Technik von komplikationslosem Einheilen, suffizientem Knochenaufbau und erfolgreicher Implantation. So könnte sich die Tenting Screw nach weiteren Untersuchungen im in vivo Modell zu einer eventuell ebenbürtigen Alternative zum bisherigen Goldstandard, dem Knochenblock entwickeln. Dieser stellt sich im Vergleich als technikintensivere und, gerade bei autologem Material, als für den Patienten weniger komfortable Maßnahme dar. N2 - Tooth loss is known to be associated with a loss of hard and soft tissue. With the relatively new tent-pole technique, the loss of volume due to wound closure during bone augmentation using the GBR method could be lower. Both methods were used to augment 10 lower jaws of pigs and the volume before and after wound closure was compared using Cerec and DVT scans. It was found that the use of a tenting screw resulted in significantly less volume loss than augmentation with the GBR technique. An additional comparison of two collagen membranes, OssixPlus and BioGide, with regard to the resistance to suture closure showed no advantage of the ribose cross-linked and stiffer OssixPlus membrane in the significance test. Numerous clinical studies report in connection with the tent pole technique of uncomplicated healing, sufficient bone formation and successful implantation. After further investigations in the in vivo model, the tenting screw could develop into a possibly equal alternative to the previous gold standard, the bone block. In comparison, this is a more technology-intensive and, especially with autologous material, less comfortable for patients. KW - Knochenaufbau KW - Knochendefektfüllung KW - Kollagen KW - Membran KW - Zahnverlust KW - Tent Pole Technik KW - Knochenaugmentation KW - Guided Bone Regeneration KW - geführte Knochenregeneration KW - bone augmentation KW - tent pole technique KW - Kollagenmembran KW - collagen membrane KW - Osteosyntheseschraube KW - tenting screw Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229549 ER -